Yes. Also that they weren't wearing bomb-belts at all but instead carrying sealed packages and waiting to meet someone who never turned up, or at least not before they had exploded. This would also have the virtue of explaining the low, almost non-existent, casualty count. Not one of them (I think; I'll check) actually entered a crowded place (though there many of those available in the immediate vicinity) but instead hung around some distance outside them.
Hypothesis: No one was killed by a suicide bomber in Paris, because there were none. The "suicide bombings" were a distraction designed mainly to be heard in the stadium by tens of thousands of trapped people, and on TV by the entire world. The three loud bangs also provided "atmo", thereby serving to raise the Tension in the city.
All of the deaths were caused by automatic gunfire & grenades used by a small highly-trained commando team travelling three short distances between cafés in a black car and concluding in the Bataclan, where "Sébastien" was a pre-planted accomplice who knew his way around the place. Probably not one of those commandos died, or if so they were shot by accident by the police who later entered the building and who have since been forbidden to talk to the media. -- ON EDIT: Or maybe, to ensure complete security, the commando team was itself double-crossed by the organisers and disposed of unknowingly by the police team who entered the building hours later and who were not part of the plot.
I would contend that this or something very like it accords better with the currently-known verifiable facts than the version we are being fed.
The bizarre ineffectiveness of the "suicide bombers" is very,
very striking, especially when compared to the icy efficiency of the gunmen.
But more evidence will no doubt emerge to refute or confirm this hypothesis.
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966
TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC