Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
eyeno wrote:Anders Behring Breivik, who has confessed to the twin attacks in Norway on July 22, claims he called police during the massacre of 69 people on the island of Utoeya, his lawyer has told Norwegian public broadcaster NRK.
This number reminds me of the concept of "twinning". Breivik's blonde hair and resemblance to Assange eerily sticks in my mind...still. People don't have to be identical twins from birth to be twinned in the occult do they?
Harvey wrote:Anyone make anything of this twitter account? One post made on the nineteenth, 3 days before. Look at the account name:
http://twitter.com/#!/91177227
nathan28 wrote:eyeno wrote:Anders Behring Breivik, who has confessed to the twin attacks in Norway on July 22, claims he called police during the massacre of 69 people on the island of Utoeya, his lawyer has told Norwegian public broadcaster NRK.
This number reminds me of the concept of "twinning". Breivik's blonde hair and resemblance to Assange eerily sticks in my mind...still. People don't have to be identical twins from birth to be twinned in the occult do they?
If you can't see how this pseudooccultist obfuscation is exactly part of the fucking problem that led Breivik to cite again and again the American loony Christian right and nostalgic authoritarian pseudopopulism to support a project to blame the global economic crisis of neoliberalism on women engaging in casual sex, which in turn led him to kill dozens of unarmed left-wing adolescents whom he undoubtedly saw as somehow feminine, if you refuse to acknowledge the the real significance lies in the fact that no one in the Obama administration has queued Robert Spencer, Pam Gellar or Geert Wilders for drone-based assassination for "promoting terrorism", if that all falls by the wayside because like another infamous figure momentarily on the world-stage Breivik also has typically Scandinavian features, well, I'm not sure what compels your fantasies to take on the tinge of a boring fascistic mistaken-identity soap opera just right for trivializing the actions of reactionary extremists across the globe, but if that's all you can occupy your mind with, enjoy it.
Peachtree Pam wrote:
Police found flasks filled with benzine in the trees. The head of the (swat forces) told this to Der Spiegel. He said he did not know what Breivik's plan was with these flasks. Der Spiegel wondered if he planned an inferno ending of fire.
Why the West Can’t Resist This Norway Massacre Psy-Op
By Stone Pinkerton
21st Century Wire
How do you define bizarre in today’s every increasingly wacky world of terrorism? Ever since the Cold War was won and history ended, we have been inundated with a seemingly never ending succession of spectacularly staged terror attacks and carefully crafted psy-ops.
This recent Norway Massacre is the latest in a series of high profile terrorist attacks which have succeeded only in inching societies worldwide further towards the final goal-line of an ever expanding global police state. Operation GLADIO 2.0? Whether you know it or not, it is rapidly unfolding before your eyes.
Recently joining the fold of public enemy number one stars, is a Scandinavian pin-up named Anders Breivik AKA “Andrew Berwick”. In case you missed it, he went on an epic rampage this past weekend.
As terrorists go, his media profile is about as slick as they come, even more refined than Osama bin Laden, scripted to the last detail and with plenty of collateral material. If he survives custody, his protracted trial will almost certainly be something along the lines of OJ Simpson meets Slobo Milosevich...
... FINAL THOUGHTS ON PSY-OPS
Any successful psy-op can achieve real results in terms of political and media distraction, and at its best, it can gain previously difficult to obtain political ground. Doing all that can be relatively easy after an event, compared to before it. Like 9/11 showed us, this dreadful occurrence has already demonstrated its way of disabling people’s ability to think critically and ask the necessary questions to determine who was indeed- behind the deed. Who benefits? What synchronicity do we see with other geopolitical and economic event currently in play?
One obvious result of such a massacre is the ramping up in security and a further license for all law enforcement to take a more aggressive approach in the pre-crime apprehension of virtually anyone. Certainly now, the Norwegian police will arrest anybody suspected of carrying a gun or knife, or anyone deemed to be suspicious-looking.
The ripple effects of such an event are rapid. Only two days later, the UK Prime Minister David Cameron announces that Britain is taking “extremely seriously” claims by the man believed responsible for killing more than 70 people in Norway that he had links with far-right groups in England, namely newly touted right-wing demon, and now notorious English Defense League. The mish-mash overlap of European groups looks like a throwback to the days of the dreaded Red Brigades, the P2 Lodge, Gladio and dare I say, Carlos the Jackal – yes, those wild days when disaffected East German students would risk life and limb to fight for the PLFP in Europe and the Middle East, whilst carrying freelance hit jobs to destabilise OPEC for the pleasure of a country like Iraq, who were actually being encouraged by the CIA to start a war with Iran. Those were the days…
The Norway talking points are already being circulated as we speak. Experts are saying the following: We need more security. Gun ownership is dangerous. Right wing thinkers could be dangerous. Multiculturalism in Europe may have back fired.
This of course will mean a full reclassification of all political activists and causes. The social re-evaluation may not stop there- it just might include anyone who holds an opinion on virtually anything. We also learned from agent Breivik that now the far-right are being anti-this, and anti-that. This will no doubt be seen by the authorities as an exciting new developement in the profiling of far-right mass killers. If you are anti-gay you are bad, or don’t like no prayer in schools you are bad etc. This can be extended to include anything, like the lack of support for the supposed war on terror. In this brave new world, it seems wrong to have an opinion that differs from being ultra liberal. Think outside “the box” ? Well, you are bad, very bad.
Because the perp in this case, Anders Breivik, is a white skinned, blonde haired pin-up model, and appearing to be 100% politically motivated by reports in the media, the mob will tend towards an apologist or sympathetic tone- and they clearly are doing this. A side note here: Anders is certain to receive thousands of love letters and marriage proposals from disaffected lonely western women- particularly from females residing in the UK, US and Canada.
But let’s not kid ourselves here: if he had been a Muslim, then the experts and political operators would have already firmly denounced his agenda and be steadfast in defending “western values” (anyone’s guess what those are). We will even defend vice, depravity and slandering other faiths in the face of any terrorist that possesses a markedly Eastern or Islamic bent. Ditto if he was a white, gun-toting militia from Indiana- in the new politically correct glossary, this is equal to a Muslim in the eyes of any mainstream politician or news pundit who thinks they can gain some political kudos for denouncing anyone who demonstrates a right to carry arms or does not worship at the altar of the state.
Either way, they are simply ‘terrorists’, and as Ronald Reagan taught us some 30 years ago, “We don’t negotiate with terrorists”, regardless of what their political agenda might happen to be. But Anders… well, he’s different. He’s not a Muslim.
Hence, Anders Breivik has not been classified as a pure terrorist by the media mob, rather he has already been officially labeled as a “political extremist”. This is an important detail when we consider the talking points that will be rolled out over the next few weeks. These talking points will form the thrust of social conditioning which the public will undergo as a result of the Norway massacre event.
Here is the other point of a psy-op like this one. It’s easy to be Anders Breivik. Very easy, so we are told. It is not hard to buy fertilizer. It is not hard to buy 55 gallon drums. It is not hard to pour fertilizer into those drums and add diesel to them. It is not hard to load them into a van. It is not hard to drive a van. It is not hard to park a van. It is not hard to initiate an M60 fuse igniter. It is not hard to walk to a car you parked nearby yesterday or the day before. It is not hard to drive to an island. It is not hard to slaughter a crowd of unarmed young people on that island. Anyone can apparently do it, and so can you.
That makes you a potential terrorist. Indeed, here in lies the functionality of the psy-op.
All eyes are on you now.
By all accounts, this is a false flag psy-op with some real legs on it, and may run for years. This one should be interesting to say the least.
barracuda wrote:Bruce Dazzling wrote:Do you see any evidence of tampering in either of these, 'cuda?
I spent some time looking, inverting, applying filters such as "find edges" and the like, and all I can honestly say is that in an image as degraded by jpeg compression artifacting as this one is, just about anything could be the case. Anyone who tells you that they know for certain that those images have been altered is confirming a bias imho, because I see nothing that jumps out at me. And we now have four separate images of the same scene, all relaying extremely similar data, with no conflicts as far as I can tell.
The image above is the oddest one, because of the frontal pose, the red eye effect and the centering of the figure within the window. But is it pasted in? To me, evidence of manipulation is unconvincing. Look closely at the bright green and red compression artifacts around his eyes. I can't for the life of me understand why these would have been inserted in a fake, they are natural occuring debris, and similar greenish flecks are found near the driver's ear and hair, in the reflection under the rearmost window, and even a bit around the thin wire antenna to the upper far left. I don't see faking it in the pixels, and don't understand the purpose or the motive that would require it. But again, it's impossible to be sure without an earlier generation image.
eyeno wrote:what happened to wombat's post in which he indicated that the people that want to take down assange and the people backing olso explosion were one and the same? i lost it and wanted to reply to it.
Harvey wrote:The why, is where my argument fails. I simply can't see a motive.
lupercal wrote:Harvey wrote:The why, is where my argument fails. I simply can't see a motive.
Harvey it's very odd that you mention that because these pics, even to a rank amateur, do look ridiculous, like somebody used MS Paint to put a smiley headshot into the cop car, but as you say, why would do they that?
Well the weird thing is, I looked at a video of "Breivik" being brought into that car, in what what looked like a basement garage, then the car driving out with a gaggle of photographers clicking and flashing away, much like the DSK perp walk, but at night, and there was no actual walk. I was trying to figure out how tall he is and what kind of haircut he has, to match him with the bald shooter, but what's weird is that I couldn't get a good look at Breivik either getting into the car or driving by.
In other words, even though there's video, and the video shows a bunch of photographers who would presumably alert us if it wasn't this guy, I never actually saw his face. So I'd have to suppose it's possible that Happy Red Polo isn't the guy they put in the car, which would explain why these pics look so, well, let's say so surreal.
Harvey wrote:Can't find where you said you had twenty years photoshop experience, presume you've edited it away.
Let's agree to disagree.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 186 guests