by dbeach » Fri Dec 02, 2005 2:34 am
RAPT<br><br>I think the blue bloods and many of their supporters are hybrids with reptile DNA..much more reptile DNA than so called normal human beings who are able to show love and compassion and don't want WW III and the destruction of planeteearth to continue..<br><br>the many slips and misspeaks are their arrogance and their inability to speak from the heart..as humans.<br><br>Problem is there are millions of em and they are in power/control of the war machines...<br>somebody posted on a different thread that 1 of 27 americans is a psychopath i.e. somebody without feelings of compassion <br> BTW the current term anti-social personality disorder has replaced the term psychopath or sociopath.in the APA manuel<br><br><br>""And as you find things, the law enforcement officials who have the responsibility to deal with that type of thing -- the FBI at the federal level, and although it is not, it's an investigative service as opposed to a police force, it's not a federal police force, as you know. But the state and local law enforcement officials have the responsibility for dealing with those kinds of issues."<br><br>To sum up Rumsfeld's explanation: 1) The warnings were there; 2) the Defense Department and the intelligence community couldn't figure them out; but anyway 3) it was up to the FBI, state law enforcement, and local police to uncover and prevent the worst terrorist attack in US history.<br><br>And here's something to kick around. Still answering this question, Rumsfeld goes on to make a strange statement:<br><br>"It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, any place, using any technique and it's physically impossible to defend at every time and every place against every conceivable technique. Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center. The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them."<br><br>"Missile"? What missile would that be? Did he let something slip? Or was this just a gaffe? A bad choice of words? A transcription error? Until we know for sure, it deserves scrutiny.<br><br>The article based on this interesting interview was "We Have to Defend Our Way of Life" by Lyric Wallwork Winik in Parade, 18 Nov 2001. The only part of the above exchange to be included is this:<br><br>To Rumsfeld, the Sept. 11 attacks did not come as a complete surprise. "There were lots of warnings," he says bluntly. <br><br>"The only way to deal with this problem," he continues, "is by taking the battle to the terrorists and dealing with them."<br><br>Now, it is pretty bold for Parade to quote him about the warnings. Of course, the magazine then skips Rumsfeld's subsequent shifting of blame and use of the word "missile," jumping right to the innocuous final sentence of the exchange.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.getoutthetruth.com/archives/news/rumsfeld_says_911_plane_shot_down_in_pennsylvania_0106.php">www.getoutthetruth.com/ar...a_0106.php</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>"Rumsfeld says 9-11 plane 'shot down' in Pennsylvania<br>"I think all of us have a sense if we imagine the kind of world we would face if the people who bombed the mess hall in Mosul, or the people who did the bombing in Spain, or the people who attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania and attacked the Pentagon."<br>So said Donald Rumsfeld during a suprise Christmas Eve visit to our troops in Iraq. READ THE COMPLETE STORY AT WORLD NET DAILY"<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
