Nobody here seems to have any issue with masturbation, but porn is surely just an optional extra for that activity - wanking wont stop if porn vanishes, and theres error in conflating the two.
compared2what? wrote:..I'd say that if an argument can't be made that pornography in and of itself is categorically unsafe, violent, illegal or harmful to someone, then by default it is one part of a more complex whole that is good for us. ..
Hiya c2w, fab to read you again.
If we're talking about modern commercial 'mainstream' porn, then yes i'd say it is harmful to someoneS, namely both the producers (my mere opinion, no experience) and the consumers (1st hand).
Porn embodies and illustrates some really ugly power relationships - women are usually cast in gross dehumanising sterotypes, money is frequently used to rationalise/escape responsibility ('she'd do anything for $' = economic violence), and nowhere is there any respect for vulnerability or intimacy or really any truely positive emotions apart from lust.
Consuming/seeing-thinking-imagining such material inevitably colours the experience of the consumer - railroads it along power-abuse tracks, feeding that ugly side that is in us all. I have no problem with media portraying bodies or sexual acts of any kind among consenting adults - except when that media overwhelmingly glorifies violence of some kind or another, which i think most porn does.
"Wintler2, you are a disgusting example of a human being, the worst kind in existence on God's Earth. This is not just my personal judgement.." BenD
Research question: are all god botherers authoritarians?