Is it still legal to wonder aloud whether Ryan Lanza's ID was planted on that body? Because, if not, I'm now a criminal.
9.35am First 911 calls that a shooting is underway; police arrive within minutes
9.40am Shooting underway at the school's main office and a kindergarten class
9.45am SWAT team arrives; checks building
It seems the SWAT team were first on the scene, and extremely quickly too. Masked and armed, presumably. So exactly where did that SWAT team come from? Was it an FBI team? Is it still legal to distrust those fine anonymous gentlemen?
Also, what was that ID, exactly? I will presume it's still legal to wonder. Was it by any a chance a blurred b&w photo of a brown-eyed boy, namely the young, skinny Ryan? Accidents can happen, even to the most experienced SWAT team. ("Shit! Wrong brother!")
Questions, questions... Purely hypothetical, of course. And only because a) the entire case is such a grotesque mess, and b) I find it hard to conceive that Adam Lanza would have been capable of such a crime, and I have certainly seen no hint of a motive so far, unless it was the untrue assertion that his mother was a teacher at the school. I find it much easier to conceive that some extremely brutalised and hardened psychopaths were employed to carry out the crime, although I don't find that easy to conceive either.
NB I am presuming, of course, that the Newtown local police were as appalled as anyone else by the massacre - indeed, that they were even more appalled than most people. They have my sympathy. Many of them will be well-acquainted with the victims and their families. Some of those police officers will be parents themselves, maybe even parents of victims. It is
not the Newtown local police I distrust.
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966
TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC