"Lady" Mary Archer

by **antiaristo** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:06 pm

I ACCUSE: LADY MARY ARCHER, FELLOW OF NEWNHAM COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE AND FORMER DIRECTOR OF ANGLIA TELEVISION GROUP plc. THAT you did provide insider information to Jeffrey Archer about the agreed takeover of Anglia Television by MAI PLC; THAT you did conspire to conceal the crimes then committed by Jeffrey Archer in using that insider information for profit; THAT you then conspired to defraud John Cleary and one hundred and seventy six other employees of Anglia Television Group plc; THAT you then conspired to murder John Cleary by a variety of means on at least six occasions between January 1995 and April 2000; THAT you then conspired to steal the only home and last remaining asset of John Cleary between May 1999 and the present day; THAT far from the wounded victim you portray so well, you are in fact the regular partner in crime with Jeffrey Archer, your joint paths strewn with the wreckage of innocent lives. …. and THAT is why you stay with him. [INSERT: Mary Archer to John Cleary June 7 1994] SUCH KIND WORDS FROM A FRAGRANT LADY! SLIPPING THE KNIFE IN BETWEEN MY RIBS [INSERT: FORGED Court Order dated February 9 1995] [INSERT: Reply from Court Service CEO to Sir Teddy Taylor MP] This document is a forgery. There can be no doubt about this fact because the document was issued under a false and fictitious name. Any document issued under a false and fictitious name is a forgery, irrespective of the true identity and eminence of its author. MARY ARCHER, Director of Anglia Television Group plc, lay behind this forgery. MARY ARCHER ruined my life with this forged court order, as her husband ruined poor Monica with his forged diary. Sir Teddy Taylor MP asked Lord Mackay of Clashfern a point blank question. Is this a forgery? The Lord Chancellor knows full well that his court runs no writ in the Republic of Ireland, and there is no Sir John Baker at The Strand. So he passed this Commons written question to an underling to lie on his behalf. The Conservative Party line that there was never any hard evidence against the man sits ill with the fraud, perjury, forgery, perversion and worse that are a way of life for this despicable Archer family. You know from experience that you cannot trust much of what you read in the newspapers. So treat yourself to what the bigwigs don’t want you to find out. The inside story behind Archer’s climb down in November 1999, his expulsion from the Party in February 2000, and finally his prosecution in September 2000. [INSERT: Wandsworth County Court "judgement"] COMMENTARY *The "judge" making this decision is not a real judge but a lay deputy. There is no record of this person at the Wandsworth County Court. *There was no real hearing because the "costs" include nothing for court fees. There is no record of this hearing at the Wandsworth County Court. *The "Legibly signed statement of truth" is yet another Walker rubber stamp (by LEG of Wandsworth Council). * 242.25 of costs assessed. 242.24 of costs released. One penny outstanding. *Still holding my money on the basis of this one-penny "virtual reality" judgment. This nightmare is happening to me because I worked for Anglia Television. When MARY ARCHER tried to cheat me I not only caught her fraud but also compiled the evidence to prove it in court. The Conservative Party line that there was never any hard evidence against Archer is a complete lie. So for more than seven years MARY ARCHER has been attempting to kill me bodily and financially. I will never prove that the murder attempts took place, for it is her practice to isolate the victim so no witnesses exist. But her financial machinations in attempting to eliminate John Cleary have left a paper trail. The forged Court Order of 9 February 1995 ended my professional career. It cannot be other than a forgery because it was issued under a false and fictitious name. Yet the English Court behaves as though it carries legal force, and have never heard my claim for wrongful dismissal. This is not the England I knew, and I have not worked since. The forged Wandsworth Court/Council papers stole my only wealth. They cannot be other than forgeries because that case number had been heard already on 5 November 1999. Yet the English Court and Wandsworth Council behave as though these papers carry legal force, and continue to withhold (steal) my money. This is not the England I knew. Both are evidence of MARY Archer’s conspiracies to kill me by financial means. She has this much power because she remains a favourite in certain circles. And her husband was a "Blue Chip" in the 1960´s alongside Major, Patten, Clarke (the author of the infamous Cabinet "suicide pact" which kept John Major at the top of the heap throughout 1995) and others. John Major and Tony Blair buried the Anglia Television fraud in 1995. MARY ARCHER will stop at nothing to bury John Cleary, who is the last remaining victim/witness to her capital crimes. From the very outset the existence of the Anglia inquiry was a State secret of the Major Government. It is for this reason that fraud by the Directors against the employees of Anglia Television was possible in May 1994. The inquiry became public knowledge only in July 1994 when Archer was tricked by an enterprising journalist into that famous confession "You’re not supposed to know about that". When questioned about the Anglia inquiry from the floor of the Commons by Dale Campbell-Savours MP, John Major famously replied in March 1995 "Lord Archer is my friend. Lord Archer has been my friend. Lord Archer will continue to be my friend" (Hansard) [INSERT: Lord Archer, Yours Sincerely The Economist November 21, 1998] [INSERT: Reply from Nicholas Pardoe August 30 1995. This one I'll reproduce in full] <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Roger Kaye QC & Hugh Aldous FCA Inspectors appointed by the Secretary of State for Trade & Industry pursuant to s177 of the Financial Services Act 1986 Our ref: NGFP/NJMT/jsh 30 August 1995 STRICTLY PRIVATE – ADRESSEE ONLY John Cleary Esq. 30 St Patricks Hill Cork Eire Dear Mr Cleary Thank you for your letter of 24 August. As I explained in my letter to you of 10 August the Inspectors do believe that you may be able to assist them, and you may be assured of the seriousness of their enquiries. Therefore, I would be most grateful if you could contact me again, as soon as possible, to try to identify a mutually convenient time for you to see the Inspectors. I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience. Yours sincerely Nicholas Pardoe<hr></blockquote> The official report was never published. The British people were told only "No further action is to be taken against any of the parties". Including MARY ARCHER, who was the Director of Anglia Television Group plc, and hence the guilty party. And she got away with far worse than her partner-in-crime.(John Major stood down from the Commons at the last Election and has left public life, accepting a sinecure with the Carlyle Group. He has not been offered the peerage that should be his by right). Time passed before Archer reverted to type and told us all another enormous lie. He claimed he had been "exonerated" by the unpublished report. And he stood for public office. Archer was trapped when I sent 200 copies of my appeal to the Prince of Wales to interested and significant third parties in London. He could not answer my charges, as he could not take the stand at the Old Bailey. He could not hide behind MARY ARCHER, for she was guiltier than he, and I held her reply of 7 June 1994. So he was forced to stand down. But how? The British people had been told he was a “man of probity and integrity”, with “The vision energy and commitment to be an outstanding mayor”. The entire political Establishment was behind him. How to stand down, just days after winning the nomination of the Conservative Party? He had no choice but to admit wrongdoing, but not Anglia Television, which was an enormous scandal for Major and Blair. So instead he confessed to a fake alibi, and poor old Ted Francis got dragged into it one more time (the Old Bailey jury seemed to sense this). Still Sir Paul Condon and the Metropolitan Police did nothing, even though Archer had confessed to stealing 500,000 from the Daily Star. (And recall the words of Hugh Aldous when told in France of the official pronouncement....."Oh well! If they want to let him off that’s up to them." And he wrote the report!). These give some idea of the powerful connections that this despicable Archer family enjoys to this day. I circulated copies of the younger Archers letter from 27 March 2000, and purchased a return ticket to Gatwick. The despicable Archer family set their trap with Wandsworth Council/Court and awaited my appearance. But I did not return, and they were caught in a trap of their own making. After ten weeks gestation they were forced to send the forged documents to the address cited. Into Spain, into Spanish jurisdiction: thereby did they commit a crime in Spain. I swore my affidavit on 29 July 2000 and sent copies all over Europe. To all EU member States, but more importantly to many Harvard Business School graduates. High-level Europeans with commercial skills and flawless English. (If anyone wants to check me out I am in the European Directory up to 1995) [INSERT: Judgement of the Constitutional Court of Spain No. 3414/98 dated July 27, 1998] I had lodged already an appeal for protection against the Archer family and their organized crime connections under Article 162.1.(b) of the Spanish Constitution. I had been rejected by three Magistrates of the Constitutional Court (appeals for protection are heard only by the highest court in the land) on the grounds that I had insufficient evidence. Now such evidence was being thrust beneath their noses in a very public way. The only way for the Spanish to avoid investigation and prosecution was for the British to prosecute in their stead. The British were forced to act against Archer, and that is the only reason he has passed pro tem out of the ranks of the untouchables. So out of the blue in September 2000 the Met made its dramatic, theatrical move. Apparently it took a ten-month worldwide inquiry for PC Plod to find Angie Peppiatt and nail Archer for the crime he had admitted back in November 1999! That is the reason we have had to endure another Old Bailey farce at huge public expense. Archer must be seen to be put on trial for crimes carrying a life sentence (equal to the crimes committed in Spain). Poor old Ted Francis did not shop Archer and commit hare-kiri. Francis was shopped by Archer. Archer could not take the stand because his whole criminal past would become fair game. The only way they could stage this theatre for foreign consumption was for MARY ARCHER to take the stand as lone defender of her partner-in-crime. And play the role as victim one more time. But the true victims in this whole sordid mess are two little girls who lost their Daddy. Victoria was five years old when MARY ARCHER pulled her fraud against the employees of Anglia Television. Victoria is now verging on young womanhood. Georgia was just three years old and is now ten. All those years without their father, with all the terrible consequences. Economic hardship. Emotional damage. Stunted development. And God knows what else in all these long years apart. Will they still be paying this price when the Nation celebrates the Golden Jubilee next year? With a little help from her friends MARY ARCHER is destroying my children. MARY ARCHER has been destroying my children. MARY ARCHER will continue to destroy my children. MARY ARCHER is one mean, cold-blooded, nasty, tough-as-nails bitch to paint herself as the poor victim in all this. [INSERT: Photograph of Victoria and Georgia in 1994 aged five and three respectively]

