uk, pedo death cult or weird custody case?

[divideandconquer]

Someone pointed out that, when interviewed, Dearman said that the kids said, "I was selling them to people… I’d been selling them in this satanic cult thing… Not just, they said, by myself, but by, they named 60, 70, 80 people.” However, it seems the the kids never once said that their father sold them; I don't know if that's true because I only watched the beginning of the children's testimony...that was enough to get the idea that these kids were telling the truth. Did anyone hear them say that their father was selling them? If not, sounds like a slip-up on his part.

I don't see how anyone can deny that institutional pedophilia exists. The roots of pedophilia, the child sex trade and ritual abuse run very deep. They reach far and wide reaching the highest levels of society. Those with great authority and power have been involved in this for as long as there have been people with great authority and power, and will go to great lengths to keep this covered up..

Cases like this are usually swept up and tossed out quickly to protect the vast network involved, however, in this case, because of the videos, they have to may have to work a little harder, but as usual they turn it to their advantage by communicating an important message to potential future exposers: If you try to expose us, we'll destroy you.

[Luther Blissett]

Then I suspect you haven't given it much thought.

If you think it takes MORE credulity to believe that two vile people will spew vile lies to cover up their vile actions than itit does to believe that AN ENTIRE COMMUNITY is engaged in a massive, ongoing Satanic cannibalistic baby-raping orgy on an industrial level - without a shred of evidence beyond the say-so of two children who have subsequently recanted the outrageous and ridiculous lies fed to them by said vile criminals, well then... I guess we don't live on the same planet.

J

Though entire communities have conspired to rape kids. It happened in my diocese when I was an altar boy (+1000x over worldwide) and in my ex-wife's rural christian community when she was young, with some details recalled that are strikingly similar to some in this case.

[backtoiam]

It happened in my diocese when I was an altar boy (+1000x over worldwide) and in my ex-wife's rural christian community when she was young,

I have learned of, never exposed to or been directly involved in, enough scenarios over the years that I am convinced this is true that there are very sophisticated networks engaged in this practice. These sophisticated networks do exist in my opinion.

jerky wrote:
AN ENTIRE COMMUNITY is engaged in a massive, ongoing Satanic cannibalistic baby-raping orgy

One thing that puzzles me about this case is the fact that a network of this caliber, IF this particular one does really exist, when taking into account the diversity of the vocations, varied skill sets, positions in maybe judicial or other influential positions, would be very powerful and dangerous to anyone that opposes it. Not to mention that a network of this caliber may well have connections to some very very powerful politicians, as did the Franklin scenario.

So, if a person were parents, relatives, acquaintances of these children, and had been raping them and maybe affiliated children, within the context of a larger affiliated network, almost no matter how bad things got under threat of possible exposure, I cannot think of a WORSE thing that they could ever do than the threaten the network as a desperate way to illicit protection from the network, or even just simply muddy the water to escape punishment.

I could see the network itself doing something like this, naming people that is, as a last hail mary effort to sling so much informational noisy shit against the wall, implicate respected people into the noise stream that could easily be found innocent, so that eventually investigators would simply throw their hands up in despair and decide that there was too much conflicting information to pursue the case.

But, as far as a couple of isolated individuals, who may be connected to the network, these kids parents or whoever, deciding to go rogue against the network, in an effort to coerce the network into protecting them under threat of exposure of the network, would appear to result in death, imprisonment, torture, and maybe worse things. Once these individuals start naming as many prominent names as these individuals have done its game on, and would seem to make them targets of a much worse situation than any local investigators could bring to bare.

I have seen individuals that turned on the network of mobsters and became a "snitch" in a last ditch effort to survive, but in this particular scenario, for whatever reason, I see that as the least likely option for them to exploit. Now it doesn't matter if the people named are guilty or not, and have nothing to hide from, if they have any power they will use it collectively to sink these individuals.

So where does this leave me? Puzzled like everybody else.

I do have a scenario in my mind and I will 'attempt' to explain it. In the occult ritual world, as you all know, labels and names of just about anything that can be thought of are attached to other objects and concepts that would 'appear' to be totally unrelated. Names and objects such as Moons, Stars, Egypt, Ethiopia, and other geographical coordinates, things like "baby", marriage, blood, death, kill, bride, live, and a whole host of others map directly to areas, parts of the brain, organs and glands, chakras, and all that sort of business.

I can see at least a possibility that these children have been raised in a ritual environment and have witnessed rituals of a much more benign nature. If this were to happen these children would be spouting terminology that appeared horrifying to anybody and everybody that didn't understand the map over process of the terminology.

I have no idea if this could be the case. I am not even suggest that this is probably the reason. It is just a nagging thought I have had.

People that understand occult terminology, were they to speak it in the proper context and sequence to the profane, could send the profane running and screaming in terror, and in reality it would mean something totally different than the profane suspected.

This little idea doesn't solve anything. But it was just something I have been thinking about.

[guruilla]

But, as far as a couple of isolated individuals, who may be connected to the network, these kids parents or whoever, deciding to go rogue against the network, in an effort to coerce the network into protecting them under threat of exposure of the network, would appear to result in death, imprisonment, torture, and maybe worse things. Once these individuals start naming as many prominent names as these individuals have done its game on, and would seem to make them targets of a much worse situation than any local investigators could bring to bare.

Sure, if they were connected to the abuse-network, it wouldn't make any sense for them to want to talk about it as a way to protect themselves. If they weren't, and just made up a wild story using elements culled from previous cases and speculations around them, would it have had such widespread media play? The mainstream media is tightly controlled and it's hardly random what story gets picked up.

As many people who post at this forum already know, a majority of the details that show up in the children's testimonies closely match elements from verified accounts, including the well-documented MKULTRA experiments (in which I am fairly sure even killing babies, or at least simulation of the same act, was reported).

[backtoiam]

(in which I am fairly sure even killing babies, or at least simulation of the same act, was reported).

Creating a media storm that was actually a "false simulated scenario" in which maybe dolls, or worse, simulated human babies, or actual corpses acquired in ways that couldn't be traced, could be of enormous value to a network. It would create a lot of talk and investigation and the trail would be missing the supposed now deceased or maimed victims, forensic evidence, and witnesses, and family members. It would create an atmosphere of "we've heard this craziness before, and it never produces evidence."

[Grizzly]

MPs - If They F*ck Our Children Are They F*cking Us All? Russell Brand

(E365)

[chump]

FWIW, Aangir posted this story awhile ago, followed by this Anonymous comment about the woman speaking at the same press conference.

Anonymous31 March 2015 at 01:55

the woman at the start of this vid is an undercover FBI agent sent to spy on the hampstead activists..http://co-creatingournewearth.blogspot. ... .Christine Ann Sands ...testified in over a 100 cases in USA against protestors..&Belinda mckenzie (MI5)skulking around like she doesn,t know anything.check the shiftyness of this shifter @1.51!!!..Belinda is probably Christines UK handler ..Ella and Abram take note...x

http://co-creatingournewearth.blogspot. ... bogus.html


http://crimesofempire.com/2015/03/31/th ... alsehoods/

[Jerky]

Then I suspect you haven't given it much thought.

If you think it takes MORE credulity to believe that two vile people will spew vile lies to cover up their vile actions than itit does to believe that AN ENTIRE COMMUNITY is engaged in a massive, ongoing Satanic cannibalistic baby-raping orgy on an industrial level - without a shred of evidence beyond the say-so of two children who have subsequently recanted the outrageous and ridiculous lies fed to them by said vile criminals, well then... I guess we don't live on the same planet.

J

Though entire communities have conspired to rape kids. It happened in my diocese when I was an altar boy (+1000x over worldwide) and in my ex-wife's rural christian community when she was young, with some details recalled that are strikingly similar to some in this case.

What happened in your diocese, Luther? Hundreds of babies sacrificed and skinned for Satan? Hundreds of children being raped by the butcher, the baker and the candlestick maker? I would venture that NOTHING in the history of the West has ever occurred that comes close to what these children were coached into telling the police (before admitting that they were coached to do so by the only real criminals in this scenario, enema-freak mommy and her history-of-physical-abuse-of-children boyfriend).

J

[Jerky]

I didn't read the piece Wombat quotes because & I don't see the point in reading blogposts expressing opinions when I can look at the evidence directly, i.e., the various testimonies. I did read some of the responses, however, and overall those supporting the children's testimonies were more reasonable and balanced than those debunking. The same seems to be true at this thread..

Perhaps the reason for some frustration on the part of those of us who see this ridiculous farrago of fantasias for what it is lies with those of you who insist on believing something for which there is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER. Calling the children's coached testimony "direct evidence" is, quite frankly, the height of blockheaded stupidity, especially when you consider that they recanted.

Now, those of your bent who are confronted with this fact say that the children were "bullied" or "coached" into recanting by the police (when the video of the event shows that the officer in question couldn't have been more gentle and understanding). But if you believe it's possible for the police to coach and bully these children into lying, why don't you believe that it is at least JUST AS POSSIBLE that Abraham did so?!

The cognitive dissonance and willful ignorance on display in this thread is, quite frankly, mind-boggling.

J

[Jerky]

This is doubly worsened when you (and others like you) stand up and count yourselves PROUD to ignore the voices of reason in favor of the pearl-clutching finger-sniffers who claim they KNOW it's true (just KNOW it!) because they can "see it in their eyes" or some such fucking meaningless bullshit like that.

Grow the fuck up. PLEASE. I'm begging you.

(the above is not directed towards any single participant in this thread, btw)

J

[Wombaticus Rex]

(the above is not directed towards any single participant in this thread, btw)

That's really not an "out" for such Jerkishly phrased material, bruh.

If you're the voice of reason, voice it more reasonably going forward. Deal?

[guruilla]

Am I the only one here who scrolls rapidly past Jerky's posts while squinting to make sure none of his bile spills into my field of vision?

Just wondering...

[divideandconquer]

[tapitsbo]

(in which I am fairly sure even killing babies, or at least simulation of the same act, was reported).

Creating a media storm that was actually a "false simulated scenario" in which maybe dolls, or worse, simulated human babies, or actual corpses acquired in ways that couldn't be traced, could be of enormous value to a network. It would create a lot of talk and investigation and the trail would be missing the supposed now deceased or maimed victims, forensic evidence, and witnesses, and family members. It would create an atmosphere of "we've heard this craziness before, and it never produces evidence."

BRILLIANTLY put. Organized predators would be bound to at least consider such a scenario.

And the misdirection around "Satanic Panic" had elements of it - even if the alleged atrocities often were indeed horribly real.

[Jerky]

Am I the only one here who scrolls rapidly past Jerky's posts while squinting to make sure none of his bile spills into my field of vision?

Just wondering...

I've no doubt that you avoid my posts, as having to address them honestly would shatter your precious Satanic Conspiracy fantasies.

J