'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much worse

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby Pele'sDaughter » Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:48 pm

Bruce Dazzling wrote:Should I post this here, or in the Fuck Obama thread?

Decisions, decisions...

BP Oil Disaster: Obama Administration Tightens Lid on Dolphin Death Probe
Published on Saturday, March 26, 2011 by Reuters
by Leigh Coleman

BILOXI, Mississippi - The U.S. government is keeping a tight lid on its probe into scores of unexplained dolphin deaths along the Gulf Coast, possibly connected to last year's BP oil spill, causing tension with some independent marine scientists.

A bottlenose dolphin breaks the surface off Florida in this 2009 photo. Wildlife biologists contracted by the National Marine Fisheries Service to document spikes in dolphin mortality and to collect specimens and tissue samples for the agency were quietly ordered late last month to keep their findings confidential.

The gag order was contained in an agency letter informing outside scientists that its review of the dolphin die-off, classified as an "unusual mortality event (UME)," had been folded into a federal criminal investigation launched last summer into the oil spill.

"Because of the seriousness of the legal case, no data or findings may be released, presented or discussed outside the UME investigative team without prior approval," the letter, obtained by Reuters, stated.

A number of scientists said they have been personally rebuked by federal officials for "speaking out of turn" to the media about efforts to determine the cause of some 200 dolphin deaths this year, and about 90 others last year, in the Gulf.

Moreover, they said collected samples and specimens are being turned over to the government for analysis under a protocol that will leave independent scientists in the dark about the efficacy and outcome of any laboratory tests.

TRANSPARENCY UNDERMINED?

Some researchers designated as official "partners" in the agency's Marine Mammal Stranding Network complained such constraints undermine the transparency of a process normally open to review by the scientific community.

"It throws accountability right out the window," one biologist involved in tracking dolphin deaths for more than 20 years told Reuters on condition of anonymity. "We are confused and ... we are angry because they claim they want teamwork, but at the same time they are leaving the marine experts out of the loop completely."

Some question why the Marine Fisheries Service, a branch of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA, has taken so long to get samples into laboratories.

"It is surprising that it has been almost a full year since the spill, and they still haven't selected labs for this kind of work," said Ruth Carmichael, who studies marine mammals at the independent Dauphin Island Sea Lab in Alabama.

"I can only hope that this process is a good thing. I just don't know. This is an unfortunate situation."

NOAA officials expressed sympathy but insisted the control and confidentiality measures were necessary.

"We are treating the evidence, which are the dolphin samples, like a murder case," said Dr. Erin Fougeres, a marine biologist with the Fisheries Service. "The chain of custody is being closely watched. Every dolphin sample is considered evidence in the BP case now."

METHODICAL APPROACH

Blair Mase, a marine mammal scientist for NOAA, said lab results would go directly back to the Fisheries Service in about two to three months.

"We have to be very methodical," Mase said. "The criminal investigation does play a role in the delay of findings, but it has to be done this way."

As of this week, scientists have counted nearly 200 bottlenose dolphin carcasses found since mid-January along the shores of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida, about half of them newly born or stillborn infants.

That tally, about 14 times the numbers averaged during that time of year between 2002 and 2007, coincides with the first dolphin calving season in the northern Gulf since BP's Deepwater Horizon drilling rig exploded last April.

The blast killed 11 workers and ruptured a wellhead on the sea floor, dumping an estimated 5 million barrels (206 million gallons) of oil into the Gulf over more than three months.

Nearly 90 dead dolphins, most of them adults, washed up along the Gulf Coast last year in the weeks and months following the blowout.

The latest spike in deaths, and high concentration of premature infants among them, has led some experts to speculate that oil ingested or inhaled by dolphins during the spill has taken a belated toll on the animals, possibly leading to a wave of dolphin miscarriages.

But most of the specimens collected bear no obvious signs of oil contamination, making lab analysis crucial to understanding what caused the deaths.

Mase said the carcasses also are considered potential evidence in the natural resources damage assessment being conducted in conjunction with civil litigation pursued against BP by the government simultaneously with the criminal probe.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... eaths.html

Gagging order on scientists probing dolphin deaths as U.S. builds criminal case against BP

Scientists probing the deaths of baby dolphins in the area affected by last year's BP oil spill have been ordered by the government not to speak about the project.

Wildlife biologists who have been contracted by the National Marine Fisheries Service to investigate a huge rise in dolphin mortality this year must keep their findings confidential.

The gagging order was imposed because the review of the deaths is part of the federal criminal investigation into last year's BP disaster.

A letter sent out to senior scientists who are not working on the project and are baffled by the silence, said: 'Because of the seriousness of the legal case, no data or findings may be released, presented or discussed outside the investigative team without prior approval.'

About 90 dolphins died last year, but this year the toll has jumped to 200 already.
Dr. Erin Fougeres, a marine biologist with the Fisheries Service, said: 'We are treating the evidence, which are the dolphin samples, like a murder case.

'The chain of custody is being closely watched. Every dolphin sample is considered evidence in the BP case now.'

The secrecy has angered many in the scientific community who are used to making their findings public and the free flow of information, Reuters reports.

One biologist, who has been tracking dolphin deaths for more than 20 years and does not want to be named, said: 'This throws accountability right out the window. We are confused and angry because they claim they want team work, but at the same time they are leaving the marine experts out of the loop completely.'

The Fisheries Service is a branch of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, (NOAA).

Blair Mase, a marine mammal scientist for NOAA,said: 'We have to be very methodical. The criminal investigation does play a role in the delay of findings, but it has to be done this way.'

The 200 carcasses, nearly all bottlenose dolphins, have been found along the shores of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida.

Nearly half of them are either newly born or stillborn infants.

It is the first dolphin calving season in the northern Gulf since BP's Deepwater Horizon drilling rig exploded last April.

Five million barrels (206 million gallons) of oil spewed into the Gulf after the blast which ruptured a wellhead on the sea floor and killed 11 workers.

Some experts are speculating that the oil ingested or inhaled by dolphins during the spill has taken a belated toll on the animals, possibly leading to a wave of dolphin miscarriages.

Aside from the criminal investigation Miss Mase said the carcasses also are potential evidence in a review of the damage to natural resources from the spill and the civil litigation case being pursued against BP.
Don't believe anything they say.
And at the same time,
Don't believe that they say anything without a reason.
---Immanuel Kant
User avatar
Pele'sDaughter
 
Posts: 1917
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:45 am
Location: Texas
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby eyeno » Thu Apr 21, 2011 5:08 pm

I had forgotten about Hutchinson. I like him. He is always up to some far out stuff and very intelligent.




Oil Cleanup Confounds Coast Guard with Hutchison Solution
http://pesn.com/2011/02/13/9501764_Coas ... ison_Says/
A report published last Friday by the US Coast Guard says they've reached a point where the disruption from their clean-up efforts is on a par with just leaving the oil as it is. They have ignored eccentric John Hutchison's scientist-validated success in clearing the water back to a near pristine condition using a non-invasive method of radio frequencies and sound waves.




by Sterling D. Allan
for Pure Energy Systems News


According to the Associated Press, last Friday the US Coast Guard announced in a report that the cleanup of oiled beaches along the Gulf of Mexico has reached a point where crews, heavy equipment and thorough scrubbing can cause more damage to the ecosystem than good. Birds, sea turtles, fish and other species are more likely to be harmed by an aggressive cleanup than by simply leaving remnants of oil and letting it slowly degrade, the Coast Guard said. They are therefore in process of stopping the processing of cleanup operations on the beach sands of Alabama, Florida, Mississippi and Louisiana.

My associate Paul Noel writes:

The sad truth about the Gulf of Mexico is that nothing is cleaned up. Every time a storm wave ruffles the sea bed in the area, it will bring up tons more of the poisonous chemicals and spread them around.

Recently I met the owner of a BP station in Huntsville, Alabama and I let on to him that while I had nothing against him, I am angry with BP. He said that he hated BP. He owns beach front property in Orange Beach, Alabama. He hasn't been able to rent the property one day since the oil started spilling. The fact is that the sea creatures are so full of oil that the fish have meat that is weak and which tastes bad. Nothing is safe.


Now we are seeing reports that the NOAA sea surveys are finding fresh oil plumes leaking in the area. The sea bed appears to have been sufficiently unsettled due to the drilling that the sea is now leaking more oil in quantity. This fact cannot be verified in scale but BP continues to spray Corexit in the area. One can hardly imagine a reason for this unless the situation is still unstable.

Medical reports from North Florida indicate that large numbers of persons exposed to the Gulf waters are now coming down with illnesses corresponding to the damages of Corexit and from petroleum compounds; in particular benzene, xylene and menthyl complex compounds. Some evidence exists that this may have penetrated inland a considerable distance and contaminated the ground water.

There is good news in all of this, namely that John Hutchison and Nanzy Lazaryan continue to make progress, albeit on a small scale, in their Gulf-clearing operations that are not recognized or officially supported by the government, but which are far more effective and non-damaging than anything that the government is officially supporting.

The methods the government has been supporting are so damaging that now they have announced that they have apparently reached point where they should cease "clean-up" since the damage from clean-up has reached a point of being as detrimental as just leaving the oil as it is.

John's method of using sound and radio frequencies nearly eliminates the oil and toxins completely, and has no known dangerous side effects. They can clear a radius of about a mile in one 24-hour session. Dolphins come up and seem to thank them for what they are doing.

Here is a letter of endorsement that John forwarded to me the other day, from a scientific validation establishment:

ANALYTICAL CHEMICAL TESTING
LABORATORY, INC.

Consulting Chemists, Scientists, & Engineers

January 27, 2011

To: US CUSTOMS &
U.S. BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION
And/or any other party:

Reference: Mr. John Hutchison- Frequency Exposure Affects
BP Oil Spill

Analytical Chemical Laboratory, Inc. (ACT) has completed the analysis of water samples and sediment samples from many instances where John Hutchison has implemented the use of an Interferometer to send frequencies into oil affected bodies of water. Generally speaking, his work has had a very positive affect on numerous bodies of water and affected areas. ACT Lab technical staff has personally witnessed clean, green water bodies as a result of his efforts. ACT has documented the affect his treatment has had on these water bodies which include Perdido Bay, Dauphin Island, Cotton Bayou, and Indian Pass. I would plead with anyone concerned about the situation in the Gulf of Mexico, to allow him to continue his work to restore the Gulf to pre-spill conditions. He has undertaken this task with little help from Government entities, and ACT Lab has given full support with analytical testing to help document his results, and the great success he is having with the frequency treatments. The task he is undertaking is immense and he needs to be allowed to use his technology for the betterment of the entire Gulf of Mexico. While very complicated, his technology seems to be the only attempt known of its kind to help restore Oil/dispersant- affected water-bodies. He must be allowed to continue this work.