by **antiaristo** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:15 pm

MARY ARCHER´s FRAUD At the end of 1993 Anglia Television Group plc enjoyed an enviable employee shareholder base. Individuals held around ten percent of the shares, and the Employee Share Scheme held a further ten percent. Any purchaser wanting to go unconditional and forcibly buy out dissident minorities would have to deal with the employees´ interests. The board meeting on 12 January 1994 approved the terms of the MAI offer. In addition the following commitment was agreed, and subsequently incorporated into all of the offer documents “The board of MAI has given assurances to the board of Anglia that the rights of the management and employees of Anglia, including pension rights, will be fully safeguarded” This did the trick, and MAI were able to achieve the 90% acceptance required to go unconditional. In the meantime, Lord Archer had triggered the first of the two inquiries undertaken by the DTI. All Anglia Directors were interviewed and sworn to silence on pain of inprisonment. What better circumstances to commit fraud than those of enforced total secrecy? And so it transpired. The controlling Directors of Anglia/MAI decided they did not want to safeguard the pensions of the employees after all. So they hatched a plot to defraud John Cleary and one hundred and seventy six other employees of Anglia Television. In order to achieve this they brought in a new Managing Director, Mr Malcolm wall. Mr Wall wielded the axe with the vengeance of a man backed by an army of enforcers and brutally chopped one in three of the people. He issued my own redundancy note on 24 May 1994 and gave me three days to get out. (Some of the nastiness of what happened can be gleaned from Lisa Buckenham´s article in The Guardian in June 1994. According to Private Eye Lord Hollick went thermonuclear!) But the truth was that Mr Wall was an impostor, and had not been appointed a Director of the company. He had no authority to act as he did – which is why he required the backup of a private army of enforcers. I refused to accept a breach of contract by a straw man and continued to attend my office until 6 June 1994, when I was excluded by force and left on the instructions of a police officer. MARY ARCHER´s kind regards were dated the day after her hired thugs had done their work. The Fragrant Assassin. The lies were consummated on 21 July 1994 when the Directors actually met as a board to elect Mr Wall as a Director of the company. This was a nasty cross party avant-garde toffs fraud, cut and dried under S. 285 of the Companies Act 1985. At that time the big shot bullies on the Anglia board included Lord Clive Hollick (New Labour), Lord David Puttnam (Liberal Democrat) and of course The Fragrant Assassin (Conservative). I first wrote to Mr Blair on 27 May 1994, then with more substance on 25 July 1994. He took my advice about Lord Clive Hollick. When he became Prime Minister in May 1997 he did not make Hollick a Minister of the Crown. Instead he put him into the DTI as “Special advisor to the Prime Minister”. When Mr Blair asked his man at the DTI to “have a look” at the Anglia inquiry in the run up to the election for Mayor, he was asking that very Anglia Director who defrauded the employees under cover of that very inquiry! Clearly Archer´s election meant safety for Hollick. (When Archer stood down in November 1999 the DTI announced that it was “no longer necessary” to “have a look”.) At the beginning of last year ITV was controlled by three companies – Carlton, United News and Media, and Granada. Early last summer United News and Media launched an agreed bid for Carlton. Success would give total dominance of the “regional” network, and clear questions of Public Policy were invoked. Not to worry, though, for you will recall that Mr Blair’s “Special Advisor” at the DTI was none other than Lord Clive Hollick of United News and Media! But then something big must have happened. Out of the blue, in late summer, everything changed. The United takeover of Carlton suddenly became a Granada takeover of United. Lord Clive Hollick went from big time buyer to big time seller. United News was dismembered and parts sold off to a pornographer. We were never told why. But if you have read I Accuse: Lady Mary Archer you might have your own suspicions. The Economist (21 July 2001) ran a typically understated piece on the Archer conviction, and left us with these final thoughts: “Maybe the moral of Lord Archer’s career is that you get found out in the end. Or maybe it is that favours can be bought quite cheaply in British public life.” The truth is that everything is for sale in London. If you have money, you can have anything. Judges and judgements go to the highest bidder. Like his son the Honourable James Archer, Lord Jeffrey Archer got “found out” only because he was provoked into committing a crime in a foreign jurisdiction. Favours are cheap in British public life because the supply is fulsome. The court of Barrister Blair is the most lucrative and corrupt of the last hundred years, and the Tory top brass knows it and does nothing but aid and abet him. Maybe that’s why they want to hold the election ahead of the conference?

by **dbeach** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:13 am

"Favours are cheap in British public life " and the US is but a reflection of same

by **jenz** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 9:44 am

sorry, still lost in the detail. what was the forged document - what was its purpose?

by **emad** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 12:51 pm

She is called Lady Archer. Wife of non-hereditary peer Lord Archer. Title dies out with him. If she was Lady Mary Archer she would be the daughter of an Earl or Marquis and the title could be passed down to her heirs. But she ain't and it can't.

by **antiaristo** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:12 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>sorry, still lost in the detail. what was the forged document - what was its purpose?<hr></blockquote> jenz, See where it says [INSERT: FORGED Court Order dated February 9 1995] [INSERT: Reply from Court Service CEO to Sir Teddy Taylor MP] On this document as I wrote it appears a scan of a court order dated February 9 1995, followed by a letter from the Court Service to Sir Teddy Taylor MP dated October 27 1995. Let me explain what happened. A few days before Christmas 1994 I was sitting in my house trying to decide what to do. I was alone – knowing I was in danger my wife and daughters were elsewhere. Suddenly three words popped into my head “Go to Ireland.” It was crazy. My connections there were so weak as to be non-existent. Yet I knew I had to obey my Guardian Angel. So I piled the car with my computer and belongings, and set off for Dublin. A week later I came back for a second load and returned. At the same time I left some letters with a friend to be posted in January. They were addressed to the wives of those who were cheating me. On 9 January Lady Archer stood down as a director of Anglia Television. Towards the end of January I began to agitate once more with letters from Dublin. Then on 13 February 1995 a document was delivered to my front door. I swore an affidavit about it. <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Plaintiff JP Cleary Fourth Affidavit 14 February 1995 1994-c- No. 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEENS BENCH DIVISION BEETWEEN JOHN PAUL CLEARY Plaintiff - and ANGLIA TELEVISION LIMITED Defendant AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN PAUL CLEARY I, John Paul Cleary, of Meimia, Fakenham Road, Great Ryburgh, Fakenham, Norfolk NR21 7AG MAKE OATH and say as follows 1 I am the Plaintiff in this action and I make this affidavit as a matter of record and in opposition to the affidavits made on behalf of the Defendant. Save where otherwise stated, the facts within this affidavit are within my own knowledge 2 I refer to Exhibit JPC8 attached to this affidavit, which is a draft minute of order supplied to me by Ashurst Morris Crisp (AMORC) and which was submitted as Exhibit GPW2 with the affidavit sworn by Mr Webb. This was delivered through my letterbox by hand on 8th February 1995, together with cover letter. 3 I further refer to Exhibit JPC9 attached to this affidavit. This was delivered to my door in Ireland by a young lady whose only word were “I’m a courier and I have some documents to deliver.” The young lady called at between 8:45 and 8:50 on Monday 13th February. No receipt or signature was sought from myself 4 Exhibit JPC9 is included exactly as it was delivered to me, in an unsealed envelope, with no covering letter, and a small note between third parties 5 It is my belief that the document shown at Exhibit JPC9 is a forgery and has never been sanctioned by the High Court of England and Wales. I do not come to such a view lightly, and my notes to myself on the evening of 13th February after receipt run to five full pages of A4 longhand. These notes are included as the attached Exhibit JPC10. 6 There are marked discrepancies between the documents contained within Exhibits JPC8 and JPC9, and which lend further support to my belief that the Order is not genuine. I detail these below. 7 The first discrepancy lies in that the “Order” claims to be serviceable in the Republic of Ireland, when the draft sent to me beforehand did not refer to the Republic at all. 8 The second discrepancy lies in changes to the wording included as category (v) by the Defendant. The wording has been changed from “The Independent Television Commission;” to “The Independent Television Commission, its members or their spouses;” 9 This amendment must have been made following my letter to the Countess of Dalkieth pointing out to her that ITC members were not covered by the Order of 20th January 1995. 10 There is also the minor discrepancy in that the draft Order refers to the Second Affidavit sworn by Mr Webb, whereas Exhibit JPC9 refers to the First Affidavit by Mr Webb. Both dated 7th February 1995 11 I believe an effort was made to serve papers on me on the night before the scheduled hearing when my neighbours were disturbed by a motorcycle courier at 10pm on 8th February 1995 12 For these reasons, plus my observations included as Exhibit JPC10 I do not believe the “Order” served on me to have any legal validity or enforceability. 13 Because of my suspicions I have attached Exhibits JPC8, JPC9 and JPC10 to the body of this Affidavit by means of the binding. Sworn this 14 day of February 1995 Before me, A solicitor<hr></blockquote> Nothing much happened, so I decided to sneak back to England at the end of March. When I got back to Norfolk there were piles and piles of legal papers. The letters to the wives had driven them crazy. The Norfolk, Staffordshire (where my wife and daughters were staying) and Metropolitan Police forces were all searching for me from 10 to 20 January. All sorts of court filings had been made against me at the same time. I shat myself, and got on the first available flight back to Dublin. The document you ask about was their effort to shut me up after they had learned I fled their jurisdiction, viz: <blockquote>Quote:<hr><div style="text-align:center">PENAL NOTICE IF YOU, THE WITHIN NAMED JOHN PAUL CLEARY DISOBEY THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER YOU WILL BE LIABLE TO PROCESS OF EXECUTION FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPELLING YOU TO OBEY THE SAME</div> IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE 1994 C No 2024 QUEENS BENCH DIVISION Before Sir John Baker BETWEEN JOHN PAUL CLEARY Plaintiff -and- ANGLIA TELEVISION LIMITED Defendant <div style="text-align:center">______________________. ORDER ______________________.</div> UPON HEARING Counsel for the Defendant AND UPON READING the Affidavits of Caroline Jane Carter sworn on 18th January 1995 and 20th January 1995 and the First Affidavit of Graham Phillip Webb sworn on the 7th day of February 1995 and the exhibits thereof. IT IS ORDERED THAT:- 1 You, John Paul Cleary, by yourself, your servants or agents or otherwise howsoever be restrained until judgement in these proceedings or until further Order from communicating with, publishing or causing or permitting to be published or written or sent any letter or communication of whatsoever nature save with the prior written consent of the Defendant’s solicitors, Ashurst Morris Crisp, or the prior leave of the Court to: (i) the Defendant, Anglia Television Limited (ii) Anglia Television Group Plc; (iii) MAI plc; (iv) Meridian Broadcasting Limited: (v) The Independent Television Commission, it’s members or their spouses; (vi) The Directors, former Directors, Officers or employees of any of the foregoing companies or entities named at (i) – (v) above or their spouses. Save that the Plaintiff may communicate with the Defendant, Anglia Television Limited, by letters addressed to Mr Graham Webb, Ashurst Morris Crisp, Broadwalk House, 5 Appold Street London EC2A 2HA; (2) That the costs occasioned by this application and those costs reserved by the Order of Deputy Judge Rogers QC dated 20th January 1995 be paid by the Plaintiff. (3) There be leave to serve this Order on the Plaintiff in the Republic of Ireland DATED THIS 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1995<hr></blockquote> I knew it had to be a forgery for the reasons cited in my affidavit above. But I didn’t know WHO had forged the document until October of that same year. Sir Teddy Taylor MP responded to one of my (many) letters from Dublin, and put in a question to the Lord Chancellor: “Is this a forgery?” Here is what was sent in reply. <blockquote>Quote:<hr>THE COURT SERVICE Southside 105 Victoria Street London SW1E 6QT Michael Huebner CB Chief Executive CA95/9/2 27 October 1995 Sir Teddy Taylor MP House of Commons London SW1A 0AA Dear Sir Teddy, <div style="text-align:center">MR J P CLEARY 30 ST PATRICKS HILL CORK EIRE</div> Thank you for your letter of 29 September to the Lord Chancellor. As you know, your letter has been passed to me, as Chief Executive of the Court Service, to reply. You ask whether an order, a copy of which you enclosed with your correspondence, is a forgery. To assist you in replying to Mr Cleary, it might be helpful to you if I begin by explaining that Mr Cleary issued a writ against Anglia Television Limited in the High Court on 11 August 1994. I enclose a copy of the writ for your information. I am told by the High Court that the order to which you refer was sealed by the court on 9 February 1995, and is therefore authentic. The order was actually made by His Honour Judge John Baker and not Sir John Baker. I enclose a copy of my reply for your use. Yours sincerely, Michael Huebner<hr></blockquote> So it turned out that the creator of this forgery was none other than a High Court judge! John Baker had issued a court order under the name Sir John Baker. Let me be clear here. Under the common law John Baker and Sir John Baker are completely different names, for COMPLETELY DIFFERENT PEOPLE. He might as well have called himself Sir Fred Smith. The underlying case, which is Queens Bench 1994-c-2024 J P Cleary v Anglia Television, has been frozen by the forgery. Nothing has happened since 9 February 1995.

