FBI WATCH MAKING CRUELTY VISIBLE

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: FBI WATCH MAKING CRUELTY VISIBLE

Postby fruhmenschen » Mon Oct 18, 2010 11:30 pm

FBI agent Suzanne Doucette sued the FBI after she was sexually assaulted by her FBI supervisor in Arizona and the FBI did not do anything when she filed a complaint.
We brought her to speak at our local college where she told the audience
two mantras are taught at the FBI academy to new recruits.
The first mantra a new FBI recruit is taught is if they are caught breaking the law they are to admit nothing, deny everything and file counter allegations.
The second mantra new recruits are taught is don't embarrass the FBI or we will get you. This applies to people who do not work for the FBI.
This next story illustrates my point.
see link for full story
http://blogs.forbes.com/janetnovack/201 ... -tax-mess/

The famously combative Yagman claimed both before and after his conviction that he had been singled out for prosecution as retaliation for his long history of bringing civil rights suits, including police brutality claims against the LA Police Department. In 2002, he was one of the first lawyers to challenge the treatment of terrorist suspects at Guantanamo Bay. In the 1990s, Yagman sued the IRS over violent conduct by one of its agents and was hired by an Idaho county to prosecute an FBI sniper in the Ruby Ridge shootings.
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5977
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: FBI WATCH MAKING CRUELTY VISIBLE

Postby fruhmenschen » Sun Oct 31, 2010 12:18 am

2 videos

This an abridged version of investigative journalist Daniel Hopsicker's film "Mohamad Atta and the Venice Flying Circus." Hopsicker has also written a comprehensive book on this subject titled "Welcome to Terrorland: Mohamad Atta & the 9-11 Cover-Up in Florida." His web site is http://www.madcowprod.com Hopsicker details connections between the owners of the flight schools, corporate fraudsters, intelligence operatives, and drug traffickers. Independent of Hopsicker, former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds (currently under a court-imposed gag order) reports that according to documents she was given to translate, the 9/11 conspiracy was made up not of Islamic extremists, but of overlapping organizations involved in money laundering, fraud, and drug trafficking Daniel Hopsicker's web site: http://www.madcowprod.com


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 5177039347


Investigative Journalist Daniel Hopsicker speaks at the New England 9/11 Symposium in Keene, New Hampshire - May 17, 2008.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 601759159#
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5977
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: FBI WATCH MAKING CRUELTY VISIBLE

Postby fruhmenschen » Sun Oct 31, 2010 7:41 pm

File this story under you are only as high as the reporter you read.
The reporter can only take you to where their consciousness is.

2 reads about voter fraud let god sort out who is telling the truth


1st read
see link for full story
http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/ne ... 002e0.html

Assistant U.S. Attorney Jessica Fehr will be on hand while polls are open in the Bozeman area Tuesday to respond to complaints of election fraud or voting rights abuses. She can be reached at (406) 247-4637.

The FBI will also have a special agent available in each district of the country to hear any Election Day allegations of election fraud and other election abuses. Special Agent Kevin Damuth will be on duty in Montana while the polls are open and can be reached at (406) 443-3617.

2nd read
http://www.thelandesreport.com/news+resources.htm
The Cincinnati Bell-FBI scandal: Leonard Gates, a Cincinnati Bell employee for 23 years, testified that in the late 1970's and 80's, the FBI assisted telephone companies with hacking into mainframe election computers in cities across the country. He spoke with agents from both the DOJ (U.S. Attorney Kathleen M. Brinkman) and FBI (Agent Love), but to his knowledge, neither agency took further action. Leonard Gates 1987Deposition, plus 1985 Background Material from Jim Condit, Jr. //Pandora's Black Box & http://www.votefraud.org/expert_strunk_report.htm (contains case number)

* Gates testified, P. 28, "He (Gates's supervisor, Mr. Jim West,) said the programming was obtained out of California, and that the programming had been obtained through the FBI, and all this kind of stuff, and that was about it."
* Page 34 excerpt: "And I knew that we did do certain things under certain court direction, under certain court orders, and I just didn't see where they would have a court order to get into that, and I expressed my concern to Mr. Dugan (President of Cincinnati Bell). Mr. Dugan said it was a very gray area, and that they were into like New York and Atlanta, Georgia, and to the other computers, you know. This was just small compared to what was going on."
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5977
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: FBI WATCH MAKING CRUELTY VISIBLE

Postby fruhmenschen » Sun Oct 31, 2010 9:07 pm

We brought Ed Tatro of Quincy Mass to speak at our local college twice because he knows more about the Kennedy
assassination than the men and women who murdered President Kennedy.
Here is his response to an article written by a reporter.

"Nothing Like It Since JFK Assassination" article

Dear Marianne Means:
I have felt pretty demoralized by the events of this week, but your article
of historical inaccuracies sent my depression into overdrive. I'm sure my
response will accomplish nothing in your mind, but having researched the
Kennedy assassination since it occurred, (when I was an idealistic boy of
16), I feel compelled to respond.
I can't stop you from denigrating my 38 year effort to determine who really
killed JFK by your calling me an obsessed buff, but it does give me
satisfaction to know that you're wrong in blaming Lee Harvey Oswald for
JFK's demise.
Your article makes reference to LBJ's commandeering of Air Force One after
the assassination and his subsequent conversations aboard the plane back to
Washington. Are you aware that those conversations were taped, but that
only a one and a half hours of edited tape of those conversations exist
today? We're talking about the destruction of some five hours of taped
conversations, Marianne. Do you know who possessed those pristine tapes? I
didn't think so. Well, I do...and it wasn't Oswald. Did you know that
Arlen Specter tried to persuade Ken O'Donnell to say that O'Donnell told LBJ
to take Air Force One back to DC when it was LBJ who made that decision?
Specter wanted O'Donnell to commit perjury to hide the fact that Johnson
had, in fact, lied to everyone.
Do you know why all this deception was taking place? I didn't think so.
Well, I do, and it had nothing to do with Oswald.
Are you aware that Governor John Connally's clothes were laundered prior to
reaching the FBI's lab preventing Hoover from determining if the metal on
Connally's clothes would match the metal on Kennedy's clothes, a crucial
factor in verifying or destroying the single bullet theory? Do you know the
people involved in the chain of transfer of those clothes? (The documents
were hidden for 35 years). I didn't think so. Well, I do, and it wasn't
Oswald.
Are you aware that the JFK limo windshield possessed an entrance hole
through it, not a crack? Do you know the witnesses who saw it? Do you know
the name of the professional glass man who was instructed to remove it?
Do you know who told him to do so? I didn't think so. Well, it wasn't
Oswald or Castro or the Russians ...and yes, I know who did it.
Do you know who suckered JFK to Texas? Do you know who tricked him into
going to Dallas? Do you know who set up that motorcade route? Do you know
who owned the buildings in Dealey Plaza? It wasn't Oswald.
You seem to be bragging that you talked to Johnson. Do you know about his
impending future had JFK not died? Are you familiar with his lifelong
corruption? Does the name, Bobby Baker, mean anything to you? Are you
remotely aware of the murders related to his affairs? Do you recall Don
Reynolds? Do you know what Reynolds said after November 22, 1963? He
didn't accuse Oswald. Are you familiar with Billie Sol Estes at all? I've
been to the man's house. Do you recall Fred Korth and the TFX scandal?
These are the reasons JFK died....and they have nothing to do with Oswald.
Did you think Johnson would tell you that his best friends killed JFK? He
told his mistress BEFORE it happened that it was coming. I edited her
autobiography. Have you ever talked to her? I didn't think so.
Have you ever talked to the autopsy technicians who prepared JFK's body at
Bethesda? Do you know that every damn one of them has said those published
photos are fake? My best friend met them all and videotaped them all. I
have met two of them. They aren't lying. Who controlled the medical
evidence which has been tampered with? It wasn't Oswald.
I could provide you with much more, but educating you, considering your
article, is probably pointless.
Please don't respond with Orwellian doublespeak and arrogant journalistic
rhetoric. I'm no dummy. I have been a consultant to Oliver Stone and Nigel
Turner, I have two masters' degrees, and I was invited to testify before
President Clinton's Assassination Records Review Board in 1995, one of only
6 New Englanders to do so.
Lyndon Johnson , through the years, questioned whether the Russians did it,
whether Castro did it, whether the CIA did it, whether the Mob did it,
whether the Vietnamese did it... all in the name of diversion...and you
fell for it. Only to the mother of his illegitimate child did he tell the
truth....and even then, he neglected to include himself in the mix.
And on a more personal level, Oswald was never convicted so your article
condemns him when he never had his day in court, a fundamental right for all
Americans. Secondly, I am friendly with his widow and articles like yours
sting her children unmercifully and unfairly. Ironically, his mother was
treated very poorly, but she knew who perpetrated the crime. Do you know
the names of those she accused? I didn't think so.
One last point: When JFK died, it was LBJ and his cronies who benefited.
Thousands of American kids and millions of Asians were sacrificed for
nothing but greed. Keep this in mind when you write about this week's
tragedy. Even if Bin Laden is responsible, find out who educated his people
and who really financed them before jumping foolishly ahead as before. Who
will really gain from all that is apparently about to take place? It is a
fair and sobering and frightening question....and many of us may die
prematurely because of them and their thirst for money and power.
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5977
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: FBI WATCH MAKING CRUELTY VISIBLE

Postby fruhmenschen » Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:29 pm

Ed Tatro sent me this email yesterday.




