What constitutes Misogyny?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: What constitutes Misogyny?

Postby Canadian_watcher » Sat Mar 05, 2011 12:35 pm

crikkett wrote:You responded with a condescending remark that didn't seem to address what I actually wrote, but in which you write that I am clueless about economic power.


guilty. and now that I've done that, I apologize and offer observations based on what I think, not on what you wrote, but rather riffing off of that which you wrote.

This whole plumber/day care worker debate is important to me. I reject the following ideas:

1. That day care workers have a more pleasant life in general than plumbers. This plays into the fallacy that raising children is a joy and involves no hard, dirty work.
2. that money doesn't help a person to be happy. This notion is based on a rich person's idea of money and not a poor person's idea of money.
3. that one job is more important than another in our society. This is a very fundamental element of all power dynamics - the ranking of labour.

I know you didn't go near to saying anything related to point number 3 but I feel that your other statements do reflect that you've bought in to the fallacies inherent in points #1 and #2.
Satire is a sort of glass, wherein beholders do generally discover everybody's face but their own.-- Jonathan Swift

When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him. -- Jonathan Swift
User avatar
Canadian_watcher
 
Posts: 3706
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 6:30 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: What constitutes Misogyny?

Postby Hammer of Los » Sat Mar 05, 2011 12:42 pm

I am a childcare provider. And a homemaker. Really, I am a 1950's housewife. Except I'm not of the female gender. Actually, I run a small guest house for one other adult and two children. All three residents require my constant attention when present, and my chores occupy my time when they are not.

I might retrain as a plumber, though. Although I think it would take more than two weeks. Perhaps more women ought to take up plumbing. I am certain that some do, at least here in the UK.

But to be honest, I think that comparing child care providers with plumbers on any basis whatsoever, is going to tell you very little about misogyny.

In addition, there is such a thing as overstating a case. It won't do anyone any good to start hating men for hating women. And doesn't it go without saying that not all men are misogynists? "All men hate women." Does that seem like a sound proposition to you? Because it doesn't to me. To suggest that all men hate women is a sort of empty rhetoric, I feel.

I don't doubt that our culture systematically discriminates against women though. I suppose it is largely run by and for men. Originally I suppose that would have had to do with the simple fact of the greater physical strength of the male.

I favour equality I must admit, not seeking to prefer one gender against the other.

But obviously women are nicer, on the whole. A lot of men are really not terribly nice at all.
Hammer of Los
 
Posts: 3309
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 4:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: What constitutes Misogyny?

Postby compared2what? » Sat Mar 05, 2011 1:16 pm

In addition, there is such a thing as overstating a case. It won't do anyone any good to start hating men for hating women. And doesn't it go without saying that not all men are misogynists? "All men hate women." Does that seem that like a sound proposition to you? Because it doesn't to me. To suggest that all men hate women is a sort of empty rhetoric, I feel.


Please pay attention. I implore you. The issue is not male hatred of women. It is not fundamentally about sex, relationships, dating or push-up bras. It is not a boy-versus-girl problem. No one is accusing, indicting or yelling at men generally, or a man in particular. And no one seeks to deprive plumbers of a single one of their advantages over babysitters, be it their wages, beauty, charm, or influence.

It's about the adversity specifically faced by girls and women at every stage of life, in multiple spheres, in every culture on earth, for all recorded history.

Although, needless to say, narrowing that down a little for conversational purposes is probably a good idea.
_________________________-

PLEASE NOTE: The adversity specifically faced by girls and women at every stage of life, in multiple spheres, in every culture on earth, for all recorded history is NOT mutually exclusive of the adversity specifically faced by boys and men at every stage of life, in multiple spheres, in every culture on earth, for all recorded history.

Thanks for listening!
“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.” -- Rand Paul
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: What constitutes Misogyny?

Postby Canadian_watcher » Sat Mar 05, 2011 1:19 pm

compared2what? wrote:
In addition, there is such a thing as overstating a case. It won't do anyone any good to start hating men for hating women. And doesn't it go without saying that not all men are misogynists? "All men hate women." Does that seem that like a sound proposition to you? Because it doesn't to me. To suggest that all men hate women is a sort of empty rhetoric, I feel.


Please pay attention. I implore you. The issue is not male hatred of women. It is not fundamentally about sex, relationships, dating or push-up bras. It is not a boy-versus-girl problem. No one is accusing, indicting or yelling at men generally, or a man in particular. And no one seeks to deprive plumbers of a single one of their advantages over babysitters, be it their wages, beauty, charm, or influence.

It's about the adversity specifically faced by girls and women at every stage of life, in multiple spheres, in every culture on earth, for all recorded history.