by **jenz** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 5:41 pm

so, sorry to be thick about this, after writing to various people whom those you oppose considered to be inappropriate (viz wives etc) you had a hand delivered restraining order, telling you you could not write to anyone other than the solicitors for Anglia, about your concerns. and you say this is a forgery because the name of the judge was incorrectly written on the document? is that it? now here's the hard bit - how is it that you feel that this was a deliberate forgery? not just a clerical error? was there ever a hearing for the order? did the judge concerned ever express himself as to its validity? and how would such a forgery a. benefit your opponents and b. disadvantage you? I

by **antiaristo** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 6:32 pm

jenz, When it comes to Court documents the only thing that really matters is the name of the judge. HE is the one exercising power, HE is the one accountable. Were it a simple clerical error it would have been corrected promptly. It was not admitted until a formal question was raised in parliament. What do you think Taylor was responding to when he wrote to the Lord Chancellor? My claim that it was a forgery. How did I know his real name was not Sir John Baker? I didn't. I didn't know who was responsible, but I knew it was a forgery. Think about it like a cheque. Is the name insignificant? If someone writes you a cheque for a million dollars, and it is a false name, is that insignificant? The point is that he could not issue this order under his real name. Doing it this way meant that when it came back to haunt him he could deny all knowledge ("not my name"). This was foiled because I attacked it immediately. Why do I know it is a forgery? Well, apart from what I said in the affidavit, it was served OUT OF JURISDICTION. You can't do that. The English High Court cannot tell me what I can or cannot do in Ireland. The other questions you raise? Look at the reply from Michael Huebner. What does NOT appear is the case number - Queens Bench 1994-c-2024. Instead he uses the reference CA95/9/2. He's burying the case. So far as the PTB are concerned, this litigation never happened. Added on edit. The other thing to bear in mind is that these people do not make glaring mistakes. They make small mistakes. If this seems like an awful lot of effort on behalf of Lord and Lady Archer, it is. They are (were?) EXTREMELY well connected. I can give you the names of two women I know for a fact were murdered on the orders of the Archers. I can give you the name of a innocent man serving the sentence for one of those murders. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=antiaristo>antiaristo</A> at: 12/13/05 3:49 pm