Based on testing performed from samples received, his frequency exposure resulted in the complete removal of Oil and Grease from the after treatment sample source tested in Perdido Bay, and great reductions in Cotton Bayou, Dauphin Island, and Indian Pass. ACT recommends that doubters investigate this process further to determine large-scale capabilities in cleaning water bodies and areas affected by the dissolved oil/dispersant in water.

This applied Frequency Exposure process may have extreme value in the removal of petroleum contamination from a large body of water. It is the opinion of this analyst that the persons involved with this process could have a very serious positive effect on the removal of hydrocarbon contamination from bodies of water. These individuals should be allowed to remain in this country to offer their services to State and Federal Agencies, and Municipalities. I would like to recommend that interested parties be open-minded to their capabilities because some petroleum contamination likely exists in all Gulf of Mexico water sources/bodies.

Because this process has proven to be capable of petroleum clean-up, it should be given an opportunity to be showcased to any interested party, including The US Federal Government, US EPA, Homeland Security, as well as BP and any other interested State Environmental Agencies. The process has been proven to be an excellent manner to approach the petroleum-contaminated water columns that are currently present in the Gulf of Mexico.

It is clear that all water bodies have been affected by the dissolved hydrocarbons. Solutions to this condition have not been presented as of the date of this writing. It is not clear what the impact of dissolved hydrocarbons in Gulf waters will mean. The treatment process John is using may help develop a clean-up plan that can reach a large-scale area.

The best and easiest-to-see example of water column contamination can be found in the lack of the existence of pole-mounted barnacles. These barnacles have become non-existent in every affected water-body seen by the undersigned, in the last several months.

While the technology is not completely understood by many non-physicists, it has been investigated by the undersigned, and he has been given positive feedback from technical persons, colleagues, and other scientists, including the undersigned, and it is clear that the process has extreme value. It should be given a chance to be presented and tested on a large scale basis. At this point the undersigned is not aware of any entity that has attempted to undertake the biggest remaining problem that currently exists in the Gulf of Mexico, which is water column contamination by dissolved petroleum due to dispersant use in the Deepwater Horizon Spill.

A laboratory (The Subra Company) has presented alarming data on the high presence of Oil-based hydrocarbons and Polynucleated Aromatic Hydrocarbons( PAH’s)… from 2,000 ppm to >10,000 p.p.m. …found to be present in shellfish and finned fish. ACT is conducting similar tests as well.

Your decision should be clear…allow John Hutchinson’s work to continue. He may be our only hope. This situation cannot be corrected by Mother Nature. It’s too much to ask. Once Southern winds start blowing submerged hydrocarbons to shore…and it will happen…his technology may become more necessary than ever. I would be pleased to discuss his technology with anyone.

We appreciate this opportunity to submit this information. If there are any questions, please feel free to call.
Very truly yours,

ANALYTICAL CHEMICAL TESTING LABORATORY, INC.
State of AL Certified Engineering Co. #CA-1936-E

Robert M. Naman, President, Analytical Chemist
E-Mail: robertnaman@aol.com
Fellow, American Institute
of Chemists, Reg. 15488

RMN/lcb

P.O. Box 161198 • Mobile, Alabama 36616 • 251.479.9205 • Fax 251.478.8181

So a major point of action here would be to contact the Coast Guard and other involved government agencies to encourage them to support John and Nancy's work.

# # #

This story is also published at BeforeItsNews.
What You Can Do

Pass this on to your friends and favorite news sources to have them cover it too.
Contact the Coast Guard and other involved government agencies to encourage them to support John and Nancy's work.
If you have beach property along the Gulf and are willing to let John and Nancy operate from your beach to clean up the region, contact Nancy (see contact info below).
If you have a barge you could let John and Nancy use, let them know, so they can speed up their work, operating from the water, rather than having to find friendly beach property.
We at PES Network are in a pinch right now. Donations would be greatly appreciated.
Subscribe to our newsletter to stay abreast of the latest, greatest developments in the free energy sector.

Links

http://www.restorethegulf.gov/release/2 ... onal-clean
RestoreTheGulf.gov Report
Coast Guard: Gulf cleanup should be scaled back - The cleanup of oiled beaches along the Gulf of Mexico has reached a point where crews, heavy equipment and thorough scrubbing can cause more damage to the ecosystem than good, the Coast Guard said Friday. Birds, sea turtles, fish and other species are more likely to be harmed by an aggressive cleanup than by simply leaving remnants of oil and letting it slowly degrade, the Coast Guard said. (MSNBC; Feb. 11, 2011)
http://blog.al.com/live/2011/02/federal ... beach.html

Related PESN Coverage

In reverse chronological sequence:

Featured: Nuclear > Remediation >
Hutchison Gives Instructions for Earth Radiation Shield from Japanese Fallout - John Hutchison and Nancy Lazaryan apparently they think that a network Ham Radio, CB radio and Tesla Coil operators could form a protective barrier, not just in the U.S., but worldwide, even in Japan, from the radiation that is spewing from the damaged reactors. (PESN; March 19, 2011)

Featured: Oil > Ecological Impact > Gulf Oil Disaster > Remedies > John Hutchison >
Oil Cleanup Confounds Coast Guard with Hutchison Solution - A report published last Friday by the US Coast Guard says they've reached a point where the disruption from their clean-up efforts is on a par with just leaving the oil as it is. They have ignored John Hutchison's scientist-validated success in clearing the water back to a near pristine condition using a non-invasive method of radio frequencies and sound waves. (PESN and BeforeItsNews; February 13, 2011)

Featured: Anti-Gravity > John Hutchison >
A chat with John Hutchison -- on anti-gravity and more - Walter has posted a dialogue he had with John while driving a couple of hours to their next Gulf waters pollution clearing work in Grand Isle. John reminisces about his experiences with anti-gravity and transmutation experimentation and reactions by neighbors, media, and government. (PESN; December 2, 2010)

Featured: Oil > Ecological Impact > Gulf Oil Disaster > Remedies > John Hutchison >
John Hutchison's interferometer - Two more videos have been posted about John Hutchison and Nancy Lazaryan's work in the Gulf coast to clear the waters via sound and radio frequencies. One video gives a close-up look at the apparatus. The other talks about the latest in the unfolding saga. (PESN; November 16, 2010)

Featured: Oil > Ecological Impact > Gulf Oil Disaster > Remedies > John Hutchison >
Coast Guard chases Hutchison away from clearing section of Gulf water - While clearing an area of oil- and Corexit-polluted water and air at Dauphin Island, the "command center" for the Coast Guard, who appear to be involved in the continued Corexit spraying, John Hutchison and Nancy Lazaryan were asked by the police to leave. (PESN; November 13, 2010)

Featured: Oil > Ecological Impact > Gulf Oil Disaster > Remedies > John Hutchison >
Colbern's EDX data confirms Hutchison-Lazaryan frequency generator clearing Gulf gunk - Scientific analysis of the water samples before and after treatment by the frequency generator apparatus designed by John Hutchison and Nancy Lazaryan shows alteration of the chemical composition of the dissolved solids in the seawater. (PESN; November 6, 2010)

Featured: Oil > Ecological Impact > Gulf Oil Disaster > Remedies > John Hutchison >
Happy dolphins update on Hutchison-Lazaryan frequency generator clearing polluted Gulf waters - Nancy reports that local captain of a boat that charters dolphin sightseeing tours, who had no idea what she and John Hutchison had done in treating the polluted waters with their radio/audio frequency generator, logged an entry concerning the change in the water and the dolphins being "happy". This was in a neighboring bay. (PESN; November 1, 2010)

Featured: Oil > Ecological Impact > Gulf Oil Disaster > Remedies >
Hutchison-Lazaryan frequency generator clears polluted Gulf waters - Famous anti-gravity researcher, John Hutchison, and his associate, Nancy Lazaryan, have come up with a device that emits a combination of audio and radio frequencies that have the effect of clearing waters polluted by oil and dispersant in less than 24 hours, bringing the native life back. (PESN; Oct. 27, 2010)

To communicate with the Hutchison-Lazaryan team, Nancy can be reached by email at nancylazaryan {at} yahoo.com. Her phone number is 850-227-6666
See also

Directory:BP's_Gulf_Oil_Volcano - index at PESWiki.com
Directory:Ecological Impact of Oil - index at PESWiki.com
Directory:Abiotic Oil - index at PESWiki.com
Directory:Oil - index at PESWiki.com
Directory:Best_Exotic_Clean_Energy_Technologies - index at PESWiki.com
More Stories by Paul Noel

PESN (Pure Energy Systems News) - Feature stories on cutting-edge, clean energy technology.
Free Energy News (.com) - Daily cutting-edge, clean energy technology news from around the world
PESWiki Latest - Newest feature pages in the publicly-editable energy directory.
This Week in Free Energy™ - Ten-minute recap each Sunday, 7:50 - 8:00 pm Mountain.
Free Energy Now (.net) - in-depth interviews
User avatar
eyeno
 
Posts: 1878
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:22 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby Iamwhomiam » Thu May 05, 2011 12:39 pm

Sorry about such late notice, but that's probably due to the EPA's unwillingness to have these important meetings well attended.

CONTACT:
EPA Press Office
press@epa.gov

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
May 5, 2011

FRIDAY: EPA Administrator to Head Gulf Ecosystem Restoration Task Force Meeting in Mobile, Ala.

WASHINGTON – On Friday, May 6, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa P. Jackson will convene an official meeting of the Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Task Force in Mobile, Alabama. The meeting will further the task force’s ongoing commitment to supporting the conservation and restoration of resilient and healthy ecosystems in the Gulf of Mexico.

Administrator Jackson will also hold a press availability at 12:15 p.m.

During the meeting, Jackson, a New Orleans native who chairs the task force, and other members will review progress on the group’s restoration strategy and provide ongoing guidance to intergovernmental teams on the timeline of actions and the objectives of the president’s executive order. Participants will provide an update on the work of the task force, which incorporates public input and recommendations from stakeholder engagement opportunities provided during the meetings in Pensacola and New Orleans, as well as those gathered during a series of listening sessions held in each state.

The Mobile meeting will be the latest in a series of meetings that the task force is holding throughout the five gulf states. The group is committed to ensuring ongoing input from gulf residents and local leaders throughout the strategy development process and will continue to receive feedback during this meeting.

President Obama issued an executive order in October to create the Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Task Force, continuing the administration’s ongoing commitment to the gulf region. The task force works to integrate federal restoration efforts with those of local stakeholders and state and tribal governments, and to facilitate accountability and support throughout the restoration process.

More information on the president’s executive order: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/10/05/executive-order-gulf-coast-ecosystem-restoration-task-force

Members of the public seeking to pre-register for this meeting should email gulfcoasttaskforce@epa.gov.


WHO: EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson

WHAT: Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Task Force Meeting

WHEN: May 6, 2011 – 8:00 a.m. - 2:30 p.m. CT
(Public Listening Sessions 2:30 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. CT)
Press Availability – 12:15 p.m. CT

WHERE: Renaissance Mobile Riverview Plaza Hotel
64 South Water Street, Mobile, Ala. 36602

More information on the task force or to pre-register for this meeting: http://www.epa.gov/gulfcoasttaskforce.

Note: If a link above doesn't work, please copy and paste the URL into a browser.

View all news releases related to water
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby Iamwhomiam » Sat May 07, 2011 1:22 am

CONTACT:
EPA Press Office
press@epa.gov

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 6, 2011

Gulf Ecosystem Restoration Task Force Creates Citizens’ Advisory Committee, Releases Restoration Priorities

EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson, joined by CEQ Chair Nancy Sutley, other task force members, hold official meeting today in Mobile, Ala.

WASHINGTON – U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa P. Jackson convened an official meeting of the Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Task Force today in Mobile, Alabama. During the meeting, the task force created a citizens’ advisory committee to help guide the group’s efforts and released a strategy background document outlining the priorities of the ongoing gulf restoration. The meeting in Alabama furthered the task force’s ongoing commitment to supporting the conservation and restoration of resilient and healthy ecosystems in the Gulf of Mexico.

Jackson proposed to establish and support a 25-member Gulf of Mexico Citizen Advisory Committee during the meeting, acknowledging the need to ensure residents and local organizations have a formal process to offer input and guidance on the work of the task force and to voice environmental concerns. The newly formed committee will hold its first official meeting later this summer.

“Since President Obama first formed this task force, our focus has been on collecting the ideas and input of gulf residents,” EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson said. “We’ve made clear that restoration plans should come from the gulf to Washington, and we’re counting on the people who know these areas best to shape our work through public meetings like this one, through the Citizens’ Advisory Committee and other efforts.”

During the meeting, the task force also identified four key priorities for the ongoing restoration of the gulf, including enhancing community resilience, restoring and conserving habitat, restoring water quality, and replenishing and protecting living coastal and marine resources. The priorities were developed based upon input from the general public and key stakeholder groups throughout the region. The task force plans for the priorities to serve as the main restorations goals and will identify specific actions to help to achieve these goals.

The Mobile meeting was the latest in a series of meetings that the task force is holding throughout the five gulf states. Previous meetings were held in New Orleans and Pensacola. President Obama issued an executive order in October to create the Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Task Force, continuing the administration’s ongoing commitment to the gulf region. The task force works to integrate federal restoration efforts with those of local stakeholders and state and tribal governments, and to facilitate accountability and support throughout the restoration process.

More information on the task force: http://www.epa.gov/gulfcoasttaskforce

Edited once to italicize text and to remove unnecessary last sentence advising you to copy and paste link above if found to be not working.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby beeline » Mon May 16, 2011 1:56 pm

Link

Taxpayers on the Hook for BP's Gulf Spill

By Elizabeth MacDonald

Published May 16, 201

The oil hearings last week revealed that BP (BP: 42.65, -0.28, -0.65%) is moving to cut its tax bill by about $11.8 billion by writing off the costs of its devastating oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico as an ordinary business expense, a spill which wreaked havoc on the Gulf, killed wild life and damaged the local economy.

BP booked $11.8 billion in tax savings in its fourth quarter as it partly wrote off the costs for the clean-up, the $20 billion victim compensation fund, and legal expenses.

Without the move, BP’s bottom line would have been deep in the red. BP says it has already taken a $40.9 billion total pre-tax charge to its income in 2010.

The oil company did not return calls or e-mail requests for comment.

Taxpayers are on the hook for about 29% of BP's overall costs, says Senate Democrat Bill Nelson of Florida, who has introduced a bill that would shut down deductions for legal, clean-up and other costs associated with oil spills in U.S. territorial waters as "ordinary and necessary" business expenses.

The legislation would apply to most of BP's expenses, Nelson has said.

Nelson says this bill was necessary, especially after BP itself vowed to not deduct such costs as "ordinary and necessary" business expenses. And especially after Boeing (BA: 78.26, -0.78, -0.98%) and Goldman Sachs (GS: 141.82, +0.36, +0.25%) didn't deduct similar costs after they got in trouble with the government.

All this unfolded at a testy hearing last Thursday of the Senate Finance Committee, where oil executives defended their lucrative profits and attempted to explain away rising gas prices.

Sen. Nelson began a line of questioning with BP America chairman and president Lamar McKay on whether the CEO thought it was justifiable that BP was attempting to take a tax write-off for costs associated with the spill.

In BP’s fourth quarter 2010 SEC filing. the company indicated it planned to generate $11.8 billion in tax savings as a result of the oil spill.

“Surely, the Gulf oil spill was the result of wrongdoing, and yet you want to claim that as a tax credit," Sen. Nelson said at the hearing. BP “may be entitled to this under the law, but that doesn't make it right."

But McKay said the company was not treating the expense deductions as a tax credit, and said the write-offs were justified as "standard business expenses."

However, Nelson said: "BP agreed to pick up the entire tab for cleaning the mess up the Gulf. Shifting these costs back to the taxpayer shouldn't be allowed."

Sen. Nelson also noted that in unrelated cases involving company wrongdoing Boeing and Goldman Sachs had voluntarily agreed not to deduct such things as legal expenses. Sen. Nelson said at the hearing that “ should consider changing the law to follow the example set by Boeing and Goldman Sachs.”

Boeing agreed to pay a $615 million fine to the U.S. government in 2006 to end a three-year federal investigation into its Pentagon contracting scandals.

The fine was the largest financial penalty ever slapped on a military contractor.

The Department of Justice had alleged that Boeing illegally obtained thousands of pages of confidential and proprietary documents from corporate rival Lockheed Martin Corp. to help it win Defense Department contracts to make rockets and other things. Justice had also alleged that Boeing illegally recruited a top Air Force procurement officer while she was simultaneously sanctioning contracts worth billions of dollars to Boeing.

And last year, Goldman Sachs agreed to pay $550 million to settle a civil suit filed against it by the Securities and Exchange Commission which alleged that the Wall Street investment bank had misled investors in touting subprime mortgage investments, while not disclosing it let John Paulson, a hedge fund manager, pick the assets for the same security which Paulson planned to bet against, or "short."

The fine was the largest in the history of the SEC, and came within a day of Congressional passage of the Dodd-Frank financial regulatory overhaul bill.
User avatar
beeline
 
Posts: 2024
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 4:10 pm
Location: Killadelphia, PA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby Nordic » Mon May 16, 2011 4:05 pm

beeline wrote:Link

Taxpayers on the Hook for BP's Gulf Spill

By Elizabeth MacDonald

Published May 16, 201

The oil hearings last week revealed that BP (BP: 42.65, -0.28, -0.65%) is moving to cut its tax bill by about $11.8 billion by writing off the costs of its devastating oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico as an ordinary business expense, a spill which wreaked havoc on the Gulf, killed wild life and damaged the local economy.

BP booked $11.8 billion in tax savings in its fourth quarter as it partly wrote off the costs for the clean-up, the $20 billion victim compensation fund, and legal expenses.

Without the move, BP’s bottom line would have been deep in the red. BP says it has already taken a $40.9 billion total pre-tax charge to its income in 2010.

The oil company did not return calls or e-mail requests for comment.

Taxpayers are on the hook for about 29% of BP's overall costs, says Senate Democrat Bill Nelson of Florida, who has introduced a bill that would shut down deductions for legal, clean-up and other costs associated with oil spills in U.S. territorial waters as "ordinary and necessary" business expenses.

The legislation would apply to most of BP's expenses, Nelson has said.

Nelson says this bill was necessary, especially after BP itself vowed to not deduct such costs as "ordinary and necessary" business expenses. And especially after Boeing (BA: 78.26, -0.78, -0.98%) and Goldman Sachs (GS: 141.82, +0.36, +0.25%) didn't deduct similar costs after they got in trouble with the government.

All this unfolded at a testy hearing last Thursday of the Senate Finance Committee, where oil executives defended their lucrative profits and attempted to explain away rising gas prices.

Sen. Nelson began a line of questioning with BP America chairman and president Lamar McKay on whether the CEO thought it was justifiable that BP was attempting to take a tax write-off for costs associated with the spill.

In BP’s fourth quarter 2010 SEC filing. the company indicated it planned to generate $11.8 billion in tax savings as a result of the oil spill.

“Surely, the Gulf oil spill was the result of wrongdoing, and yet you want to claim that as a tax credit," Sen. Nelson said at the hearing. BP “may be entitled to this under the law, but that doesn't make it right."

But McKay said the company was not treating the expense deductions as a tax credit, and said the write-offs were justified as "standard business expenses."

However, Nelson said: "BP agreed to pick up the entire tab for cleaning the mess up the Gulf. Shifting these costs back to the taxpayer shouldn't be allowed."

Sen. Nelson also noted that in unrelated cases involving company wrongdoing Boeing and Goldman Sachs had voluntarily agreed not to deduct such things as legal expenses. Sen. Nelson said at the hearing that “ should consider changing the law to follow the example set by Boeing and Goldman Sachs.”

Boeing agreed to pay a $615 million fine to the U.S. government in 2006 to end a three-year federal investigation into its Pentagon contracting scandals.

The fine was the largest financial penalty ever slapped on a military contractor.

The Department of Justice had alleged that Boeing illegally obtained thousands of pages of confidential and proprietary documents from corporate rival Lockheed Martin Corp. to help it win Defense Department contracts to make rockets and other things. Justice had also alleged that Boeing illegally recruited a top Air Force procurement officer while she was simultaneously sanctioning contracts worth billions of dollars to Boeing.

And last year, Goldman Sachs agreed to pay $550 million to settle a civil suit filed against it by the Securities and Exchange Commission which alleged that the Wall Street investment bank had misled investors in touting subprime mortgage investments, while not disclosing it let John Paulson, a hedge fund manager, pick the assets for the same security which Paulson planned to bet against, or "short."

The fine was the largest in the history of the SEC, and came within a day of Congressional passage of the Dodd-Frank financial regulatory overhaul bill.




