by robertdreed » Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:47 pm
but, after all, this is the RI ezboard.<br><br>Data point one: Count Coudenhove-Kalergi, one of the prime movers behind the post WW2 Pan-Europa movement, once offered his opinion that the most superior gene pool resulted from the hybridization of European Jewry with Northern Europeans. Coudenhove-Kalergi was considered a model "aristocratic liberal" of his time. <br><br>Note: It was the 1940s, the pre-DNA era. Humans- particularly elites- have long had a fascination with ancestry and bloodlines, no? And the taxonomy nomenclature was traditionally that of animal husbandry, in the days before the discovery of the double helix.<br><br>( Meanwhile, the "conservative reactionaries" of that era were represented by people like Walter Darre, Hitler's Agriculture Minister. Note: Darre still has a cult following. I read a recent bio of him and his ideas, which I found rather insidious. Beautifully bound, though...green pebble finish, embossed with a gold swastika on the binding of the book spine. )<br><br>For what it's worth, I think Coudenhove-Kalergi's univariate estimation positing a single "superior breed" of human is overly cut and dried. To say the least. But speaking as a brown-eyed brunette Scots-Alsatian, I'm not opposed to that variant by any means. I have approximately zero problem hooking up with the right Jewess, not that I'm likely to find one here...but there are plenty of other ethnicities and hybrids that appear to be bright, good-tempered, and phenotypically desirable, not to put too fine a point on it. <br><br>(Ever notice how the people most obsessed with the ethnicity, specific phenotypes, and ancestry of human mating tend to be MALE? And the more ethnically particularistic/caste-conscious they are, the more that's likely to be true...also note the atavistic insistence on close in-breeding by aristocracies, wherever they've historically appeared. Not particularly genetically sound, but there it is...human males tend to be fond of "collecting", sorting, ranking, concocting hierarchies of desirability that lead to a univariate apex...and then there's the "stay away from my tribe, but if I like yours, I'm on it...all I want is a harem menagerie, and total control over choosing suitors for my offspring" program... a subset of the larger program "I'm a total egotist, all I want from life is the full array of gratification that I'm capable of imagining." Christ, what a planet. And to realize that I have these tendencies myself...) <br><br>It would be a pity if the long-standing political alliances between Zionist Israelis like Bibi Netanyahu and WASPs like George Bush came down to a covert faction within the Zraeli Ashkenazim wanting to increase their hybridization and "pass for white", for which purpose they've allied themselves with the American military-industrial complex, the South African apartheidists, the abhorrent ethnic biowarfare research underground, etc. in pursuit of that dreadful objective.<br><br>Oh, it is too horrible, I cannot utter it...<br><br>...well, this is the RI ezboard...<br><br>What if there's a Blue-Eyed Conspiracy? Binny Netanyahu has blue eyes. Ariel Sharon has blue eyes. GHWB and GWB have blue eyes. Tony Blair has blue eyes. Rumsfeld has blue eyes. Henry Kissinger has blue eyes.<br><br>Condi Rice has green eyes. Colin Powell has green eyes. So maybe it's an anti-brown-eyed conspiracy... <br><br>Now I've done it. Judging from the record of some of the commentaries aound here, that ought to be more than enough information to send some of the more suggestible RI chatboard denizens straight off the deep end.<br><br>I feel that I should at least add the disclaimer that I'm not indicting every blue-eyed person in the world...some of my best friends...and I dig that Bob Dylan... <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p097.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=robertdreed>robertdreed</A> at: 7/15/05 2:15 pm<br></i>