by **jenz** » Wed Dec 14, 2005 8:17 am

ok, thanks aristo, I hope you have the patience to help me through this. is this a good synopsis? unhappy about events at Anglia, you direct your points wider than the immediate legal team dealing with their side. (these events, as well as netting a few thou in insider trading have raided the pension fund and put people out of jobs, using a bit of a scam in bringing in a hatchet man?) In directing your points to a wider group of recipients - wives etc, you upset people. (this is a bit unusual - what was it about those letters - why didn't they just get the usual one liner brush off replies or go straight to the bin without passing go?) but, the upset was big enough to have them get a judge on board, or someone who could fake it for the judge - do we know which? and the answer he came up with was to issue an order restraining you from further contact, but, knowing this to be outside his power, he made sure the doc. which it was hoped would fool you, could in fact be later denied if necessary as a forgery? Am I on track so far? you challenged this forgery, where, in Ireland, the uk or spain? Additionally, you were visited by thugs - was this after your challenge? Now , if I've got this right so far, next question is exactly why F and Jeff were so very upset? As I understood things, F was non exec director of Anglia, and Jeff made a share deal, profiting from the knowledge about the take over, (for a friend), but, remarkably, some would think, no unpleasant fragrance was found stuck to his Lady over this matter - effectively they were in the clear? So what was it about the gnat bites of a former employee, which could provoke a reaction from them which in itself would seem to place them in greater danger of being smelt out than they would have been by sitting tight and smiling bravely through adversity? Also, were you the only target of attacks? Mary Archer per a google, was or is a solar energy expert, vice chair of Addenbrookes NHS Trust (chair ethics ctee, according to one source, questions raised about her suitability for this, after selectivity of her memory wa evidenced) She is also CHAIR OF EAST OF ENGLAND STEM CELL NETWORK, which has links with Cambridge genetic knowledge park, Addenbrookes and commercial interests. stem cells are found in early stage embryos and certain human tissues. You refer to 2 deaths - possible to give details? I have read of the speculation around Jill Dando's murder, and also, some time ago now, read on a site dealing with alleged miscarriages of justice, elements questioning the soundness of the conviction for that murder. Would that be one of the deaths?

by **emad** » Wed Dec 14, 2005 1:51 pm

were both represented at their failed libel trials by Alexander Cameron QC, barrister brother of new Thatcher glory-boy David Cameron, latest leader of the Tory Party. Wouldn't like to say who is the bigger crook but older brother Alex certainly hand-picked on Carlyle Group advice by Thatcher/Kissinger interests to represent both Archer and Aitken and is privy to more hidden dirt on Jeffrey and Mary than most. However, both former Tory MPs Archer and Aitken ended up in jail despite their QC's exhortations as to their probity. And Cameron the barrister has flourished since. His younger brother's elevation to the leadership of the UK Tory Party is arguably the biggest gamble that the Tories have ever taken since doing a deal with MI5 and 6 on lifetime gagging orders placed on the Archer and Aitken families in exchange for relatively low custodial sentences on their famous jailbird paterfamiliases. David Cameron's over-confidence in the whitewashing of his extensive 1980s/90s criminal career is merely symptomatic of his faith that the 'done deal' that protects Archers and Atikens will ensure him a smooth passage into Tory glory. There are outstanding arrest warrants still unexecuted in the UK on both Jeffrey and Mary Archer which relate to murder charges connected with perversion of the course of justice in the Lockerie bombing. However, Archer and his wife are relatively B-list players in terms of criminal culpability. Mary continues her seminal fraudulent career of deception, espionage and subversion on behalf of former UK-resident KGB operatives involved in the theft and laundering of an estimated $100billion of assets pumped through HSBC between 1993-2001. But she is easy fodder to the deception machine that has corralled both A-List and B-List players into assuming they have cast-iron guarantees of immunity from treason charges. Superbe!

by **jenz** » Wed Dec 14, 2005 3:47 pm

emad - any chance of elaboration? as 1. what gagging orders are about 2. what DCs criminal career refers to 3. what attempt (?) to pervert course of justice re Lockerbie 4. what $100bn assets would these be?

