by Dreams End » Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:38 pm
I'd urge caution in studying COS. There's plenty of fire under that smoke..there has to be. But I'm pretty sure a lot of it is not exactly as it appears.<br><br>However, if you don't see the role of sex "scandals" in maintaining the power structure, you'd be missing a very large boat.<br><br>Who outed the "Call Boy" scandal in D.C. in 1989?<br><br>Cult leader and likely intelligence creation, Sun Myung Moon via his Washington Times. <br><br>What happened to that story, which should have been a field day for anti-Bush "liberal media" types?<br><br>Died almost immediately.<br><br>What happened to Craig Spence, the man behind the prostitution ring and allegedly filming all the power players in their encounters?<br><br>Suicided.<br><br>I think the pattern is: rightwing intel networks set up and utilize these sex rings (whether using minors or adults) for blackmail purposes. Sometimes, when necessary, they throw a few bones out to the public as with the Call Boy thing, or with Foley. The "liberals" (or Socialists in Belgium) stay pretty much silent, as they are also implicated. The far right then uses the revelations to fuel their agenda. <br><br>This isn't really a "secret government" style thing as I'm guessing that many implicated in these scandals are true believers in the first place, or at least self-absorbed assholes who will do whatever it takes to get and maintain power. But it's another tool in the toolbox.<br><br>If you continue to cooperate you get power and access to whatever sexual goodies you are into, and if not, you get thrown under the bus for public disgrace and perhaps even arrest.<br><br>Also remember the Finders. They had definite CIA ties...in fact the CIA called off the investigation of them with a "it's one of our ops that 'went bad' so cease investigation." <br><br>This is part of HOW they do what they do...or one part of how they do it.<br><br>The fact that CoS is becoming popular on Youtube, however, also has my spider sense tingling a bit. I think that there is an effort to energize more reactionary elements against Bush to ensure that when he's brought down there isn't a genuine populist movement that threatens the power structure. Or worse, to usher in a more reactionary group than we already have...<br><br>While I worry about military coups or more subtle fascist power grabs, I think the most likely scenario is that anything and everything is being pushed, promoted and "leaked" to knock Bush from power. My next blog post will be a summary of how this was done by our CIA (actually a secret sub group) in Australia in the 70's. Not a shot fired, but leaks and media assets brought to beat which brought down an entire government. <br><br>So we may just end up with a Kerry or a Clinton as our "saviors". Yay, rah....go team.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>