Icke Interview

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

thanks for the Levy site/article

Postby AnnaLiviaPlurabelle » Sat Jul 16, 2005 11:50 am

I wrote years ago that Bush is “a permanent son”…never able to rise up and become the father…as the natural state of things would have it. <br><br>He is indeed, a little fraction of a man.<br><br>As for “controlling” the collective psychosis, I don’t know if that’s possible, but I never forget that advantage takes advantage and makes advantage wherever it can.<br> <p></p><i></i>
AnnaLiviaPlurabelle
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Oklahoma City Bombing

Postby DrDebugDU » Sat Jul 16, 2005 12:11 pm

I see that Starman brought this subject up as well. A classic analysis is David Hoffman's The Oklahoma City Bombing and the Politics of Terror. It'll clearly demonstrate that the official explanation couldn't be correct.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><br>The Oklahoma City Bombing and the Politics of Terror<br>by David Hoffman<br><br>Copyright © 1998 David Hoffman<br><br>ISBN 0-922915-49-0 (Out of Print)<br><br>Published online with the irrevocable permission of the author to republish with attribution on a non-profit basis.<br><br>In January 1997, ABC 20/20 reported that the government had prior knowledge of the of the Oklahoma City bombing. In February, a Time magazine article reported that the ATF had advance warning from one of its own informants.<br><br>Shows how terrorist acts are used by the government to increase wiretapping, search and seizure, and invasive surveillance of private citizens.<br><br>The sheer volume of detailed evidence in this book about the U.S. government's unholy alliance with the terrorist underworld - and of a sting operation that led to the Oklahoma City bombing - will shock some people. At the same time, many readers will be relieved to finally hear the awful truth about the politics behind such acts of terror. Reporter David Hoffman spent two years investigating the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Building in which 169 people died in April, 1995. He carefully traces the government's case and discovers an amazing conspiracy and cover-up. His investigation leads to a number of revelations, including:<br><br>* A complex web of connections between bombing suspects Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols - via the American neo-Nazi movement - to a Middle Eastern terrorist cell that was actually responsible for the tragic blast.<br><br>* Links between Middle Eastern terrorists and the U.S. government via a little- reported resettlement program initiated by Presidents Bush and Clinton that brings former enemy Iraqi soldiers into the United States.<br><br>* The government's advance knowledge that the Federal Building might be bombed: an informant warned federal officials after she learned that her associates in the Aryan Republican Army were casing the Murrah Building and two other federal buildings.<br><br>The evidence goes even deeper. Hoffman found information about the government's behind-the-scenes involvement in other terrorist acts, which must be explained in order to understand the context of federal involvement in Oklahoma City. Hoffman uncovered parallels to the explosion of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, and even to the World Trade Center bombing in New York, and reveals the connections between the three in this book.<br><br>"All governments are run by liars and nothing they say should be believed."<br>— I.F. Stone<br><br>The whole book is available online at:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.constitution.org/ocbpt/ocbpt.htm">www.constitution.org/ocbpt/ocbpt.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>It's a very long story, but it's a wonderful read for anybody who has doubts about the Oklahoma City Bombing <p></p><i></i>
DrDebugDU
 
Posts: 808
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Protocols

Postby Seventhson » Sat Jul 16, 2005 12:17 pm

Sweejak says: <br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>BTW, I think the protocols are a real document. I won't hazard to guess who wrote them or if Jews were inserted for someone else. I hardly matters though, you can see the protocols in action everyday.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> <br><br>This statement speaks volumes.<br><br>Your knowledge of history and the history of disinformation is sadly deficient.<br><br>The Protocols are a fictional account of a conversation between Napolean and machiavelli in hell written by a French author in the 19th century.<br><br>They were adapted and tagged with the Zionist label for disinformationist antiSemites in Russia and then adapted and promoted by Hitler and his "luminaries" as well as by our own idiot Nazi-supporting resident corporatist Hnery Ford in the 1930's and '40's.<br><br>The definitive history of the protocols can be found in the definitive books on Naziism by Konrad Heiden "Der Fuehrer" and "A History of National Socialism"<br><br>To say that the Protocols are "real documents" and that it doesn't matter if they were written by Jews or not is chillingly nauseating.<br><br>I agree that the concept of totalitarian fascism from hellish imaginations and concepts is something we see every day - but when I criticize you here it is with profound desire to help you understand how your words can be seen as promoting a hatefilled agenda, whether you intend them to or not. <p></p><i></i>
Seventhson
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 8:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Protocols

Postby Sweejak » Sat Jul 16, 2005 1:03 pm

Thanks. What hate filled words? You mean like calling everyone who doesn't see things your way unthinking idiots, disinformationists and sadly deficient?<br><br> <!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I agree that the concept of totalitarian fascism from hellish imaginations and concepts is something we see every day<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>Oh, very well. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Sweejak
 
Posts: 3250
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 7:40 pm
Location: Border Region 5
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Protocols

Postby slimmouse » Sat Jul 16, 2005 1:13 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>The Protocols are a fictional account of a conversation between Napolean and machiavelli in hell written by a French author in the 19th century<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br> And the fact that, like it or not we see this manifesting itself in the world we live in today is unimportant ?<br><br> Rather like the Charles keating book " The final jihad " - a fictional account of a guy called Tom Mcvey who bombs OKC - written 2 years before the event !<br><br> No one needs to blame anyone as regards who wrote either work to see the obvious truths they contain - Though I readily take your point re the protocols, that they can fuel virulent antisemitic feeling in the wrong hands - Namely when quoted by those who would suggest that they were written by Jews, and then deliberately use them as part of a broader more sinister agenda. But I dont think for one minute that with the exception of the clinically deranged hitherto mentioned, that most people think that way.<br><br> This of course presents A dire predicament indeed for scholars who have no hatred of anyone in their hearts. To comment upon or not to comment upon ?<br><br> As to their authorship, Ive heard a squillion different people attributed to them. I havent got the first idea who Icke attributes them to - I havent read anything in his 3 books that ive actually read that refers to them. But to me that is quite frankly irrelevant.<br><br> The reason being, that whilst I havent actually even read the Protocols in their entirety, what I have read sure spooked the crap outta me, with regard to their relation to today. <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: thanks for the Levy site/article

Postby Sweejak » Sat Jul 16, 2005 1:32 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>As for “controlling” the collective psychosis, I don’t know if that’s possible, but I never forget that advantage takes advantage and makes advantage wherever it can.<br><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I have to think of the media first here. While I'm not sure it creates the psychosis it certainly takes advantage of it. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Sweejak
 
Posts: 3250
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 7:40 pm
Location: Border Region 5
Blog: View Blog (0)

On disinformation, hatemongering and protocols

Postby Seventhson » Sat Jul 16, 2005 2:27 pm

Sweejak says:<br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Thanks. What hate filled words? You mean like calling everyone who doesn't see things your way unthinking idiots, disinformationists and sadly deficient?</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>I did not say that: what I said was that Icke is an idiot and that his stuff is disinformation and antiSemitic (hatefilled rhetorical disinformation) and that those who embrace it either do so because they are willingly supporting it or they are naive lemmings.<br><br>I am not a hater. But I am certainly going to call out people who spread hate as I see it.<br><br>I also am not saying "everyone who disagrees with me" is such. I am quite specific regarding what types of material and information and links and types of posts or posters are disinformational. I am happy to have folks disagree with me. but if the distinction is between those spreading hate and those who object to spreading hate, then I am on the side of objecting to it. Vociferously. And calling it out as hate speech.<br><br>Being sadly deficient or naive about history, and claiming that you still think the protocols are 'real" (when they are wholely fictional, despite their "visionary" quality regarding the current global fascist alliances, and I have cited an authorititative source for their origin), is not hate-filled speech: it is my opinion regarding the naivete or disingenuousness of the poster.<br><br> <br>slimmouse<br>Registered Member<br>Posts: 108<br>(7/16/05 11:13 am)<br>Reply Re: Protocols<br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br> <br>Quote:<br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>The Protocols are a fictional account of a conversation between Napolean and machiavelli in hell written by a French author in the 19th century<br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br><br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>And the fact that, like it or not we see this manifesting itself in the world we live in today is unimportant ?</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>No - the fact is that the Protocols in their original form were a brilliant anticipation of Hitler and the Third and Fourth Reich that we are seeing today. The fact that they were a totally fictionalized conversation between two totailiatrian historical figures in hell makes them fictional, not unvisionary. To blame jews or Zionists for the Protocols is simply hateful antiSemitism and proNazi rhetoric.<br><br><br>Don't be too sure: there are plenty of mindless sheeple and fundies who love to loll in such despicable sewage .<br><br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>This of course presents A dire predicament indeed for scholars who have no hatred of anyone in their hearts. To comment upon or not to comment upon ?</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>No problem at all. Any serious scholar will have read the pertinent research and the supporting evidence in both their primary and secondary sources. Commenting on it is fine. Commenting on it without any solid footing is brainless and foolish.<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>As to their authorship, Ive heard a squillion different people attributed to them. I havent got the first idea who Icke attributes them to - I havent read anything in his 3 books that ive actually read that refers to them. But to me that is quite frankly irrelevant.<br><br>The reason being, that whilst I havent actually even read the Protocols in their entirety, what I have read sure spooked the crap outta me, with regard to their relation to today. </em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> <br><br>a "Squillian" ??? I find this disingenuous too. Authoritative research has shown that the original work was written by a Frenchman and that it was taken over as a propaganda antiJewish tract by antiSemites in Russia, attributed to the Zionists after the first Zionist convention, reworked to make the Zionists the architects of global fascism and Bolshevism, and then reworked again for Hitler and the nazis as a propaganda tool to arouse hate in the German masses and globally (here in the US too).<br><br>One original fiction, and one or two derivatives for the Tsarists, I believe, and the Nazis.<br><br>But again - unless you read "Der Fuehrer" (Houghton Mifflin 1944)and his sources all of this debate is academic and really a waste of time.<br><br>The hiostory is well known, but propagandists like Icke and other Bushzis keep trying to get people to fall for the practice of the big repeated lie.<br><br>Falling for it is just pitiful, especially when the historical sources have been cited and you can read them for yourselves. <p></p><i></i>
Seventhson
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 8:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Back to Icke

Postby lantern » Sat Jul 16, 2005 2:32 pm

I have read most of Icke's books over the years and heard many of his interviews and I personally think that he is 100% honest even if sometimes his research is a bit sloppy. This man writes books really fast, often paralleling events in real time, and as a result his information is often not as well thought out as it should be. If you read his books in chronological order you can see him downplaying certain parts or revising certain ideas in favor of others etc. his books grow and evolve as he does. Quite commendable really, that he has the guts to change his mind on his previous ideas in my view.<br><br>The lizard issue: he came to that conclusion in the book the Biggest Secret after hearing many reports from people that they had seen people shape shift into reptilian form. He uses Cathy O'Brians testimony as one of his central testimonies with regrads to shape shifting lizards. And he wrote of this stuff in 1998, way before many other more rigorous researchers added their contributions and reflections to the topic. Now, a few years on and may more RA stories later, it appears that maybe O'Brien is a disinfo agent, but when Icke was writing of this stuff, the story was fresh and so umbelievable in all of its content that doubting the lizard issue was as easy as doubting all the RA issue. I cke believe the RA story and the lizard story and brought both to our attention. I think he was quite shocked by all of this infformation when he first came across it, as the biggest secret is a fairly freaked out book. You can tell that he is just about jumping out of his skin with horror as he learns about the depth of cruelty that the powers that be can reach in their starnge journey into power. <br><br>Through this book, Icke brought the whole RA/satanic/Illuminati connection to the attention of a wide audience way before many others had jumped on the bandwagon after the events of 9/11. Before 9/11 talking of this kind of stuff did not receive much support at all and in the UK there was a huge wave of press aimed at discrediting Icke and distorting what he said in his books, taking what he was saying out of context, so that he appeared as an extreme raving lunatis (the whole nazi BS being a supreme example of this- if anybody reads his stuff, it is obvious that he is not an antisemite, he is not denying the holocaust, etc- all of that is a distortion a discredit the messanger, discredit the message op). I personally commend David Icke for the balls and tireless effort that he has put into spreading a certain kind of unpleasant truths to a wide audience. His purpose in the larger scheme of things is that of waking people up to the fact that things are not as they seem, the rigourous research is not his thing IMHO. But lets not throw away the baby with the bath water. If it were not for people like Icke, almost screaming certain things from the rooftops, more intellegent discussion such as the ones held here would probably not even be occuring. The guy has been at it for almost 15 years and if he was ever displaying signs of mental imbalance , it is beacuse blowing the whistle publicly on this stuff for years in the 90s, pretty much on his own, when everybody else was calling him a cook is very hard on the nervous system. Much easier to do now that so many more people are on the same page.<br><br>And the voices issue - one of the things that I find most frustrating in discussions with the intelligentia on the whole RA/ satanic/ consciousness shift/illuminati/etc is that there is such a lack of understanding of the multidimensional aspect of being human. Psychic phenomena do exist, communications with beings from other dimensions do exist. Some of these beings are working with us, some against us. There is a psychic/multidimensional component to some of this RA stuff (negative) and there is a psychic/multidimensional component to some of the good work that some people are doing ( positive). Not all psychic/multidimensinal components are negative, as some seem to think. It depends on which beings one is connecting with and the intention of that connection and much more - too long to explain, enough material for a book here. Labelling anybody that communicates with the other side as insane or evil is just a sign of ignorance. It is wise to think a little deeper before criticizing what you do not understand. Don't lump all of this psychis/interdimensional stuff in one basket or you will loose some vital pieces of information and knowledge that are funadamental in understanding about what is going on in the world today. Matters such as collective consciousness and how to influence it energetically being one of the battles that is going on right now....but I have to go get ready for an appointment now, so that topic will have to wait for now...<br><br><br>I do not have time to spell check this, so apologies for the many mis-spellings and typos<br><br>A great weekend to you all :-)<br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
lantern
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 2:32 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: thanks for the Levy site/article