by **emad** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:10 pm

"lifetime gagging orders placed on the Archer and Aitken families in exchange for relatively low custodial sentences on their famous jailbird paterfamiliases." A very large chunk of the gagging orders relates to Thatcher's role in official deception campaign to hide the identity and criminal career of convicted UK mass-murderer called The Yorkshire Ripper - PETER SUTCLIFFE. See Pic: <a href="http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/graphics/2005/01/21/nripr21.jpg">news.telegraph.co.uk/news...ripr21.jpg</a> Likewise Sutcliffe's family/in-laws - mainly members of the Sythes family/clan including former Tory Foreign Sec Geoffrey Howe, now life peer in the Lords, and his daughter, who assumed the ID of Camilla Parker-Bowles in 1980 and has continued ever since, rising to full-blown House of Windsor stature as the consort of Charles. Both Archer and Aitken used their extensive knowledge of the Ripper's real parentage to blackmail their way up the Tory greasy pole to high office. Sutcliffe is the adopted child of a very nasty DNA union involving one of the House of Windsor's highest and mightiest and a senior Tory grandee. Archer was instrumental in executing Thatcher's deception campaign by making sure British intelligence shredded files on criminal records of members of the Sythes family. And by ensuring family/clan members were promoted into key public office positions including military intelligence and diplomatic posts. One very prominent Sythes family member was given a whole new ID by up-and-coming Thatcher protogee Stella Rimington (who became MI5 CEO) and has enjoyed an illustrious academic career in one of the UK's foremost universities: The School of Oriental and African Studies (part of London University), probably the most celebrated MI6 recruiting ground in the entire ritish Isles. Unfortunately, part of that fake ID included an Islamic marriage to a sister of terrorist Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (see link for background reference at: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalid_Shaikh_Mohammed">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kha...h_Mohammed</a> ). She in turn has a disastrous past that includes being the mother of a Russian/Cuban gangster and former IRA quartermaster Henry Gelli. She gave birth to his son when she was aged approximately 12. Tha offspring has the adopted name of Ahmed Al-Reyayssi and is currently involved in the criminal courts for defrauding London casinos of some £11 million, for which National Bank of Abu Dhabi is suing both him and his former gaming clubs. His fake ID involved claiming he was the Ruler of Ajman's official UK advisor, but is wealth was stolen and his entire credit rating is owed to the deceptions that Archer and then Aitken put into place when his false ID was constructed. In reality he has been a moneylaunderer and cash conduit between former IRA fundmasters, bent bank managers in the HSCB empire and Russian oligarchs connected to refugee crook Boris Berezhovsky. Back to The Ripper's horrendous career: it went unchecked largely because of criminal intelligence being perverted by UK cops on Thatcher's orders, and partly because of a disinformation campaign of deception cnducted by one JOHN HUMBLE, who was finally arrested and charged in october this year for his role. See BBC background story: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_yorkshire/4354952.stm">news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/engla...354952.stm</a> Humble now arraigned and expected to appear in coirt again in January. HOW he got away with his extensive deception is 100% down to Archer's role during the Thatcher years and later under John Major's premiership. DAVID CAMERON: he is Blair's son by one Irene Gelli, another natural daughter of George Herbert Bush, and a former UK-based KGB officer protected by Dick Cheney against prosecution in the US fro her role in industrial espionage connected with former Republic Naqtional Bank owner/CEO Edmond Safra. Cameron was 100% involved in a huge property/assets theft connected to the former Midland Bank (now HSBC) and the July 1986 'disappearance' of London estate agent Suzy Lamplugh - in reality an MI5/Mossad double agent working for Robert Maxwell - see this link for Gordon Thomas And Martin Dillon's excellent book on maxwell's espionage career: <a href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=12419168&method=full&siteid=50143">www.mirror.co.uk/news/all...teid=50143</a> UK cops have investigated Lamplugh's 'disappearance' for nearly 20 years and concluded that oth she and a wman called Shirley Bakks were probably murdered by the same assailant. Lamplugh's real name was Maria Gelli and she acted as a go-between between Jefrey Archer, Robert Maxwell and John Bond, the future HSBC CEO. LOKERBIE BOMBING: Mary Archer was caught trying to pass UK military secrets to North Korea in July 1988. A protracted security operation netted over a dozen highly-placed UK individuals in equally 'fragrant' ositions in public life, just like her. Husband Jeffrey Archer used his influence to find out the details of her main accuser in UK miltary intelligence. That officer was aboard the Pan-Am Lockerbie flight that was allegedly bombed by Libyan spoof Al-Megrahi. Another key witness to Mary Archer's espionage career (officially she's a chemist professor at Cambridge University in the UK) was mysteriously gunned down outside a London casino just days before the Lockerbie bombing. Mary Archer's alibi for that evening then mysteriously committed suicide. $100bn assets: a massive industrial portfolio comprising the original shareholdings of the Virgin Group (Richard Branson), Marks & Spencer plc (retail clothing), what is now the retail clothing empire of Philip Green (Arcadia group), Harrods (Mohammed Fayed) etc etc incluidng industrial real estate in the UK, Europe and US. Running out of time here on my lunchbreak, Jenz. Hope the above gives a reasonable glimpse in answer to your question.

