WP: USS Cole plot unravels (ALL those convicted are free)

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

WP: USS Cole plot unravels (ALL those convicted are free)

Postby MacCruiskeen » Sun May 11, 2008 1:36 pm

As Mathias Bröckers reminds us at his German website, the FBI man John O'Neill was investigating the Cole attacks in 2001. He had wanted to travel to Yemen in search of the planners, but permission was refused - not by the government of Yemen, but by the White House. O'Neill then resigned in anger and took up his new post as security chief at the World Trade Center, starting in August 2001. Less than a month later, he was dead in the rubble.

Now comes this flabbergasting stuff, from the Washington Post. White House complicity in the attacks is just completely transparent. (Or why hasn't the USA invaded mighty Yemen yet?)

- First page of a four-page article:
-------------------------------------------------------


Probe of USS Cole Bombing Unravels


Plotters Freed in Yemen; U.S. Efforts Frustrated

By Craig Whitlock
Washington Post Foreign Service
Sunday, May 4, 2008; Page A01

ADEN, Yemen -- Almost eight years after al-Qaeda nearly sank the USS Cole with an explosives-stuffed motorboat, killing 17 sailors, all the defendants convicted in the attack have escaped from prison or been freed by Yemeni officials.

Jamal al-Badawi, a Yemeni who helped organize the plot to bomb the Cole as it refueled in this Yemeni port on Oct. 12, 2000, has broken out of prison twice. He was recaptured both times, but then secretly released by the government last fall. Yemeni authorities jailed him again after receiving complaints from Washington. But U.S. officials have so little faith that he's still in his cell that they have demanded the right to perform random inspections.

Two suspects, described as the key organizers, were captured outside Yemen and are being held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, beyond the jurisdiction of U.S. courts. Many details of their alleged involvement remain classified. It is unclear when -- or if -- they will be tried by the military.

The collapse of the Cole investigation offers a revealing case study of the U.S. government's failure to bring al-Qaeda operatives and their leaders to justice for some of the most devastating attacks on American targets over the past decade.


A week after the Cole bombing, President Bill Clinton vowed to hunt down the plotters and promised, "Justice will prevail." In March 2002, President Bush said his administration was cooperating with Yemen to prevent it from becoming "a haven for terrorists." He added: "Every terrorist must be made to live as an international fugitive with no place to settle or organize, no place to hide, no governments to hide behind and not even a safe place to sleep."

Since then, Yemen has refused to extradite Badawi and an accomplice to the United States, where they have been indicted on murder charges. Other Cole conspirators have been freed after short prison terms. At least two went on to commit suicide attacks in Iraq.

"After we worked day and night to bring justice to the victims and prove that these Qaeda operatives were responsible, we're back to square one," said Ali Soufan, a former FBI agent and a lead investigator into the bombing. "Do they have laws over there or not? It's really frustrating what's happening."

To this day, al-Qaeda trumpets the attack on the Cole as one of its greatest military victories. It remains an improbable story: how two suicide bombers smiled and waved to unsuspecting U.S. sailors in Aden's harbor as they pulled their tiny fishing boat alongside the $1 billion destroyer and blew a gaping hole in its side.

Despite the initial promises of accountability, only limited public inquiries took place in Washington, unlike the extensive investigations that followed the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Basic questions remain about which individuals and countries played a role in the assault on the Cole.

Some officials acknowledged that pursuing the Cole investigation became less of a political priority with the passage of time. A new administration took power three months after the bombing. Then came Sept. 11.

"During the first part of the Bush administration, no one was willing to take ownership of this," said Roger W. Cressey, a former counterterrorism official in the Clinton and Bush administrations who helped oversee the White House's response to the Cole attack. "It didn't happen on their watch. It was the forgotten attack."

...

http://tinyurl.com/44jks5
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby 8bitagent » Sun May 11, 2008 5:11 pm

The article goes onto say, that even officials quietly admit that high level people in the Yemenese government work with al Qaeda, so this was probably an inside job.

Now quietly, the US claims this was a Sudanese orchestration...if so, it would be revenge by Sudan on the US for blowing up that baby milk factory.

For years Sudan was saying to Bill Clinton and pals, "hey we have everything you could imagine on Osama and his cronies"...instead, Lee Hamilton, Madeline Albright and Sandy Berger(later caught destroying pre 9/11 evidence and stuffing papers in his pants) covered it all up as the Clinton administration blocked the FBI from going after high level Osama financiers and terror charities out of Saudi Arabia

Now isnt it interesting, that from the USS Cole to 3/11 Spanish bombing
to the Hamberg Cell, virtually ALL "al Qaeda plotters" in these attacks have been freed?

Then you have one of the masterminds of the 1998 Embassy Attack being the CIA/FBI asset, Ali Mohamed(now in witness protection)
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby stickdog99 » Tue May 13, 2008 4:59 pm

Some Yemenis have questioned whether their government has other motives. One senior Yemeni official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said Badawi and other al-Qaeda members have a long relationship with Yemen's intelligence agencies and were recruited in the past to target political opponents.

Khaled al-Anesi, an attorney for some of the Cole defendants, said Yemen had rushed to convict them. But he said he is still mystified by the government's subsequent handling of the case.

"There's something that doesn't smell right," he said. "It was all very strange. After these people were convicted in unfair trials, all of a sudden it was announced that they had escaped. And then the government announced they had surrendered, but we still don't know how they escaped or if they had help."
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6577
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby 8bitagent » Tue May 13, 2008 8:43 pm

Charges have just been dropped for one of the "main 9/11 six" at Gitmo:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24587062/

Man, so freaky how many of these "top al Qaeda terrorists" keep getting let go. Makes you wonder what's really going on
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Eldritch » Tue May 13, 2008 10:17 pm

8bitagent wrote:Charges have just been dropped for one of the "main 9/11 six" at Gitmo:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24587062/

Man, so freaky how many of these "top al Qaeda terrorists" keep getting let go. Makes you wonder what's really going on


Exactly. The Bush Administration framed a bunch of people on and after 9/11 for their oh-so-fake War On Terror. Then they tortured those people—hoping they'd find something actionable against them—and now that Bush and his boys are on the ropes, they're trying to back away from these crimes as quietly as possible.

The "top terrorists" that deserve to be in jail are in the Bush Administration.
Eldritch
 
Posts: 1178
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:02 pm
Location: USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby 8bitagent » Tue May 13, 2008 10:46 pm

Eldritch wrote:
8bitagent wrote:Charges have just been dropped for one of the "main 9/11 six" at Gitmo:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24587062/

Man, so freaky how many of these "top al Qaeda terrorists" keep getting let go. Makes you wonder what's really going on


Exactly. The Bush Administration framed a bunch of people on and after 9/11 for their oh-so-fake War On Terror. Then they tortured those people—hoping they'd find something actionable against them—and now that Bush and his boys are on the ropes, they're trying to back away from these crimes as quietly as possible.

The "top terrorists" that deserve to be in jail are in the Bush Administration.


Turns out that the "muscle hijacker trainer" was framed too:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7244418.stm

AND the OTHER so called head of the Hamberg 9/11 cell
is now freed:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4692375.stm

Yet, many anti war people and conservatives believe the official story...its falling apart like never before.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby MinM » Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:47 am

USS Cole Commander Discusses Obama Meeting

All Things Considered, February 9, 2009

President Barack Obama met Friday with about 40 family members of those killed in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and the bombing of the USS Cole. The goal was to discuss the decision to close Guantanamo Bay. Kirk Lippold, the former commander of the USS Cole, who was at the meeting, says he went into it "very guarded," but characterized the meeting as "good."


Monday, February 9, 2009


Look at these photos of the USS Liberty and Cole and ask yourself this:
Image
Image
Why are they so similar?
Earth-704509
User avatar
MinM
 
Posts: 3288
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:16 pm
Location: Mont Saint-Michel
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby JackRiddler » Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:55 am

MinM wrote:
Look at these photos of the USS Liberty and Cole and ask yourself this:
Image
Image
Why are they so similar?


This is a joke, right?

You're not going to tell me a Boeing went in there!
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby MinM » Tue Feb 10, 2009 1:10 pm

Navy captain relieved of command - Bulletin - Starbulletin.com
The USS Port Royal is freed more than 3 days after it ran aground
Image
By Gregg K. Kakesako

POSTED: 07:14 a.m. HST, Feb 09, 2009

The captain of the USS Port Royal was relieved of his command today after running the $1 billion warship aground a half mile south of the Honolulu Airport’s reef runway.

Rear Adm. Dixon R. Smith, commander of Naval Surface Group Middle Pacific, relieved Capt. John Carroll of his duties as commanding officer pending the results of an investigation into what went wrong.

Capt. John T. Lauer III, who is currently assigned to the staff of Naval Surface Group Middle Pacific, has been temporarily assigned as the guided missile cruiser’s commanding officer. Carroll took command of USS Port Royal in October.

The Port Royal is back at a Pearl Harbor after being freed early today from a rocky and sandy shoal where it was stuck for more than three days. It was the fourth attempt to free the ship.

The 567-foot cruiser — one of the most expensive and lethal warships in the Pacific Fleet — was towed to Pearl Harbor’s “Mike” piers after being freed around 2:40 a.m. It ran aground at 8:30 Thursday night while offloading personnel to a smaller boat about a half-mile south of Honolulu Airport’s reef runway.

It took a high tide, the salvage ship USNS Salvor, the Motor Vessel Dove and seven Navy and commercial tugboats to pull the warship free.

The Navy said today that the Aegis cruiser will be moved to the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard sometime next week after a damage assessment is completed.

“Every shipyard worker is ready to do what it takes to repair Port Royal and get her back to sea as soon as possible,” Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard commander Capt. Greg Thomas said in a news release.

The 15-year-old warship ran aground in about 22 feet of water and Navy officials are concerned that there might be extensive damage to a sonar dome that protrudes beneath the bow of the ship.

The Port Royal had just completed an $18 million repair and maintenance job in the shipyard last week and was undergoing sea trials in anticipation for an impending western Pacific deployment.

Most of the crew were taken off the grounded cruiser to lighten it. More than 800 tons of seawater, diesel marine fuel, anchors, anchor chains and other equipment were removed to lighten the 9,600-ton warship.

With all that equipment and water removed from the warship, it now sits high in the water and some of its newly painted blue hull is exposed.

The Coast Guard did an aerial survey this morning of the site where the Port Royal had been stuck and found a sheen approximately one mile by 100-yards wide of marine diesel, a thin fuel that burns off quickly in sunlight, according to a news release.

The Coast Guard said the sheen was comprised of about seven to eight gallons that could have come from any of the ships involved in today’s effort. Officials said there was no threat to marine life.

“The Navy will lead the effort to inspect and remediate the site of the grounding if necessary. Our priorities have been and remain the safety of the crew, the safety of the ship, and the safety of the environment,” said Rear Adm. Joe Walsh, deputy commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet.

The captain of the USS Port Royal was relieved of his command today after running the $1 billion warship aground a half mile south of the Honolulu Airport’s reef runway.

Rear Adm. Dixon R. Smith, commander of Naval Surface Group Middle Pacific, relieved Capt. John Carroll of his duties as commanding officer pending the results of an investigation into what went wrong.

Capt. John T. Lauer III, who is currently assigned to the staff of Naval Surface Group Middle Pacific, has been temporarily assigned as the guided missile cruiser’s commanding officer. Carroll took command of USS Port Royal in October...

:backtotopic:
Earth-704509
User avatar
MinM
 
Posts: 3288
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:16 pm
Location: Mont Saint-Michel
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby unaltered » Tue Feb 10, 2009 1:23 pm

JackRiddler wrote:
MinM wrote:
Look at these photos of the USS Liberty and Cole and ask yourself this:
Image
Image
Why are they so similar?


This is a joke, right?

You're not going to tell me a Boeing went in there!


You KNOW what he's trying to tell you and lemme say this the Elders are pissed.
unaltered
 
Posts: 345
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 9:55 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

here you go, MinM...

Postby IanEye » Tue Feb 10, 2009 1:33 pm

[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ehime-Maru]US Submarine Accidentally Rams Japanese Research Vessel
Aired February 10, 2001 - 8:00 a.m. ET

KYRA PHILLIPS, CNN ANCHOR: A freak accident at sea between a U.S. nuclear submarine and a large Japanese fishing vessel has everyone wondering how it could have happened.
Search efforts continue near Honolulu for nine people still missing from the sunken trawler.
The boat went down in 18,000 feet of water when the USS Greeneville, a Los Angeles class attack sub, surfaced underneath the fishing boat during a routine patrol.[/url]
User avatar
IanEye
 
Posts: 4865
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:33 pm
Blog: View Blog (29)

Re: WP: USS Cole plot unravels (ALL those convicted are free)

Postby MinM » Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:08 am

Thanks, IanEye. That was 9-years ago today...
Image
February 9, 2001: Navy Submarine Accidentally Sinks Japanese Fishing Boat; Civilians at Controls
Image
A close-up of the USS Greeneville, showing the gouges on her hull from the collision with the Ehime Maru. [Source: US Navy]

Commander Scott Waddle, the captain of the Greeneville, initially defends the presence of the civilians on board his sub, but in April 2001 says he has changed his mind: “Having them in the control room at least interfered with our concentration.” He also confirms that the only reason the Greeneville put to sea on February 9 was that Macke intended to treat his distinguished visitors to a submarine ride.