Although, needless to say, narrowing that down a little for conversational purposes is probably a good idea.
_________________________-

PLEASE NOTE: The adversity specifically faced by girls and women at every stage of life, in multiple spheres, in every culture on earth, for all recorded history is NOT mutually exclusive of the adversity specifically faced by boys and men at every stage of life, in multiple spheres, in every culture on earth, for all recorded history.

Thanks for listening!


thank you. I was just washing some walls & hoping someone was going to explain this better than I can. (literally washing walls.. it's not a metaphor.)
Satire is a sort of glass, wherein beholders do generally discover everybody's face but their own.-- Jonathan Swift

When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him. -- Jonathan Swift
User avatar
Canadian_watcher
 
Posts: 3706
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 6:30 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: What constitutes Misogyny?

Postby compared2what? » Sat Mar 05, 2011 1:57 pm

Nordic wrote:Actually it wasn't just you, it seems that particular statement of mine got a wide response from a fair number of people, which is why I wanted to go on the record and state that it was meant in a humorous way, so the reactions could perhaps stop and we could spend our valuable time talking about things that actually mattered.

You bring up something I have been meaning to add to this thread, which others have touched upon, and that is that women often treat men as if we have no feelings. We are expected to watch every nuance of what we say, including our tone of voice, our body language, every little thing, yet women seem to feel a complete freedom in spouting off whatever the hell they feel like saying to us, no matter how hurtful, and expect us to have no emotional wounds from it whatsoever.

Men do have feelings. As much as women do.


While I couldn't speak for all women (or even most women) on a subject that kinda requires a subjective knowledge of individual attitudes, I can say that in my experience and among women known to me, those expectations and beliefs and practices would be regarded as frankly insane.

As well as precisely opposite to a very broadly stated and generalized truth along the same general lines that doesn't apply to all men by any means, and which I therefore present with an a priori proviso and a full advance concession of whatever qualifications anyone wants to make to it:

Men are so heartbreakingly, hopelessly and excessively sensitive to just about all perceived and real criticism, rejection and/or abandonment by women and have so much unaddressed guilt and fear and anger and performance anxiety about sex and have so few resources and coping mechanisms for dealing with those feelings that (loosely speaking) it's generally either pointlessly cruel or pointlessly dangerous to raise those issues and/or a host of associated issues with them at all directly. In those terms or, for that matter, even closely related terms.

Because no matter how carefully, lovingly, impartially, or non-critically you do it, they just go into a complete state of defensive meltdown immediately. They are, in fact, that thin-skinned. So the conversations all end up like this thread. Women try to say something about themselves, then spend the next eternity soothing, handling, wrangling with, or expiating themselves for whatever brutal thing about men the men who heard them thought they said.

I think -- although as I said, I have no way of knowing -- that most women know that better than most men do.

In any event. It always goes that way. Every single time. And it really is heartbreaking, first and foremost. As well as frustrating, both on one's own behalf and as a matter of love and consideration for the man and/or men, assuming a relationship in which that's present.

If you have any ideas about how that might most constructively be approached, please share them.
“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.” -- Rand Paul
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: What constitutes Misogyny?

Postby barracuda » Sat Mar 05, 2011 2:17 pm

compared2what? wrote:Because no matter how carefully, lovingly, impartially, or non-critically you do it, they just go into a complete state of defensive meltdown immediately. They are, in fact, that thin-skinned.


BULLSHIT!!!
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: What constitutes Misogyny?

Postby brainpanhandler » Sat Mar 05, 2011 2:29 pm

barracuda wrote:
compared2what? wrote:Because no matter how carefully, lovingly, impartially, or non-critically you do it, they just go into a complete state of defensive meltdown immediately. They are, in fact, that thin-skinned.


BULLSHIT!!!



HA! But seriously, how about men just grow the fuck up? That might not be a constructive approach, but short of a wholesale reevaluation of all values that's what I got.

c2w wrote:In any event. It always goes that way. Every single time. And it really is heartbreaking, first and foremost. As well as frustrating, both on one's own behalf and as a matter of love and consideration for the man and/or men, assuming a relationship in which that's present.


I think it is almost a certainty that your experience of men and their response to you has some elements to it that are not generally speaking common. You're intimidating. No matter how hard you try not to be, you are. Merely by virtue of your intelligence you are going to illicit feelings of insecurity and all that entails. It's painful to watch you tippy toe around and dumb down in order to find a way to get past the defensiveness and build a bridge of communication.

I fucking resent it, on your behalf.
"Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." - Martin Luther King Jr.
User avatar
brainpanhandler
 
Posts: 5114
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:38 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: What constitutes Misogyny?

Postby charlie meadows » Sat Mar 05, 2011 3:20 pm

(At least two) Boys have cooties.
(Some) Boys have cooties.
(Many) Boys have cooties.
(Most) Boys have cooties.
(Nearly all) Boys have cooties.
(All) Boys have cooties.

(At least two) Girls have cooties.
(Some) Girls have cooties.
(Many) Girls have cooties.
(Most) Girls have cooties.
(Nearly all) Girls have cooties.
(All) Girls have cooties.

Discuss...
charlie meadows
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 7:31 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: What constitutes Misogyny?

Postby Nordic » Sat Mar 05, 2011 3:39 pm

compared2what? wrote:Men are so heartbreakingly, hopelessly and excessively sensitive to just about all perceived and real criticism, rejection and/or abandonment by women and have so much unaddressed guilt and fear and anger and performance anxiety about sex and have so few resources and coping mechanisms for dealing with those feelings that (loosely speaking) it's generally either pointlessly cruel or pointlessly dangerous to raise those issues and/or a host of associated issues with them at all directly. In those terms or, for that matter, even closely related terms.

Because no matter how carefully, lovingly, impartially, or non-critically you do it, they just go into a complete state of defensive meltdown immediately. They are, in fact, that thin-skinned. So the conversations all end up like this thread. Women try to say something about themselves, then spend the next eternity soothing, handling, wrangling with, or expiating themselves for whatever brutal thing about men the men who heard them thought they said.
.



Interesting take. Having never been in a romantic relationship with a man, at least not a two-sided one (that was a joke), I'll have to take your word on that, to a point.

I would just like to add that men and women are sensitive about different things.

I had to tell my stepdaughter some time ago that the worst thing she could ever call a man was a "loser". For women, it seems the worst thing you can do is criticize her weight or her appearance.

So criticizing a man for his level of income is the same as criticizing a woman for being overweight.

I live in close quarters, and interact directly, in both my professional and my personal life, with a lot of rich people. I mean, super rich, entire neighborhoods of them. Whenever I have to dive into that world, I feel like the fat chick at a Victoria's Secret modelling fitting or something. It's really tough on a guy's self esteem to be surrounded by nothing but wealthy men.

My point of this is to say, as a response to your missive, that women perhaps don't understand what it is that makes a man emotionally hurt.

The biggest one is to criticize him for his economic situation, his job, his income. This is like us saying you "look fat" or "you know you'd look so much better if you lost a few pounds".

The other is the loyalty thing. Guys are like dogs, they travel in packs with each other, there's usually an alpha involved, and they're expected to be loyal as dogs in these situations. When we take a vow to be loyal to a woman, we expect the same in return. So when a woman suggests "maybe we should just split up" or hits you with that "I'm not sure this thing is working with us" or whatever, we are devastated. I've been with women who have later admitted they did this just for attention. But to us, that's the worst punch in the gut you can imagine.

Dogs and cats.

This thread is turning into a 24/7 dinner party. First thing I did when I got up this morning was check into this thread. WTF?
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: What constitutes Misogyny?

Postby JackRiddler » Sat Mar 05, 2011 3:50 pm

compared2what? wrote:Men are so heartbreakingly, hopelessly and excessively sensitive to just about all perceived and real criticism, rejection and/or abandonment by women and have so much unaddressed guilt and fear and anger and performance anxiety about sex and have so few resources and coping mechanisms for dealing with those feelings that (loosely speaking) it's generally either pointlessly cruel or pointlessly dangerous to raise those issues and/or a host of associated issues with them at all directly. In those terms or, for that matter, even closely related terms.

Because no matter how carefully, lovingly, impartially, or non-critically you do it, they just go into a complete state of defensive meltdown immediately. They are, in fact, that thin-skinned. So the conversations all end up like this thread. Women try to say something about themselves, then spend the next eternity soothing, handling, wrangling with, or expiating themselves for whatever brutal thing about men the men who heard them thought they said.

I think -- although as I said, I have no way of knowing -- that most women know that better than most men do.


Conceded.

.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: What constitutes Misogyny?

Postby compared2what? » Sat Mar 05, 2011 3:56 pm

Stephen Morgan wrote:I wasn't so much thinking about what you thought of what I was writing, as of how I was writing it. What sort of attitude towards those with whom I correspond may be imputed to me. Specifically in your first post to Nordic you were condemning society for creating in him a mindset which causes him to react to talk of misogyny with, I suppose, a sort of objectification of women. I was wondering if you think I fall into the same category, and whether you see me as being, say, dismissive towards people.


The short answer is: No, not at all. And I strongly suspect that there's a longer answer, too.

But I have no idea what it is, because immediately after supplying me with "No, not at all," my mind plunges straight off a cliff into a bottomless pit of shy, self-conscious uncertainty and begins struggling -- serially, alternately, and infinitely -- with a piteous, inarticulate wish to please and the harshly implacable conviction that it's as presumptuous for a being as inherently (if non-specifically) low and repellent as I am even to entertain such a wish as it would be laughable were I to attempt to act on it.