by **jenz** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 6:19 am

by your changeling theses emad. Peter Sutcliffe was born to a couple of Sutcliffes, Kathleen? and husband in Yorkshire in 1946. A friend who had known him since his early youth, if not childhood, attempted to inform police anonymously at first then by walking into a police station, that the ripper was in fact PS. His wife was of eastern european origin if I remember. PS had several brothers and sisters. How on earth could there have been an identity change? I don't know how Archer and femme worked up greasy pole - ( feel that it is probably more a case of being hauled up it by the neck if one shows the appropriate qualities), but Aitken surely had the background to be there without recourse to blackmail - even if this was one of his many talents. I don't know anything about the Sythes you refer to, and so far have found very little on gen. sources, so to be honest, this has me more baffled than enlightened.

by **emad** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 2:54 pm

The whole official spin about Sutcliffe, his official family, his background and relations are pure counter-intelligence. He was taken in by a family as a baby and all normal adoption/fostering procedures were circumvented/ignored. The Sutcliffe family was given financial help with the baby and brought him up with siblings as if all was normal. Given his actual parentage, it is not surprising the levels of secrecy and disinformation that were piled on to his life, starting a long time before he was even suspected of being involved in his murderous career. There was a protracted investigation by UK intelligence services about this while the Ripper was on remand awaiting trial for the murders he committed. In the end a deal was done to exclude any/all reference to this background, and his solicitor and barrister had to sign the official secrets act in agreement. If you study the legal hearing transcripts you will see that some parts of the hearing were held in camera with the judge insisting on the most draconian reporting restrictions being placed about this. Needless to say there is zilch about this on the internet or in any archived press reports. However, UK newsletter Defence Intelligence Monitor WAS raided by the Special Branch in 1984 when it published a series of articles about Sutcliffe, his true ID and parentage, along with the results of DNA lab tests and a paper trail of bank account payments to the Sutcliffe family since PS's infancy. A D Notice was placed on the Monitor although a subsequent court battle saw it lifted and some horsetrading done on a promise not to republish the articles during the Ripper's actual birth mother's lifetime. The amount of time, energy and subterfuge that Thatcher devoted to the concealment of this saga during her UK premiership is documented in classified files relating to House of Windsor material. Another exellent example of such a cosy arrangement relates to the official spin that surrounded Princess Margaret's supposed affair with divorcee Group Captain Peter Tonwshend and her apparent attempt to try to marry him. ALL that was hogwash, a spin campaign to cover up that she had had an affair with Ronald Reagan and had got pregnant, had the baby - a boy - and been made to adopt him. THAT offspring is none other than former Poodleman Northern Ireland Secretary and now UK's EU trade commissioner Peter Mandelson. He too was 'placed' into a suitable family and a whole life history and new ID invented for him and around him. And all the documentation about this nasy saga is also classified under House of Windsor files. As for Archer, he was Thatcher's fixer in all blackmail scenarios relating to House of Windsor chicanery. His apparent ability to liaise with organised crime on the payroll of Thatcher's security/intelligence services made him invaluable as her hatchet man. The Saville Enquiry into collusion between UK military and terrorists on both sides of the Irish political spectrum is a good example of how this worked. Both he and Mary have since re-invented themselves, sealing the deal as part of Poodle's Good Friday Agreement with the IRA. As for Mary, her cover role as a bona fide academic chemist, travelling to international symposia and educational conferences concerned with solar physics was ideal. However, she was caught trying to pass classified information from the UK's atomic weapons research labs in Aldermaston to North Korean intermediaries who were on Robert Maxwell's payroll. The final destination of her booty was a child medical research facility in North Korea where disabled, congenitally deformed or abandonned babies/children had been dumped into supposed state care and who were being used for medical experimentation on potential "cures" for radiation sickness. When a WHO-accredited inspector was allowed access to one of these 'facilities' she found that normal, healthy twins and triplets had also been used, allegedly as 'controls' in the experiments, but treated no better than the other children who had been dumped because they were deemed as being incurable. EDIT: Addendum JENZ: my background posts about all this refer: SEE: <a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessage?topicID=2097.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...2097.topic</a> MY: 1)the ole rumours hitler escaped..UK Official Secrets Act 2)Re Why replace old Nazi bushes with the lookalikes? 3)Not just an impostor... 100% willing participant Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=emad@rigorousintuition>emad</A> at: 12/16/05 12:35 pm

by **jenz** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 4:46 pm

So defence intelligence monitor crops up again as source, and this is only available at Brit mus. or now not at all? Much of what you say, unsupported by docs I can refer to sounds so far out as to trigger alarm bells. if I had not had a jangling sound in my ears over these people for a while I wouldn't be so curious. the north korean med experiments has sent a shiver down my spine, because it was along these lines that my thoughts had been running, though with only hunches based on unsupported testimony from someone in a vulnerable situation. so I'm grateful for your replies and anything you can add.

"Lady" Mary Archer

"Lady" Mary Archer

Re: "Lady" Mary Archer

Re: "Lady" Mary Archer

forgery

Mary Archer

Re: "Lady" Mary Archer

restraining order?

Re: "Lady" Mary Archer

patience

Convicted Tory perjurers Jeffrey Archer & Jonathan Aitke

bloody hell

Jenz: re bloody hell

somewhat baffled

Re: somewhat baffled

DIM

Who is online