On Tuesday, May 22, 2007 Vincent Bugliosi spoke about his new book, Reclaiming History, at the Brattle Theatre in Cambridge
Massachusetts. Approximately 70 patrons were there. A young girl
representing the Harvard Book Store introduced him in a highly
complimentary manner and he received a positive reception from the
crowd. I sensed immediately that I was in the minority. My best friend,
Rick Russo, a humble, but confident individual, who possesses
excellent knowledge and insights into the JFK case, filmed Bugliosi's
presentation.
Priscilla Johnson MacMillan, the journalist with CIA links,
who interviewed Oswald in Russia and subsequently pegged him in a
published article shortly after 11/22/63 as an obvious loser who must
have killed JFK, sat one row in front of me, but approximately 20
seats away. She kept turning around to look at me. I expected she
recognized me from somewhere, but couldn't remember who I was. One row
behind me, and two rows directly behind MacMillan sat a couple who
clearly recognized me, but I didn't know who they were at the time.
Bugliosi began his speech by complaining about the podium
which possessed wheels. As a result he couldn't lean on it at all. He
also complained about the instability of his microphone stand. He
admitted that he complains all the time and employs sarcasm
incessantly. He interjected an anecdote about a hotel room in which
the bathroom light didn't work unless he managed to push a switch near the front door of his room.
He made mention about the difficulty in pronouncing his name
which clearly irritates him since he has brought the issue up at other
speaking engagements. He cited one person who called him, "Mr. Bella
Lugosi." The audienced found his schtick amusing.
The rest of the night was all business, selective preference
dripping in condescending ire. Bugliosi called Reclaiming History, "A
book for the ages." He made it clear that "Modesty is not a vitue" in
his self-absorbed mind. He felt it a necessity to be assertive and
confident in overdrive in order to assure all conspiracy theorists
that he is beyond reproach in integrity and fighting spirit, that they
just can't beat his positions on the JFK matter. He admitted that he
wanted to make a lot of money, but that marketability was second in
priority to scholarship. There is no question in my mind that Bugliosi
absolutely loves himself and intentionally projects that image, one
that also oozes with controlled disdain while on stage.
He said that he could have prosecuted Oswald in
two-three-four days, but after 44 years of conspiracy books, the JFK
assassination has become "the most complex murder case in history." It
has become a "bottomless pit" and that admission may have been his one assertion that will not be challenged.
Basically, his speech paraphrased the introduction to his
book and the half hour filmed interview available on his web site. His
primary contention is Oswald's sole guilt. He cited that 53 pieces of
evidence confirm that Oswald alone committed the JFK and Tippit
murders and he rattled off five points concerning the matter....
Oswald owned the Carcano; he was the only TSBD employee to flee; he killed Tippit; he pulled a gun at the theatre where he was arrested;
and he lied about owning a rifle. Bugiosi knows Oswald lied because
the backyard photos show him with the rifle.
Bugliosi boasts that "no reasonable person" can disagree
with him. The unyielding arrogance and unmitigated self-assurance of
his declarations were endless--- No credible evidence of conspiracy
exists. Bugliosi admits that motive, means and opportunity abounded
for many organizations to commit the crime, but these basics, espoused
constantly by conspiracy theorists, are just not enough. Motives prove
nothing. Besides, the FBI found no Oswald connections to groups like
the Mafia or the CIA, and no one who is "credible" has ever leaked
anything substantiating a conspiracy.
The integrity of the FBI, is obviously unquestioned by
Bugliosi as he made his assertions, and the definition of "credible"
certainly is one that might be interesting to determine if a phalanx
of reseachers were allowed open access to him in a proper forum.
Bugliosi states as fact that Oswald was such a loser that
no organization would have trusted him as a hired killer, and that the
Mob or the CIA would have killed him instantly, if they had employed
him. He cited that he has amassed 32 concrete proofs that no
conspiracy existed and those who believe in a conspriacy are either
silly or ignorant of the evidence. The simmering rage and belittling
of "conspiracy buffs" was ever-present.
Bugliosi stated that the parade route was set so late that
no conspirators could have been ready in time. To think otherwise is
just "silly." He explained the head snap as a neuro-muscular reaction,
that the Zapruder frames show a 2.3 inch forward head movement before the eventual snap backward. And anyone who alleges that the Zapruder film has been altered is a fool. Before answering questions from the audience, he made it clear that no other weapons were found and no other bullets were discovered either.
I do not claim that the above synopsis covers everything
Bugliosi offered, but it covers most of his overview. The questions
asked by the audience showed little or no knowledge of the inticate
and complex aspects of the case. Most annoying were those who gushed over him like rock and roll groupies as well as the philosophical
questions as to why the masses would (foolishly) buy into conspiracy
theories. Such discussion never pressed Bugliosi to defend any of his
premises and the Q & A was so short-lived, there was little time to
engage him in any meaningful dialogue.
One individual named Tony Marsh, called him a liar at
one point and Bugliosi just carried on with his presentation. Marsh's
outburst tended to reinforce the idea that some "conspiracy theorists"
are obsessive and rude in their approach to the case. Audience members behind Marsh lashed out at him later as book buyers lined up for Bugliosi's autograph and Marsh angrily shouted back at them.
At this point I walked over to Priscilla Johnson
MacMillan and asked her if I could get a photograph of the two of us
together. The gentleman who had sat behind her offered to take the
picture. I thought I might be able to use it if I ever publish my own
book about the complicity of LBJ, his handlers and his cronies in the
Dealey Plaza caper.
She asked me who I was, and I told her that I had
testified before President Clinton's Assassination Records Review
Board (ARRB) in Boston in 1995 right after her testimony. I told her I
was a member of those who spoke in Nigel Turner's "The Guilty Men,"
that I had corresponded with Oswald's mother, was friendly with Marina Oswald and Judyth Baker. I concluded by saying that I disagreed with everything Bugiosi had just said.
The man who took the photo was named Paul and he told me
that he had taken my course years ago at Quincy College. His derisive
tone was such that it was evident to me that he was rejecting
EVERYTHING I had ever said in twenty-five hours of class (3,000
slides). I was momentarily stunned and a little hurt. I told him that
my class was twenty years ago and I added, "Imagine what I know now."
He replied, "Unless you can link that little weasel, Oswald, to LBJ, you don't have a case." His constant smile was hard and unfriendly.
I tried briefly to cite a few issues, (nine witnesses
who observed a bullet hole in the windshield), but he had no intention
of listening. I was just not "there" in his closed mind. As I walked
away, knowing the futility of pursuing any meaningful interaction, I
was thinking to myself that I knew Oswald's best friend, George de
Mohrenschildt, is described in recently declassified military
documents as a "business associate" of Lyndon Baines Johnson, but
those Brattle Theatre folks wouldn't have read them if I had those