Postby heath7 » Sat Jul 16, 2005 2:33 pm

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Advantage takes advantage and makes advantage wherever it can.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>How true. I'm reminded of the goofy anti-tobacco ads on TV that are supposed to represent actual meetings of tobacco executives. <br><br>I love 'em! <br><br>These ads actually show these execs, acting as corporations do, thinking of <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>everything</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> and implementing anything they can get away with. Obviously, sometimes they fail<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :D --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif ALT=":D"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>It seems the joke is lost on most people that these commercials are showing how all corporations are <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>supposed to act</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> in this modern market climate. Machiavelli is king these days.<br><br>It'd be great to see spoofs of meetings from companies who make junk food (I'm convinced chips and soda these days are tinkered with like cigarettes, maximising addiction), or medicine, or insurance...so many ideas. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p097.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=heath7>heath7</A> at: 7/16/05 12:38 pm<br></i>
heath7
 
Posts: 293
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 9:44 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: On disinformation, hatemongering and protocols

Postby slimmouse » Sat Jul 16, 2005 2:36 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>The hiostory is well known, but propagandists like Icke and other Bushzis keep trying to get people to fall for the practice of the big repeated lie.<br><br>Falling for it is just pitiful, especially when the historical sources have been cited and you can read them for yourselves.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br> So in essence, what you are saying, is that is ignorant to comment on the protocols without having done a plethera of background work on the subject. Sorry, let me rephrase that. To do so is is foolish and brainless ?<br><br> Whereas it is fine to form an opinion on Icke having never actually read one of his books ? <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: On disinformation, hatemongering and protocols

Postby Seventhsonjr » Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:12 pm

Reading a handful of articles and visiting his website was too mcuh for me to waste my time on it.<br><br>I never said you had to do a plethora of research on the protocols (although I have so i am giving you the benefit of my research) I am saying read ONE book (or maybe two) by the principal and first antinazi writer Konrad heiden; a German whose life was put on the line opposing Hitler amd who escaped by the skin of his teeth to write the definitive biography of Hitler (and a history of the socalled "Protocols" in "Der Fuehrer" - Houghton Mifflin 1944) and of National Socialism in 1935.<br><br>These are the definitive works by an antifascist in the depths of it.<br><br>No rteptilian shapeshifting baloney here.<br><br>Just evil men doing evil things.<br><br>Frankly, I think the whole reptile thing is just a bunch of MKUltra brainwashing shit that is used to frighten the abused and scare (or rather distract) away anyone else who might try to help the abused and oppressed under these beasts.<br><br>It saddens me that a large part of this whole forum seems to have evolved into a pitiful defense of a very dark psyops campaign which is designed to discredit Jeff and any serious progressive who posts here. <p></p><i></i>
Seventhsonjr
 
Posts: 486
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 10:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: On disinformation, hatemongering and protocols

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:31 pm

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"It saddens me that a large part of this whole forum seems to have evolved into a pitiful defense of a very dark psyops campaign which is designed to discredit Jeff and any serious progressive who posts here."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>Just to clarify my position:<br><br>I think Icke is, at best, a lazy thinker, and possibly much worse, but I have no objection to Icke's supporters making their case for him here. So long as the posting guidelines are respected, let a hundred schools of controversial thought contend.<br><br>About shapeshifting, I wonder: could the memories have been hypnotically induced to discredit accounts of mind control and ritual abuse?<br><br>Posts on this board don't discredit me, unless they're my own. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Missing the point here.

Postby slimmouse » Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:41 pm

<br> I think perhaps youre missing a very important point here.<br><br> If the object of my study is the <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Content</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> of the protocols, and where they actually stand in relation to today, where is the relevance of studying their background and origins ?<br><br> Im not particularly interested in the messenger, Im interested in the message. In fact The messenger quite frankly is irrelevent to me. It may be of further interest to me, if I wish to understand them in the context of other debates - Such as do they actually act as an incitement to racial hatred. Was that their intended design et cetera. <br><br> I have heard your commentary with regard to this, and taken your point.<br><br> But this is actually a seperate argument in many respects. Since, as mentioned earlier, it is the eerie parellels I can draw in the limited knowledge I have of their content, with the state of affairs today ; Something which actually prevented me from considering them further, particularly in the light of the racial labelling attatched to them. Perhaps I need to read them all, and offer a critique, with working examples ?<br><br> Similarly vis a vi Icke. I was put off from reading his message by a similar tirade of ridicule and racism that seemed to attatch itself to just about everything he said or wrote. <br><br> Whereas having actually brought myself to the point where I felt I needed to form my own opinion, as opposed to listen to that of others - surely the most logical course of action - I actually was both pleasantly surprised on the one hand, and somewhat dismayed on the other.<br><br> Pleasantly surprised with regards to what he was saying - not that I agree with everything he says of course - But certainly with the overall theme.<br><br> And dismayed by the fact, that in my sincerest opinion, this man was in fact by and large none of the things that people said he was. People who I could immediately see had never really read much about what he said, other than that which might be used to ridicule him and falsely label him.<br><br> I find lanterns overall analysis earlier in the thread to be more or less that of my own. I hope that doesnt make either of us too much of a gullible sap in the eyes of many . But then again to be honest who gives a shit.<br><br> That is where I find myself in so many other opinions anyway - Most of those opinions which we probably commonly share, along with, Yes youve guessed it, David Icke.<br><br> <br><br> <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

re: Oklahoma City Bombing: False Flag ops?

Postby Starman » Sat Jul 16, 2005 5:23 pm

DrDebugDU<br><br>Heyia;<br>Yeah, a Lotta questions about the OKC bombing remain unanswered, and more troubling, officially unasked -- the 'investigation' has been shown to be horribly botched and directed from the Justice Dept, whose prosecuters ordered the FBI to NOT provide them with evidence of involvement by anybody but the close circle of perps they had focused on, esp. McVeigh as the prime suspect.<br><br>I've read excerpts of Hoffman's book and other reports that suggest such anomalies as: The damage was totally inconsistent with 4800 pounds of fertilizer and diesel fuel;<br>The local ATF bomb-squad was seen on-site in the early morning, apparently as part of a plan to intercept McVeigh in a spectacular bust, but because McVeigh was delayed they called-off their surveillance about 6:30 am and so 'missed' McVeigh's arrival later -- did someone bungle a spectacular PR arrest-stunt?<br><br>Evidence of additional bombs was repressed. Additional witnesses weren't interrogated. The FBI had an informant whose detailed information suggests a provocateur with rightwing inside-Intell connections was inciting violence as per Rumsfeld's P20G network:<br><br>This would correspond with Rumsfeld’s P2OG network, described in this article by Chris Floyd in Counterpunch: <br>**<br>--excerpt--<br>According to a classified document prepared for Rumsfeld by his Defense Science Board, the new organization-<>the “Proactive, Preemptive Operations Group (P2OG)”-will carry out secret missions designed to “stimulate reactions” among terrorist groups, provoking them into committing violent acts which would then expose them to “counterattack” by U.S. forces.<br><br>“Rumsfeld’s plan to create “a super-Intelligence Support Activity” that will “bring together CIA and military covert action, information warfare, intelligence, and cover and deception.”<br><br>“In other words-<>and let’s say this plainly, clearly and soberly, so that no one can mistake the intention of Rumsfeld’s plan<>the United States government is planning to use “cover and deception” and secret military operations to provoke murderous terrorist attacks on innocent people. Let’s say it again: Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, George W. Bush and the other members of the unelected regime in Washington plan to deliberately foment the murder of innocent people<>your family, your friends, your lovers, you-in order to further their geopolitical ambitions.<br><br>“For P2OG is not designed solely to flush out terrorists and bring them to justice-<>a laudable goal in itself, although the Rumsfeld way of combating terrorism by causing it is pure moral lunacy. (Or should we use the Regime’s own preferred terminology and just call it “evil”?) No, it seems the Pee-Twos have bigger fish to fry. Once they have sparked terrorists into action-by killing their family members? luring them with loot? fueling them with drugs? plying them with jihad propaganda? messing with their mamas? or with agents provocateurs, perhaps, who infiltrate groups then plan and direct the attacks themselves?<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/floyd1101.html">www.counterpunch.org/floyd1101.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>If so, it wouldn’t be the first time: <br><br>As Chomsky explains in his essay “Domestic Terrorism: Notes on the State System of Oppression”, the 60’s and 70’s were replete with violent provocateur actions masterminded by the FBI.<br><br>“During these years, FBI provocateurs repeatedly urged and initiated violent acts, including forceful disruption of meetings and demonstrations on and off university campuses, attacks on police, bombings, and so on. Meanwhile, government agencies financed, helped organize, and supplied arms to right-wing terrorist groups that carried out fire-bombings, burglaries, and shootings, all with the knowledge of the government agencies responsible 12—in most cases the FBI, although one right-wing terrorist in Chicago claims that his group was financed and directed in part by the CIA. 13 <br><br>One FBI provocateur resigned when he was asked to arrange the bombing of a bridge in such a way that the person who placed the booby-trapped bomb would be killed. This was in Seattle, where it was revealed that FBI infiltrators had been engaged in a campaign of arson, terrorism, and bombings of university and civic buildings, and where the FBI arranged a robbery, entrapping a young black man who was paid $75 for the job and killed in a police ambush. 14 In another case, an undercover operative who had formed and headed a pro-Communist Chinese organization “at the direction of the bureau” reports that at the Miami Republican convention he incited “people to turn over one of the buses and then told them that if they really wanted to blow the bus up, to stick a rag in the gas tank and light it” (they were unable to overturn the vehicle). <br><br>The same ex-operative contends that Cointelpro-type operations, allegedly suspended in April 1971, were in fact continuing as late as mid-1974, when he left the Bureau’s employ. 15 Many details are now available concerning the extensive campaign of terror and disruption waged by the government during these years, in part through right-wing paramilitary groups organized and financed by the national government but primarily through the much more effective means of infiltration and provocation. In particular, much of the violence on campus can be attributed to government provocateurs. <br><br>To cite a few examples, the Alabama branch of the ACLU argued in court that in May 1970 an FBI agent “committed arson and other violence that police used as a reason for declaring that university students were unlawfully assembled” 16—150 students were arrested. The court ruled that the agent’s role was irrelevant unless the defense could establish that he was instructed to commit the violent acts, but this was impossible, according to defense counsel, since the FBI and police thwarted his efforts to locate the agent who had admitted the acts to him.”<br><br>With events of a more spectacular nature, the agents are given an elaborate history complete with doubles, handlers, means of support and false identities. <br><br>The most elaborate set-up for any patsy ever was of course Lee Harvey Oswald, who though he hung out with fascists, spooks and gangsters liked to give out Communist literature is his spare time, even appearing on a public radio show to promote “Marxist-Leninism” and defecting to the Soviet Union.<br>(above excerpt from the excellant blog-article, 'Cut-outs, Moles, Patsies and Provocateurs',<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://rasputin.gnn.tv/blogs/7306/Cut_outs_moles_patsies_and_provocateurs">rasputin.gnn.tv/blogs/730...ovocateurs</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>****<br>From:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.serendipity.li/more/ok_bomb.html">www.serendipity.li/more/ok_bomb.