Tried to share that story and here's what popped up. (never seen this before:)

Fox Business is requesting permission to do the following:

Access my basic information
Includes name, profile picture, gender, networks, user ID, list of friends, and any other information I've shared with everyone.
Send me email
Fox Business may email me directly at XXXXXXXX@verizon.net ·
Post to my Wall
Fox Business may post status messages, notes, photos, and videos to my Wall
Access my profile information
Birthday and Current City
Access my photos and videos
Photos Uploaded by Me and Photos and Videos of Me

Fox Business
6,350 users


Unfuckingreal!!!
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby Peachtree Pam » Fri May 27, 2011 10:42 am

Has anyone read this report mentioned by a poster on Florida Oil Spill Law, written by a Dr Tom Termotto, who is in hiding and fears for his life. It states that the Gulf Oil Spill was planned, that the corexit was pumped in to hide the oil and keep it underwater to disrupt and kill off the Gulf stream that warms Europe. He also says that BK Lim, who first began writing about the hoax BP was pulling, which supported Matt Simmons comments, has also had his life threatened.

He states flat out that Dr Manton and Matt Simmons were murdered. The charges against Dr Manton were fabricated.

Don't know what to make of this riveting report of the three oil wells, with the rov deliberately focussing on the wrong one - not the one where the oil was gushing out.

Anyway, it can be read here: http://phoenixrisingfromthegulf.wordpress.com/

Apologies if this has been posted before.
Peachtree Pam
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:46 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby 2012 Countdown » Fri May 27, 2011 10:58 am

Well, fyi, I just watched a local (N.O.) report on TV yesterday talking to shrimpers and fishermen in general who are very concerned about the drop off in catch. They all suspect the oil has killed some breeding grounds and food chain. Catches are down.
George Carlin ~ "Its called 'The American Dream', because you have to be asleep to believe it."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q
User avatar
2012 Countdown
 
Posts: 2293
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 1:27 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby 2012 Countdown » Fri May 27, 2011 2:45 pm

.
Catches down 50-60%!
Found a video report to post-
===============
Video - News

Dealers worry oil spill hurting shrimping in Barataria Bay
Posted on May 26, 2011 at 6:50 PM

Bill Capo / Eyewitness News

BURAS, LA - There was little reason to smile at Ditcharo's Seafood dock in Buras Thursday. Captain Kim Chamblin caught only 300 pounds of shrimp when he expected to catch one thousand. It was not even enough to pay the fuel bill.

"Probably burned $350 worth of diesel, so I'm working for the oil company, I ain't working for me," Chamblin said in disgust.

"I'm very worried," said Grand Isle Seafood Dealer Dean Blanchard, "I been worried, spent a lot of sleepless nights."

Major seafood dealers from Port Sulphur to Grand Isle say boats are bringing in shrimp so small they fall through the mesh on the conveyor belts, but the big worry is that few shrimp are being caught.

"Normally we'd be buying about three trailers a day, two to three, we're not even buying a trailer load," said Rocky Ditcharo of Ditcharo Seafood in Buras .

"Very scared, business is down about 50-60 percent," said E.J. Otero, of Ocean Shrimp in Empire.

"This is the worst we've ever had," added Eric Hansen of Chris Hansen Seafood in Port Sulphur. Been in business forty years."

Dealers say the impact seems confined to areas affected by the BP oil spill.

"I'm very worried," said Ditcharo. "It seems like all the Barataria Basin waters where these shrimp is mainly coming from is the most affected."

"Where the oil went, there's no shrimp, and where the oil went is some of our best fishing grounds in the United States really," said Blanchard.

"I'm worried that the shrimp are born in the deep water, and that's where all the oil and the dispersant was. I'm wondering if the oil and dispersant killed all the eggs," said Otero.

State Wildlife and Fisheries agents say they are hearing the concerns, but it will be mid June before they are able to get a definitive reading on how the start of this season looks. In the meantime they say they are investigating to see what problems might be out there."

"In typical years we had a high river, spillway opened up in '08, cold fronts, plenty years we had that," said Ditcharo.

But what happens if the season doesn't improve?

"Boats are tied up, bills come in, people aren't making their money," worried Hansen.

"Fuel is up, shrimp price is down. I'm really worried that we're in big trouble this year," said Otero.
------
2 min. video report at link-
http://www.wwltv.com/video?id=122687564&sec=554607
George Carlin ~ "Its called 'The American Dream', because you have to be asleep to believe it."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q
User avatar
2012 Countdown
 
Posts: 2293
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 1:27 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby Nordic » Fri May 27, 2011 2:49 pm

Yeah, and who would want to eat that shrimp anyway?

I sure won't.

I won't eat shrimp at all any more unless I absolutely know it didn't come from the gulf.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby 2012 Countdown » Fri May 27, 2011 2:55 pm

To be honest, I don't blame you. I used to eat shrimp about every other day. Not to go all Forrest Gump, but there are a lot of delicious shrimp recipies. Now its shrimp every other week. Crabs too -unless its lake crabs (Ponchartrain) that I know where they were caught.
George Carlin ~ "Its called 'The American Dream', because you have to be asleep to believe it."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q
User avatar
2012 Countdown
 
Posts: 2293
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 1:27 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby Peachtree Pam » Fri May 27, 2011 4:27 pm

Thanks for the update 2012.

It just seems to me that the GOM "oil spill" was yet another attempt to cut off food, destroy lives due to the effects of corexit, the methane, and the radiation aspects of this disaster.

