by Peachtree Pam » Tue Sep 27, 2005 4:31 pm
Hello John Doe II and welcome to RI, how lucky we are to have your insight. I have been reading your research posts for a long time on team8 plus and on Nico's original site. <br><br>I have to say that I agree with "the surgeon" who posted on team8+ that there was no plane crash at Shankville and the link from your site is here:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.team8plus.org/forum_viewtopic.php?6.163">www.team8plus.org/forum_v....php?6.163</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>I think the "engine" was a plant, much like the "engine" discovered in NY on the sidewalk, which some have concluded could not have come from the plane alleged to have crashed into the tower.<br><br>Everything about 93 seems fake, in particular the phone calls. But back to the crash site. In your own site you have made such a persuasive case that there were two planes there. I think one was there to be shot down, scattering pre-demolished confetti and other debris, including fake "body parts" of passengers. After all, all one knows about the body parts is what the authorities have told you. ALL of it could be lies. Could it be that the fake 93 shot down went into the area which was then blown up from underground to demolish anything left of the fake plane. I do not know why the second plane was there. Do you have any ideas? I think the crash site was blown up from underground, as surgeon suggests.<br><br>Do you think that the real 93 landed in Cleveland, as Woody Box has speculated? Do you have any ideas about the passengers at Cleveland and their fate? There were so few passengers ORIGINALLY scheduled to be on 93, most transferred from 91. Why was the original 93 not cancelled with so few people flying?<br><br><br>Well, I could go on forever, late into the night, but you are not looking for questions, but answers. Again, welcome to RI.<br><br>Pam<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
