U.S. Intelligence agencies have become aware that the Russians have built the largest building under a single roof in the world. No one in the agencies, however, knows what is going on inside. The President’s National Security Council staff orders INSCOM to have remote viewers see what they can determine about it. One of INSCOM’s better remote-viewers, Joseph McMoneagle (a consultant with OT VII Hal Puthoff) reports, after his remote viewing of the facility, that a very large, new submarine with 18-20 missile launch tubes and a “large flat area” at the aft end will be launched in 100 days. Two Soviet subs, one with 24 launch tubes, and the other with 20 launch tubes and a large flat aft deck, are sighted 120 days later. These are new Soviet “Typhoon”-class submarines—the largest in the world.
If the CIA in fact had a spy of the ground who had access to this submarine facility, and at the same time had suspicions that US intelligence had been penetrated by moles working for the Soviets, there would be a very pressing need to disguise the source of their information. What better way to disseminate the info and yet guard the source, than to cloak it as the result of "remote viewing"? If the Soviets became aware that the CIA had specific information about the design of a new class of Soviet submarine, information which was a closely guarded secret, and no believable explanation for the source of the information, a mole with access would be one of the obvious conclusions. This would of course would put their source at great risk, mandating a convincing cover story. And of course to make remote viewing a convincing story, you have to have the requisite projects, programs, working groups with actual histories, you can't just say it came from remote viewing if you haven't laid down the appropriate verifiable back story. It also helps that the Soviets seemingly are conducting the same experiments, though of course I wonder if they possibly had the same motives as the CIA's that I am positing here. It would be very funny if both of these intelligence communities were stuck in the same hall of mirrors as we are in trying to determine the truth of ESP and its validity. Perhaps the Soviets started leaking the idea of ESP spying to give cover to the their clandestine humint gathering, and then had the same cover story reflected back to them by the CIA, neither one knowing for sure if it was real, forever wondering if perhaps the enemy had in fact really discovered legitimate ESP based information gathering techniques.
This interpretation does not preclude remote viewing actually working, of course. Remote viewing and the information from spies on the ground could be used to cross-check and confirm each other, as well provide a credible cover story, or even disinformation. Information gathered from remote viewing could be leaked out as having come from a spy where one does not exist, leading to a mole hunt where one does not exist, causing chaos and dissension in the ranks of the enemy. So it could work on many levels.
Has anyone seen this interpretation offered? I personally haven't, but I know that if I could think of it, than someone surely could as well.