wordspeak2 wrote: Cui Bono? The entire global fascist capitalist apparatus. Neo-nazis are used as patsies.
I'm now starting to lean more than way...I didnt want to believe Gladio was being activated again
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
wordspeak2 wrote: Cui Bono? The entire global fascist capitalist apparatus. Neo-nazis are used as patsies.
JackRiddler wrote:MacCruiskeen wrote:I'm just a bit baffled as to why you would discount the likelihood that he had any sympathisers in obscure high places, e.g., among the intelligence agencies, or in the armed forces, or at certain levels of the police hierarchy. These are the kind of places where reactionary, right-wing, authoritarian "thought" tends to flourish, in any society. And the extreme right is far from non-existent in Scandinavia.
I don't. If that's so, we're likely to see evidence of it. The families of the dead as you say are themselves elite, and they are a great many and without a doubt angry beyond what we can conceive, as well as devastated. They're talking to each other. If there's evidence, they won't be silent. I'm not sure we have seen such evidence, so far. So far, the police and counterterror response seems to have been according to the likely protocols for it, not incompetent per se, but geared more to military and hostage situations, rather than a rampage killing in an enclosed space by a completely unrestrained gunman (or gunmen). Honestly, they no doubt had plans for everything we or they can think of, but do you think they had a plan for an attack on the Utoya island teenager camp? (Another huge difference from 9/11, where we now know that exercises simulating hijack planes crashbombing into the WTC itelf were being prepared in the week prior, and scheduled for the day after. Among countless other red flags.)
.
kenoma wrote:stickdog99 wrote:kenoma wrote:Searcher08 wrote:
You are putting a model of 1940s Hollywood-based American / Brit 'individual takes charge in a crisis, bangs heads together and makes things happen' onto a Scandanavian response.
"They wouldnt wait if someone needed it."
Yes they would, if that was the consensus
Particularly if there was a procedure for it and 'Health and Safety' said lives might be at risk for not following it. Given it was uncertain how many gunmen there were, that he was killing people in the water, the decision to wait for non-police forces doesnt seem strange to me at all.
Yeah. this is plausible.
The response time of the police may well prove to be a tragic disgrace, but I don't see why it has become the shibboleth by which one's cop-loving gullibility or healthy scepticism should be judged.
Even if the cops had arrived with alacrity, Breivik would still have killed tens of youths. That's not disputed. The political and psychological aims of the massacre, whateer they prove to be, would still have been achieved. There is not some magical number of fatalities by which a madman's rampage crosses over to deep-political psyop.
So it's not how many kids who died that matters, it's whether it's a conspiracy?
You're a fatuous idiot. You know exactly what point I was making.
barracuda wrote:stickdog99 wrote:This is the current official timeline as provided by the cops the themselves!
What is your source that the Wikipedia article is the official police timeline? The events you are referencing seem to be sourced at your link to a Norweigian news website, Dagbladet.Laodicean wrote:It's insulting comments like this from you especially (bringing the "belief" thing from c_w's thread you locked) that make me not want to post here anymore.
Read through the post of yours I was responding to and decide for yourself if my mild sarcasm, if it can even be called that, was uncalled for. Personally, I thought I was demonstrating great patience. This argument has been going on for twenty-odd pages now, and seems no closer to settlement outside of some new evidence we have yet to see.
And, fwiw, the closest helicopter that the Contingency Platoon Delta has available to them is in Rygge, Moss. That is roughly twice the distance from Oslo to Utøya, and requires a standing fifteen-minute ready time. I pointed this out earlier in the thread, but apparently the logistics under examination by the authorities in the face of this incident failed to impress you. So be it.
MacCruiskeen wrote:On that Norwegian lakeside, for example, the most ordinary people imaginable functioned remarkably well & efficiently as emergency search-and-rescue teams, not because they had worked out some ace hyperprofessional hotshot Contingency Plan in advance, but simply because they did the obvious when they realised that children were in mortal danger: they actually gave a damn and did their best to help them. Above all, quickly.
Have we landed in DU's 9/11 dungeon?
stickdog99 wrote:And it bothers me a tad that I'm stranded on an island taking fire for this stance.
Laodicean wrote:barracuda wrote:stickdog99 wrote:This is the current official timeline as provided by the cops the themselves!
What is your source that the Wikipedia article is the official police timeline? The events you are referencing seem to be sourced at your link to a Norweigian news website, Dagbladet.Laodicean wrote:It's insulting comments like this from you especially (bringing the "belief" thing from c_w's thread you locked) that make me not want to post here anymore.
Read through the post of yours I was responding to and decide for yourself if my mild sarcasm, if it can even be called that, was uncalled for. Personally, I thought I was demonstrating great patience. This argument has been going on for twenty-odd pages now, and seems no closer to settlement outside of some new evidence we have yet to see.
And, fwiw, the closest helicopter that the Contingency Platoon Delta has available to them is in Rygge, Moss. That is roughly twice the distance from Oslo to Utøya, and requires a standing fifteen-minute ready time. I pointed this out earlier in the thread, but apparently the logistics under examination by the authorities in the face of this incident failed to impress you. So be it.
You are not worth my time, barracuda. You really aren't. And neither is this place anymore from where I'm sitting. I've asked Jeff to delete my account. Have fun with your continued baiting of posters here with your so called "mild sarcasm". You can go fuck yourself.
A genuine thank you to the rest of the RI posters here who've shown what this place needs more of in their moderators - respect.
Cheers.
stickdog99 wrote:Canadian_watcher wrote:stickdog99 wrote:I think this thread has provided ample evidence that the youngsters on Utøya were phoning and texting their friends and relatives within minutes of the shooting spree. Does anyone still disagree with this? If so, then do you think all the kids and parents who reported this are part of some massive conspiracy? If not, then how can you account for the fact that the police claim that they did not learn about the attack until the shooting spree had gone on for more than 19 minutes?
I'm going to give this a shot:
1. There are reports from the kids on the Island that they had trouble getting their cell calls through to anyone.
But there are also several reports of kids whose texts got through immediately. What do you think their parents were doing with that information?
stickdog99 wrote:
Sure, I do. But everyone here seems to be missing the point I am making. I'm not really considering what the greater ramifications of this attack are at the moment. I'm just pissed that the cops sat back and let a number of kids die, and then lied about it. And it bothers me a tad that I'm stranded on an island taking fire for this stance.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 171 guests