Searcher08 » Mon Jun 23, 2014 10:29 am wrote:Hunter » Mon Jun 23, 2014 2:05 pm wrote:seemslikeadream » Mon Jun 23, 2014 10:00 am wrote:we don't need nannies here....we don't need a member here all by himself deciding what should be censored at RI ...and that is EXACTLY what has happened....in all my years here there has been only one member that has successfully been able to censor discussion ...couple that with the nannies here....Houston we have a problem ...when I can not post an article from DissidentVoice ...there is a problem...period
and it's just not crazy conspiracy theories
While I agree with you in spirit we also have rules against people posting holocaust denial shit and no planes crap, and for good reason. I bet dollars to donuts if Jeff were still active, the crisis actor shit would be added to that list in very short order.
@Hunter
Jeff is still active and he hasn't. He took out the 'Menz rights' troll quite recently.
I think that talking about the events of Sandy Hook specifically should NOT be conflated with Holocaust Denial. There is a very large base of accurate information about the Holocaust which Deniers flee from. There is no such base of accurate information regarding Sandy Hook.
Are you saying that there is nothing unusual about Sandy Hook?
I believe the State government there are passing a law which will mean five years in jail for whistleblowing any evidence related to it, under the guise of victim protection.
No I am not saying there is nothing unusual about Sandy Hook at all, to the contrary there is a lot of unusual things, whether those unusual things are the result of inaccurate early reports due to chaos and confusion or actual cover-up conspiracy I do not know. I am still open to any discussion about it but I have asked four times on this forum in the last few weeks for someone to explain to me that if it is a hoax, where are all the kids that were killed, they have to be somewhere right? All their cousins, friends, parents co workers etc surely all knew these children and now the kids are gone, presumed dead, and if it was a hoax, where are they. And as of yet nobody has responded to my posts about that. I am open to discussion but it seems nobody has any real answers as to how such a large scale event could be hoaxed.
But I will ask you a similar question do you not see anything unusual about the introduction of outrageous theories like no planes, holograms and crisis actors in to what was otherwise very sincere and genuine discussion about things like 9-11, Boston and Sandy Hook and which once introduced turned that discussion in to a quagmire that most of those sincere and honest researchers no longer wanted anything to do with it and wont touch it with a ten foot pole?
I am certainly open to the possibility that MAYBE Lanza wasnt the killer or maybe there was more than one shooter or maybe it was some sort of psyop but I do believe those kids were killed and the parents are and were mourning the loss of those children, so I dont understand who the crisis actors were. I am also pretty sure people had their legs and arms blown off in Boston and those were not actors we seen laying there with veins and arteries hanging out of said blown off limbs who just stepped out of hollywood makeup trailer. IMO the introduction of such BS was designed specifically to drive away the honest and sincere researcher who had honest and sincere questions about the events, those honest and sincere researchers with honest and sincere questions have now been effectively driven away or to the sidelines by these crisis actor pushers because, for good reason, they dont want anything to do with that sort of outrageous bullshit and that, my friend, is what I call Mission Accomplished, they did it with 9-11 and they did it with Sandy Hook and Boston, those are discussions that the honest and sincere conspiracy researcher can no longer touch without immediately being associated with the likes of Alex Jones et al, and that includes me. I cant touch those things and bring up what I believe are real and honest and sincere questions about the official stories because I cant afford to have my reputation and credibility destroyed by being associated with people like Jones.
So you dont think those who want to stop us from asking the tough questions would not introduce the outrageous in an attempt to stop us from talking about it altogether by making it in to a fucking mockery and a three ring circus? Yes they would, they do and they have and they will continue to do so until we smarten up and stop becoming their unwitting supporters and propagandists.
On first thought I would think Jeff probably isnt aware of the depth of how sinister the crisis actor shit is and that is why he hasnt banned that discussion but maybe I am wrong and he has no problem with it, I can only speak for myself and from what I know of Jeff my guess would be that is something that he wouldnt like very much if he were still as active as he used to be, even though he may pop in now and then I dont think he is reading every thread and sees what that is all about. But that is just my opinion. In any case him not banning it doesnt mean he supports it perhaps he just feels it hasnt become a big enough problem around here to take those measures which he doesnt take lightly, the guy doesnt ban much and only does so in extraordinary circumstances.
