If it were a right wing government, the tweaked plot point would involve an "anti-gay agenda." Or, more likely, how the right wingers in power will "never let an election happen because they can't risk being voted out, and yadda yadda yadda blah de blah de blah..."
That was an RI fav during the Bush years if I remember correctly.
As far as Disney being part of "the Illuminati" because they're gay friendly, I know that if you troll back in time on the RI blog you'll find that Disney is part of the Illuminati for entirely different, and probably equally spurious, reasons.
I've come to believe that the entire conspiracy meme is, at its heart, a complete invention.
Not that conspiracies don't exist, it's just that the people who write about them really have no clue as to their real nature. And, being human and pathologically incapable of just saying "I don't know," they feel compelled to endlessly ramble on & invent an insight that they don't really have.
You see it here, endlessly reiterated ad nauseum.
For example,
"the MSM is directing full attention to this story so it must mean something nefarious & yadda yadda yadda blah de blah de blah....."
Or
"Does this story signal the beginning of the end game because I'm so adept at prophecy I can discern the future & yadda yadda yadda blah de blah de blah..."
I find it curious that being wrong once or twice or thrice squared never deters, even for an instant, the conspiracy genius from posting further insights & prophecies that are as empty & pointless & wrong as their last series of insights & prophecies.
I also find it curious that conspiracy truth seekers rarely call out members of their social group for past lapses in reality. They just march onward like the suburban van driving daddy who refuses to stop & ask for directions until everyone is hopelessly lost. I also imagine that this explains why conspiracy theorizing is primarily a male preoccupation. Although, just like with lung cancer, heart disease & hypertension, I'm sure that the women will soon catch up.
I suppose that all of this has more to do with group psychology, even completely imaginary groups like Internut forums, than anyone's desire to know "da troof."
I also suspect that folk have just enough information to be paranoid but never enough information to find out exactly who or what they should be paranoid about.
It probably also has a lot to with the Internut's ability to draw in a constant influx of new faces who are generally unaware of the twisted roots of their favorite conspiracy crapola. They read some rambling revolutionary wannabe &, lacking any appreciable critical thinking skills, swallow their bullshit like it was a juicy steak and then pass it on like a virus.
That's why I usually tell any budding conspiracy wonk that I meet to refrain from wasting their time with Internut conspiracy cashews & their almondy friends. Their time would be better spent getting laid or learning to play the mandolin or even staring at Vince 'Walter White' Gilligan's "I could be a drug dealing suburban white boy Grand Theft Auto 50 cent gangsta if I wanted" Breaking Wind fantasy, if, for no other reason, than it's funny as hell. Unintentionally funny, but funny none the less.
Still, it's about style. My father doesn't accept being born a serf, either, but he copes by watching Fox News and fantasizing about lining liberals against a wall and shooting them all for ruining his country. Hopefully I can avoid the same fate when I reach his age.
Then of course, there are all the over-aged adolescents with unresolved daddy issues...
But that is far too trite & boring to get into...