Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Burnt Hill » Mon Jun 10, 2013 12:06 pm wrote:^ its not the enforcement of rules , its the selective enforcement.
Which possibly contributes to the proliferation of personal attacks and name calling- "well if he can get away with saying that to me, than wait till you hear what I have to say!" happens often on such threads- and then moderation ensues.
Consider c2w?s list- why is you are an asshole unacceptable, yet you are an arse acceptable?
Are well contrived personal attacks acceptable? Reading through, yes they are.
I understand at this point moderators don't read every word posted here, I wonder why not?
Or whether- shouldn't that be a goal?
I applaud the expectation of self-moderation, but we all have different levels of acceptance.
We need consistency.
Also no need to lock a thread that has evolved into something else, perhaps split it off in to two.
be well
h o l
Bruce Dazzling » Mon Jun 10, 2013 12:32 pm wrote:Yes, C_w, I split the topic.
See below...Burnt Hill » Mon Jun 10, 2013 12:06 pm wrote:^ its not the enforcement of rules , its the selective enforcement.
Which possibly contributes to the proliferation of personal attacks and name calling- "well if he can get away with saying that to me, than wait till you hear what I have to say!" happens often on such threads- and then moderation ensues.
Consider c2w?s list- why is you are an asshole unacceptable, yet you are an arse acceptable?
Are well contrived personal attacks acceptable? Reading through, yes they are.
I understand at this point moderators don't read every word posted here, I wonder why not?
Or whether- shouldn't that be a goal?
I applaud the expectation of self-moderation, but we all have different levels of acceptance.
We need consistency.
Also no need to lock a thread that has evolved into something else, perhaps split it off in to two.
be well
h o l
Unless drew develops a robot moderator, there will always be "selective enforcement," also known as judgement, and as I indicated in my post above, our interpretation of the rules comes into play, and in every single instance, there will be posters who agree with our interpretations, and posters who disagree. That's just the nature of this business.
We (the mods) are just people with day jobs, and wives, and dogs, and groceries to shop for, and lawns to mow, and tomatoes to plant, etc. We can't be here all of the time, and we can't read every single post. It's just not feasible. This is why we ask that you alert us to potential problems via PM and/or the post-flagging function.
And taking c2w's list into consideration (as per your request), nobody has said that "you are an arse" is acceptable, unless I missed it. I certainly didn't say it.
You're asking for consistency and that's exactly what I'm trying to give you.
No personal attacks. Don't call anyone a dickhead, or an asshole, or an arse, etc. Just don't do it.
It you wish to discuss this further, please do it here in the posting guidelines forum.
Let's get this thread back on topic now.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests