8bitagent » Tue Mar 18, 2014 4:43 pm wrote:No sign of pre planned flight route change
http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/18/world/asi ... nes-plane/
They let idiots like that fly planes? Scary.
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
8bitagent » Tue Mar 18, 2014 4:43 pm wrote:No sign of pre planned flight route change
http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/18/world/asi ... nes-plane/
8bitagent » Tue Mar 18, 2014 4:05 pm wrote:Lord Balto » Tue Mar 18, 2014 8:54 am wrote:Iamwhomiam » Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:24 am wrote:...the plane was electronically hijacked, that someone may have snuck to the bottom of the plane and hacked the computers...
You're overthinking this. Why would one need to sneak into the belly of the aircraft to hack it? RIsk death when they could hack in with their laptop from the comfort of first class while enjoying a cocktail?
Why is everyone dismissing the obvious "pilot did it" scenario? After all, he's the one with the flight simulator. What's he "simulating"? And if he has state (or regional) sponsors, all of this searching is for naught. The plane's already in a hangar or otherwise disguised.
The older main pilot Shah is where most of the focus is. Though it's been reported this morning that a search of his email, home flight simulator, belongings, house and talking to close friends that nothing seems out of the ordinary. So if he planned this thing, he somehow scrubbed any trace of it. And the only possible scenario would be he either locked out or killed the co pilot, and depressurized the entire plane to kill/make people unconscious...all for some very unknown reason. This seems to be the main working theory. No way would both these cats have been in on it, since they were randomly assigned to be together.Lord Balto » Tue Mar 18, 2014 9:05 am wrote:jingofever » Tue Mar 18, 2014 2:47 am wrote:As you should have been anticipating, Malaysian officials have now decided that the "all right, good night" came before the equipment was shut off. And CNN says:The phrase "good night" is the radio parlance used by pilots when executing a handover from one airspace to another, Quest said.
"That is normal. That happens a gazillion times," Quest said. " 'All right, good night' is a pleasantry at the end of radio communication."
As for the co-pilot, the pilot would only need to wait for him to use the bathroom and lock him out of the cabin and he could then do whatever he pleased with the plane, like take it for one last joyride and fly the way you are only allowed to fly in simulators.
Or deliver it to the state-sponsored preplanned location where it is now safety stashed in a hangar and safe from the prying eyes of the world's satellite operators. Do these yokels really think that an organzied theft of a 777 would not foresee the need for hiding the plane once it was on the ground?
Just trying to think what dictatorship with an army needs to go to elaborate ends to get a civilian non military passenger plane? As I don't doubt some of these countries are holding back the true scope of their radar.
Warring countries India and Pakistan are helping, even the head of the Taliban apparently gave a press statement. Isn't there a bunch of atoll islands ungoverned somewhere on the flight path? Tho I cant imagine a successful landing.
smiths » Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:27 am wrote:
So did the pilot hijack the plane, reprogram the flight path, turn off the transponder, and fly low above the surface and below radar all the way to the Maldives, or alternatively, US airbase, Diego Garcia, where Captain Shah promptly offloaded 20+ tons of still unknown cargo?
smiths » Tue Mar 18, 2014 8:27 pm wrote:today's biscuit crumbs
"Well over a week after the disappearance of flight MH370 - which now is the longest official disappearance of a modern jet in aviation history - with no official trace of the missing plane yet revealed, the investigation, which as we reported over the weekend has focused on the pilots and specifically on Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah, earlier today revealed that on his home-made flight simulator had been loaded five Indian Ocean practice runways, among which those of Male in the Maldives, that of the US owned base at Sergio Garcia, as well as other runways in India and Sri Lanka - all notable runways as all are possible landing spots based on the flight's potential trajectories ...
the Maldives news is of particular note since earlier today, Haaveru Online, quoted locals who said they had seen a "low flying jet" whose description is approximate to what flight MH370 looked like. From the source:
Whilst the disappearance of the Boeing 777 jet, carrying 239 passengers has left the whole world in bewilderment, several residents of Kuda Huvadhoo told Haveeru on Tuesday that they saw a "low flying jumbo jet" at around 6:15am on March 8.
They said that it was a white aircraft, with red stripes across it – which is what the Malaysia Airlines flights typically look like.
Eyewitnesses from the Kuda Huvadhoo concurred that the aeroplane was travelling North to South-East, towards the Southern tip of the Maldives – Addu. They also noted the incredibly loud noise that the flight made when it flew over the island.
"I've never seen a jet flying so low over our island before. We've seen seaplanes, but I'm sure that this was not one of those. I could even make out the doors on the plane clearly," said an eyewitness.
"It's not just me either, several other residents have reported seeing the exact same thing. Some people got out of their houses to see what was causing the tremendous noise too."
...
A local aviation expert told Haveeru that it is "likely" for MH370 to have flown over the Maldives. The possibility of any aircraft flying over the island at the reported time is extremely low, the expert added.