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Pentagon Report Reveals Multiple<br>Blasts in Oklahoma City Bombing<br>According to the March 20, 1996 issue of Strategic Investment newsletter, a classified Pentagon study confirms that the Oklahoma bombing was caused by more than one bomb. A classified report prepared by two independent Pentagon experts has concluded that the destruction of the federal building in Oklahoma City in April 1995 was caused by five separate bombs. The two experts reached the same conclusion for the same technical reasons. Sources close to the Pentagon study are reported to have said that Timothy McVeigh did play a role in the bombing but peripherally, as a "useful idiot."<br>We reported in Freedom Network News at the time that seismograph readouts at the University of Oklahoma indicated more than one blast impulse. Independent ordnance experts, including a Navy Commander, unanimously agreed that a car-bomb with low intensity fertilizer explosives could not have inflicted such extensive damage to the building and that it was highly likely that high-intensity explosives had been wired directly to the columns. Our suspicion then as now is that it was an "inside job." But by whom is the mystery. Strategic Investment reports that the multiple bombings had a Middle Eastern "signature." Others find the whole business to be extremely fishy because of the fact that no ATF or FBI agents were in their offices at the time of the blast [about 9:05 a.m.] — and that evidence pertaining to both Waco and Mena had been stored there.<br>— Strategic Investment, 1217 St. Paul St., Baltimore, MD 21202-4799.<br>***<br><br>And also:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.disinfo.com/archive/pages/article/id2461/pg1/index.html">www.disinfo.com/archive/p...index.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br> Oklahoma City Bombing: Startling Evidence Proves Government Cover-up<br>"We have affidavits in our report from paramedics and other rescuers at the scene who say they heard law enforcement people stating there were other bombs found in the building. And then you had bomb experts who had time to drive to a TV station, and sit there, and talk about the un-detonated bombs they had, bombs that were found in the building. You know, it's just too much competent information that can't be reasoned away as mistakes." <br>*****<br><br>The Lockerbie Flight 103 and TWA Flight 800 airline crashes are also noteable for having abundant evidence suggesting they were methodically and deliberately-planned, not a terrorist bombing (Lockerbie) or a center-fuel-tank explosion (TWA Flt. 800) for specific geopolitical purposes. In the case of the TWA accident, some 100 witnesses reported seeing a missile-strike -- their testimony was simply ignored and discreddited because it didn't fit the 'official' version of required truth. Was the missile actually a navy-sub munition that was accidently fired? <br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://users.rcn.com/virtual.nai/sot/missile.html">users.rcn.com/virtual.nai...ssile.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>--excerpt--<br>"My sources within the intelligence community tell me government authorities may call it a bomb when indeed they know it was a missile that destroyed Flight 800."<br>-Martin Keating, the author of "The Final Jihad"<br><br> For anyone with even the slightest skepticism about the honesty of government, the investigation into the crash of TWA Flight 800 should raise an eyebrow. In the two months since the crash, effectively no definitive conlusions have been made public about what likely caused the crash which claimed more than 200 innocent lives. Beyond being an extraordinarily slow investigation, uncovered evidence and investigative findings often appear to be concealed from the public.<br><br>Furthermore, some of the information which was revealed to the American people has been later contradicted or called into question creating collective doubt about what might have happened. <br>(the site suggests Islamic terrorists are smuggling CIA-provided missiles from the Afghan conflict into the US -- which as they'd be largely undefendable just wouldn't do for the public to know -- instead of an accidental navy test that went awry.)<br><br>ie:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.emergency.com/twa800ed.htm">www.emergency.com/twa800ed.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>Baur's eyewitness account comes to light as critics of the official probe, cover-up and initimidation said to have evidence suggesting that TWA 800 was shot down by an errant US navy missile. A Pentagon spokesman, Kenneth Bacon, assistant secretary of defense for public affairs, claimed US official investigators had thoroughly probed the issue, even inventorying the navy's missile arsenal. Bacon claimed "there is absolutely no evidence to support this theory".<br><br>Commenting on the accidental "friendly fire" possibility, James Hall, chairman of the NTSB claimed that there is no physical evidence of TWA Flight 800 being shot down by a missile. The FBI seized a videotape on Tuesday 11 March 1997 from the Florida home of retired United Airlines pilot Richard Russell, who has long supported the theory that a US navy missile brought down the plane. Russell contends the tape is a copy of the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) radar and that it shows an object speeding *toward* the jetliner. The tape is to be reviewed by a US federal grand jury which has been considering possible criminal elements of the crash, but the exact nature of that probe is "top secret," the souce told Shanti RTV news agency.<br><br>The NTSB and FBI officials continue to claim they cannot yet determine whether the jumbo jet was brought down by a bomb, a missile or a mechanical malfunction. The crash into the Atlantic Ocean off New York's Long Island almost seven months ago killed all 230 people aboard.<br><br>Last year Muslims were being blamed - by self-styled "terrorism experts" - for the crash. New, independent evidence indicates that a missile probably brought down the jetliner. This would give credence to the theory of an accidental shootdown by US forces training in the area. The evidence includes reddish residue found on several seat backs that laboratory analysis showed to be "consistent with solid missile fuel" ingredients.<br><br>*****<br>William Blum makes a compelling case that the Pan Am Flight 103 bombing was other than a Libyan terrorist plot, involving CIA and DEA agents and criminal contacts in a complex heroin-smuggling entrapment racket gone sour --<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.rense.com/general3/panam.htm">www.rense.com/general3/panam.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>***<br>As well, the '93 WTC bombing is much-more than meets the casual eye or the 'official' explanation. Damning evidence that the FBI instigated and then 'allowed' the bombing to succeed has managed to evade all attempts to discredit it. <br><br>Lies, lies, and more lies. About the only thing we have going for us is rigorous skepticism, a quest for the 'truth', and faith that Good will ultimately triumph over evil.<br><br>Be strong and pass the light!<br>Starman<br> <p></p><i></i>
Starman
 
Posts: 410
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 3:57 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Icke-lots of replies

Postby Project Willow » Sat Jul 16, 2005 5:34 pm

Hi Slimmouse,<br><br> <!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>So who IYHO is decieving who here ? Icke quoting these people or these people who are telling Icke what happened.<br><br>Or is he mis interpreting people ? Or is he being too honest ?<br>Im not in any way poking fun here, Im seriously trying to learn !<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>The problem is he has bought and propagated the disinfo right along with the rest of the story. And as far as I know he has not backed off of it. I wonder why?<br><br>Hi Starman,<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>As far as Icke's Lizard-claims discreditting RA victims -- Look, if people are SO stupid that they're going to be convinced about one issue because of another unrelated issue that appears ludicrous, then they're just incredibly stupid people who are glomming-onto the flimsiest reason going to excuse their own moral cowardice and intellectual laziness. <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Exactly, and that's how it works. A perception is created that makes the whole easily dismissable to a great many people. The problem is we need as many people as possible to have an impact on these criminal activities, not just the brave or smart or independant thinkers. <br><br>Hi Sweejak,<br>Thanks for the Levy article. I wish I had the time and clearer head to comment in detail. He certainly gets so much of it, the inability to confront the wounded self and its projection onto the other, the identification of followers who cannot confront their wounded selves... <br>What is stunning about this cabal is its ability to manipulate those and related impulses and needs. So someone is conscious of some of these processes.<br><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>On the other hand I have a trusted friend who has worked with and around the elite and claims that besides having what he describes as 'dead eyes' he has seen one of their faces change in front of his very eyes. Hmmm indeed.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>If I may posit an alternate explanation.. Perps are battered, abused, traumatized people who've not experienced love and aren't capable of experiencing it. They're so damaged they've chosen to follow the paths of those who harmed them. Of course their eyes are dead. It's also quite possible they're multiple, so their faces can change a great deal. There have been reports of multiples who could change their eye color, and I have seen evidence that this is possible.<br><br>Hi Jeff,<br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>About shapeshifting, I wonder: could the memories have been hypnotically induced to discredit accounts of mind control and ritual abuse?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>In a word, absolutely. They're called screen memories, but I'm sure you already knew that. <p>PW</p><i></i>
User avatar
Project Willow
 
Posts: 4798
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Seattle
Blog: View Blog (1)

PreviousNext

Return to UFOs and High Weirdness

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests