In parts of West Virginia, water is only for flushing

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: In parts of West Virginia, water is only for flushing

Postby conniption » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:11 pm

The Politics Blog

Another Step In The Clean Getaway

By Charles P. Pierce
February 11, 2014


View All Comments (38)

Image
Ty Wright/Washington Post via Getty Images

Freedom Industries, the Orwellian author -- and conveniently bankrupt cause -- of the chemical spill in West Virginia that poisoned most of the state's drinking water, had an unbreakable hair appointment and found itself unable to attend a congressional hearing on what it did because why should it, anyway?

That was OK, though, because nobody else knew anything, either.


Despite more than two hours of testimony, there was little discussion of the available information -- or the unknowns -- that, if focused on publicly, might help residents understand why no one can really answer for certain the question Capito said everyone is asking. There was little testimony about the huge lack of data about Crude MCHM, or about thousands of other chemicals. There were few, if any, questions about the formula federal public health officials used to come up with an emergency "screening level" of 1 part per million the state used to clear the regional water system for public use. Only U.S. Chemical Safety Board Chairman Rafael Moure-Eraso seemed to really want to try to wade into those issues. "It would be hard to say if it's safe," Moure-Eraso said. "In order to give a scientific answer, you have to have scientific information."


In other words, over a month after the spill occurred, the answer given by most responsible officials to the question, "Can we drink the water yet?" is "Fked if we know."

The witness list, though, included no average West Virginians -- no business owners or schoolteachers or working mothers -- who might have told lawmakers personal stories about the spill's impacts. Committee Chairman Bill Shuster, R-Pa., did allow public comments at the end of the hearing, but limited those to seven individuals who were given two minutes each. Witnesses and lawmakers discussed various options for legislation that might help to avoid a repeat of the spill and the water crisis that followed. Barely mentioned was the fact that numerous agencies knew Freedom was storing large quantities of chemicals 1.5 miles upstream from the water intake, but did nothing to try to prevent or plan for such a spill.


Overregulation is such a burden.



selected comments

Jack Mahoney · Top Commenter · Founder at Maine Prep

This is proof that corporations are people. Really shitty people.
Reply · 15 ·
· 5 hours ago


Bob Kincaid · Top Commenter · Works at Head-On Radio Network (The H.O.R.N.) · 136 subscribers

BREAKING:
New coal toxin spill in WV: http://www.wvgazette.com/News/201402110 ... uild=cache

Note that the closest the company can estimate is that the breach of the 8" pipe occurred between Midnight and 5:30 a.m. today.

Pumps turned off at 5:30 a.m.

Patriot waits till 7:42 a.m. to report it to WVDEP, who are as useless as a screen door on a submarine.

Toxic waste contained MCHM, as well as many other poisons. It was being pumped into a massive lake of toxic waste, one of 126 that dot West Virginia's landscape. Largest toxic waste lake in WV is at Brushy Fork, presently rated for 9+ billion gallons.

Reply ·
· 4 hours ago


Michael Schmitt · Top Commenter

As any good CONservative can tell you, there is nothing in The Constitution as written by The Founding Patriarchs and the Sky Dad above saying that non-upper class people have a right to unpolluted water. Where do non-Klanservatives get these kooky liberal ideas anyway? Not everybody can have non-polluted water, and maybe those WV Americans ought to be glad to have water at all - surely water with mercury, lead, and selenium is better than no water? If liberals hadn't told the people in WV about the water, then the people wouldn't even know about the water to begin with, problem solved. Sometimes what they don't know, won't hurt them. Just let all industry have freedom, and the Lord will take care of everything else. And even if the water is harmful because of a little lead, or whatever, people need to take personal responsibility, pull themselves up by their bootstraps, stop whining and blaming others for their problems, and stop looking for handouts from the productive people not on welfare and foodstamps. If you don't like the water, then don't drink it. Take responsibility for your own bad choices. And if you don't like WV because of a slight water problem, move to Russia or Cuba. It's all Obama's fault anyway. Small water "problem"? Maybe don't be a glass half empty type, and how about talking about what's good about America. These things wouldn't even be an issue if there were school prayer and no abortions and no evolution being taught. We need to go by The Bible, and then The Constitution, with no handouts like "clean" water. Mike Huckabee for President, no handouts for people whining about privileges like water. John 3:16. Hallelujah, Gawd bless FOX News.
Reply ·
· 2 hours ago


Brad Hicks · Top Commenter · Retired at Social Security Disability

Did you see the thing, over the weekend, about the water company billing people $500 and up for flushing their pipes, something the water company ordered them to do? I swear, if this was a Captain Planet episode, we would be mocking it for having such unrealistic villains, even by Captain Planet standards.

Ever since the first day of this disaster, I've been waiting for someone to ask West Virginia American Water something. On the first day of the spill, we were assured that once the water went through the treatment system it would be safe, and I yelled at the screen, "How do we know that!?" Has anybody even asked the engineers who designed that treatment plant what MHCHM will do to the treatment plant itself? Does it react, chemically, with any of the materials that the plant is made from, does it bind to the pipes or the filters, does it settle to the bottom of the settlement ponds? Same question, PPH? Same question, any chemicals that are formed by the interactions between MHCHM, PPH, and/or the chemicals used in water treatment?

And there's a reason we don't ask, at least I assume this is the reason: we know that we don't know, and the answer is potentially too scary to contemplate. It is entirely possible that we're going to find out that the only way to render the system safe is to demolish the whole water treatment plant, rip out every foot of water main, rip the plumbing out of every building that ran that water through it. Given what that would cost, it is entirely possible that we're going to discover that the entire city of Charleston, West Virginia, the capital of the state, has been rendered uninhabitable and will have to be evacuated like Love Canal, New York or Times Beach, Missouri. And only chronic depressives like me are ready to start thinking about that.


Reply ·
· about an hour ago
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: In parts of West Virginia, water is only for flushing

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Feb 11, 2014 7:03 pm

The Cost of Doing Business: Regulators Impose Minor Fine on Duke Energy Over Coal Ash Pollution
Tuesday, 11 February 2014 11:39
By Rachel Maddow, MSNBC | Video Report


Rachel Maddow reports that as citizen's environmental groups were bringing suit against Duke Energy, now responsible for the environmental damage in North Carolina after a massive coal ash spill, the state agency moved in, took over the case and assessed a minor fine ending the case. There were no provisions for cleanup or damages. State regulators blocked lawsuits and assessed $99,111 fine, but the company is worth $50 billion.


Duke Energy permanently plugs leaking ash-pond pipe


By Bruce Henderson
bhenderson@charlotteobserver.com
Posted: Sunday, Feb. 09, 2014


Gerry Broome - AP Photo
Amy Adams, North Carolina campaign coordinator with Appalachian Voices, shows her hand covered with wet coal ash from the Dan River swirling in the background as state and federal environmental officials continued their investigations of a spill of coal ash into the river in Danville, Va., Wednesday, Feb. 5, 2014. Duke Energy estimates that up to 82,000 tons of ash has been released from a break in a 48-inch storm water pipe at the Dan River Power Plant in Eden N.C. on Sunday.

NC admits mistake, says arsenic topped safe level
NC regulators shielded Duke's coal ash pollution
McCrory demands Duke fix leaking ash pond

Duke Energy says it has installed a permanent plug in the leaking stormwater pipe that dumped tons of coal ash and wastewater into the Dan River about 130 miles northeast of Charlotte.

Crews filled a section of the 48-inch pipe with concrete grout and a cap, Duke said. The material hardened for 12 hours and was tested Saturday afternoon.

Duke said it will continue to grout the whole pipe, which drains stormwater from the plant under the 27-acre ash pond and into the Dan. The pipe is about 850 feet long from the point where it broke to the river.

The plant is in Eden.

“Plugging the pipe was clearly job one, but we’re continuing our efforts and working closely with all the agencies involved in this response,” Charlie Gates, Duke’s senior vice president for power generation operations, said in a statement. “Our next step is to continue to monitor the water quality of the river and to accelerate our planning for the best long-term solution at the site.”

Spokesman Jeff Brooks said Sunday that workers continued to excavate around the broken part of the pipe so grout can be pumped into it.

The pipe at the now-retired Dan River coal-fired power plant broke last Sunday, sending 50,000 to 82,000 tons of ash and 24 million to 27 million gallons of water into the river. The Environmental Protection Agency says it was likely the nation’s third-largest ash spill.

Duke struggled for days to stop the broken pipe from leaking into the Dan, in part, it said, because of repair crews’ need to have access to the pipe’s interior. The company also discovered that the pipe, which was installed decades ago, was made of corrugated metal at its break point instead of the reinforced concrete it was believed to be.

On Friday, Duke said water coming out of the pipe was being recirculated back into the ash pond. The company also apologized for the spill.

“We’re committed to the Dan River and the communities that it serves,” Gates said. “We are accountable for what happened and have plenty of work ahead of us.”

Downstream municipalities say they’ve been able to filter out the potentially toxic metals in the ash. Water from the Dan River itself has shown elevated levels of arsenic, iron, aluminum and copper, the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources said Friday.

Gov. Pat McCrory visited the site Thursday, urging Duke to stop the leak. N.C. Senate leader Phil Berger, who lives in Eden, asked that a legislative inquiry begin into the spill. Berger asked that it be placed on the agenda for Wednesday’s legislative Environmental Review Commission meeting.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: In parts of West Virginia, water is only for flushing

Postby seemslikeadream » Sat Feb 15, 2014 11:25 am

Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: In parts of West Virginia, water is only for flushing

Postby Elvis » Sat Feb 15, 2014 5:04 pm

BrandonD wrote:It seems quite clear at this point that major corporations intend to charge money, like a troll at the bridge, for every necessity that human life requires. This includes drinking water, of course, and I believe this has already been implemented in some underdeveloped countries.

However, Americans and citizens of industrialized nations would never tolerate being charged for tap water


I, too, long assumed that US water utilities were strictly local, public operations, but, sadly, water privatization is well underway in the US. In fact, as we've seen, the affected WV water supply is under license to American Water, "the largest water management company." (see below)

This is from 2009:

The United States is experiencing a controversial trend towards privatization of public water services.20 The amount of all public water services in the United States provided by privately-owned water suppliers is relatively small.21 They serve about 15% of U.S. water customers (measured in volume of water handled), take in about 14% of total water revenues, and hold about 11% of all water system assets in the United States, even though the number of such systems constitutes about 33% of all community water systems.22 Nonetheless, private operation, control, or ownership of local water supply systems has increased dramatically since the 1980s.

[...] Political leaders sympathetic to reducing government, supporting private sector companies, or stretching limited public funds have found justifications for privatizing public water systems in policy reports and studies by private market advocates like the Reason Foundation and the Cato Institute.46

http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewc ... ext=wmelpr

Much, much more in that article; the footnoted sources are extensive if anyone really wanted to dive deep into the subject.

Not to get too far afield of the main topic, but water privatization seems relevant in this case. And we need to be aware of this long-creeping trend; I had no idea, either!

This from 2003:

Privatization has hit the water sector, which has remained mostly the bastion of public utilities. Over the last five years, hundreds of American communities, including Indianapolis, Milwaukee and Gary, Ind., have hired private companies to manage their waterworks, serving about one in 20 Americans.
[...]
But a cautionary tale has emerged here in Atlanta, where the largest water privatization deal collapsed in January. Instead of public savings and private profit, a deal reached in 1999 between Atlanta and United Water resulted in bitter disappointments for all sides, not least of all consumers.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/10/us/as ... -back.html

The good news there is that Atlanta ditched the private contract and went back to municipal funding & operation.

Here is a very interesting aspect of corporate water-management takeover:

taxpayers ultimately suffer when water systems are privatized, and that leasing or selling these essential systems simply masks, not alleviates, local budget shortfalls.
[...]
“Water system concession contracts are a new form of predatory lending, targeting cash-strapped, financially desperate cities and towns,” said Food & Water Watch Executive Director Wenonah Hauter. “Because they do nothing to address the source of budget problems, long-term water system leases just use fiscal smoke and mirrors to obscure them, transferring a municipality’s money woes to local taxpayers through rate increases.”
[...]
Such loans are far more expensive than the common form of government borrowing on the municipal bond market. The upfront loan can have an interest rate of 14 percent or higher, while local government debt typically has an interest rate of about 4 percent.

http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/pressr ... han-loans/



The US administration is doing just what you'd expect. From July, 2013:

By Elizabeth Schuster

Monday, I participated in a meeting hosted by the White House Council on Environmental Quality and the Environmental Protection Agency on financing water infrastructure.

Although I applaud the administration’s efforts to convene a discussion about the enormous need to invest in our nation’s aging infrastructure, I was discouraged that much of the meeting focused on promoting public-private partnerships and attracting more private financing for public water systems.

Throughout the meeting, a misleading notion was continually raised that using private capital to fund water systems somehow constitutes an innovative approach to financing. This couldn’t be further from the truth. Time and again, municipalities and consumers have suffered under privatized water systems.

As if attempting to package and sell privatization as a new trendy approach isn’t alarming enough, the chief financial officer of American Water, the nation’s largest water company, added insult to injury when she asked about the status of the company’s proposal that the Internal Revenue Service modify its rules to allow companies that take over privatized municipal water systems to retain public tax benefits on the system’s existing debt.
[...]
http://ecowatch.com/2013/07/03/will-pub ... rivatized/



Anyway, I think we need to start just leaving coal in the ground. Maybe this WV disaster will quell the crowing about "clean coal." But, I noticed most of the first stories about the spill were slow to mention what the chemical is used for.

In my neck of the woods there's a huge push-back to the proposed Goldman Sachs-financed coal trains they want rumbling through our county and city: at least twenty coal-filled trains every day (some say up to 40 per day), in addition to the several that already run. This would amount to a nearly continuous rumbling of dirty, noisy, traffic-stopping coal trains. The ground shakes in many areas when the trains pass. All that coal is headed for export, mostly to China.
“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7585
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: In parts of West Virginia, water is only for flushing

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu May 22, 2014 8:15 am

The Untold Story Of What Happened At An Overcrowded West Virginia Jail After The Chemical Spill
BY CHRISTIE THOMPSON MAY 21, 2014 AT 11:32 AM UPDATED: MAY 21, 2014 AT 2:30 PM

"The Untold Story Of What Happened At An Overcrowded West Virginia Jail After The Chemical Spill"
When roughly 10,000 gallons of chemicals leaked into a West Virginia watershed this January, Governor Earl Ray Tomblin declared a state of emergency. Officials shut down schools, deployed the National Guard, and rallied volunteers to bring water and support to the 300,000 people without potable water.
But in the state’s emergency response, there was one group that many forgot: the 429 prisoners locked in Charleston’s overcrowded jail, who were entirely dependent on the state to provide them clean water.
The only article that looked at the spill’s impact on inmates was a small, glowing report published two months later in the Charleston Daily Mail. Jail officials trumpeted their success at “protecting” inmates by providing a “plentiful supply of bottled water.”
Joe DeLong, executive director of the West Virginia Regional Jail Authority, told the paper inmates were given eight bottles of water a day and that they had “essentially no access to the contaminated water.” Before the jail returned to using tap water on January 18, DeLong said the jail went through a “very extensive” flushing process that lasted two to three days. They said they weren’t aware of any inmates reporting health problems related to chemical exposure.
In many ways, the jail seemed to be one of the safest places in Charleston after the spill. Except that much of it wasn’t true.

Interviews with multiple current and former inmates, their family members and internal documents obtained by ThinkProgress tell a very different story of what happened inside South Central Jail, where many inmates have yet to be tried or are being detained for minor offenses.
Inmates say they were sometimes given as little as 16 oz. of water a day. Without enough clean water to drink, brush their teeth and wash their face, many say they resorted to using contaminated tap water. The jail went back to using the tap water full-time only eight days after the spill, after what inmates say was a brief, perfunctory running of the taps. Many prisoners interviewed by ThinkProgress say they suffered a myriad of health problems after exposure to MCHM and other chemicals present in the water supply.
“We got three 8 oz. jugs of water a day. I don’t think that’s enough water. We thought we was going to pass out,” said former inmate Perry Changes, who was transferred out of South Central in February.
Documents obtained by ThinkProgress show guards were only told to provide inmates with four 8-oz. servings of water a day. After inmates complained, officials decided five servings should be “sufficient,” according to internal emails. A heavily-redacted jail log shows flushing occurred in a single day, not three.
According to guidelines from the Institute of Medicine, men over 19 years old should be drinking roughly 100 oz. of water a day (over three-quarters of a gallon) to stay hydrated. Women need around 73 oz. (over half a gallon) a day.
Image
In response to the documents and inmates’ allegations, jail officials said some of the information provided to the paper was in fact untrue.
A spokesman from the West Virginia Department of Military Affairs and Public Safety confirmed inmates were given far less than eight bottles a day, and that the flushing process was much less extensive than what jail staff initially described.
While the jail initially said there had been no health concerns, multiple inmates say they suffered problems ranging from minor rashes to respiratory infections and fainting spells. Prisoners also described a policy implemented after the spill, which could land someone in solitary confinement for asking to see a nurse too many times.
Inmates’ claims of abuse were first told to volunteers with the West Virginia Clean Water Hub and Radical Action for Mountain People’s Survivals in mid-February. Since then, volunteers with the two groups have communicated with over 50 inmates, almost all of whom they say shared a similar story of deprivation and exposure in the weeks and months following the chemical spill.
“They’ve had no choice but to be exposed to the chemicals, they’ve had minimal access to clean water, and they’ve faced harsh consequences for standing up for their rights to access safe water and health care,” advocates wrote in a report published today.
The Drain of Dehydration
Changes is tall with wire-frame glasses, and hides his sand-colored hair under a camouflage baseball cap. He grew up in rural Boone County, West Virginia, a half-hour drive out of Charleston and just a few miles down the road from the two-bedroom apartment he shares with his girlfriend Crystal, her daughter, and her sister and her sister’s fiance. He’s released on probation now, and hopes to land a job at a nearby sawmill where friends of his work.
Former South Central inmate Perry Changes
Former South Central inmate Perry Changes
CREDIT: CHRISTIE THOMPSON
He lights another cigarette and adjusts in his recliner as he remembers growing up without tap water. “We had well water. If you washed your clothes it turned your clothes red,” he said. “We had to go to the laundromat, buy jugs of water to cook with.”
Nine years after his family got indoor plumbing, Changes was locked up at South Central and back to living without clean water. He was arrested in September on charges of breaking and entering and burglary.
An inmate in Changes’ “pod” had broken a window, so they were all on lockdown when the water was first shut off. He said the guards didn’t tell him much. All he knew was that there was an emergency, and everyone in Charleston was without water.
When the lockdown was lifted two days later, he finally got the chance to watch the channel 13 news. As he listened to newscasters describe the coal-cleaning chemicals in the water he had been drinking, “We was all stressing,” he said. “‘Cause hell. We was thirsty.”
Inmates said they had a choice: They could drink the sweet-tasting water that might make them sick. Or they could deal with the inevitable drain of severe dehydration.
Some tried not to drink the water. “That lasted about a day,” said inmate Eric Ayers. “I was just extremely exhausted. I got headaches, felt like I couldn’t do anything. My urine was dark yellow, almost orange.”
As inmate Jamaa Johnson described it in a letter to West Virginia Clean Water Hub volunteers, “My head hurt like a hangover for days.”
Many resorted to desperate measures. Inmate David Burgess said some were selling the 8-oz. bottles of water for $1.60 a piece.
“I saw a guy make coffee out of toilet water,” said inmate Michael Moss.
I saw a guy make coffee out of toilet water.
Jail officials said this was “a learning process” in how to respond to such a crisis. “The emails show what we initially thought would be sufficient was not, and we were responsive to that,” said Lawrence Messina, communications director at West Virginia Department of Military Affairs and Public Safety. “We [should] make sure that if anything we do better the next time this sort of thing happen.”
Messina said his colleague Joe DeLong “either misspoke or maybe misunderstood” when he said inmates received eight bottles of water a day, and that he understood inmates were receiving five after jail staff increased the amount.
“I’ve spoken to him about that and he doesn’t recall saying it that way,” he said.
Messina later called back to add that jail staff were now telling him mess halls had jugs of water available for inmates to drink from during meal times, which he had not been told about until then. No inmates reported access to such jugs, nor were they referenced in documents discussing inmates’ access to water.
The jail’s initial assertion that inmates had “essentially no access to contaminated water” has also been disputed by inmates. The jail maintains that water was only available to flush the toilets and did not come through the taps.
But many prisoners claim they could access tap water when it was periodically turned on. “We’d be filling up every jug we had,” Changes said. “We had to drink something.”
A former South Central corrections officer said he was also told by corrections officers that inmates were only receiving three small bottles of water a day, and that they still had access to tap water. When he called to see if any guards could use some extra water, he said the jail’s office told him the same information.
“They’re criminals and they’re the worst of the worst, yes, but they’re people and at the same time,” said the officer, who asked to remain anonymous due to his current position in West Virginia law enforcement. “It’s the state’s responsibility to take care of those people. That doesn’t mean you give them hugs, it just means you make sure their basic needs are met. Water is one of them.”
“Just Like Drinking That Chemical Out Of a Tank”
After the water ban was lifted, Governor Earl Ray Tomblin addressed whether the water was safe to drink in a press conference. “It’s your decision,” he said. “If you do not feel comfortable drinking or cooking with this water, then use bottled water.”
Unless, of course, you’re in jail. South Central inmates went back to bathing, cooking and drinking tap water as soon as the Governor ended the state of emergency in their zone. Jail officials say they stopped providing bottled water after January 17, eight days after the spill was detected.
But while the do-not-use advisory had ended, the health risks had not. Local hospitals reported an increase in emergency room visits after some returned to using the tap water. Water testing continued to show multiple chemicals present in the water supply. And schools were again dismissed when the signature licorice-smell of MCHM resurfaced.
Most West Virginians impacted by the spill continued to avoid drinking the water. A poll conducted by the Kanawha County Public Health Department found that only 36 percent of those surveyed had returned to drinking tap water by the end of April.
“Funny it’s March and restaurants still are using bottled water. Nobody cared in here,” wrote inmate Jamaa Johnson.
Print
His fiance Ayesha Boatwright was “disgusted” the jail returned so quickly back to using tap water. “I still don’t drink the water. My cat drinks bottled water,” she said, while waiting for her weekly no-contact visit with Johnson. “I was afraid. That’s my fiance. They okayed the water before it was ok.”
Officials said they flushed the jail’s whole water system before returning to use the tap water. In response to a FOIA request for documentation, the jail provided a one-page handwritten log from January 14th. “Flushed all water supply” was written for several wings of the jail and one of the three pods that house inmates.
Many inmates say they were briefly taken out of their cell while guards and a maintenance worker ran the taps and flushed the toilets.
“After two to three minutes they said good to go you can drink the water,” Changes said. “It tasted real strong. Just like drinking that chemical out of a tank.”
Messina said the jail followed West Virginia American Water’s protocol for flushing the system. He said staff ran the taps for 20 minutes in every sink, toilet and water fountain throughout the facility, and flushed the hot water tanks over the course of 24 hours, not two to three days as the jail originally claimed.
I think that’s a basic tenet of public health, is to be on the side of caution.
In comparison, flushing that occurred in local schools was far more rigorous. It happened multiple times, for 30 to 45 minutes at each tap, with the assistance of the West Virginia National Guard and a licensed sanitarian from the county public health department. Water within schools was also tested before students returned to drinking the water.
“In an emergency circumstance when a lot of unknown exists, you must take any and all precaution to protect the most vulnerable population amongst us,” said Dr. Rahul Gupta, Health Officer and Executive Director at Kanawha Charleston Health Department. “I think that’s a basic tenet of public health, is to be on the side of caution.”
Messina said his office hadn’t considered similar measures because they hadn’t heard any complaints.
Jail staff wrote on February 10 that the “health dept came and took water testing.” But both the county and state health department say they haven’t had any interaction with the jail since the spill and have no record of any testing ever taking place. Messina and other jail officials said they had never heard of any water testing inside the jail, and did not have results available.
Jail Document 3
Inmates say the water carried the taste of MCHM for months. “The water was still bad but they said it wasn’t,” said former inmate Terry Davis, who went back to drinking bottled water when he was released in March. “It had the smell, like licorice. It was nasty.”
“It was the end of March before it started tasting decent,” Ayers said.
Test results from private homes suggest MCHM remained in the water supply weeks after the water ban ended. Environmental consultants Downstream Strategies found MCHM in 40 percent of the private homes they tested between 1 1/2 and three weeks after the spill.
“They waited to lift the ban until water monitoring data at the intake in the Elk River was below a certain level,” said Evan Hansen, president of Downstream Strategies, “but that doesn’t necessarily mean that the water delivered to customers was safe.”
Sent to Solitary for Getting Sick
There remain more questions than answers about the risk of exposure to crude MCHM, the compound chemical leaked by Freedom Industries. The primary study being consulted by health officials was conducted by a company that produced the chemical, and tested the substance on lab animals rather than people.
“What we know is that after the do-not-use order was lifted, people seem to have suffered a lot of health [effects],” said Dr. Gupta. West Virginians have reported health problems related to drinking the water, coming in contact with it and inhaling its vapors, Gupta notes. “We know most of those symptoms included nausea, abdominal pains, respiratory symptoms, eye irritation. These types of symptoms are consistent across the data set.”
Many inmates reported similar health problems. “After water was turned on, I had to go to the medical unit because I felt pain in my liver. The medical unit took a blood test, but I never got the results back,” wrote inmate Jason Clendenin in in a letter to West Virginia Water Hub volunteers. “A couple of days later I was standing in the chow line, and got dizzy and got lost eyesight. A guy behind me caught me when I fell.”
Inmate Ray Legg said that after his first few days at South Central at the end of January, he started feeling what he thought was a head cold coming on. “I was experiencing dizziness, runny nose, stuffy nose, headaches, tightness in chest, shortness of breath, coughing (although nothing came up at first), sneezing, etc.,” he wrote. “I got so sick that I layed in bed, (my mat on the floor because there are no bunks open) for 2 days. The pressure in my head was so great I thought my head might explode.”
Messina said officials knew of “five sick calls that were attributed to the water.”
ThinkProgress requested a tally of the monthly total of inmate requests for medical attention from June 2013 to present. In response to a FOIA, jail officials provided a handwritten list of numbers for the months requested. The figures provided show no significant increase in inmates’ health concerns.
Those numbers diverge from what health officials reported among the general population, where hospitals reported an increase in emergency room visits. A recent survey by the Kanawha Charleston Health Department estimates nearly 1 in 3 affected West Virginians (as many as 100,000 people) experienced negative health impacts, but most did not seek medical treatment.
Representatives from PrimeCare Medical, the contractor that provides healthcare for all West Virginia jails, did not respond to a request for comment.
In February, inmates say they were notified of a new policy. Anyone that made more than three sick calls in a month would be moved to medical isolation until they saw a doctor. If there weren’t any bunks there, inmates say they could be put in solitary confinement.
Anyone that made more than three sick calls in a month would be moved to medical isolation until they saw a doctor.
“Now because medical is so full, they put you in segregation. They had the notice hung on our doors and on one of the medicine carts,” said inmate David Burgess. “They were posted after the water spill. I’ve been here a year and I ain’t never seen anything like that before.”
Jail officials originally said they had never heard of the policy. Later, they said PrimeCare Medical had posted “some kind of policy” in February, but that they did not know the details.
Inmate Roberta Stewart said she was held in isolation for eight days after asking to see a nurse four times in a month. She’s had earaches, headaches and blurred vision ever since the spill. Stewart said she filed a grievance, but never received a response.
“I’ve never been so sick in my life,” she said of the health problems she’s had for the last several months. “Everything from my head to my chest hurts. I can’t get no relief.”
Overcrowded and Understaffed
South Central Jail was in a state of crisis long before the chemical spill. Many inmates that are supposed to be housed in the state’s overcrowded prisons are instead languishing in local jails. South Central has been called “the worst in the state” when it comes to overcrowding. It now houses 476 inmates — over 50 percent above the jail’s intended capacity. Many are sleeping two and three to cells built for one. Sixteen inmates are currently sleeping on mats on the floor.
Several inmates said they “can’t wait” to be transferred to a state facility. There they have access to more classes and programming, and are given more than the one hour of recreation in a concrete yard that they get at South Central.
Messina said “inmate crowding has been a significant issue in this state,” but that West Virginia is “trying to find ways to be smart about who we put behind bars.”
The jail has also struggled to keep corrections officers on staff. “It’s virtually impossible to recruit and keep good people as corrections officers at $22,500 a year,” Steve Tucker, former South Central Regional Jail administrator, told the Charleston Daily Mail in 2012. “The good people we do get, we work them to death, they burn out, and then they’re gone.”
That’s led to a jump in assaults by and on inmates and a breakdown in the facilities. Even before the water shortage, Tucker reported in 2011 that jail officials received about 170 to 220 complaints a day about plumbing and water.
Print
At least two “pods” of inmates staged a protest to demand more water in the days after the spill. One unit was put on lockdown and not allowed out of their cells. Others say they were punished with 15 days in solitary confinement.
Michael Moss was one of several inmates that said he refused to return to his cell for lockdown one night, to protest the meager amount of water they’d been given. “We told them, ‘we just want water,” Moss said. “They told us to get back in our cell and we could talk about it.” The next day, Moss said, they were taken to “the hole” for “inciting a riot” and “obstruction.”
Several inmates said they had filed grievances but had either not heard back or received responses saying they had been denied. Multiple family members also said they called the jail to complain about their loved ones’ access to water, but weren’t given any answers.
“I’ve called there several times, and they get you off the phone as soon as possible,” said Gwendolyn Mitchell, whose only son William Young is locked up at South Central.
Inmates have circulated two petitions which include allegations of not having access to enough clean water following the chemical spill. “We (the inmates) have been forced to drink MCHM contaminated water, survive staff’s excessive force & constant neglect, and deal with constant hunger due to insufficient food services,” wrote inmate Eric Ayers in February. His petition has so far been signed by 23 inmates.
The other was drafted with the help of West Virginia Water Hub volunteers, and is still making its way around the jail.
Several law firms that handle prisoner rights cases are looking into the allegations. All declined to comment on the issue before they decided whether to file a formal complaint.
Messina said he had only heard of one grievance related to the spill, but that his department would look further into inmate complaints. “The state is now undergoing a review of how it handled the water crisis. I think it is absolutely appropriate to look at the amount of water provided to inmates,” he said.
Emergency Response for Everyone But Inmates
South Central inmates’ allegations raise uncomfortable questions beyond this one jail in this one city in West Virginia. When disaster strikes, who provides for the prisoners? The push for more disaster preparedness has largely left inmates — those most at the mercy of the government — behind.
“Emergency preparedness is a topic of particular relevance in the correctional context because, unlike other Americans, prisoners have been deprived of their ability to care for themselves,” wrote American University law professor Ira P. Robbins, whose research looked at the abuse of New Orleans inmates in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. “When prisoners’ safety is not planned for, the results are both tragic and unconstitutional.”
During the West Virginia water crisis, officials at the West Virginia National Guard, the Department of Health and Human Resources, and the Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management all said they had almost no interaction with the jail.
“We don’t get in the way,” said Paul Howard, director of planning and response for the state Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management.
Inmates say the jail’s inadequate emergency response denied them their right to clean water. But the real harm to prisoners may not surface for many years.
“What we do not know is what are the long-term health impacts,” said Dr. Gupta, of exposure to MCHM. “We do not know what is the cancer risk, what is the danger to pregnant women.”
Many West Virginians are left fearing what health problems might arise decades down the road. But inmates might be at even bigger risk. “They’ve had a more extreme exposure than the typical West Virginia American Water customer,” said lawyer Kevin Thompson, who is representing affected West Virginians in a class-action lawsuit. “The typical customer had the power of freedom. They didn’t have to drink the water, they didn’t have to stay, they didn’t have to take showers.”
Phyllis and Kennith Johnson, Jamaa’s parents, said they’re outraged the jail exposed their son to such risks. “They’re taking chances with these inmates’ lives. That water could have killed somebody,” Phyllis said. “They could be 60 and trying to figure out what happened. I didn’t know human beings could treat other human beings like that.”
Kennith remembers his son calling home after the water crisis hit. “He was like, ‘Dad I really don’t know what I should do.’ And we couldn’t help him.”
So Phyllis did the only thing she could do. “What can you say? I told my son to pray over that water.”
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests