Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Sepka wrote:I have no trouble at all believing such a thing of Al Gore. The man's a colossal sleaze bag, and the masseuse's story just sounds credible. Sadly, it'll probably never be proven either way.
Simulist wrote:Has there been well-documented evidence of behaviors similar to the allegations of this masseuse?
Sepka wrote: He just gives off these very slimy vibrations, like the lowest sort of political opportunist. It's worth remembering that 25 years ago he and Tipper were pushing hard for censorship laws to 'protect' Americans from unchristian music and video games. That seemed to be the wave of the future at the time, and Gores were determined to ride it to power.
Today it's 'climate change'. You'll note that Gore's strong convictions on the subject don't seem to limit his own carbon footprint.
Admittedly I've got some bias here, as I tend to believe the worst where Al Gore is involved.
Apart from that, the masseuse's story just sounds believable to me. 'Sex crazed poodle' sounds like the kind of stupid thing that people actually say under stress, not like the generally more convincing dialogue that's invented after the fact.
barracuda wrote:That idea only makes sense if you think Tipper Gore was in some way insincere in her belief that children shouldn't be exposed to horrocore and gangsta rap. She may have been a completely misguided ass, but she was obviously working within the schema of her true core convictions.
barracuda wrote:That's a complete right wing talking point you're parrotting. I find it ridiculous in the extreme, and unworthy even of your usual parrotting of right wing talking points.
barracuda wrote:It's the timing of the resurrection of the story in the midst of the worst ecological disaster in history I find suspect.
Speka wrote:Are you contending then that Al Gore *does* practice what he preaches? Simply because the truth is politically convenient doesn't make it any less true. Whether or not AGW is true or a scam, Al Gore:
A. Tells us the world's future is at stake.
B. Is willing to push for legislation to control the behaviour of others.
C. Is unwilling to subject himself to the same rigours he prescribes for the masses.
That's the conduct of a charlatan.
Well of course it's being resurrected to impugn the AGW camp in the public eye. Why does that bother you? Every AGW proponent from the President on down are doing their level best to use the "worst ecological disaster in history" to advance their political agenda, not through calm and rational discussion, but through the exact type of emotional association that's being used in the Gore case. Is dirty politics fair for one side but not for the other?
stoneonstone wrote:Interesting take on this in GLP:
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum ... 119590/pg1
Report: Gore Accuser Failed Lie Detector Test
Allegation Of Sex Abuse Emerged Last Month
PORTLAND, Ore. -- A masseuse who accused former Vice President Al Gore of groping and kissing her at a downtown hotel in 2006 failed a lie detector test and had a history of falsely accusing people of mistreating her, according to a report in this week's Portland Tribune newspaper.
Tribune editors said they found out about Molly Hagerty's sex abuse allegation against Gore 3 ½ years ago, but they didn't print an article because the newspaper's reporters thought her story lacked credibility.
The National Enquirer first reported the story last month and detailed Hagerty's accusations that Gore made unwanted sexual contact at Hotel Lucia in Portland.
Tribune editor Mark Garber said Hagerty's lawyer asked her to take a lie detector test and she failed, but that wasn't the reason they didn't print the story. He said the newspaper reporters' "personal interaction" with Hagerty raised red flags.
"We became concerned throughout dozens and dozens of conversations that she had with another editor and the reporter," Garber said. "They both became concerned about credibility issues as it relates to her story."
Hagerty told the National Enquirer recently that she had Gore's DNA saved on a pair of slacks. But this week's Tribune report said DNA tests showed there was no semen at all on the pants.
"What she told us about the pants was that she had had them tested and the test showed it did not contain Al Gore's semen," Garber said.
Tribune reporters and editors said they also questioned Hagerty's recollection of the alleged events, which contributed to their decision to not run the story.
"We still feel comfortable with the decisions that we made (not to run the story), although our decision is sort of irrelevant now to see that the allegations are out there anyway," Garber said.
Earlier this month, police said they reopened the Gore case because there should have been a decision made in 2009 at the command level on whether the investigation should go forward. That is when Hagerty came to officers with a prepared statement.
"It is our responsibility to both parties involved to conduct a thorough, fair and timely investigation," Portland Police Chief Mike Reese said July 1.
Detectives refused to give details about the ongoing investigation.
A spokeswoman for Gore's family said Gore has denied the allegation from the beginning and he continues to stand by that denial.
Sepka wrote:Are you contending then that Al Gore *does* practice what he preaches? Simply because the truth is politically convenient doesn't make it any less true. Whether or not AGW is true or a scam, Al Gore:
A. Tells us the world's future is at stake.
B. Is willing to push for legislation to control the behaviour of others.
C. Is unwilling to subject himself to the same rigours he prescribes for the masses.
Sepka wrote:Mx32 wrote:Possible actions?
Enforce the immigration laws. The American labour market has been permanently slack since the late '70s or so. Employers needn't bid competitively for short-term or unskilled labour, as there's an inexhaustible pool ready to take jobs for minimum wage. When you have a permanent pool of unemployed ready to take up slack in the labour market, then wages are not going to rise to counter costs of living.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 163 guests