It is not known how far inland this extends. The report I posted also seems to indicate that low-level earthquakes are also a part of the repercussions from the BP spill, having an affect on the New Madrid fault.
Peachtree Pam
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:46 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby 2012 Countdown » Mon May 30, 2011 10:59 am

You are most welcome, and in fact, I thank you for following/keeping an eye on this. I'd always thought living here, I may suffer the decline of the Empire, but would never go hungry. I'm still not going hungry, but not eating oysters, shrimp, fish, etc. is antithetical to our existence here. They're killing us all.
George Carlin ~ "Its called 'The American Dream', because you have to be asleep to believe it."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q
User avatar
2012 Countdown
 
Posts: 2293
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 1:27 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby Bruce Dazzling » Mon Jun 20, 2011 10:04 am


BP Wins a Big One in Oil Spill Litigation
By SABRINA CANFIELD

NEW ORLEANS (CN) - Ruling in favor of Transocean and BP, a federal judge on Thursday dismissed third-party environmental claims in a giant pleading bundle in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill litigation, saying the fact that the oil flow has stopped makes those lawsuits irrelevant.

"The injunction at this stage would be useless, as not only is there no ongoing release from the well, but there is also no viable offshore facility from which any release could possibly occur," U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier wrote. "The Macondo well is dead, and what remains of the Deepwater Horizon vessel is on the ocean floor, where it capsized and sank in 5,000 feet of water.

"Moreover, BP and the agencies comprising the Unified Area Command have been and are cleaning up the Gulf of Mexico. An injury is not redressable by a citizen suit when the injury is already being addressed."

Judge Barbier is overseeing the massive, consolidated oil spill litigation, which has been divided into "bundles," based upon the nature of the claims.

In instances where claims in the D1 bundle pertain to how the oil is being cleaned up, Barbier ruled that even if he allowed those claims to go forward, the claimants are not directly involved in the cleanup, so a ruling in their favor would not affect how the cleanup is progressing.

"The D1 defendants do not unilaterally direct the cleanup activities in the Gulf; such activities have been under the control of the National Incident Commander, Federal on-Scene Coordinator, Unified Area Command, and the Coast Guard in cooperation with other federal agencies. Thus, plaintiffs cannot show that an order from this court would actually resolve any potential deficiency in the ongoing cleanup," Barbier wrote.

"In order to prevail on their claims for injunctive relief, plaintiffs must demonstrate an ongoing violation of various statutes on which plaintiffs' claims for relief is based. Because the Macondo well is dead and is no longer discharging oil, plaintiffs' only claims are confined to seeking environmental citizen suit injunctive relief of a prospective nature to stop noncompliance in the form of a continued release of oil. Thus, the citizen suit claims brought by the plaintiffs are moot, because no future-orientated injunction can provide any meaningful relief for plaintiffs in terms of stopping discharges that already concluded in mid-July 2010."

Transocean's Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, operated by BP, exploded and burned 50 miles off the Louisiana coast on April 20, 2010, killing 11 and setting off the worst oil spill in history. Millions of gallons of oil were spilled in the next 87 days.

More than 100,000 people have filed lawsuits seeking damages from the spill.

The lawsuits dismissed on Thursday belonged to the D1 pleading bundle.

D1 bundle claims were filed by third-party organizations that alleged environmental damages under the Clean Water Act; the Endangered Species Act; the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act; and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act.

This was the first ruling arising from issues addressed during a May 26 hearing on the defendants' motions to dismiss particular bundles.

Claims with varying types of damages were included in more than one bundle, depending on type of claim.

In dismissing the D1 claims, Barbier said the claims could still be heard if they seek damages for violations other than environmental claims.

"To the extent that plaintiffs assert claims under general maritime law and/or state law, the court will consider those claims separately when it addresses the pending motions to dismiss the B1 bundle master complaint," Barbier wrote.

During the May 26 hearing, Barbier indicated that he might find the claims asserted in the D1 bundle were moot.

"The fundamental argument is that this is all moot because the well is sealed," Barbier said.
During the hearing, Ervin Gonzales, of the plaintiff steering committee, said the cleanup has not been adequate and "the environment is suffering."

Greg Buppert, an attorney for Defenders of Wildlife, told Barbier at the hearing that "the Endangered Species Act is not linked to the well spill; it is linked to the take of species."

In response, Barbier cited the federal government's investigation of the spill. Federal attorneys have said that criminal charges will be filed if the investigation turns up evidence of willful negligence by the defendants.

Because of the continuing investigation, the government has tried to keep certain issues undercover. For instance, autopsy results of the hundreds of dead baby dolphins that have washed up along the Gulf Coast have been kept private, and independent scientists have not been allowed to conduct their own autopsies.

"Isn't that what the federal government is doing?" Barbier asked on May 26. "It sounds like you think they may not do it right."

Later that day, Barbier told Buppert: "It's speculative right now. You're surmising that somebody is going to do something that you don't like."

Attorneys did not immediately return calls for comment.
"Arrogance is experiential and environmental in cause. Human experience can make and unmake arrogance. Ours is about to get unmade."

~ Joe Bageant R.I.P.

OWS Photo Essay

OWS Photo Essay - Part 2
User avatar
Bruce Dazzling
 
Posts: 2306
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:25 pm
Location: Yes
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'Not for public': the oil spill may be getting much wors

Postby Project Willow » Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:18 pm

User avatar
Project Willow
 
Posts: 4798
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Seattle
Blog: View Blog (1)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 168 guests