Which is about as one hundred percent inimical to the consideration of others as all interior psychodrama inevitably is, obviously. So if I ever emerge from it with something to say that I'm reasonably confident is about you rather than me, I'll let you know.
_________________

It's kind of hairsplitting, since I know you didn't intend to suggest otherwise, particularly. But just to be on the safe side wrt potentially sensitive matters, I don't think of you or Nordic or anyone else as falling into a category, really. I mean wrt your personal and/or individual and/or essential attributes. Some instances of speech and action by individuals are congruent with (or maybe representative of) categorical ideological systems -- eg, misogyny -- but persons themselves are inherently uncategorizable by definition, imo.

But there's not really any way of getting around that entirely, unless you're writing lengthy doctrinaire political tracts or something, I don't think. It's just a persistent vocabulary problem afflicting the language of politics and other comprehensively ideological systems overall.
“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.” -- Rand Paul
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: What constitutes Misogyny?

Postby 82_28 » Sat Mar 05, 2011 3:59 pm

Haha. One thing me and my GF do when we're in good enough moods to fuck with people is go into swanky boutiques, Victoria's Secrets and shit and pretend like I'm "taking my lady on a shopping spree".

Me: (walking up to clerk/salesperson with GF behind me acting obedient) Uh, yeah do you guys have anything that can fit her? (my GF is a "little heavy")

Clerk: (eyes open wide in surprise) Of course we do.

Then she takes us around and shows us a bunch of shit we're not gonna buy in a hundred years anyways. Then we leave and laugh our asses off.

We do the same thing at jewelry stores. We walk in, looking all white trash and I loudly say, "Alright, pick something out and let's get the fuck out of here. I'm sick of shopping" Or we find the most stupid, heinous silver deer with diamonds and emeralds on it and begin to ask questions.

Also swanky restaurants are really fun to have fake fights in about shit that never happened.

Friendship! That's key. You wouldn't believe the funny shit me and my lady have done.
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: What constitutes Misogyny?

Postby 82_28 » Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:05 pm

Here's a starter for starting a fake fight in a restaurant with all kinds of people enjoying their expensive wines and food and shit.

"So, I went into the office today and Watson told me you had sex with him last week."

And then go from there. The best way to enjoy a night out with your sweetie evar! I suggest everybody try it.

"LOL"
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: What constitutes Misogyny?

Postby Canadian_watcher » Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:12 pm

charlie meadows wrote:(At least two) Boys have cooties.
(Some) Boys have cooties.
(Many) Boys have cooties.
(Most) Boys have cooties.
(Nearly all) Boys have cooties.
(All) Boys have cooties.

(At least two) Girls have cooties.
(Some) Girls have cooties.
(Many) Girls have cooties.
(Most) Girls have cooties.
(Nearly all) Girls have cooties.
(All) Girls have cooties.

Discuss...


you are getting at the point that generalizing is a bad thing. I agree with that for the most part. I mean it's okay to generalize about things, and even people sometimes. Like for instance: the stuff they sell at the mall is crap and people who work at the mall are never going to make very much money working there. We shouldn't really have to go around qualifying EVERYTHING, or else what I just said would be much more cumbersome because I'd have to explain that I knew I was making a generalization and then list some possible exceptions.

The fact is, though, that on this very thread there are some very specific examples that you didn't address. You are focusing on the generalities you are seeing at play here. Fair enough, focus on what you want to. BUT, for the conversation to move forward we have to recognize that some generalities are going to be made, some stereotypes are going to be mentioned, and imprecise language will be used in the pursuit of getting at the bigger picture. If we keep stopping every time someone makes such a faux pas to dissect how they in general tend to interfere with debates of all kinds then we're just going to go in circles. I would like to see us acknowledge/challenge any specific examples (if we must point them out in the first place) and then move forward.
Satire is a sort of glass, wherein beholders do generally discover everybody's face but their own.-- Jonathan Swift

When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him. -- Jonathan Swift
User avatar
Canadian_watcher
 
Posts: 3706
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 6:30 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: What constitutes Misogyny?

Postby crikkett » Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:13 pm

82_28 wrote:Here's a starter for starting a fake fight in a restaurant with all kinds of people enjoying their expensive wines and food and shit.

"So, I went into the office today and Watson told me you had sex with him last week."

And then go from there. The best way to enjoy a night out with your sweetie evar! I suggest everybody try it.

"LOL"


Young people pull stunts like that. It's daring, since youngsters don't always anticipate how someone will act when deliberately provoked.

And another thing: I'm glad you're friends with your lady.
crikkett
 
Posts: 2206
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:03 pm
Blog: View Blog (5)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 183 guests