Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
seemslikeadream wrote:barracuda wrote:seemslikeadream wrote:There is only one holocaust deniel that anyone cares about here
It's just that everyone here loves the Jews so much, they can't stop talking about them.
it's not the love that being closely watched for here but carry on and as long as this thread continues we will all be reminded over and over and over and over again that RI is not an anti-semitic Jewish holocaust denying website
Simulist wrote:Simulist wrote:Murder is a crime, and it's wrong. But unless I'm grossly misinformed on the subject, the Holocaust was "the Final Solution" to exterminate every Jewish man, woman, and child. To utterly wipe the Jewish people from the face of the earth.
Because of this, I see few crimes that compare in (A) intent, or (B) scope — if any.
Is this not true?
seemslikeadream wrote:compared2what? wrote:seemslikeadream wrote:bluenoseclaret wrote:Thanks Alice
He still waits with regard to Ireland.
Kro
me too....but some holocausts are much more important than others
Not to me. I oppose them all equally.
But you're entitled to your partialities and prejudices, I suppose.
Cheers.
you and others here may oppose them equally but one would be hard pressed to verify that sentiment with actual RI threads on the subject ...but you are entitled to your partialities and prejudices, I suppose....Ad nauseam
Slainte
slimmouse wrote:Which particular holoclaust are you referrring to c2w ?
Would that be the only known holocaust amidst every current "reputable" historical source ? The only holocaust mentionable in current rhetoric ?
I assume so.
seemslikeadream wrote:compared2what? wrote:seemslikeadream wrote:bluenoseclaret wrote:Thanks Alice
He still waits with regard to Ireland.
Kro
me too....but some holocausts are much more important than others
Not to me. I oppose them all equally.
But you're entitled to your partialities and prejudices, I suppose.
Cheers.
you and others here may oppose them equally but one would be hard pressed to verify that sentiment with actual RI threads on the subject ...but you are entitled to your partialities and prejudices, I suppose....Ad nauseam
Slainte
compared2what wrote:
So I guess what I'm saying here, SLAD, is:
If you'd kept your big, slobbery Irish cry-baby mouth shut, there'd be two-plus fewer pages of search results for you to count. ________________
Of the remainder, I can see at a glance that a bunch of them are from a thread on which Alice and I were both arguing against expanded Holocaust education; that a significant further number occur in words not written by me; that a few don't even refer to the -- or any -- Holocaust; and that none of them constitutes whining, imposing, or otherwise insisting on the primacy of one genocide over another.
Did I already tell you to go fuck yourself?
If not: Go fuck yourself.
eyeno wrote:Don't speak for me. You don't do it well.
I"ve said over and over that I like jewish people. What is being done in jewish people's name is not cool. All jewish people may suffer for this, again. How many times should we go through this, in the name of the jewish people? I am asking YOU this question. As a jewish person do you seriously want to take the blame for all this? I didn't think so...If I were jewish I certainly would not take the blame for it. Atzmon is trying to shield judaism from zionism. This is not complicated.
compared2what? wrote:seemslikeadream wrote:compared2what? wrote:seemslikeadream wrote:bluenoseclaret wrote:Thanks Alice
He still waits with regard to Ireland.
Kro
me too....but some holocausts are much more important than others
Not to me. I oppose them all equally.
But you're entitled to your partialities and prejudices, I suppose.
Cheers.
you and others here may oppose them equally but one would be hard pressed to verify that sentiment with actual RI threads on the subject ...but you are entitled to your partialities and prejudices, I suppose....Ad nauseam
Slainte
Here are the search results for my username, plus "genocide." So knock yourself out counting how many were in comments made by me and to what they referred; and how many were made by others and were agreed to explicitly or implicitly by me, and to what they referred. I don't have time to get to it right now, but I'm confident about what the results will be.
http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/sear ... mit=Search
Here are the search results for my username, plus "holocaust":
http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/sear ... F&start=30
One of the first thing you may notice is that the first two-plus pages are from this thread, which represents a statistical upsurge of exponential proportions over my overall use of the word. And you also may notice that I've referred to the H-H-H-olocaust many, many more times in the last two months than I had in the entire, preceding four years.
And would you like to know what prompted me suddenly to start mentioning that I acknowledged that particular little reality, in which I'd never shown any very sustained or serious interest of any kind before, little Miss Erin-Go-Fuck-Yourself?
YOU GOT IT!
It was you.
After you started pitching your repellent little series of tantrums (starting shortly before this thread, IIRC) about how oppressed this board was by constant (largely non-existent) whining about the Holocaust (and, to be fair, the degree of popular acclaim with which it was met) I FELT OBLIGATED to make a conscious decision to start mentioning it in neutral terms as an acknowledged historical fact, purely out of respect for the memory of the numerous relatives I have who died therein.***
So I guess what I'm saying here, SLAD, is:
If you'd kept your big, slobbery Irish cry-baby mouth shut, there'd be two-plus fewer pages of search results for you to count. ________________
Of the remainder, I can see at a glance that a bunch of them are from a thread on which Alice and I were both arguing against expanded Holocaust education; that a significant further number occur in words not written by me; that a few don't even refer to the -- or any -- Holocaust; and that none of them constitutes whining, imposing, or otherwise insisting on the primacy of one genocide over another.
Did I already tell you to go fuck yourself?
If not: Go fuck yourself.
__________________________
***And just to start out my little private project of quietly admitting to the Holocaust with maximum consideration for others here, I actually went out of my way to make sure that my very first use of the term was contextualized by immediately following it with an argument that the word "zionazi" was a legitimate political reference to the Holocaust. Right here:
http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/view ... st#p452163
But, of course, that only led to this:slimmouse wrote:Which particular holoclaust are you referrring to c2w ?
Would that be the only known holocaust amidst every current "reputable" historical source ? The only holocaust mentionable in current rhetoric ?
I assume so.
Because you can't put nuthin' over on that slimmouse.
Incidentally, every word of that is true. I have been deliberately mentioning the Holocaust in measured terms, purely in response to you.
Or, more accurately, purely out of a combination of the private respect for my dead that I naturally feel and the equally natural wish to avoid feeling more of the shame that my silence in the face of your shitting, pissing, and vomiting on their memories had made me feel. And yet, I didn't want to get in your stupid ugly face about it any more than I could avoid. Of course. Because you're entitled to your feelings, too.
Also: Go fuck yourself.
Simulist wrote:seemslikeadream wrote:barracuda wrote:seemslikeadream wrote:There is only one holocaust deniel that anyone cares about here
It's just that everyone here loves the Jews so much, they can't stop talking about them.
it's not the love that being closely watched for here but carry on and as long as this thread continues we will all be reminded over and over and over and over again that RI is not an anti-semitic Jewish holocaust denying website
I repeat:Simulist wrote:Simulist wrote:Murder is a crime, and it's wrong. But unless I'm grossly misinformed on the subject, the Holocaust was "the Final Solution" to exterminate every Jewish man, woman, and child. To utterly wipe the Jewish people from the face of the earth.
Because of this, I see few crimes that compare in (A) intent, or (B) scope — if any.
Is this not true?
If you don't care to answer — clearly and unambiguously — then please don't complain about others whenever they don't respond to you.
barracuda wrote:eyeno wrote:Don't speak for me. You don't do it well.
I"ve said over and over that I like jewish people. What is being done in jewish people's name is not cool. All jewish people may suffer for this, again. How many times should we go through this, in the name of the jewish people? I am asking YOU this question. As a jewish person do you seriously want to take the blame for all this? I didn't think so...If I were jewish I certainly would not take the blame for it. Atzmon is trying to shield judaism from zionism. This is not complicated.
You're fucking creepy, man.
Searcher08 wrote:compared2what? wrote:seemslikeadream wrote:compared2what? wrote:seemslikeadream wrote:bluenoseclaret wrote:Thanks Alice
He still waits with regard to Ireland.
Kro
me too....but some holocausts are much more important than others
Not to me. I oppose them all equally.
But you're entitled to your partialities and prejudices, I suppose.
Cheers.
you and others here may oppose them equally but one would be hard pressed to verify that sentiment with actual RI threads on the subject ...but you are entitled to your partialities and prejudices, I suppose....Ad nauseam
Slainte
Here are the search results for my username, plus "genocide." So knock yourself out counting how many were in comments made by me and to what they referred; and how many were made by others and were agreed to explicitly or implicitly by me, and to what they referred. I don't have time to get to it right now, but I'm confident about what the results will be.
http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/sear ... mit=Search
Here are the search results for my username, plus "holocaust":
http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/sear ... F&start=30
One of the first thing you may notice is that the first two-plus pages are from this thread, which represents a statistical upsurge of exponential proportions over my overall use of the word. And you also may notice that I've referred to the H-H-H-olocaust many, many more times in the last two months than I had in the entire, preceding four years.
And would you like to know what prompted me suddenly to start mentioning that I acknowledged that particular little reality, in which I'd never shown any very sustained or serious interest of any kind before, little Miss Erin-Go-Fuck-Yourself?
YOU GOT IT!
It was you.
After you started pitching your repellent little series of tantrums (starting shortly before this thread, IIRC) about how oppressed this board was by constant (largely non-existent) whining about the Holocaust (and, to be fair, the degree of popular acclaim with which it was met) I FELT OBLIGATED to make a conscious decision to start mentioning it in neutral terms as an acknowledged historical fact, purely out of respect for the memory of the numerous relatives I have who died therein.***
So I guess what I'm saying here, SLAD, is:
If you'd kept your big, slobbery Irish cry-baby mouth shut, there'd be two-plus fewer pages of search results for you to count. ________________
Of the remainder, I can see at a glance that a bunch of them are from a thread on which Alice and I were both arguing against expanded Holocaust education; that a significant further number occur in words not written by me; that a few don't even refer to the -- or any -- Holocaust; and that none of them constitutes whining, imposing, or otherwise insisting on the primacy of one genocide over another.
Did I already tell you to go fuck yourself?
If not: Go fuck yourself.
__________________________
***And just to start out my little private project of quietly admitting to the Holocaust with maximum consideration for others here, I actually went out of my way to make sure that my very first use of the term was contextualized by immediately following it with an argument that the word "zionazi" was a legitimate political reference to the Holocaust. Right here:
http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/view ... st#p452163
But, of course, that only led to this:slimmouse wrote:Which particular holoclaust are you referrring to c2w ?
Would that be the only known holocaust amidst every current "reputable" historical source ? The only holocaust mentionable in current rhetoric ?
I assume so.
Because you can't put nuthin' over on that slimmouse.
Incidentally, every word of that is true. I have been deliberately mentioning the Holocaust in measured terms, purely in response to you.
Or, more accurately, purely out of a combination of the private respect for my dead that I naturally feel and the equally natural wish to avoid feeling more of the shame that my silence in the face of your shitting, pissing, and vomiting on their memories had made me feel. And yet, I didn't want to get in your stupid ugly face about it any more than I could avoid. Of course. Because you're entitled to your feelings, too.
Also: Go fuck yourself.
Yes, but tell her what you REALLY mean.![]()
I didn't imagine you to be a racist c2w; I felt you seemed disinterested about mapping Atzmon to a another culture and wondered why. Is this the same c2w who was lecturing me about bullying AD??![]()
You can express your anger fully without being racist, if you choose.![]()
I would appreciate it if you apologized to my friend for saying those things.
I much prefer the c2w who calls me honey, and I'd like her back please.
Simulist wrote:Yes. There appears to be some genuinely creepy shit afoot here: antisemitic, Holocaust-denying shit — thinly-veiled to navigate board rules, but increasingly apparent nonetheless.
seemslikeadream wrote:Simulist wrote:seemslikeadream wrote:barracuda wrote:seemslikeadream wrote:There is only one holocaust deniel that anyone cares about here
It's just that everyone here loves the Jews so much, they can't stop talking about them.
it's not the love that being closely watched for here but carry on and as long as this thread continues we will all be reminded over and over and over and over again that RI is not an anti-semitic Jewish holocaust denying website
I repeat:Simulist wrote:Simulist wrote:Murder is a crime, and it's wrong. But unless I'm grossly misinformed on the subject, the Holocaust was "the Final Solution" to exterminate every Jewish man, woman, and child. To utterly wipe the Jewish people from the face of the earth.
Because of this, I see few crimes that compare in (A) intent, or (B) scope — if any.
Is this not true?
If you don't care to answer — clearly and unambiguously — then please don't complain about others whenever they don't respond to you.
I have anwsered you and I have NEVER ever complained about the lack of responses to me
and thanks for making it clear who's deaths are more important
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 175 guests