Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
"For the record, Campbell did not belong to any organization that condoned racial or social bias, nor do we know of any other way in which he endorsed such viewpoints. During his lifetime, there was no record of such accusations of public bigotry"

Look at the hydrangeas who associated with Campbell! after all those years with him....man did he fool them![]()
![]()
![]()
AD brekin get on it on.....tell the flowers who knew him all these years....man what a fool they were!
so I guess the flowers are anti-semites too?
AD brekin take a look up the old lady's skirt...I'm sure you'll find what you are looking for there
FIND IT AD CRUCIFY THE DEAD MAN..... CRUCIFY THE DEAD MAN!!!.....IT IS YOUR JOB 1
INFORM US ALL WHAT THE EVIL CAMPBELL HAS DONE AS AN ANTI-SEMETIC....TELL US ALL THE CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY CAMPBELL HAS COMMITTED
JUST LIKE GILL DO IT AFTER HE'S DEAD AND GONE
WATCH THE VIDEOS TELL US WHERE THERE WAS ANYTHING ANTI-SEMETIC IN THOSE 6 HOURS
WHAT A BUNCH OF FUCKIN COWARDS
this was NEVER brought up when the man was alive and could speak for himself....when he would have had the chance to defend himself.......Campbell's body wasn't even cold when Gill wrote that shit
can't take the word of long time friends that KNEW HIM...FLOWERS THAT WERE HIS FRIENDS!!!! unlike yourself
WHERE HAVE ALL THE ANTISEMITIC FLOWERS GONE? HUH? YOU FOOLS!! FOOLS i TELL YOU!
Brekin,
Can you cite actual Campbell quotes backing up your above assertions regarding his beliefs?
Apologies if they've already been posted, as I've arrived to this thread late in the game, but I'm always skeptical when I see characterizations of someone's beliefs as opposed to their actual words.
Is this Burger King? Is it your way right away? How about you read the thread first before you make a request? compared2what? » 24 Jun 2013 19:07 wrote:slimmouse » Mon Jun 24, 2013 1:19 pm wrote:Im left wondering if the problems with his abhorration of monotheistic tihnking would have barely registered a murmur had he been an islamophoble.
I think thats an angle worthy of discussion, if we daire
I'd object. And (more to the point) there's a reasonably well-organized faction of people and groups who would as well. So I think it would be considerably more than a murmur, in the United States, at least.
But not in all precincts. And it's just not as profoundly culturally or emotionally contentious here, for the vast majority of people. Because it's not as close to home. So it wouldn't be as big a deal, realistically speaking.
I mean, to me, there's no difference and that's, like, a first principle. (Meaning: IIf I'm aware of it and it's bigotry/prejudice/hatred, it's the exact same concept every time. The only question is how best to address it. But that's not to say I'm any less error-prone or selfish or self-deluding than anyone is, obviously. I'm talking about beliefs/ideals/best efforts/etc.)
Anyway. For some other people, likewise. But most divvy up their resources on a less conceptual basis. And there's not necessarily anything wrong with doing that. So it's never literally exactly the same issue in practice, from one group to another.
_________
Took your dare.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests