UFO in China - video is excellent

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: UFO crash test dummies

Postby yesferatu » Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:50 pm

Has anyone noticed the video noise around the buildings? Kind of greenish-brown edge pixelated lining around the buildings? I can't believe it. Not ONLY did they hoax the ufo, but they hoaxed the buildings!!!! No wait. Maybe the greenish brown lining around the buildings is their aura captured on film. No, I'm sticking with the only possibility: the buildings were hoaxed.<br><br>In fact, google video is one giant hoax!! Everything on all videos on any subject have video noise around ALL objects!!!<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> <br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
yesferatu
 

iu

Postby orz » Mon Sep 04, 2006 6:06 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>orz, I hope you're not directing those comments at me..<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> Not at all, sorry if it looked that way... more just general comment on mystery UFO movies online.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><br>In fact, google video is one giant hoax!! Everything on all videos on any subject have video noise around ALL objects!!!<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :lol --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/laugh.gif ALT=":lol"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> Indeed! people claiming videos are fake because they can see 'video noise' around the UFO annoys me even more than people believing the most obvious fakes are real! <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START |I --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/tired.gif ALT="|I"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>As i've said before, when you look at a mpeg compressed movie or jpeg image, you're not actually even seeing the original photo at all! More like an impressionist painting of it! <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> ...so you can say pretty much NOTHING useful about how well or badly the 'grain' is matched in a fake shot; the original video noise or film grain ISN'T VISIBLE IN THE ONLINE IMAGE! <p></p><i></i>
orz
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:25 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 911 vs. UFO's

Postby rocco33 » Mon Sep 04, 2006 7:26 pm

What seems so odd to me is people are so willing to dismiss or suspect UFO video's as being tampered with or fabricated in some way, yet when that's brought up about the 9-11 videos, everyone seems to go in the opposite direction with fervor.<br><br> Remember, there was only one video that played on all the channels on 9-11 of the 2nd crash shown minutes after it happened. That is, until just before Bldg. 7 came down. Then the other videos came out that we've all seen. That leaves 6-7 hours time. Hard to believe it would take that long for CNNMSNBCABCFOX to get those other crash videos to the studio and on the air that day considering many had cameras stationed live on the buildings within minutes. <br><br>Sort of like that one 9-11 crash video that took 3 years to come out. IT came out of Canada(CBC) on that Dick Cheney documentary... I never heard anyone question that one either. Why did it take so long to release that and why insert it into a unflattering documentary about Cheney? <br><br>To get what I mean, you'd have to watch the 2 hour DVD of just straight VCR taping done on 9-11 as captured by Tim Canale. He went from channel to channel, nationally and locally, and taped it all day and into the night. I think you can get that video for pretty cheap from maebrussell.com. IT's got to be out there somewhere on the net. I just got it last week and was shocked to see all kinds of footage that should have made it onto a 911 doc, but never has and I've seen about 5 or 6. <p></p><i></i>
rocco33
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 11:35 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

I guess it comes down to....

Postby slimmouse » Mon Sep 04, 2006 7:27 pm

<br> I guess, ultimately it comes down to a simple question. <br> UFO's exist or they dont.<br><br> Now then, let me look at the "official" position here and make my own logical mind up.<br><br> Well, the "official" story says they dont.<br><br> You do the maths on that.<br><br> Meanwhile, have a look at the Sphinx, and ask yourself ;<br> "Whats all that about?"<br><br> Probably another hoax - LOL. <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: I guess it comes down to....

Postby Et in Arcadia ego » Mon Sep 04, 2006 7:41 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I guess, ultimately it comes down to a simple question.<br>UFO's exist or they dont.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Partially true, but what I think this is the real question:<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>If </em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->they are real, are they someone else's or ours?<br><br>And that one question's a real PITA to grapple with. People can believe that we aquired technology from the Roswell incident, but there's others that can say this technology was here in the past and was recovered not by aliens, but from a very small group that exploited an ancient text like the Mahabharatta which details flying vehicles, nuclear war <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>and</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> radiation sickness, and the planet from orbit.<br><br>It only gets messier from here on..<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p>____________________<br>Some are born to sweet delight, some are born to endless night.</p><i></i>
User avatar
Et in Arcadia ego
 
Posts: 4104
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: The Void
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: I guess it comes down to....

Postby 4911 » Mon Sep 04, 2006 7:54 pm

theres no tits in it... <p></p><i></i>
4911
 
Posts: 673
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 9:34 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: I guess it comes down to....

