Enter: Gattaca?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Enter: Gattaca?

Postby Uncle $cam » Mon Feb 02, 2009 3:54 pm

DIY DNA research
http://www.metafilter.com/78813/DIY-DNA-research

Hugh Reinhoff has sequenced his daughters DNA at home attempting to diagnose her unique genetic mutation.


Good discussions over there, I no longer have an account at mifi, but my question would be, how long before they brand this guy as a terrorist?

And sue him for not conforming to the "experts" of the FDA/ EPA military academic pharmaceutical industrial complex. If you get my drift...

Damn someone that takes action outside of the establishment. Can't have that! Quick, he must be re-educated. Can't have people taking power into their own hands, besides, it hurts our profit margins.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gattaca



Gattaca trailer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7OYCmynrRU

Gattaca is a 1997 science fiction drama film written and directed by Andrew Niccol, starring Ethan Hawke, Uma Thurman and Jude Law with supporting roles played by Loren Dean, Gore Vidal and Alan Arkin.[1] The film was a 1997 nominee for the Academy Award for Best Art Direction - Set Decoration.

The film presents a biopunk vision of a society driven by liberal eugenics.[2][3] Children of the middle and upper classes are selected through preimplantation genetic diagnosis to ensure they possess the best hereditary traits of their parents. A genetic registry database uses biometrics to instantly identify and classify those so created as valids while those conceived by traditional means are derisively known as faith births, god children and in-valids. While genetic discrimination is forbidden by law, in practice it is easy to profile one's genotype resulting in the Valids qualifying for professional employment while the In-Valids who are susceptible to disease are relegated to menial jobs. The movie draws on concerns over reproductive technologies which facilitate eugenics, and the possible consequences of such technological developments for society. It also explores the idea of destiny and the ways in which it can and does govern lives. Characters in Gattaca continually battle both with society and with themselves to find their place in the world and who they are destined to be according to their genes.

The title is based on the initial letters of the four DNA nitrogenous bases (adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine). During the credits the letters G, C, T, and A are all highlighted.


There is no gene for the human spirit
Suffering raises up those souls that are truly great; it is only small souls that are made mean-spirited by it.
- Alexandra David-Neel
User avatar
Uncle $cam
 
Posts: 1100
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:11 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Enter: Gattaca?

Postby InfraGard » Sun Mar 22, 2015 8:09 pm

Ethan Hawke Drone Warfare Drama ‘Good Kill’

The first official U.S. trailer for the drone warfare movie “Good Kill” finds Ethan Hawke tormented by a remote war.

Combat now unfolds like a video game as Hawke — a former Air Force pilot with six tours of duty under his belt — works eight hours a day fighting the Taliban by remote control from an air-conditioned bunker. He soon begins to question the ethics of dropping bombs from the safety of his post in Las Vegas.

“Don’t ask me if it’s a just war,” his commander (played by Bruce Greenwood) says. “It’s just war.”


The movie from IFC Films reunites Hawke with his “Gattaca” and “Lord of War” director, Andrew Niccol...

http://variety.com/2015/film/news/watch ... 201457456/
User avatar
InfraGard
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 9:47 am
Location: occidental hemisphere
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Enter: Gattaca?

Postby elfismiles » Mon Mar 23, 2015 12:31 am

Gattaca DNA Dystopia
Post by elfismiles » 26 Nov 2009
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=26013
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: Enter: Gattaca?

Postby slomo » Mon Mar 23, 2015 12:31 am

Meh
Ideas about personalized medicine are underpinned in part by evolutionary biology's Modern Synthesis. In this essay we link personalized medicine to the efforts of the early statistical investigators who quantified the heritability of human phenotype and then attempted to reconcile their observations with Mendelian genetics. As information about the heritability of common diseases was obtained, similar efforts were directed at understanding the genetic basis of disease phenotypes. These ideas were part of the rationale driving the Human Genome Project and subsequently the personalized medicine movement. In this context, we discuss: (1) the current state of the genotype-phenotype relationship in humans, (2) the common-disease-common-variant hypothesis, (3) the current ability of 'omic' information to inform clinical decision making, (4) emerging ideas about the therapeutic insight available from rare genetic variants, and (5) the social and behavioural barriers to the wider potential success of personalized medicine. There are significant gaps in knowledge as well as conceptual, intellectual, and philosophical limitations in each of these five areas. We then provide specific recommendations to mitigate these limitations and close by asking if it is time for the biomedical research community to 'stop chasing Mendel?'

Joyner MJ, Predergast FG “Chasing Mendel: five questions for personalized medicine”, J Physiol, 2014.
You should be able to freely download the pdf to the whole article if you hit the "Link Out - More Resources" link.
User avatar
slomo
 
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:42 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 156 guests