“The program was set up by the Navy to win favor for the submarine service from Congressmen and other opinion leaders,” Time magazine reports, “and the Greeneville had made several such trips for visitors under Waddle’s command. Not only did the visitors crowd the control room, but because Waddle spent so much time with them over lunch, the ship also fell behind schedule, giving Waddle added impetus to move quickly through the series of maneuvers he had designed to impress them.”

A month later, a Greeneville sailor will testify that the sub had been violating standard procedures for nearly four years by routinely using unqualified sonar technicians to track surface vessels. In late March, the editor of a journal published by the US Naval Institute in Annapolis will accuse the Navy of “stonewalling” the investigation, and says that the entire incident is a “public relations fiasco.” Waddle will be allowed to retire instead of facing court martial, though he will be found guilty of dereliction of duty and held responsible for the accident.

“I didn’t cause the accident. I gave the orders that resulted in the accident,” he will say in April 2001. “And I take full responsibility. I would give my life if it meant one of those nine lives lost could be brought back.” Only well after the incident is under investigation does further investigation find that many of the 16 civilians on board the submarine are highly placed members of the oil and energy industries, and many well connected to the Republican Party and the Bush family.

* One passenger, Helen Cullen, owns Houston’s Quintana Petroleum and is a heavy donor to the GOP and the Bush campaign; her family has contributed tens of thousands of dollars to the GOP. [Salon, 2/21/2001]
* Three other passengers head the Houston-based Aquila Energy, which has financial ties to the GOP. [Washington Post, 3/26/2002]
* Another passenger, Mike Mitchell, is the managing director of EnCap Energy Advisors, a Dallas firm with ties to the Bush business family. [Houston Chronicle, 9/16/2002]
* John Hall is a well-known and well-connected Texas oilman who is a major player in a number of multimillion-dollar oil deals, many involving business cronies of the Bush family. And the honorary chairman of the USS Missouri Restoration Fund, the sponsor of the entire contingent of civilians, is former president and Texas oil billionaire George H.W. Bush.

Image

It is also discovered during the investigation that the Greeneville would not have sailed that day if not for the contingent of what the Navy terms “distinguished visitors” who wanted to take a ride on a submarine.

Vice-Admiral John Nathman, who will head the Navy’s board of inquiry, will say of the Greeneville’s voyage, “In my view this doesn’t fit the criteria. It doesn’t come close.…I would never get a carrier underway to support a DV (distinguished-visitor) embark. We’re going to disagree on that.” An e-mail sent to the Navy’s public relations office says that the Greenville was slated to play host to “/10 or 12 high-rolling CEOs” finishing a golf tournament. Nathman will call it “Disneyland on a submarine.”

Reflecting on the accident two months later, Time Magazine will write, “The sinking of the Ehime Maru resonated around the world. It was the first major foreign policy challenge for the newly installed Bush Administration.

In Japan it contributed to the fall from power of Prime Minister Yoshiro Mori, who shocked public opinion by continuing a golf game even after he heard of the accident. The Pentagon fretted about damage to the already fragile military alliance with Japan. The Japanese families of the nine dead were left in shock and grief.”


Ehime Maru and USS Greeneville collision - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Greeneville_(SSN-772)
Earth-704509
User avatar
MinM
 
Posts: 3288
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:16 pm
Location: Mont Saint-Michel
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re:

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:14 am

JackRiddler wrote:
MinM wrote:
Look at these photos of the USS Liberty and Cole and ask yourself this:
Image
Image
Why are they so similar?


This is a joke, right?

You're not going to tell me a Boeing went in there!



That's correct, hard to believe though, not one blade of seaweed was mussed up

Image

Image
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Re:

Postby psynapz » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:55 am

seemslikeadream wrote:
JackRiddler wrote:This is a joke, right?

You're not going to tell me a Boeing went in there!

That's correct, hard to believe though, not one blade of seaweed was mussed up

But eyewitnesses saw the Boeing go right past them before striking the Cole, breaking their ships masts left and right on its way by.

The smiling Yemenis were obviously holographic projections.
WAKE UP SHEEPLE!
Image

Word.
“blunting the idealism of youth is a national security project” - Hugh Manatee Wins
User avatar
psynapz
 
Posts: 1090
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:01 pm
Location: In the Flow, In the Now, Forever
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: WP: USS Cole plot unravels (ALL those convicted are free)

Postby JackRiddler » Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:17 pm

But seriously.

The OP presents another important point that goes ignored.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 164 guests