Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
I love PK Dick and some of my favorite films are sci-fi. But I found Inception empty and tedious. Disguised as something novel, it's the same old shit Hollywood manufactures for public consumption. 30,000 shootings and crash ups, not a single one quickening the pulse. No more soulful than a sudoku puzzle, it's characters are just abstractions — they might as well have been popsicle sticks — and the sham and hackneyed motivations of the hero (his kids, he must see his kids!) reveal its contempt for the human heart.
It's the land of the waking dead. Our collective dream is that we have free will. Engineers construct big-budget kinetic extravaganzas to feed that dream, seducing and then molding viewers into submissive consumption machines, machines who fancy that they're actually individuals philosophizing about, say, alternative realities! Meanwhile they’re already pinned in (hi-def 3-D) amber. These are the hip, pornographic epics that our culture of distraction rides into the broken future.
MinM wrote:Typecasting?
Mickey Rourke caught making out with Evan Rachel Wood at SAG bash! | The Dish Rag | Los Angeles Times
Ironically the 21-year old actress hanging out with the old dude is probably much more politically astute and aware than Rourke. She's the daughter of Ira David Wood III:
Evan Rachel Wood joins 'Conspirator'
Was the plot of Christopher Nolan’s Inception inspired by a Don Rosa Uncle Scrooge comic book story? In the story, created for the European market in 2002 and published in the US in the May 2004 issue of Uncle Scrooge (#329), Scrooge’s totem is a 25-pound bar of solid gold. His “limbo” is an endless desert where each grain of sand is actually a microscopic gold coin. Both stories have characters use a machine to enter someone’s dream – and entering someone’s dream to steal a secret. The similarities don’t end there.
brekin wrote:…
Somebody told me that the theory is being kicked around the Internets that Inception is an allegory for film making. Different characters representing the role of the producer, director, set designer, etc
orz wrote:wow you guys are still here.
They hate this board and others like it all exposing the family jewels of social control and are demonizing us as dangerous dupes of extremists over in Oil World.
82_28 wrote:The sci-fi writer in me says it is close to "coming alive" and it will be seized on, only not for the cause of good. Yet perhaps, just perhaps, we are, nature is, intuition is, a number of steps ahead of it. It could be only the perception that it controls us that it controls us. "It" could already be alive, but is so smart that it knows how to play dead. There is so much we just don't know and are forced to speculate over in our small and seemingly insignificant ways.
elfismiles wrote:.....
As for Hugh's commentary ... um, yeah, sure.
Find me JUST ONE DOCUMENT or INVOICE showing someone/somewhere was tasked with or paid for ANY of the things you suggest in your KWH theories and I will bow down before your Disinfo-Deciphering prowess.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 154 guests