documents right in my hands.
I decided to have Bugliosi sign my book and get a
photo of him too. When I reached the signing table, I told him, "I've
known Gary Mack for thrty-five years."
His eyes lit up and a broad smile beamed. He said,
"I'll be seeing Gary Thursday."
Then I told him that I had edited Madeleine Brown's
memoirs and was a primary recruiter for those who participated in "The Guilty Men". The smile faded.
I told him that I had read some of the book and I
said, "We will have to agree to disagree." I added that I knew a lot
of information that he didn't. He advised me to read the rest of the
book to make sure of that. I told him I would do so. He smiled again.
He wanted to know my name, and when I said, "Ed Tatro," he admitted
knowing it in some vague manner from his research.
I concluded (sarcastically), "I'm one of the kooks."
In a rather gracious moment, he said, "But you're
searching for the truth."
I replied, "Yes." I refrained from saying that I knew
a lot of it, but I didn't want to act like him, and it was clear
throughout the night that the book buyers behind me were barely
tolerating folks like me.
The line of people behind me was lengthy and I saw no
real purpose in confronting him on any issues of substance. The time,
place, and circumstances were just not conducive to anything
productive.
While in line, I had briefly offered advice to Tony
Marsh that this was no place for him to get into a shouting match,
that he was not appreciated here by this gathering, and it might be
best to keep his cool.
I managed to meet Priscilla again and she said, "Paul
told me you used to teach a course on the assassination. When is your
book coming out?" I wasn't sure I had mentioned my book previously,
but it was clear to me that she and Paul were friends. The question
was---Did they become friends later in life or were they friends when
he took my course? I don't know that answer. I do know an FBI
informant named Hollis Mosher, (identified as such in his obituary),
took my course four or five times so it shouldn't surprise me if a
friend of a CIA asset had done so also. Am I being wisely cautious or
am I paranoid? We know that Bugliosi would call the latter notion,
"just silly."
I told her that she must be thrilled with this book,
and she said she had not read it yet, but she admitted that she was
glad that Bugliosi had confronted the conspiracy theories. I spoke
candidly by telling her that many researchers had brought forth some
outrageous concepts, but for Bugliosi to lump all assassination
critics into one lump was unfair. Having earned three college degrees,
I certainly do not consider myself insane, irrational or unreasonable.
She seemed to accept that criticism, but stoically so with an
accepting shrug.
Bugliosi headed in Priscilla's direction and thanked
her profusely for her input. He told her that he could not have
written the book without her help.
The gathering was breaking up and Bugliosi's rather
sizable entourage of disciples followed him out to a waiting auto.
Rick Russo and Bugliosi began a rather intense debate over the nature
of JFK's head wounds. Rick cited many witnesses who had observed a
frontal shot, but Bugliosi rejected anything he pointed out. It's
difficult to share any meaningful postions on a street corner, one
inundated by youngsters unwilling to hear any viewpoint contrary to
Vince Bugliosi's.
One 20-something said, "No one said any shots came
from the grassy knoll that day" to another Bugliosi supporter. I
snapped, "What are you talking about? Sixty-four witnesses said shots
came from the grassy knoll."
He said, "Not that day!"
Of course, as this clown was defending his comment, I
could still picture the video of Bill Newman telling a Dallas
television crew (THAT DAY) that the shot had been fired from the
grassy knoll.
It was time to leave. I talked to one 28 year old who
admitted knowing virtually nothing, and I advised him to read as many
books as he could.
Twenty years ago I had watched Bugiosi debate Mark
Lane in Boston. After the debate ended, I engaged Bugliosi in
conversation. A lingering crowd of twenty or so observers gathered
around us. I told him that there were lots of problems with the
evidence and I gave him one example. Since I was constantly teaching a course at the time, the names were fresh in my mind. I discussed the
chain of transfer for the "magic bullet," CE 399. The bullet was found
by hospital employee, Darrell Tomlinson who gave it to O. P. Wright, a hospital security guard. Wright gave it to a Secret Service man named
Richard Johnsen, who brought it back aboard Air Force One. Johnsen
turned it over to James Rowley, the chief of the Secret Service and he
gave it to FBI agent Elmer Todd who gave it to Robert Frazier of the
FBI who conducted the ballistic tests upon the bullet.
Unlike Todd and Frazier, Johnson and Rowley admitted
that they never marked their initials into the bullet, a grave error
in judgment if Oswald had ever been properly brought to trial. Any
clever defense attorney would have introduced the possibilty of a
bullet switch to frame his client, particularly in a political murder
such as this.
Bugliosi dismissed the issue immediately by claiming
that errors like that occur all the time. I countered that they
shouldn't happen, especially in a case concerning the murder of the
president of the United States. It is evident to me that Bugliosi's
cavalier approach and powers of denial concerning the BIG DALLAS LIE have existed for decades. Thus, I wasn't really surprised when his
advanced placement version of Posner's Case Closed hit the book
stores.
Now we know, thanks to the excellent research by
Josiah Thompson and Gary Aguilar, (See the History Matters web site), that FBI agent Bardwell Odum's name was cited on FBI documents in which hospital employees, Tomlinson and Wright stated with confidence that the bullet they had handled resembled CE 399. Odum insisted to Thompson and Aguilar that he never handled the bullet, never showed it to the two witnesses and never wrote the FBI documents in evidence.
Furthermore John Hunt's meticulous research (see his
essays, particularly, "Frazier Speaks,") confirms that CE 399 does not
contain the carved initials of FBI agent Elmer Todd. Thus, CE 399 is
NOT the same bullet which Todd handed to FBI agent Robert Frazier. I doubt Bugliosi even knows about Hunt's explosive essays about the
bullet/ballistic anomalies in this case.
Twenty years ago, I tried one last time with the
Manson prosecutor. I told him Emory Brown and I had discovered a
sidewalk mark consistent with a bullet scar (and a suspicious history
as well in its background), which coincided with photo blow-ups in my
possession of a human-like figure holding a rifle-like object on the
grassy knoll south, the unfamous knoll.
Bugliosi said he wanted me to send him copies and
wrote his name and address on a piece of paper. But the next night the
Boston newspapers quoted Bugliosi as saying, "Kennedy assassination
buffs are like wolves baying at the moon."
I never contacted him. I'm glad I didn't...
Suffice it to say, on May 22, 2007, Rick and I left
Cambridge with a general sense of cynicism, but with a quiet
understanding, that even if we can't win this mighty quest, that we
have much work to do in an effort to fight the good fight for the
principles of justice and democracy. We must never capitulate despite
the odds against our success. We must not allow Bugliosi's mastery of
fallacious arguments to stand unchallenged. He is a worthy adversary,
but his lone nut theory is more than "silly." It is a classic
representation of Orwellian propaganda and needs to be addressed
despite our limited resources and minmal access to the national media.
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5977
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: FBI WATCH MAKING CRUELTY VISIBLE

Postby fruhmenschen » Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:37 pm

2 reads about Ed Tatro
see links for full story
http://jfkmurdersolved.com/phpBB3/vi...php?f=1&t=1899

Wednesday, May 16, 2007
Expert on Kennedy assassination speaks this week at Olney Central College
By Kevin Ryden
Published: Wednesday, May 2, 2007 4:11 PM CDT

It's been nearly 44 years since President John F. Kennedy was assassinated and nearly as many years since conspiracies began forming and molding themselves into the national consciousness.

Conspiracy theorists vary in what they believe, but agree that Lee Harvey Oswald did not act as a lone gunman or possibly at all in Kennedy's death on Nov. 22, 1963, in Dallas.

“The story that Oswald acted alone after 40 years seems to me more impossible, even nonsensical,” said Olney Central College instructor David Denton, who has taught a course since 2000 on political assassinations of the 1960s.
There have been numerous theories of who, besides Oswald, could have killed Kennedy: the CIA, the mob or Cuban exiles are several groups that often come up as alleged key players.

One of the more obscure theories is that Lyndon B. Johnson, who as vice president in 1963 immediately took over as president after Kennedy was killed, was involved.

That theory will be explored Thursday by Ed Tatro, a retired English teacher from Massachusetts who has studied the Kennedy assassination since it happened.


2nd read

News Thursday, May 17, 2007
Author pokes holes in official Kennedy theory
By Kevin Ryden
Published: Monday, May 7, 2007
As he began his talk about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and his belief that President and former Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson was involved, Ed Tatro gave a stark but blunt warning to the audience.

“I will scare the hell out of you before I leave this place tonight,” he said Thursday during his first presentation at the John D. Stull Performing Arts Center at Olney Central College. “I promise for some of you, this is going to be a life-changing event.”

The presentation included a lot of pictures, names, documents and details about JFK's assassination and information to support Tatro's theory that powerful men, not one man, killed Kennedy.
Tatro, a retired English teacher from Massachusetts, said the novel 1984” by George Orwell and its themes of government manipulation (2+2= 5 as “controlled nonsense”) are relevant to the JFK issue and to our current society.

“We don't live in a Banana Republic”

Tatro was 16 years old when Kennedy was shot and killed, presumably by Lee Harvey Oswald, while riding in a motorcade in Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963. “I believed what I was being told,” Tatro said.
When he saw Oswald shot and killed by Jack Ruby on live television, Tatro jumped out of his seat and yelled, “Yes!” In his mind, justice had been served on someone who killed his president.

When he shared his thoughts with his father, the elder Tatro gave his son a counterpoint to consider. “The whole thing stinks, Ed,” he said.


He became interested in the case and read the 26 volumes of the Warren Commission's report. The commission, which was led by Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren, concluded Oswald acted alone.


LBJ

While the Mafia, CIA, Russians, Cubans and any number of groups could have killed Kennedy, Tatro said, they could not get Kennedy's car to drive only 11 mph without a bubbletop through Dealey Plaza in Dallas.
That came from within LBJ's powerful inner circle and some of the Secret Service, according to Tatro, who did not have kind words about the 36th president of the United States.

“He was one of the most amoral human beings who ever lived,” he said. “I think he's second only to Hitler.”


After the 1960 election, Johnson became mired in various scandals and Kennedy supposedly did not want him to be his running mate for the 1964 election.

Johnson was friends with FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover and had information about Kennedy's womanizing and other issues and bribed his way into being on the ticket, Tatro said.
He said notes from Kennedy's former secretary, Eleanor Lincoln, indicated that JFK wanted to drop LBJ from the ticket.

“So, there's your motive,” he said.

Trip to Texas
On April 23, 1963, Johnson went on Texas radio to announce that Kennedy would be coming to the state in the fall. Neither Kennedy or the White House ever announced that, Tatro said.



Kennedy's motorcade was not supposed to drive under 40 mph and a bubbletop was standard security procedure, he said.

The route the motorcade took in Dealey Plaza was surrounded by buildings and trees, he emphasized, something that bothered Jerry Bruno, who scouted the area for security for Kennedy.

Texas Gov. John Connally, another close friend to Johnson who was sitting next to Kennedy in the motorcade and was shot, pushed for the route Bruno did not like, according to Tatro. Expressing his displeasure to Bruno's advice, Connally apparently stated, “This is not how we do it in Texas,” Tatro said, later alleging that Connally's job was to “sucker Kennedy to get (him) to Texas.”

Bruno was asked by the White House to come back to Washington, D.C., and another aide was sent to smooth over relations with Connally.

That man, Tatro said, was Bill Moyers, who is now a famous journalist and public commentator. “One of the greatest men of all time. Hogwash,” Tatro said sarcastically.

When Moyers was questioned by the House Select Committee on Assassinations, Tatro said he was “less than clear on all the details” and could not recall if he had ever even visited Dallas.

Shots fired

The Warren Commission concluded three shots were fired by Oswald from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository.

Authorities stated Oswald used an Italian Mannlicher-Carcano rifle to shoot Kennedy. Tatro said it takes 2.3 seconds to **** the gun before it can be re-fired.

The time it took for Kennedy to react to his wounds and Connally to react to his was less than two seconds, he said.

Tatro roundly trashed the single-bullet theory, which was created by Sen. Arlen Specter, who served as legal counsel for the commission at the time.

Kennedy's body was taken by the Secret Service from Texas to Bethesda Naval Hospital in Bethesda, Maryland, Tatro said.

Although several witnesses testified that Kennedy was shot in the back, the autopsy report stated he suffered a wound to the neck.

Twelve years after the assassination, the death certificate was released that stated that Kennedy was shot in the back and was killed by a bullet to the head, Tatro said.

A portion of executive session minutes from the Warren Commission that went missing for some time stated that a bullet entered Kennedy's back, Tatro said.

Connally's clothes were taken away and cleaned, which destroyed any chances of matching the metal from bullet fragments within Kennedy's and Connally's clothing, according to Tatro.

“Why would you do this?” he asked. “Because you're covering up the murder of the president.”



Jack Ruby

After Ruby was convicted of killing Oswald, he wrote a lot of letters from prison.

In one of those letters, Tatro said Ruby wrote, “If you hear honking of horns, it will be me. They will want my blood.”

Tatro played an audio recording of the newscast in which Oswald was shot. In the recording, one hard honk can be heard, followed by a soft honk and then the gunshot that killed Oswald.

Tatro believes Ruby was “trying to squeal.”

Tatro noted a disparaging quote by Ruby about Johnson: “Compared to Lyndon Johnson, I am a saint.”

Ruby also made many telephone calls while in prison to powerful individuals within organized crime, but the Warren Commission never investigated, Tatro said.


The Warren Commission



After the commission asked for Oswald's military file from the Pentagon, the commission was told it would not give it to them. When Congress demanded it, the Pentagon released a statement saying it had been destroyed and nothing was done, Tatro said.

The Canadian government also destroyed documents about Oswald, Tatro said after explaining that he tried to obtain that information in 1990.

“If the guy did it alone and is a nut, what are you destroying this stuff for?” Tatro asked.



In 2003, Tatro was part of a History Channel program called “The Men Who Killed Kennedy: The Guilty Men.” Part of the program discussed Johnson's alleged involvement.

According to Tatro, it was the History Channel's highest-rated show ever and made more than $2 million in DVD sales.

After the program concluded, Johnson's former advisors, including Valenti and Moyers, demanded the show never be played on the cable network again, Tatro said.

The show was removed from the History Channel's programming.
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5977
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: FBI WATCH MAKING CRUELTY VISIBLE

Postby fruhmenschen » Tue Nov 02, 2010 7:15 pm

It’s as if “Son of Sam” serial killer David Berkowitz were on trial for double-parking his car while committing his string of violent homicides

http://www.madcowprod.com/
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5977
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: FBI WATCH MAKING CRUELTY VISIBLE

Postby fruhmenschen » Thu Nov 04, 2010 5:54 pm

see link for full story

http://www.kpho.com/news/25634976/detail.html


Convict Won't Trade Confession For Freedom

POSTED: 11:04 am MST November 4, 2010

PHOENIX -- A convicted armed robber said he won't admit to a crime he says he didn't commit, even if it's his ticket out of prison.

CBS 5 and KPHO.com have been the exclusive sources for the story on Chris Alexander.

He was convicted of armed robbery, but he has always maintained that a crooked FBI agent set him up.

In 2009, agent Joe Gordwin pleaded guilty in federal court to depriving the public of his honest services.

Gordwin was having an affair with the wife of a man he was investigating.

That man was Alexander's brother, and Alexander thinks Gordwin framed him to conceal the affair.
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5977
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: FBI WATCH MAKING CRUELTY VISIBLE

Postby fruhmenschen » Sun Nov 07, 2010 7:58 pm

Breaking story providing more evidence that FBI agents tampered with the crime scene evidence from the Lockerbie bombing.
2 reads


1st read
LOCKERBIE BOMBER: UNSEEN EVIDENCE TO BE PRESENTED IN BID TO PROVE INNOCENCE

see link for full story
http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/vie ... innocence/


Sunday November 7,2010
By Ben Borland

SHOCKING unseen evidence from the Lockerbie bomber’s abandoned appeal is to be presented to Holyrood this week in a bid to prove his innocence.

Campaigners including Professor Robert Black and Dr Jim Swire will use the documents to try and force a Scottish Government inquiry into Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi’s conviction.

Dr Swire, whose daughter Flora was among the 270 killed in the 1988 atrocity, will introduce previously unseen diaries which could cast doubt on one of the trial’s key witnesses and show he was offered cash for evidence.


Written by a Scottish detective they reveal police knew from an early stage that Maltese shopkeeper Tony Gauci, whose identification of the bomber was pivotal in the conviction, had been promised an “unlimited” reward by the US.

Dr Swire, who will deliver a plea to ministers on Tuesday, said: “The diaries kept by Detective Inspector Harry Bell show he knew when he was interviewing Tony Gauci he was getting excited about the possibility of a reward.


It has since emerged that Gauci received $2million and his brother, Paul, received $1million from the US Department of Justice. DI Bell kept a diary during the investigation, although this was not presented to the three judges at the Lockerbie trial in 2001.

On September 28, 1989, he recorded that the FBI had discussed with the Scottish police an offer of unlimited money to Gauci, with $10,000 being available immediately. On March 5, 1990, he recorded a meeting with the FBI and a Maltese detective to discuss “reward money as a last resort”.

And on January 8, 1992, he said Dana Bhiel from the US Department of Justice had offered a $2million reward to Libyan double agent Majid Giaka, who also gave evidence against Megrahi. DI Bell wrote: “He was immediately advised of our concern regarding this. I also clarified with him about the Gauci reward and the response was only if he gave evidence.”



2nd read
see link for full story
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2009/08/m ... rs-to.html
Sunday, August 23, 2009
MORE EVIDENCE ON LOCKERBIE APPEARS TO IMPLICATE THE CIA

Mueller, of the FBI, would not want to mention any possible CIA drug smuggling?


1. Was the Lockerbie bomber a US spy?

In 2008, Scotland's top legal expert, professor Robert Black, urged the UK government to answer reports that there is evidence that Abu Nidal was a US agent.

Black believes Abu Nidal was responsible for co-ordinating the bomb that blew up Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5977
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: FBI WATCH MAKING CRUELTY VISIBLE

Postby fruhmenschen » Tue Nov 09, 2010 1:16 pm

see link for full story

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? ... &aid=21835

Mumia Abu Jamal is Innocent



Global Research, November 8, 2010
AmNews


Comrades of political prisoner Mumia Abu-Jamal are rallying supporters as they trek down to the City of Brotherly Love on Tuesday, November 9 for a critical 2 p.m. hearing at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Court (601 N. Market) regarding his death sentence.Having exhausted numerous appeals over the course of almost three decades, the Mumia contingent say it is imperative that the Black Panther penman receive mass support this Tuesday in order to again avert execution. Arguments will be made before a three-judge panel.At stake is whether Jamal will spend the rest of his natural life in the Pennsylvania penitentiary system or if his death sentence will again be reinstated.Recent revelations by Mumia’s defense team uncovered more crucial evidence that they say will help further prove his innocence.Last month, during the eighth annual World Day Against the Death Penalty forum in Philly, investigative reporter Linn Washington shared video footage of himself conducting forensic tests demonstrating the amount of damage done to a similar slab of sidewalk as the one that Dan Faulkner was shot on, on the morning of December 9, 1981.

Washington displayed the marks made by similar grade bullets fired from the exact caliber gun at about the same distance that it is assumed that Faulkner was shot from. This was very important information because prosecutors claim that while the cop lay wounded on the ground after being shot in the back, Mumia stood over him and fired four rounds, executioner-style, yet only struck him once.
Therefore, the three other bullets would’ve considerably marked up the underlying concrete.This, along with the failure by police to produce the gunpowder residue results, which are always administered to suspects who are arrested at or near the scene in murder cases, also brings into question the mishandling of their investigation, whether intentionally or not.Washington laid out the possibility of another man, Ken Freeman, who was a passenger in Mumia’s brother’s car when the journalist arrived at the scene, where his brother was being beaten by Faulkner. According to reports, the trajectory of the bullet that killed Faulkner suggests that it was fired from the proximity of the passenger side, where Freeman sat.
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5977
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: FBI WATCH MAKING CRUELTY VISIBLE

Postby fruhmenschen » Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:22 am

see link for full story



Commit a crimes but won't face criminal charges ......has a nice ring
to it. Barbara Mikulski should know. Did you hear the one about Attorney General Eric Holder, you know, the guy who just said they won't face criminal charges? It seems back in the 1990's he was an assistant US Attorney General and the Martin Luther King family had new evidence showing the FBI, the Memphis Police and other government agencies had assassinated Dr. King.
Holder refused to order a new investigation so the King family and their attorney William Pepper decided to put the new evidence into the public record by suing one of the assassins in civil court. Yeh the King family won the case and the jury held a press conference after the trial and said FBI agents and other government agencies including the US Military were behind the assassination. see http://ctka.net/pr500-king.html


Reports: Stevens Prosecutors Engaged In Misconduct But Won't Face Criminal Charges
Rachel Slajda | November 17, 2010
see link for full story
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.c ... rs_eng.php


DOJ investigators have found that two prosecutors in the corruption trial of the late Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK), as well as an FBI agent, did engage in misconduct during the trial, according to the AP. But the prosecutors will not face criminal charges, according to NPR.
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5977
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: FBI WATCH MAKING CRUELTY VISIBLE

Postby fruhmenschen » Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:59 pm

fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5977
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: FBI WATCH MAKING CRUELTY VISIBLE

Postby fruhmenschen » Wed Nov 17, 2010 6:25 pm

1947 FBI Files reveal attempt by J. Edgar Hoover to use Black Dahlia Investigation to "set legal precedent"

http://207.56.179.67/steve_hodel/2009/1 ... pts-t.html
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5977
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: FBI WATCH MAKING CRUELTY VISIBLE

Postby fruhmenschen » Sun Nov 21, 2010 12:43 pm

Serial killings: Unsolved, and unpublicized, slayings of women fill FBI files

THOMAS HARGROVE Scripps Howard News Service
November 20, 2010
see link for full story
http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2010/nov/2 ... den-trail/


Authorities in Indiana and Ohio have launched investigations into suspected serial killings after a Scripps Howard News Service study of FBI computer files found many alarming clusters of unsolved homicides of women across the nation. Many of the suspected serial killings detected in the study have never before been disclosed to the public. All told, authorities in seven cities have confirmed that a statistical analysis of federal crime files conducted by Scripps has detected known - or strongly suspected - serial homicides in their communities.

The study was based on computer records of 525,742 homicides committed from 1980 to 2008. The FBI provided most of the data. But Scripps supplemented these using the Freedom of Information Act to obtain detailed records of 15,322 killings that local police did not disclose to the federal government's entirely voluntary crime reporting system.

"I remember we had three of them, all elderly women who were strangled," said Lake County, Ind., Deputy Coroner Jackie DeChantal of a series of unsolved killings about four years ago in the Gary, Ind., area. "I remember talking about it then. We couldn't get anyone else to say that they were connected."
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5977
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: FBI WATCH MAKING CRUELTY VISIBLE

Postby fruhmenschen » Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:39 pm

fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5977
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to Data & Research Compilations

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests