Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
TSA Agent Spills Ashes of Man’s Grandfather, Laughs
June 27th, 2012
Via: RTV6:
A man’s attempt to bring the ashes of his grandfather home to Indianapolis ended with an angry scene in a Florida airport, with the ashes spilled on the terminal floor.
John Gross, a resident of Indianapolis’ south side, was leaving Florida with the remains of his grandfather — Mario Mark Marcaletti, a Sicilian immigrant who worked for the Penn Central Railroad in central Indiana — in a tightly sealed jar marked “Human Remains.”
Gross said he didn’t think he’d have a problem, until he ran into a TSA agent at the Orlando airport.
“They opened up my bag, and I told them, ‘Please, be careful. These are my grandpa’s ashes,’” Gross told RTV6′s Norman Cox. “She picked up the jar. She opened it up.
“I was told later on that she had no right to even open it, that they could have used other devices, like an X-ray machine. So she opened it up. She used her finger and was sifting through it. And then she accidentally spilled it.”
Gross says about a quarter to a third of the contents spilled on the floor, leaving him frantically trying to gather up as much as he could while anxious passengers waited behind him.
“She didn’t apologize. She started laughing. I was on my hands and knees picking up bone fragments. I couldn’t pick up all, everything that was lost. I mean, there was a long line behind me.”
Jonah Falcon, Man With World's Largest Penis, Frisked By TSA At California Airport
Posted: 07/16/2012 12:37 pm Updated: 07/17/2012 4:02 pm
Turns out it's legal to have a weapon of mass conception at the airport.
Jonah Falcon was stopped and frisked by the TSA at the San Francisco International Airport on July 9 because of a bulging package hidden in his pants. But the 41-year-old New Yorker wasn't packing a dirty bomb, drugs or a Costco-sized tube of toothpaste. The New Yorker has the world's largest recorded penis.
In an exclusive interview with The Huffington Post, Falcon described his hard times with security guards after his extra carry-on became suspect.
"I had my 'stuff' strapped to the left. I wasn't erect at the time," said Falcon, whose penis is 9 inches flaccid, 13.5 inches erect. "One of the guards asked if my pockets were empty and I said, 'Yes.'"
Falcon said he knew that his interview was about to get a lot more personal when he was led through one of the X-ray body scanners and passed a metal detector.
"Another guard stopped me and asked me if I had some sort of growth," Falcon said, laughing.
Indeed he did have a growth.
By the age of 18, Falcon knew he had something special when his manhood reached a whopping 12 inches. His family jewel was hailed as the world's largest on record after an HBO documentary featured him in 1999. The Guinness Book of World Records does not record such feats, but Falcon did show his standout feature to Huffington Post Executive Crime/Weird News Editor Buck Wolf.
Falcon has been contacted by porn companies (though he's never accepted) and has been featured on just about every talkshow in the country.
As he passed through airport security, Falcon said a younger security guard felt threatened by his "very noticeable" package -- and interpreted it as a biological threat.
"I said, 'It's my dick,'" Falcon said. "He gave me a pat down but made sure to go around [my penis] with his hands. They even put some powder on my pants, probably a test for explosives. I found it amusing."
The screener gave up the extensive search without so much as a blush or a smile. Falcon made his flight back to New York on time.
But he learned something that day. The hardened traveler has a new game plan for airport security.
"I'm just gonna wear bike shorts from now on," Falcon said. "That way, they'll know. You'd think the San Francisco TSA would have had experience with hung guys before, but I guess not."
TSA officials at the San Francisco International Airport did not return calls for comment.
Congress Smacks Down TSA
Orders agency to reduce patdowns, use private security screeners, and address scanner health concerns
Steve Watson
Infowars.com
Sept 12, 2012
A new House Report has slammed the Transportation Security Administration for “failing to meet taxpayers’ expectations.”
The report, prepared by the House Committee on Homeland Security, says that the TSA must become a “leaner, smarter organization,” and concedes that the agency’s insensitivity and obsession with defending unpopular airport screening procedures is impeding security.
The report characterizes the TSA as a bloated bureaucracy that is bogged down in promoting policies that do not match current threat levels.
“The agency has gone down a troubling path of overspending, limiting private-sector engagement, and failing to sufficiently protect passenger privacy,” said transportation security subcommittee leader Mike Rogers at yesterday’s hearing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94MYjVodwdg
“Eleven years after 9/11, the American people expect to see tangible progress in transportation security, with effective operations that respect both their privacy and their wallets,” the committee report notes. “The private sector is best suited to this challenge, not the federal government.”
The report also noted that the TSA has failed to make it clear why it has switched to a policy of invasive ‘enhanced’ patdowns, or what specific threat the procedure addresses.
“Pat-downs have hit a nerve with the general public, and TSA has failed to adequately explain why it continues to use this procedure two years after its initial rollout,” the committee said.
Recommending a reduction in patdowns, the report also slammed the TSA for taking a whole year to exclude children from the enhanced procedure after it was introduced in October 2010.
Turning to radiation firing body scanners, the committee recommends that the TSA sponsor “an independent analysis” of the health risks of body scanners and install privacy filters on all devices.
The Report cites the decision in EPIC v. DHS, pointing out that the TSA has failed to abide by the ruling of a federal appeals court to “act promptly” to receive public comments on the deployment of the scanners.
The report also questioned why the TSA has grown exponentially in size when the amount of travelers has decreased.
“A private-sector entity in the face of a shrinking customer base usually must downsize,” the committee said. “TSA, by contrast, has continually grown its ranks despite fewer travelers.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCo45_PKOuE
Geoff Freeman, chief operating officer of the U.S. Travel Association, a Washington-based trade group for tourism agencies and providers, told the committee that the TSA’s budget has increased 68 percent from 2004 to 2011, while the number of passengers has not significantly changed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxxjtrU1ncA
“The real threat of terrorism, the economic consequences of inefficient screening, and increase in screening costs, add up to create one of the biggest problems facing the travel industry today,” Freeman said, adding that “a 2010 survey found that travelers would take two to three more flights per year, if the hassles in security screening were reduced.”
“Here is the bottom line: It is time to reform TSA,” Rep. Rogers concluded. “In fact, it’s been a long time coming.”
http://www.infowars.com/congress-smacks-down-tsa/
Controversial 'naked' airport body scanners to be scrapped after failing to receive European approvalScanners use X-ray technology to show up hidden explosives or weapons
Fears machines could emit harmful levels of cancer-causing radiation
European report said risk 'close to zero' but bosses still failed to give go-ahead
By Larisa Brown and Jaya Narain
PUBLISHED: 06:01 EST, 17 September 2012 | UPDATED: 18:38 EST, 17 September 2012
..
The last remaining full-body X-ray airport scanners are to be scrapped within weeks.
The security systems, which have been tested at air terminals since 2009, scan through passengers’ clothes, creating a detailed ghost-like image of the naked body. The scan is then viewed by security staff.
Critics said the machines invaded passengers’ privacy and the radiation they generate raised the risk of cancer. Some Muslim groups also refused to walk through them on religious grounds.
Controversial: A demonstration of the scanners that European bosses have failed to give approval of. A full body scan is shown, left, and a screen showing the results of the scan, right
The European Commission ruled that the cancer risk was ‘close to zero’ but, under Brussels legislation, the three-year trial period has elapsed and it has decided not to ‘prioritise’ them for permanent use across the continent.
Airport bosses who were waiting for the green light on the machines now say they have been left with no option but to remove them.
The scanners will be replaced with ‘privacy-friendly’ machines which use radio-frequency technology.
Manchester airport, which is the last in Britain to be still using ‘naked’ scanners, said it will now have to spend £1.1million to replace them with the new devices.
It will also have to hire dozens of extra security staff to frisk passengers manually.
The airport’s chief operating officer Andrew Harrison said: ‘We’re baffled by this situation because health experts say they are safe, plus the overwhelming majority of our passengers and security staff prefer body scanners to frisking.
‘It’s frustrating that Brussels has allowed this successful trial to end.’
American use: More than 600 Advanced Imaging Technology units, using X-ray technology, have been installed at 140 airports across the U.S
The report from the EC's Committee in May said radiation doses were 'very low' compared with other sources such as cosmic radiation received during flights.
But it did add that the long-term effects, such as cancer risks, could not be 'entirely excluded'.
American academic Dr David Brenner said he believed the scanner could deliver up to 20 times more radiation to the skin than previously thought - potentially increasing the risk of skin cancer.
Fears were also raised that the scanners were an invasion of privacy and some passengers and religious groups had questioned their use.
