jlaw172364 wrote:It blows my mind that people on here think that it is normal for someone ALLEGEDLY terminally ill, with a FAMILY, to commit suicide in such a public, spectacular fashion. Had he wanted to off himself, he could have done it painlessly, and discretely in any number of ways with his family at his side.
It may blow your mind, but the most common case for suicide in the US is that of older men, especially if they get sick. That doesn't mean it's "normal," since most people don't kill themselves. However, suicides happen. Being thoughtful isn't always the prime factor. "FAMILY" has very different meanings to different people, and even to the same person in one given moment as opposed to an hour later.
Does this stuff really need to be explained?
If you don't want to believe it, the data says otherwise. Decisively. As for the method, "spectacular" is a question of definition. Bridge-jumping is common.
Instead, he allegedly jumps off a bridge and turns the whole thing into a spectacle with the foreknowledge that his family will have to deal with the aftermath. Imagine his kids, going to school with the knowledge that all their classmates know how their father died.
You're right. This is why no one with family ever, ever kills themselves.
However, I'm not saying he wasn't that insensitive, but merely that the allegation that he had a brain tumor or had financial troubles doesn't automatically lead to suicide by leap to death.
Certainly not automatic. You're reversing the causality here, see? It's already happened. Now that it has, it fits the most common profile for suicide in the United States by age, sex, and health factor. "The assassination of Tony Scott" is about four billion times less likely than "the suicide of Tony Scott."
Also, suicide doesn't solve financial problems. Life insurance won't pay out for suicide.
I merely listed another typical factor associated with suicides of old men. Not likely a factor in Scott's case! Furthermore, death by any means solves all financial and all other problems, for the dead one. This is why people kill themselves. Except, apparently, it's unbelievable to you that anyone ever would.
Whoever said Blackhawk Down was by Ridley: Correct. Sorry.
It's antiwar only if you care to see that a thousand-plus Somalis are being killed. This is not how the film was promoted or received. It was a document of the bravery and goodness of our men thrust by a questionable policy into a den of barbaric killers who do not value any life. The Somalis were filmed like reptilian creatures.
.