THE PSEUDO-SACRIFICIAL "SLUTTING" OF HANNAH MONTANA

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: THE PSEUDO-SACRIFICIAL "SLUTTING" OF HANNAH MONTANA

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:08 pm

Did JackRiddler complain about this op being in all caps like he did here or does he just really like criticizing me?

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=37108
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

.

Postby IanEye » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:35 pm

seemslikeadream » Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:08 pm wrote:Did JackRiddler complain about this op being in all caps like he did here or does he just really like criticizing me?

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=37108



ANSWER: YES.
User avatar
IanEye
 
Posts: 4865
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:33 pm
Blog: View Blog (29)

Re: .

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:37 pm

IanEye » Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:35 pm wrote:
seemslikeadream » Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:08 pm wrote:Did JackRiddler complain about this op being in all caps like he did here or does he just really like criticizing me?

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=37108



ANSWER: YES.



thanks...I really thought it was all about me :jumping:
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: THE PSEUDO-SACRIFICIAL "SLUTTING" OF HANNAH MONTANA

Postby 82_28 » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:59 pm

I have it from upon authority that yes, you were being criticized much like many of us were and are. Buck up, SLAD, it's just a TV show in which a young adult LIBERATES herself from her captors in order to free her followers (if indeed there are any) and also SOME OF OUR threads must fall within certain guidelines along with thoughts deemed thinkable by the Great Council Dead Set Upon Liberating Those Who Are Downtrodden Yet Not's (GCDSULTWAD) CODE OF CONDUCT. If you knew any better then you would have applied your training in composing the way you present your letters that you string along SOMETIMES, might I add, in what we call "CAPS" in the industry of posting comments and content on the WEB and MOST IMPORTANTLY RIGOROUS INTUITION. This calls for a mandatory refresher course and safety meeting. Feelings and thoughts must be vetted from here on by a certified emotive notary to be sent by a 3rd party in order for 1st TIER CONSIDERATION.

I hope to have a proposal to present to the Council about this concern, like, never. Keep on keepin' on SLAD!
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: .

Postby JackRiddler » Tue Sep 03, 2013 8:02 pm

IanEye » Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:35 pm wrote:
seemslikeadream » Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:08 pm wrote:Did JackRiddler complain about this op being in all caps like he did here or does he just really like criticizing me?

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=37108



ANSWER: YES.


SOMEONE HERE DOESN'T KNOW ME AS WELL AS SHE THOUGHT!

YOU WILL PRY MY CAPSLOCK-MOCKING KEYBOARD FROM MY COLD DEAD FINGERS!
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: THE PSEUDO-SACRIFICIAL "SLUTTING" OF HANNAH MONTANA

Postby JackRiddler » Tue Sep 03, 2013 8:08 pm

HUXLEYAN RMA ASSET CYRUS - HER LATEST ACTION TO HELP ENSLAVE YOUTH BY MAKING THEM THINK THEY'RE FREE!


Why Miley Got Her Gay-Marriage Tattoo

http://www.glamour.com/entertainment/20 ... march-2012

It sparked a major controversy on Twitter—now Miley Cyrus tells you the whole story.

Image
By Miley Cyrus

Imagine finding someone you love more than anything in the world, who you would risk your life for but couldn't marry. And you couldn't have that special day the way your friends do—you know, wear the ring on your finger and have it mean the same thing as everybody else. Just put yourself in that person's shoes. It makes me feel sick to my stomach.

When I shared a picture of my tattoo on my Twitter page and said, "All LOVE is equal," a lot of people mocked me—they said, "What happened to you? You used to be a Christian girl!" And I said, "Well, if you were a true Christian, you would have your facts straight. Christianity is about love." The debate resulted in a lot of threats and hate mail to people who agreed and disagreed with me. At one point I had to say, "Dude, everyone lay off." Can't people have friendly debates about sensitive topics without it turning into unnecessary threats?

