P.S. My four word review of Knowing: Another 2012 movie, yawn. (The year isn't 2012, but it might as well have been.)
bks does likewise with "State of Play".
bks wrote:They were about as subtle as a sledgehammer. The most obvious was Pointcorp-as-Blackwater. On that quick screen-shot of Pointcorp's web site, did you catch that the CEO's first name was Erick? They really were leading you by the nose.
I watched the movie with my wife and step-daughter, to whom (because I'm a big mouth) I was offering running commentary throughout the movie. About 2/3 through, I said, "I'm not sure how they got this made. It cuts pretty close to the truth."
Then in the last act, it became clear just how they got it made.
SPOILER ALERT**************
The last twist was appalling and so tacked-on I nearly threw up. Instead of Pointcorp, with its $40 billion in secret national security contracts at stake, being responsible for the murders the film depicts, we learn it was really the CRUSADING CONGRESSMAN who is at fault. His lunatic proxy does all the killing, and bad-ol' Pointcorp gets off with garden variety bribery.
The clear message: sure, they'd bribe some Congressman in order to get those billions, but Pointcorp would NEVER actually KILL someone to protect that largesse. No no, that's the preserve of the vigilante do-gooders who try to do an end-run around the system and instead appoint themselves as the government's watchdog. See what happens when you buck the system?
Revolting.
END SPOILER ALERT*********************************
Of course, if others had a different take, I'm open to updating mine.
http://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board/v ... hp?t=23631
http://realhistoryarchives.blogspot.com ... icity.html