guruilla » Sun Dec 13, 2015 5:43 pm wrote:Anyone familiar with this one? Maybe too loony-fringe for RI, but relevant to current discussion:
Is the First Lady actually the first, First Man?
This issue has mostly been that of only a few speculators until Joan Rivers brought it into the mainstream when she told the world that Barack is gay and Michelle is a transgender…she died from a relatively simple medical procedure not too long afterwards.
http://www.truthandaction.org/is-michel ... sgender/2/
The videos are bullshit, but what if Michelle is/was a man? At this point, nothing would surprise me, so let's say Michelle turns out to be transgender and/or male, cui bono? Would it provoke even more division--political, gender,
racial, sexuality, etc--and further the transhuman agenda as discussed in the gender thread? Maybe move us closer to a genderless citizenry and workforce? Or cause an even bigger rift between the races? Not to mention, its effect on gay rights? The first black American president is gay and married to a man/transgender is sure to cause an uproar. Then there are those who believe there is a conspiracy to
"emasculate the black male" that really started when white men put black men in chains hundreds of years ago.
According to Chappelle, white America loves to see feminized black males because they are far less threatening to white society than strong, proud black men. Black men in dresses make white people laugh; black men in black clothes wearing black berets scare them. The feminized black man is better received by mainstream America. Regardless, the ruling class has done everything in their power to disenfranchise black men after the civil rights era from ensuring their unemployment to propping up questionable role models that promote hyper-consumerism and false masculinity .
We have established that the black man in America has been emasculated, but that's just one piece of the puzzle. In the military, they break you down and build you back up as a soldier, Marine, etc. The same holds true for the creation of the sterile black man. The second phase in the creation of this sterile black man is feminization.
Through emasculation, a man's sense of manhood is distorted or destroyed entirely, leaving him open to all kinds of influences. He is a man physically, but emotionally and mentally he is lost. That's when "the powers that be" begin to feminize the black man. This lost black man is encouraged to adopt feminine qualities and thereby comes to resemble women emotionally and mentally and even physically in many cases.
The feminization of the black man is most evident in and propagated by music, movies, and television. Look at television shows like Real Housewives of Atlanta, America's Next Top Model, etc. We are bombarded with images of flamboyant, homosexual black men who not only are gay but who walk, talk, dress, and act like women. And if they're not feminine gays, they're unstable thugs.The emasculated black man is the product of hundreds of years of programming, indoctrination, and brainwashing. First they break us down, making us lose our sense of real masculinity, and then they try and build us back up as feminine or homosexual. Black men in the past, despite the adversity they faced, despite having their wives and children literally torn from their arms, still managed to remain masculine. Today, the black man is either a hyper-masculine thug or a feminine homosexual drag queen. Those in between exist, but they are rarely shown any love.
This may be politically incorrect on my part, and I'm not claiming it
means anything, but I notice, as hyper-masculine as some black men--usually lower socioeconomic status-- appear, they do seem to embrace a more feminine style: lots of jewelry, flamboyant colors, etc. It's a strange contradiction but I've also noticed this trend amongst Italian and Hispanic men as well. I'm sure it mostly has to do with differentiating themselves from their WASP, as George Carlin says, "owners".