Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
ninakat wrote:It's late and I've only skimmed the thread, but I don't recall hearing anyone else finding the TIMING of this oddly convenient for Obama's up and coming Afghan war escalation. Other than Percival.
Isn't this the classic case of when we should be asking Qui Bono, tired as that cliche has become? And the obvious answer is: The military benefits, just when needed -- a little fuel for the fire, right on cue.
compared2what? wrote:lightningBugout wrote:Oh, perhaps your much less alarmist approach is sensible c2w and thank you for sharing it.
I do agree that there is nothing damning about the conflicting reports which emerge in the immediate aftermath of an event like this one. Back when it took more than 3 minutes before the entire world found out about an event like this, I imagine those details had already been straightened out by the time they were widely broadcast. I see no red herring swimming in that pool.
Yet I'm not entirely sure why but I'm having a much stronger intuitive sense that something here is not right than I usually do with these things. I tend to think both Columbine and Virginia Tech were the result of mentally disturbed kids. Perhaps its simply his being a psychiatrist that troubles me so much and a personal bias of some kind. Not sure. And not sure its entirely rationally defensible but something about this and especially about the seeming phoniness of that Col.'s interview are making me much more suspicious than I am usually prone to be.
Totally agree that the colonel reeks. Also with the sense that something's not right here. I'm just relieved that the colonel is reeking from the depths rather than directing the entire show. And although it's not quite as comforting, also at least a little relieved that the something that feels not right -- which inevitably turns out to be unalloyed evil in some form to whatever degree one's ever able to discover wtf it is -- is still concealed somewhere representing some very bad thing of uncertain size and impact rather than manifesting itself by raging on in flames that are engulfing three quarters of the world right this moment. You know me. I always try to look on the bright side.
Percival wrote:Apparently a BLOG POSTING of his:
NidalHasan 5 months ago
There was a grenade thrown amongs a group of American soldiers. One of the soldiers, feeling that it was to late for everyone to flee jumped on the grave with the intention of saving his comrades. Indeed he saved them. He inentionally took his life (suicide) for a noble cause i.e. saving the lives of his soldier. To say that this soldier committed suicide is inappropriate. Its more appropriate to say he is a brave hero that sacrificed his life for a more noble cause. Scholars have paralled this to suicide bombers whose intention, by sacrificing their lives, is to help save Muslims by killing enemy soldiers. If one suicide bomber can kill 100 enemy soldiers because they were caught off guard that would be considered a strategic victory. Their intention is not to die because of some despair. The same can be said for the Kamikazees in Japan. They died (via crashing their planes into ships) to kill the enemies for the homeland. You can call them crazy i you want but their act was not one of suicide that is despised by Islam. So the scholars main point is that "IT SEEMS AS THOUGH YOUR INTENTION IS THE MAIN ISSUE" and Allah (SWT) knows best.
http://74.125.113.132/search?q=cache:bE ... =firefox-a
AhabsOtherLeg wrote:
But maybe the real question is not: how does a man shoot 43 people on an army base so much as ... how does he survive afterwards?!? How can that happen?
SonicG wrote:AhabsOtherLeg wrote:Crap, back to being flip but how does this fare against the typical NRA argument of, "If only the victims had been packing?" I know- I imagine not everyone on a military base is carrying a weapon but still it is somewhat bizarre.
IanEye wrote:The vibrant discord of Red State – Blue State has been punctured.
Purple Reign – Purple Reign
Brought to you by All State
this whole mass shooting thing is out of control and deeply fucked up. if this keeps up, there's going to have to be major changes. this may demand some kind of substantial reaction for better or worse, checkpoints and security guards everywhere just for starters maybe?
AhabsOtherLeg wrote:IanEye wrote:The vibrant discord of Red State – Blue State has been punctured.
Purple Reign – Purple Reign
Brought to you by All State
Beautifully put, and a lot to think about there.
It'll be hard to pacify or re-direct the Teabaggers though - doesn't seem like they can have two ideas in their heads at one time, so their aims tend to have a low and slow turnover.
Even in a place packed like sardines, it takes a LONG time to shoot 43 people (didn't he miss a single person?), he would have to reload multiple times (takes both hands), and... if it was so crowded, how the hell does someone not get him from behind?? I'm sorry, I agree with everything else, but this is ludicrous.
DUer quoting CNN broadcast this morning wrote:"In Washington, a senior U.S. official said authorities at Fort Hood initially thought one of the victims who had been shot and killed was the shooter. The mistake resulted in a delay of several hours in identifying Hasan as the alleged assailant."
---------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Hasan had been treating 2 US Privates who were CO's (conscientious objectors) They had been in his office.
If Dr. Hasan had pre-planned this.. would he not have targeted senior military officials? Seems to me that if I held the rank of Major... I would have the ability to get more "bang-for-the-buck", rather than to just open fire at random? (imho)(just sayin')
Is it possible that Dr. Hasan was a victim and the real shooters were the two CO's who were found dead?
I don't believe a word of the Offishul (sic) Army story. I hope Dr. Hasan recovers and is able to talk.
Yeah, like the idea that Pat Tillman was shot by the enemy...
Or that Jessica Lynch went down firing, was mishandled and held as a hostage requiring a special rescue operation (rather than treated by doctors who happened to be Iraqi).
Or that brass all the way up to a Republican, Bush-appointed secretary of defense would conspire to propagate lies about such serious matters as part of propaganda management, even after it was obvious that they couldn't get away with it.
Not taking a position on this case, which is still developing, but pointing out the necessary skepticism with which an institution that daily wages psychological warfare operations on the American people must necessarily be approached. Let people have their ideas for now.
Nordic wrote:
And it really bothers me, too, that this happened on Guy Fawkes day.
Soldiers who witnessed the shooting rampage at Fort Hood that left 13 people dead reported that the gunman shouted "Allahu Akbar!" — an Arabic phrase for "God is great!" — before opening fire, the base commander said Friday.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 186 guests