Postby Attack Ships on Fire » Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:38 pm

I'm not a video expert but I've spent enough time dissecting old school and new school CG special effects that I strongly believe the China UFO video is fake. My main point in believing this is that the UFO's gray scale is all the same, no matter if you view it near the front (left hand side) or to its rear.<br><br>The second point of contention is that when the "UFO" flashes, the points of light look all of the same intensity, even though they appear on different points on the craft (which should also be in shadow/in light depending upon where the sun is) which is a telltale sign of CG.<br><br>It looks fake.<br><br>The Australian UFO footage is definitely fake, as having originated from the "Australian UFO Wave" website. Again, as I said when it was first talked about on here, all of those bogus UFO videos are going to haunt the internet and UFO discussion groups for years to come, all because someone thought it'd be cool to do. Thanks.<br><br>As for the Crash UFO film footage...I remember first seeing that at least 10-15 years ago, well before CG programs got decent. I think I remember a discussion of it once before where the skeptics were on the side that it was a missile that managed to bounce once before crashing again, but a missile shouldn't be glowing like that nor should it regain altitude, hold it and then come crashing back to earth. It has the vague look of military test footage, and the surprising lack of hard discussion and debunking threads on that footage also adds to its mystery.<br><br>Speaking of UFO videos, has anyone ever seen the supposed leaked film footage from a lab inside Area 51? I'm not talking about that fake one showing a brown skinned alien being "interviewed", but a different clip. I've never seen it myself.<br> <p></p><i></i>
Attack Ships on Fire
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 2:24 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: I guess it comes down to....

Postby FourthBase » Mon Sep 04, 2006 10:14 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>What seems so odd to me is people are so willing to dismiss or suspect UFO video's as being tampered with or fabricated in some way, yet when that's brought up about the 9-11 videos, everyone seems to go in the opposite direction with fervor.<br><br>Remember, there was only one video that played on all the channels on 9-11 of the 2nd crash shown minutes after it happened. That is, until just before Bldg. 7 came down. Then the other videos came out that we've all seen. That leaves 6-7 hours time. Hard to believe it would take that long for CNNMSNBCABCFOX to get those other crash videos to the studio and on the air that day considering many had cameras stationed live on the buildings within minutes. <br><br>Sort of like that one 9-11 crash video that took 3 years to come out. IT came out of Canada(CBC) on that Dick Cheney documentary... I never heard anyone question that one either. Why did it take so long to release that and why insert it into a unflattering documentary about Cheney? <br><br>To get what I mean, you'd have to watch the 2 hour DVD of just straight VCR taping done on 9-11 as captured by Tim Canale. He went from channel to channel, nationally and locally, and taped it all day and into the night. I think you can get that video for pretty cheap from maebrussell.com. IT's got to be out there somewhere on the net. I just got it last week and was shocked to see all kinds of footage that should have made it onto a 911 doc, but never has and I've seen about 5 or 6.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br>Take your "No planes hit the WTC" bullshit elsewhere. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 7057
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: I guess it comes down to....

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Mon Sep 04, 2006 10:23 pm

FYI, (though I think we need to suspect that everything military employees and contractors tell us about UFOs could be disinformation), here's a trailer for a <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.theufomovie.com/">film</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> containing <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9075306542842977658&q=ufo+bases">testimony of NASA's airbrushing out lunar anamolies</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=rigorousintuition>Rigorous Intuition</A> at: 9/4/06 8:25 pm<br></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

nato crop circle

Postby rocco33 » Mon Sep 04, 2006 10:32 pm

Thanks Jeff, what do you make of this NATO symbol crop circle made recently? Do you think they've finally done a bit of autographing? <br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://thebravenewworldorder.blogspot.com/2006/08/new-venus-crop-circle-highlights-nato.html">NATO Crop Circle</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
rocco33
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 11:35 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: nato crop circle

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Mon Sep 04, 2006 10:42 pm

I'd seen that one, but hadn't made the connection with the NATO symbol. I should have, it's hard to miss. But I wonder, maybe both are symbolizing something else.<br> <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: nato crop circle

Postby greencrow0 » Mon Sep 04, 2006 10:49 pm

the closest I've come to understanding crop circles, is to think they're done by lasers from satellites [or HAARP] out in space.<br><br>Anyone else think that?<br><br>gc <p></p><i></i>
greencrow0
 
Posts: 1481
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:42 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: nato crop circle

Postby Et in Arcadia ego » Mon Sep 04, 2006 10:59 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Anyone else think that?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.miqel.com/images_1/jazz_music_heart/standing-wave-patterns.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.kindredspirit.co.uk/issues/bkimages/65/crop-circle.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v226/JeffWells/hurricane-isabel-eye.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p>____________________<br>Some are born to sweet delight, some are born to endless night.</p><i></i>
User avatar
Et in Arcadia ego
 
Posts: 4104
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: The Void
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: nato crop circle

Postby greencrow0 » Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:01 pm

arcadia...<br><br>is that a yea or a nay?<br><br>gc <p></p><i></i>
greencrow0
 
Posts: 1481
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:42 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: I guess it comes down to....

Postby yesferatu » Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:03 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>when the "UFO" flashes, the points of light look all of the same intensity, even though they appear on different points on the craft<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>Just plain.............<br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://i93.photobucket.com/albums/l56/jjgarza70/ufo.jpg">wrong</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=yesferatu@rigorousintuition>yesferatu</A> at: 9/4/06 9:04 pm<br></i>
yesferatu
 

PreviousNext

Return to UFOs and High Weirdness

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest