BREAKING: Hughes Arrested for 1981 Alavarez Murders

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby audioslave » Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:46 am

American Dream wrote:I did notice though a new username called audioslave, whose very first post was focused on an attack on Kate Dixon, so it does seem that there's still a charge around these issues...


Yes, I wrote a simple post called Kathryn Dixon Disbarred.
http://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board/v ... hp?t=26511

Where's the proof of an international pedophile ring ever operating out of Emeryville, California? Have you read the court document explaining why she was disbarred? I wasn't really attacking Ms. Dixon, at least not with ad hominems. Or is telling the truth an unfair attack?

Now we can see that Virginia McCullough threw Detective Powers under the bus by sharing his email with the tv reporter. How can that be justified? If News Making News wants to be viewed as a legitimate source, why are they revealing sources to third parties?

I have seen attacks or innuendos implied about desertfae and Mr. Powers. I also saw that news clip desertfae shared where Ms. Dixon almost got arrested in court by a judge. This all just seems so very strange. As I asked in my first post, why should anyone trust News Making News? Desertfae turned out to be exactly who she said she was. No one can say she's ever accused people of being involved in an international pedophile ring. Maybe this American Dream person can channel Ms. McCullough or Ms. Dixon about this wild and unsubstantiated Dixon allegation. I don't know about anyone else, but I'm holding my nose right nose. People should definitely read the disbarment document. Wow.
audioslave
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:10 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Dr_Doogie » Tue Jan 05, 2010 3:31 am

psynapz wrote:Also, how do you have the time for all this here? Are you retired or something? I post more often when I'm either unemployed or too cushily employed, myself.


It's funny that you raised this question, though I would ask the question of KD and VM. They somehow act as "journalists" for a website that generates seemingly zero revenue via ads or subscriptions. They will spend weeks at a time attending trials 100 plus miles from their homes - one would assume that they are not commuting daily back and forth. They seem to have unlimited funds required to file lawsuits and numerous appeals.

Being a disbarred lawyer or the curator of the Mae Brussell archives must be a lot more lucrative than one would assume. Either that or they have some outside revenue source. But what?
User avatar
Dr_Doogie
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:14 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby American Dream » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:01 am

It seems that audioslave and Dr. Doogie are both people who came here with an agenda related to the Jimmy Hughes trial. Please note that I'm not casting judgement on their agenda, as I wouldn't even claim to understand what each is doing here- just pointing out that they did seem to come here with an agenda about this.

The most central question to me regarding Jimmy Hughes relates to the goal of exposing the Octopus, which is also a goal for Rachel- and one which I would hope that we all share.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Dr_Doogie » Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:15 pm

I believe that to expose the Octopus, one must first figure out who are your ally, who is your opposition and who is your opposition posing as your ally. Only then can you move forward.

I believe that the Newsmakingnews.com site and the two women who are the only contributors of original content to that site fall into that third catagory. I came to this conclusion when reviewing their writings for the trial of Phillip Arthur Thompson - long before Jimmy Hughes was arrested. Having seen their tactics during that trial, it is easy to see how they are attempting to duplicate the strategy (with hopefully better results).

Jimmy Hughes and the executions of Alvarez, Castro and Boger are only one small, but important, part of what is certainly a much bigger picture. I would like to see that bigger picture exposed, but for that to happen, falsehoods must be exposed before truth is lost forever.
User avatar
Dr_Doogie
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:14 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby American Dream » Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:30 pm

Those are very, very serious charges, D.D., and you are levelling them against people who have a significant place in the conspiracy research community.

I would say it is far, far easier to make a strong case that Gunderson and Riconosciuto are deeply dirty, and that itself has very important implications for this case.

And please correct me if I understand wrongly, but it is my impression that these differences have much to do with the rift which we must now confront.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Cordelia » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:40 pm

Dr_Doogie wrote:....though I would ask the question of KD and VM. They somehow act as "journalists" for a website that generates seemingly zero revenue via ads or subscriptions. They will spend weeks at a time attending trials 100 plus miles from their homes - one would assume that they are not commuting daily back and forth. They seem to have unlimited funds required to file lawsuits and numerous appeals.

Being a disbarred lawyer or the curator of the Mae Brussell archives must be a lot more lucrative than one would assume. Either that or they have some outside revenue source. But what?


Strikes me as a legitimate question. Who/what is providing the funding?
The greatest sin is to be unconscious. ~ Carl Jung

We may not choose the parameters of our destiny. But we give it its content. ~ Dag Hammarskjold 'Waymarks'
User avatar
Cordelia
 
Posts: 3697
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:07 pm
Location: USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Anita » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:40 pm

Anita
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 4:05 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Searcher08 » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:54 pm



Well that was the most dramatic first post I have read on R.I.! :D

Welcome, Anita. I used to be a fan of Black Op Radio back in the day.
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby American Dream » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:04 pm

Cordelia wrote:
Who/what is providing the funding?

I don't know about KD but I do know that VM's husband is an IT/High Tech entrepreneur and I think had successfully marketed some inventions.


Anita [Langley?] wrote:
Treachery!

Is that you, Anita Langley?

What brings you to our neck of the woods?
Last edited by American Dream on Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Anita » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:04 pm

lols to searcher, why am I always late for the party?
Anita
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 4:05 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Searcher08 » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:11 pm

Anita wrote:lols to searcher, why am I always late for the party?


:lol: cos it allows you to make a really dramatic entrance!!
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby American Dream » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:17 pm

Here is something I just found by a quick Internet search from a Virginia McCullough piece which goes into a little bit of her history with Anita Langley:

For at least the past four years Michael Riconosciuto used a woman who identified herself as a cousin by marriage as his third party spokeswoman. She is a resident of Vancouver, Canada and her name is Anita Langley. Michael Riconosciuto would use Anita Langley to deliver messages to this reporter and to others.

This woman assumed the role of intermediary between the imprisoned genius and those whose help he sought and whose opinions he sought to influence. Extensive paperwork documents Langely's efforts as do numerous phone calls supported by long distance phone bills.

Michael Riconosciuto terminated all communication with this writer after Anita Langley wrote a two-page letter with twenty attachments dated March 20, 2006. The letter was addressed to Trish Kelliher, the El Dorado County prosecutor in the murder case of victim Betty Cloer. Philip Arthur Thompson is the defendant in this murder case. The letter followed up a phone conversation between Anita Langley and Deputy District Attorney Kelliher. The purpose of the letter was to establish communication between DDA Trish Kelliher and Michael Riconosciuto who wanted to testify for the prosecution. When Anita Langley emailed this reporter a copy of that letter on April 17, 2006, I wrote to Riconosciuto pointing out that the wording of the letter tended to implicate him in the open homicide of a woman named Valerie MacDonald. Surprised and concerned, I wrote to Riconosciuto asking if he had dictated the wording of the letter to Anita Langley or if she had composed this letter without his input. Michael Riconosciuto ceased all communication with this reporter at that point and this writer ceased all correspondence with Anita Langley.


From:
MICHAEL RICONOSCIUTO AND RICHARD HAMLIN AN OCTOBER 2007 UPDATE

.
Last edited by American Dream on Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Anita » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:23 pm

Searcher08 wrote:
Anita wrote:lols to searcher, why am I always late for the party?


:lol: cos it allows you to make a really dramatic entrance!!


I usually just lurk about with my trusty invisible cloak. Do I smell trolls and trollops (grabs cloak), gotta go.
Anita
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 4:05 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby desertfae » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:24 pm

Searcher08 wrote:
Anita wrote:lols to searcher, why am I always late for the party?


:lol: cos it allows you to make a really dramatic entrance!!

Just catching up because I was alerted that the thread is once again active.
Anita.. wow, that was quite a dramatic entrance lol.
Before anyone accuses me of "disappearing" again or whatever, please keep in mind that I also work and have a life apart from the net, so I may not be able to respond in split second time.
desertfae- exposing the octopus
http://www.desertfae.com
User avatar
desertfae
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:39 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Searcher08 » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:33 pm

desertfae wrote:
Searcher08 wrote:
Anita wrote:lols to searcher, why am I always late for the party?


:lol: cos it allows you to make a really dramatic entrance!!

Just catching up because I was alerted that the thread is once again active.
Anita.. wow, that was quite a dramatic entrance lol.
Before anyone accuses me of "disappearing" again or whatever, please keep in mind that I also work and have a life apart from the net, so I may not be able to respond in split second time.


Hi Rachel! I have to dash too but just wanted to flag the 'Constructive ideas for R.I.' thread as it would be great to have your input. (and everyones else's too!)
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 159 guests