The scanners were introduced at Manchester airport in a security crackdown after incidents such as the attempted 'underwear bomb' terror plot in 2009.
Passengers selected for scanning have, in the past, been banned from flying if they refuse to pass through the device.
European Commission: EC chiefs have failed to give their approval for their full time use despite a report declaring the risk was 'close to zero'
The airport said around 10 passengers were unable to board their flight after refusing to pass through the scanners, known as 'back scatter' machines.
They were used at Heathrow but scrapped amid complaints about invasion of privacy. They have also been tested in Germany, France, Italy, Finland and Holland.
Research has suggested that, despite the low radiation dosage, that because of the large number of scanners in the U.S., hundreds of passengers a year could get cancer.
When there were 250 scanners in the U.S. last year, research suggested up to 100 passengers a year could get cancer.A MORE GENERIC SHAPE IN THE U.S.
The passenger screening programme at airports in the U.S has had frequent complaints that not all passengers are screened in the same way.
In reaction to this, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has replaced the machines, which give a detailed outline of individuals' figures, for a more generic shape.
On the updated machine, the passenger and the TSA worker both view the image together which lights up on screen if it detects a problem.
The need for a separate TSA officer viewing the image in another room is no longer required.
The new images are said to be 'very generic' and 'focus on the privacy of the passenger'.
The images of passengers are not stored or printed and cannot be transmitted.
They are deleted from the system once they have been viewed.
Those who fly are not required by law to pass through AIT screening - but if they opt out, they will receive alternative screening, including a physical pat-down.
The TSA has continued to defend the safety of the X-ray devices, saying they expose passengers to the same radiation as two minutes on a flying plane.
Earlier this year it was reported that more than 600 Advanced Imaging Technology units, using X-ray technology, have been installed at 140 airports across the U.S.
The first X-ray body scanner was developed in 1992 by Steven W Smith. He sold the technology and rights to Rapiscan Systems, which now manufactures and distributes the device.
Fears about the health risks were raised in the U.S. as far back as 1998 when the machine known as the Secure 1000 was evaluated by a panel of radiation safety experts brought together by the Food and Drug Administration.
They all expressed concerns about the machine because it violated a longstanding principle that humans should not be X-rayed unless there is a medical purpose.
The machine’s inventor told panelists that the machine would most probably not be widely used for many years to come.
Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam was the first airport to implement the scanners in 2007.
In the U.S. the Transportation Security Administration scanners sparked a heated debate over security concerns versus travelers' privacy when they were first brought in in autumn 2010.
The machines have also been installed in some courtrooms.
In response, New Jersey's legislature issued a resolution urging Congress to review the programme.
Study group Electronic Privacy Information Center then filed a lawsuit to suspend the use of scanners at U.S. airports pending an independent review.
In February 2011, a trial of new 'non-intrusive' body scanners started at Atlanta, Las Vegas, and Washington, D.C. before they were rolled out permanently in July last yer.
New York's Newark Liberty International airport followed in September last year, where more than eight million passengers boarded planes in 2010.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z26rHAHLdP
Auditor: TSA can't justify costs of screening behavior
Bart Jansen, USA TODAY 4:29 p.m. EDT June 5, 2013A
TSA agent interviews a traveler as part of Boston Logan Airport's enhanced behavior detection program on Oct. 7, 2011.(Photo: Josh T. Reynolds for USA TODAY)
Story Highlights
Critics say the program is racial profiling
The government has spent $878 million on the program so far
The program's goal is to spot potential terrorists
The Transportation Security Administration can't ensure that its behavior-detection program is objective or cost-effective, according to a watchdog report released Wednesday.
TSA's program, Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques (SPOT), which now has 2,800 workers, began in 2007 and has so far cost $878 million. The program's goal is to spot potential terrorists through behavioral clues, but it has been criticized for possible racial profiling.
The Department of Homeland Security's inspector general said in a 41-page report released Wednesday that the TSA doesn't effectively assess the program or have a comprehensive training program.
"As a result, TSA cannot ensure that passengers at United States airports are screened objectively, show that the program is cost-effective or reasonably justify the program's expansion," according to the report from Anne Richards, assistant inspector general for audits.
In a written reply to the inspector general's report, TSA Administrator John Pistole said the agency was working to deal with the concerns before the audit began and that no significant concerns remain.
