Study: Everyone loves feminists and environmentalists!

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Study: Everyone loves feminists and environmentalists!

Postby backtoiam » Wed Dec 09, 2015 2:02 am

Previously in these threads I said this would happen. I tried to sew peace into this. Nobody has advocated for any rights to be taken from women. Nobody has abused women in this forum. Nobody has said women should not have rights. Slomo dared to have an opinion and got his ass ripped for it which only demonstrates that daring to even have an opinion is so hated that it is actually hurting feminism.

The following is what is left.

There might not have been any sexist hate speech in the past couple of weeks (maybe some transphobia until an actual trans poster spoke up), but our membership demographics were not made in the past couple of weeks. I'm pretty sure there's a lot of it in that "What Constitutes Misogyny?" and the "War on Women" threads.


Accusations of hate speech against women that cannot be substantiated because it is not allowed in this forum. Slomo got hated on for basically more or less saying something similar to

"feminism is mutating from advocating for equal treatment for women into attacking men and it hurts everybody"

Nobody has substantiated it yet, what is above in bold. Congratulations. I cannot imagine how the "feminist protectors" think this served feminism.

Baseless charges of hate speech in a forum where it is strictly forbidden and does not occur. This wasn't very smart strategy by the protectors of feminism.

I have an enormous amount of respect and empathy for Project Willow and I mean that from the bottom of my heart. I also have some very, very, serious past trauma in my past which is one reason I even cared.

But the attack dogs came out on this issue and there is no hate speech that has been flung at anybody in this forum. It accomplished its opposite because there has been no hate speech flung at anybody.

The ironic part is that I tried to protect feminism in this forum from this happening but it happened anyway. Patton made a comment about things slamming into a wall earlier and this deal slammed itself real good.
Last edited by backtoiam on Wed Dec 09, 2015 2:13 am, edited 2 times in total.
"A mind stretched by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions." Oliver Wendell Holmes
backtoiam
 
Posts: 2101
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:22 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Study: Everyone loves feminists and environmentalists!

Postby Iamwhomiam » Wed Dec 09, 2015 2:04 am

I've been reading your story and find it unenlightening. In fact, I find it offensive. And I've always respected you and your opinions before, to the best of my knowledge.

But this fear of women I find astounding coming from a homosexual man who has identified himself as "queer." I find it bizarre, actually.

Due to the discrimination you must have been subjected to in this masculine patriarchy for merely being the person you feel you must be, I would imagine you to be sympathetic to women who seek only the same, rather than hostile.

This, I find queer.

Rather than setting forth the truth, you allow me my fantasy. How very unkind! Surely, you must remember the epiphany that first formulated your misogynistic philosophy, so why not share it with us, rather than keeping us guessing about the roots of your evil thoughts towards women? There's no harm is sharing your mom or dad or siblings, possibly in combination, really fucked up your head. It's not really all that unique, you know, if that's the case.

I mean you no harm. But your motivations are indeed a curiosity.

I mean, considering your philosophy is based upon fantasy, rather than fact.
Last edited by Iamwhomiam on Wed Dec 09, 2015 5:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Study: Everyone loves feminists and environmentalists!

Postby Iamwhomiam » Wed Dec 09, 2015 2:12 am

backtoiam,

With all respect, we participated in those hate-filled threads. For one who claims to have been reading since 2005, I guess you might not have read every word written. I certainly haven't read a tenth of our postings and I've been here that long, too.

Krysos ring a bell?
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Study: Everyone loves feminists and environmentalists!

Postby backtoiam » Wed Dec 09, 2015 2:17 am

No. But I watched this scenario and I didn't see any hate speech coming from slomo. He had an opinion.
"A mind stretched by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions." Oliver Wendell Holmes
backtoiam
 
Posts: 2101
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:22 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Study: Everyone loves feminists and environmentalists!

Postby Iamwhomiam » Wed Dec 09, 2015 2:18 am

mentalgongfu2 » Wed Dec 09, 2015 1:43 am wrote:I, myself, am admittedly unqualified to comment on third-wave feminism, MRA or any of the other hot buttons that have been dominating lately. That is why I limited my comments on the gender thread to personal experiences and observations rather than the deeper theoretical constructs. I have learned a bit from reading the back and forth involving slomo, pw, and others, but I do sense some hostility against the feminist view that is verging on crossing lines if I hasn't already. Despite being a little out of my element, I think it would be great if we could at least keep that particular battle to one or two threads instead of the board-proliferating field day it has become. You know, especially considering past concerns about certain topics and posters dominating GD and the original posting guidelines which are intended to make RI a safe space for certain topics before 'safe space, became a pejorative term.


Thank you for this, mentalgongfu2. Far too many of these threads.

Image
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Study: Everyone loves feminists and environmentalists!

Postby backtoiam » Wed Dec 09, 2015 2:24 am

Iamwhomiam » Wed Dec 09, 2015 1:04 am wrote:I've been reading your story and find it unenlightening. In fact, I find it offensive. And I've always respected you and your opinions before, to the best of my knowledge.

But this fear of women I find astounding coming from a homosexual man who has identified himself as "queer." I find it bizarre, actually.

Due to the discrimination you must have been subjected to in this masculine patriarchy for merely being the person you feel you must be, I would imagine you to be sympathetic to women who seek only the same, rather than hostile.

I this, I find queer.

Rather than setting forth the truth, you allow me my fantasy. How very unkind! Surely, you must remember the epiphany that first formulated your misogynistic philosophy, so why not share it with us, rather than keeping us guessing about the roots of your evil thoughts towards women? There's no harm is sharing your mom or dad or siblings, possibly in combination, really fucked up your head. It's not really all that unique, you know, if that's the case.

I mean you no harm. But your motivations are indeed a curiosity.

I mean, considering your philosophy is based upon fantasy, rather than fact.



Slomo is a homosexual. He has had his own life dealing with living a little differently than most people. Your comments are the rudest in this thread probably.
"A mind stretched by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions." Oliver Wendell Holmes
backtoiam
 
Posts: 2101
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:22 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Study: Everyone loves feminists and environmentalists!

Postby Iamwhomiam » Wed Dec 09, 2015 2:28 am

Yes, backtoiam, slomo offered his opinion, which is damaging to women and was formulated by fantasy.

Most likely, some trauma has unfortunately brought him his skewed perception of reality.

Now I'm really wondering about the genetic research he's conducting.

On edit:

Too bad you feel my comments to slomo are rude, backtoiam. You've obviously not been reading since 2005 if you think that's being rude. Frankly, I find your support for slomo's position of women being an actual threat to men offensive. And therefore, also rude to our women members.

Slomo's a big boy and can deal well with my commentary. I'm sure it's nothing near as cruel as much he's experienced.

Oh, and about this, "He has had his own life dealing with living a little differently than most people."

Grow the fuck up, fer crissakes. It's life. Sometimes it really sucks and some times it's ecstatic. WE all carry around assorted baggage we have no need for that does us no good on our journey. Some are luckier than others and learn to drop whatever detrimental baggage they've been lugging around, after recognizing its uselessness, while some others, perhaps because they are psychically scarred and damaged from past experience, cannot and do not and are doomed to live a Sisyphean life of imagined burdens for whom they blame others yet.


edited to add "to" to last sentence
Last edited by Iamwhomiam on Wed Dec 09, 2015 3:12 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Study: Everyone loves feminists and environmentalists!

Postby slomo » Wed Dec 09, 2015 2:37 am

Iamwhomiam » 08 Dec 2015 22:04 wrote:I've been reading your story and find it unenlightening. In fact, I find it offensive. And I've always respected you and your opinions before, to the best of my knowledge.

But this fear of women I find astounding coming from a homosexual man who has identified himself as "queer." I find it bizarre, actually.

Due to the discrimination you must have been subjected to in this masculine patriarchy for merely being the person you feel you must be, I would imagine you to be sympathetic to women who seek only the same, rather than hostile.

I this, I find queer.

Rather than setting forth the truth, you allow me my fantasy. How very unkind! Surely, you must remember the epiphany that first formulated your misogynistic philosophy, so why not share it with us, rather than keeping us guessing about the roots of your evil thoughts towards women? There's no harm is sharing your mom or dad or siblings, possibly in combination, really fucked up your head. It's not really all that unique, you know, if that's the case.

I mean you no harm. But your motivations are indeed a curiosity.

I mean, considering your philosophy is based upon fantasy, rather than fact.

Since you're reaching out with what I imagine is an olive branch (rather than veiled insults), I'll engage. Before I answer you, do you really believe I hate women? Honestly? You might want to read what I've written, in this thread and maybe the thread I started (ignoring the bitch-slapping session Jack and I engaged in, which was borderline disrespectful on both sides). To help you out, I'll remind you that I've repeated the name Karen Straughan several times, a woman who articulates a position a notch or two more anti-feminist than my own. Guruilla embedded a video with a good example of her work. She jokes about how she doesn't quite look the part of an anti-feminist woman (the stereotype of which I imagine would be a quiverfull woman wearing an apron) with her "short hair and sensible shoes". I don't know that she mentions it in that particular video, but she has children and a boyfriend. In other words, an ordinary sort of person I might have in my circle of friends, and probably you as well. But more to the point: she recounts what she views as the history of feminism, and how and why she believes it is both anti-woman and anti-man. She does rightfully point out that there are multiple feminisms, and she is attacking specific ones; and so I'll admit that I need to be more careful with a word that has the potential to be triggering, as Jack points out, and specify that my position concerns specific feminisms, not all of them. I'm not asking you to agree with her, or to agree with me for that matter, but I am asking you to see both her and me as non-psychopathic individuals who have rational reasons for believing as we do. I personally feel that way about Christian fundamentalists, for example. I disagree strongly with some of their views, however I still believe that all but a few of them are regular people just trying to make sense of the world with the experiences they have had.

Beyond that point, my position is not based on "fantasy". It may certainly be mistaken (obviously I don't think so), but it is based on actual statistics and (other people's) research. My interpretation of that research (characterized as "truthy" by Jack) is that it refutes the theory of Patriarchy that proposes that (western) society systematically benefits men over women. The statistics demonstrate that there are substantial and important areas for which this is not true. You may disagree that these are important areas, or you may believe that other factors explain these phenomena, but if you want me and others like me to modify our positions (and, speaking for myself, my position can be modified by a convincing argument), then a careful and evidence-based explanation of why the statistics are wrong or not representative is in order. And it's really the concept of Patriarchy I have a problem with, because it's a very divisive concept, and (in my view) it doesn't really help society in the long run. As I mentioned here or in another thread, I'm actually OK with practical solutions to (e.g.) the wage gap issue, like encouraging women to take negotiation seminars or young women to enter STEM fields.

Also, I don't really have much actual skin in the game. I have a cushy white-collar job and a pretty good life (other than occasional odious professional tasks that motivate me to waste time on the internet). I work with many competent women who do not in any way threaten my professional standing, and I've written recommendation letters for quite a few of them. However, for various reasons related to volunteer activities undertaken by myself and my partner, I have met some pretty down-and-out young straight guys who have it rough (mostly for reasons having nothing to do with gender), and I have some compassion for their situation, and their point of view.
User avatar
slomo
 
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:42 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Study: Everyone loves feminists and environmentalists!

Postby slomo » Wed Dec 09, 2015 3:05 am

Well, no, I realize that there is one more set of issues on which I disagree strongly with certain popular feminisms. They all cluster around family law, domestic violence and sexual assault. If you read the fine details of the history of the legal system (and university policy) on these issues, there seems to be an unmistakable pattern of establishing precedent along two very regressive trajectories: chipping away at due process, and the establishment of debtor prisons. I'm not a legal scholar, so of course I could very well be mistaken, but I've read credible positions that describe components of these trajectories. This falls within the framework of parapolitics, and I suppose you could say that RI itself was the soil in which this epiphany sprouted.

On the surface, it seems like a good thing to promote legal policy that discourages sexual assault, domestic violence, and deadbeat dads (it seems necessary now to point out, once again, that I think these are bad things). However, if you believe (as I do) that women and men are equal in their humanity (neither superior over the other), then it necessarily follows that some women will sometimes hijack the legal system to their advantage in order to do harm. There is evidence that this in fact happens. Thus a need for due process. It is precisely because rape is considered so abhorrent a crime that it makes it easy to have sympathy for the position that due process should be discarded in this one very special instance, but the legal system doesn't work that way. Abandoning due process for sexual assault establishes precedent for a wider circle of crimes. Yes, this is a slippery slope argument, but over the last 15 years we have seen this same process evolve around the concept of terrorism. Again, the parapolitical angle.

Of course I could be wrong on this set of issues, but I hope you can see that if I am wrong, it is because I am mistaken about the legal framework or the parapolitics, and not because I "hate women".
User avatar
slomo
 
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:42 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Study: Everyone loves feminists and environmentalists!

Postby backtoiam » Wed Dec 09, 2015 3:22 am

Grow the fuck up, fer crissakes. It's life.


No shit so let the man have an opinion without calling his thoughts evil.

Frankly, I find your support for slomo's position of women being an actual threat to men offensive. And therefore, also rude to our women members.


That is not what I said. My main point is that women are being a threat to themselves by attacking another gender. This shit ain't complicated.
"A mind stretched by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions." Oliver Wendell Holmes
backtoiam
 
Posts: 2101
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:22 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Study: Everyone loves feminists and environmentalists!

Postby mentalgongfu2 » Wed Dec 09, 2015 3:26 am

Self-edited drive-by post before I go too far:

"protectors of feminism"
"baseless charges of hate speech"
"attack dogs"

Says someone who "tried to protect feminism in this forum from this happening but it happened anyway."

"feminism is mutating from advocating for equal treatment for women into attacking men and it hurts everybody"


I have found myself agreeing with much of what Slomo said, sometimes to my chagrin, and the above statement is one I can agree with relatively speaking. There is a strand of what may be considered feminism that is so vociferously anti-male it provokes a strong opposite reaction.

On the other hand, there is no shortage of MRA bullshit that is so anti-female it provokes an equally strong reaction from the other side, and arguably more justified in that instance since it is nowhere near as new or novel and has in fact been in existence since before there was such a thing as MRA.

There was an article comment shared on the gender thread I wasn't able to locate as quickly as I demanded, but the gist was a young male complaining in txt speech about how he 'couldn't get laid cause womens just wanted him to listen to their problems and he thought he was in but then he was friendzoned....' pure juvenile BS one sees on the Interwebs until you realize the proportion of the population who actually agrees. I have met them. I have shared beers with them and although I recognize them as blithering self-absorbed idiots, they are far from rare.

Language is important.
Last edited by mentalgongfu2 on Wed Dec 09, 2015 3:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
"When I'm done ranting about elite power that rules the planet under a totalitarian government that uses the media in order to keep people stupid, my throat gets parched. That's why I drink Orange Drink!"
User avatar
mentalgongfu2
 
Posts: 1966
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:02 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Study: Everyone loves feminists and environmentalists!

Postby mentalgongfu2 » Wed Dec 09, 2015 3:30 am

above edited to omit the quoted portion about RI being free of baseless hate speech.
While this is generally true, it is not always, and the censors here are much more lenient than most places, so we let a lot get by...
"When I'm done ranting about elite power that rules the planet under a totalitarian government that uses the media in order to keep people stupid, my throat gets parched. That's why I drink Orange Drink!"
User avatar
mentalgongfu2
 
Posts: 1966
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:02 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Study: Everyone loves feminists and environmentalists!

Postby backtoiam » Wed Dec 09, 2015 3:33 am

There was an article comment shared on the gender thread I wasn't able to locate as quickly as I demanded, but the gist was a young male complaining in txt speech about how he 'couldn't get laid cause womens just wanted him to listen to their problems and he thought he was in but then he was friendzoned....' pure juvenile BS one sees on the Interwebs until you realize the proportion of the population who actually agrees. I have met them. I have shared beers with them and although I recognize them as blithering self-absorbed idiots, they are far from rare.


I saw that and it looked like some young immature male that hasn't grown up trying to get laid. What a shock.
"A mind stretched by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions." Oliver Wendell Holmes
backtoiam
 
Posts: 2101
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:22 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Study: Everyone loves feminists and environmentalists!

Postby slomo » Wed Dec 09, 2015 3:37 am

backtoiam » 08 Dec 2015 23:33 wrote:
There was an article comment shared on the gender thread I wasn't able to locate as quickly as I demanded, but the gist was a young male complaining in txt speech about how he 'couldn't get laid cause womens just wanted him to listen to their problems and he thought he was in but then he was friendzoned....' pure juvenile BS one sees on the Interwebs until you realize the proportion of the population who actually agrees. I have met them. I have shared beers with them and although I recognize them as blithering self-absorbed idiots, they are far from rare.


I saw that and it looked like some young immature male that hasn't grown up trying to get laid. What a shock.

Yup. A young kid who desperately wants a girlfriend expressing his frustration stupidly. You can find lots of young girls saying stupid shit too. It's part of being a kid (boy or girl), you say stupid things. I've got plenty of both on my FB feed, I just roll my eyes and move on.
User avatar
slomo
 
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:42 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Study: Everyone loves feminists and environmentalists!

Postby mentalgongfu2 » Wed Dec 09, 2015 3:44 am

I saw that and it looked like some young immature male that hasn't grown up trying to get laid. What a shock.


It certainly looked like that. Good thing there aren't a lot of those types, and certainly they never grow up to be old immature males trying to get laid. Hopefully not the wealthy kind who take their perceived rejection too far and go on some sort of spree like that douchebag in California. Most likely just the typical whiny post-adolescent, entitled bullshit some sub-set of wishful alpha-males go through. But who knows, it could also be a Masonic Plot in the works...
Last edited by mentalgongfu2 on Wed Dec 09, 2015 3:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
"When I'm done ranting about elite power that rules the planet under a totalitarian government that uses the media in order to keep people stupid, my throat gets parched. That's why I drink Orange Drink!"
User avatar
mentalgongfu2
 
Posts: 1966
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:02 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 165 guests