I believe every American should be allowed the same rights and civil liberties. Without legalized same-sex marriage, most of the time you cannot share the same health benefits, you are not considered next of kin and you are not granted the same securities as a heterosexual couple. How is this different than having someone sit in the back of the bus because of their skin color?

One day I read online about the head of Urban Outfitters donating to a presidential candidate who does not support equality for everyone. I was shocked and disappointed that a company with such diversity would exclude such a large group of people. I can no longer bring myself to shop there.

We all should be tolerant of one another and embrace our differences. My dad [country singer Billy Ray Cyrus], who is a real man's man, lives on the farm and is as Southern and straight as they come. He loves my gay friends and even supports same-sex marriage. If my father can do it, anyone can.

This is America, the nation of dreams. We're so proud of that. And yet certain people are excluded. It's just not right.



CHRISTENDOM UNDER ATTACK!!!
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: THE PSEUDO-SACRIFICIAL "SLUTTING" OF HANNAH MONTANA

Postby MacCruiskeen » Tue Sep 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Shoud be "QUASI-", by the way (if anything), as opposed to "PSEUDO-".

Carry on.
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: THE PSEUDO-SACRIFICIAL "SLUTTING" OF HANNAH MONTANA

Postby conniption » Fri Oct 04, 2013 6:44 am

the guardian

Sinéad O'Connor's open letter to Miley Cyrus

After the 20-year-old claimed that Wrecking Ball's controversial video was inspired by Nothing Compares 2 U, the Irish singer was compelled to warn Cyrus that she is being 'pimped' by the pop industry. This is the full text of O'Connor's blogpost

Sinéad O'Connor

Thursday 3 October 2013


Image
Sinead O'Connor: 'You have enough talent that you don't need to let the music business make a prostitute of you.' Photograph: Neil Gavin

Dear Miley,

I wasn't going to write this letter, but today i've been dodging phone calls from various newspapers who wished me to remark upon your having said in Rolling Stone your Wrecking Ball video was designed to be similar to the one for Nothing Compares … So this is what I need to say … And it is said in the spirit of motherliness and with love.

I am extremely concerned for you that those around you have led you to believe, or encouraged you in your own belief, that it is in any way 'cool' to be naked and licking sledgehammers in your videos. It is in fact the case that you will obscure your talent by allowing yourself to be pimped, whether its the music business or yourself doing the pimping.

Nothing but harm will come in the long run, from allowing yourself to be exploited, and it is absolutely NOT in ANY way an empowerment of yourself or any other young women, for you to send across the message that you are to be valued (even by you) more for your sexual appeal than your obvious talent.
I am happy to hear I am somewhat of a role model for you and I hope that because of that you will pay close attention to what I am telling you.

The music business doesn't give a shit about you, or any of us. They will prostitute you for all you are worth, and cleverly make you think its what YOU wanted … and when you end up in rehab as a result of being prostituted, 'they' will be sunning themselves on their yachts in Antigua, which they bought by selling your body and you will find yourself very alone.

None of the men ogling you give a shit about you either, do not be fooled. Many's the woman mistook lust for love. If they want you sexually that doesn't mean they give a fuck about you. All the more true when you unwittingly give the impression you don't give much of a fuck about yourself. And when you employ people who give the impression they don't give much of a fuck about you either. No one who cares about you could support your being pimped … and that includes you yourself.

Yes, I'm suggesting you don't care for yourself. That has to change. You ought be protected as a precious young lady by anyone in your employ and anyone around you, including you. This is a dangerous world. We don't encourage our daughters to walk around naked in it because it makes them prey for animals and less than animals, a distressing majority of whom work in the music industry and it's associated media.

You are worth more than your body or your sexual appeal. The world of showbiz doesn't see things that way, they like things to be seen the other way, whether they are magazines who want you on their cover, or whatever … Don't be under any illusions … ALL of them want you because they're making money off your youth and your beauty … which they could not do except for the fact your youth makes you blind to the evils of show business. If you have an innocent heart you can't recognise those who do not.

I repeat, you have enough talent that you don't need to let the music business make a prostitute of you. You shouldn't let them make a fool of you either. Don't think for a moment that any of them give a flying fuck about you. They're there for the money… we're there for the music. It has always been that way and it will always be that way. The sooner a young lady gets to know that, the sooner she can be REALLY in control.

You also said in Rolling Stone that your look is based on mine. The look I chose, I chose on purpose at a time when my record company were encouraging me to do what you have done. I felt I would rather be judged on my talent and not my looks. I am happy that I made that choice, not least because I do not find myself on the proverbial rag heap now that I am almost 47 yrs of age … which unfortunately many female artists who have based their image around their sexuality, end up on when they reach middle age.

Real empowerment of yourself as a woman would be to in future refuse to exploit your body or your sexuality in order for men to make money from you. I needn't even ask the question … I've been in the business long enough to know that men are making more money than you are from you getting naked. Its really not at all cool. And its sending dangerous signals to other young women. Please in future say no when you are asked to prostitute yourself. Your body is for you and your boyfriend. It isn't for every spunk-spewing dirtbag on the net, or every greedy record company executive to buy his mistresses diamonds with.

As for the shedding of the Hannah Montana image … whoever is telling you getting naked is the way to do that does absolutely NOT respect your talent, or you as a young lady. Your records are good enough for you not to need any shedding of Hannah Montana. She's waaaaaaay gone by now … Not because you got naked but because you make great records.

Whether we like it or not, us females in the industry are role models and as such we have to be extremely careful what messages we send to other women. The message you keep sending is that its somehow cool to be prostituted … its so not cool Miley … its dangerous. Women are to be valued for so much more than their sexuality. We aren't merely objects of desire. I would be encouraging you to send healthier messages to your peers … that they and you are worth more than what is currently going on in your career. Kindly fire any motherfucker who hasn't expressed alarm, because they don't care about you.

As posted on http://www.sineadoconnor.com
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: THE PSEUDO-SACRIFICIAL "SLUTTING" OF HANNAH MONTANA

Postby Laodicean » Thu Sep 24, 2015 5:23 pm

User avatar
Laodicean
 
Posts: 3525
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:39 pm
Blog: View Blog (16)

Re: THE PSEUDO-SACRIFICIAL "SLUTTING" OF HANNAH MONTANA

Postby JackRiddler » Sat Sep 26, 2015 9:51 pm

This has got to be the most entertaining thread of 2013. Still laughing at kelley's post ("Wait a minute... Miley Cyrus is Hannah Montana?!"). Among others. Don't forget to vote in the poll!

viewtopic.php?p=519967
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: THE PSEUDO-SACRIFICIAL "SLUTTING" OF HANNAH MONTANA

Postby kelley » Sun Sep 27, 2015 8:51 am

now that I uh gotta got this sorta sorted out i'll tell ye wut

miley ain't no linda blair that's fer dang sure

and hannah ain't neither

no sir
kelley
 
Posts: 616
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:49 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: THE PSEUDO-SACRIFICIAL "SLUTTING" OF HANNAH MONTANA

Postby KUAN » Sun Oct 11, 2015 7:24 pm

bump
KUAN
 
Posts: 889
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:17 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: THE PSEUDO-SACRIFICIAL "SLUTTING" OF HANNAH MONTANA

Postby Iamwhomiam » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:08 pm

Linda Blair?
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: THE PSEUDO-SACRIFICIAL "SLUTTING" OF HANNAH MONTANA

Postby backtoiam » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:16 pm

I admit to being confused. But i'm stupid. Why does hanna montana belong on the front page of ri, right now, when she is a nobody. ?
"A mind stretched by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions." Oliver Wendell Holmes
backtoiam
 
Posts: 2101
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:22 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 165 guests