TSA finalized a mission statement, goals and objectives for the program in December 2012 after auditors visited, he said. The agency also finalized performance measurements in November 2012, he said.
"TSA believes the passengers at U.S. airports are screened by (behavior-detection officers) in an objective manner," Pistole said. The program "is effective and has been validated and determined to identify substantially more high-risk travelers than a random screening protocol."
But Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, the top Democrat on the Homeland Security Committee, who requested the audit, said the report deals another blow to the TSA's efforts to detect suspicious behavior. He said he would offer an amendment this week to the department's spending bill to prevent more funding for the "failed and misguided effort."
"After five years, approximately $1 billion spent, a history of racial profiling allegations and a lack of measurable results – this report makes it clear that the SPOT program has not improved aviation security and has wasted taxpayer dollars that could have been spent on proven safety measures," Thompson said.
The TSA program grew out of techniques developed at Boston's Logan Airport with Massachusetts state police. The program now primarily has behavior-detection officers chat with passengers waiting in security lines, and then referring any exhibiting suspicious behavior for secondary screening or to law enforcement officers.
TSA doesn't reveal what suspicious behavior will trigger additional screening. But security experts say shifty eyes and sweating are among the traits that raise suspicions.
From October 2011 through September 2012, the program resulted in 199 arrests, typically for outstanding warrants, suspected drugs and immigration status.
But the inspector general reviewed 110,000 referral records from 2009 through 2012 and found 7,019 that didn't identify the officer involved, 1,194 that didn't meet the criteria for a referral and 143 that didn't contain an airport code for where the referral was made.
"As a result, TSA cannot ensure that training contributes to the uniform screening of passengers," the inspector general report said.
TSA began in May a year-long process to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the referral reports. That followed a January move to provide refresher training for all behavior-detection officers by the end of the year.
TSA said in a statement that studies involving outside researchers found that these officers were nine times more likely to identify a high-risk traveler than random selections for more screening.
"TSA's behavior detection program is a critical part of our approach to securing travel," the agency said in a statement Wednesday. "Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques allows officers to identify specific behavior clues that have been proven through research, science and decades of law enforcement experience to be reliable indicators and predictors of anomalous or suspicious behavior."
http://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/fl ... g/2392255/
TSA searches valet parked car (VIDEO)
Posted at: 07/17/2013 6:46 PM | Updated at: 07/18/2013 7:25 AM
By: Berkeley Brean | WHEC.com
Rochester, N.Y. -- She says she had no warning that someone was going to search her car after she left to catch her flight. So the woman contacted News10NBC.
We found out it happened to her because she valet parked her car. Those are the only cars that get inspected.
So if security feels it is necessary to search some cars in the name of safety, why not search all of them?
Laurie Iacuzza walked to her waiting car at the Greater Rochester International Airport after returning from a trip and that's when she found it -- a notice saying her car was inspected after she left for her flight. She said, “I was furious. They never mentioned it to me when I booked the valet or when I picked up the car or when I dropped it off.”
Iacuzza's car was inspected by valet attendants on orders from the TSA. But why only valet parked cars? That's what News10NBC wanted to ask the TSA director about. We reached him by phone.
Berkeley Brean asked, “Are the cars in the short term lots and long term lots getting searched as well?”
John McCaffery, TSA, said, “No, those vehicles that are in the garage, short term long term parking, even if they carry pretty large amounts of explosives, they would not cause damage to the front of the airport. But for those who use the valet, the car could be there for a half hour or an hour so there is a vulnerability.”
News10NBC went to the valet parking and one of the attendants showed us the notice they put in the cars.
We asked, “You're required, they tell you, you have to search the car?” Valet Parking Attendant Frank Dettorre said, “I have to do it.”
We also noticed a large sign that alerts customers that their vehicle will be inspected. The sign is on the kiosk window. Iacuzza says it was not there when she dropped off her car. “I think the public should be aware of the fact that if their car is going to be searched, they should be informed of it.”
Iacuzza said she doesn't mind the security measure. She just wants to be told if her car is getting searched.
News10NBC asked the owner of the company that runs the valet parking when they put up the sign but he wouldn't answer.
TSA says this is part of its overall security plan and that it's a proactive move. The attendants said they've only been doing it for about a month.
http://www.whec.com/news/stories/S3101080.shtml?cat=566
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 179 guests