So did the pilot hijack the plane, reprogram the flight path, turn off the transponder, and fly low above the surface and below radar all the way to the Maldives, or alternatively, US airbase, Diego Garcia, where Captain Shah promptly offloaded 20+ tons of still unknown cargo?
...
Expect the US military to have zero official comments on the matter, and even less if indeed MH370 landed there, or merely used the base as a transit stop on its route further west, potentially to Africa.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-03-1 ... ed-summary
i also noted that there were some Russian passengers on board, i wonder if there was anyone important, anyone the US might want to chat with in the privacy of Diego Garcia over any current issues
SonicG » Tue Mar 18, 2014 9:38 pm wrote:smiths » Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:27 am wrote:
So did the pilot hijack the plane, reprogram the flight path, turn off the transponder, and fly low above the surface and below radar all the way to the Maldives, or alternatively, US airbase, Diego Garcia, where Captain Shah promptly offloaded 20+ tons of still unknown cargo?
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/mala ... s-airlines
Hadn't heard about the cargo angle but really, tons of mangosteens? On a commercial flight?
8bitagent » Wed Mar 19, 2014 5:14 am wrote:Here's a different take from an experienced pilot: all that happened from Shaw and the co-pilot was trying to save a doomed plane. Somehow the communication was lost, and they tried to
do a few things to salvage it. Least, the most innocent explanation
http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/flight-mh3 ... -ck-153416
Of course wouldn't make sense of a deliberate transponder turnoff nor any radio communication not happening
JackRiddler » Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:36 am wrote:Plane swapping, depressurization used to kill everyone on board, remote control takeover, people from a tech company of interest among the passengers, multiple hijack candidates among the passengers, did the pilot(s) do it, transponder games, there was no plane, vicsims, belated sightings, it's really about the gold... why does this seem so familiar, and yet so distant? Did I miss any posts about military exercises or radar blip injects? Where was John O'Neil? Here's a vote for serial takeovers by competing factions and snakes on the plane.
Could MH370 have been ‘swapped’ mid-air?
ROB WAUGH
Yahoo! News
March 19, 2014
...
Aircraft expert Ian Black previously worked as a fighter weapons instructor for the Malaysian Air Force, and is the author of two Haynes Manuals for aircraft, the McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom Manual and the RAF Tornado Manual. He flew the Tornado ADV in the first Gulf War and over Kosovo. He is now an A340 Airbus captain with Virgin Atlantic.
Could the aircraft have been ‘swapped’ mid-air?
Generally air traffic radars use something called a “Squawk” code – this is 4 digits, say ’1234′ – that is then used to transmit information to the ground radar of the aircraft’s position and other relevant detail. This is very easily disabled – it is operated with a simple on/off switch. The Boeing 777 has two separate systems for safety in the event of failure.
There is another angle which I think might be a possibility that the MH370 switched codes. If MH370 had a code of, say 4376, then it would be pretty easy to get another aircraft, say a Gulfstream 5 private jet, to fly up behind it and swap codes. The Gulfstream sets its squawk code to the same as MH370′s code of 4376 then the B777 takes on the Gulfstream’s code, and they then split… It would certainly make it easier for the B777 to continue on undetected.
Full article here
http://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/220486 ... d-mid-air/
elfismiles » Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:33 am wrote:Australia's MSM goes full-on LOOSE-CHANGE 911 Conspiracy on us ...Could MH370 have been ‘swapped’ mid-air?
ROB WAUGH
Yahoo! News
March 19, 2014
...
Aircraft expert Ian Black previously worked as a fighter weapons instructor for the Malaysian Air Force, and is the author of two Haynes Manuals for aircraft, the McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom Manual and the RAF Tornado Manual. He flew the Tornado ADV in the first Gulf War and over Kosovo. He is now an A340 Airbus captain with Virgin Atlantic.
Could the aircraft have been ‘swapped’ mid-air?
Generally air traffic radars use something called a “Squawk” code – this is 4 digits, say ’1234′ – that is then used to transmit information to the ground radar of the aircraft’s position and other relevant detail. This is very easily disabled – it is operated with a simple on/off switch. The Boeing 777 has two separate systems for safety in the event of failure.
There is another angle which I think might be a possibility that the MH370 switched codes. If MH370 had a code of, say 4376, then it would be pretty easy to get another aircraft, say a Gulfstream 5 private jet, to fly up behind it and swap codes. The Gulfstream sets its squawk code to the same as MH370′s code of 4376 then the B777 takes on the Gulfstream’s code, and they then split… It would certainly make it easier for the B777 to continue on undetected.
Full article here
http://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/220486 ... d-mid-air/
Published on Mar 19, 2014
SUPPORT BFP: http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/support-us/
TRANSCRIPT AND SOURCES: http://www.corbettreport.com/?p=8886
Now that the MSM is flirting with the idea of "cyber hijacking" in the increasingly desperate search for MH370, many are left wondering how long the possibility of a remote control hijack has been possible and why the public hasn't been warned of this threat. Join us for this week's BoilingFrogsPost.com Eyeopener report as we examine the cyber hijacking issue and its connections to 9/11.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 154 guests