Jeff Wells

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Jeff Wells

Postby Laodicean » Mon Feb 29, 2016 7:29 pm

User avatar
Laodicean
 
Posts: 3554
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:39 pm
Blog: View Blog (16)

99

Postby IanEye » Mon Feb 29, 2016 8:08 pm

User avatar
IanEye
 
Posts: 4865
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:33 pm
Blog: View Blog (29)

Re: Jeff Wells

Postby Laodicean » Mon Mar 14, 2016 8:22 pm

User avatar
Laodicean
 
Posts: 3554
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:39 pm
Blog: View Blog (16)

Re: Jeff Wells

Postby Laodicean » Mon Apr 04, 2016 8:31 pm

User avatar
Laodicean
 
Posts: 3554
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:39 pm
Blog: View Blog (16)

Re: Jeff Wells

Postby Iamwhomiam » Tue Apr 05, 2016 7:36 pm

User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Jeff Wells

Postby Laodicean » Sun Apr 17, 2016 7:07 pm

User avatar
Laodicean
 
Posts: 3554
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:39 pm
Blog: View Blog (16)

Mr. Wells

Postby jakell » Sat Apr 23, 2016 6:51 am

Assuming that Jeffism has varying flavours (ie, not fundamentalist), then possibly less worshipful utterances are acceptable too.



For those diehards who believe that the Zarquon model is worth adhering to, the reward is there: at the end... He speaks!


Image
" Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism"
User avatar
jakell
 
Posts: 1821
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 4:58 pm
Location: North England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Jeff Wells

Postby jakell » Mon May 16, 2016 3:57 am

In spite of Youtube slapping my wrist** and telling me that this video has been blocked, it is still viewable. Maybe there is something to the Jeff/Zarquon effect after all.

**(it was the monkey jerking off, not me)
Last edited by jakell on Mon May 16, 2016 6:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
" Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism"
User avatar
jakell
 
Posts: 1821
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 4:58 pm
Location: North England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Jeff Wells

Postby Iamwhomiam » Mon May 16, 2016 4:12 am

Either way, I hope you feel better after sharing this important news with us.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Jeff Wells

Postby jakell » Mon May 16, 2016 5:48 am

I thought that when they said something was blocked, then it was blocked. Apparently their system is not as efficient as they make out.
" Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism"
User avatar
jakell
 
Posts: 1821
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 4:58 pm
Location: North England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Jeff Wells

Postby Iamwhomiam » Mon May 16, 2016 1:24 pm

Oh, it's blocked for this us viewer; BBC copyright infringement.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Jeff Wells

Postby Laodicean » Tue May 17, 2016 5:05 pm

User avatar
Laodicean
 
Posts: 3554
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:39 pm
Blog: View Blog (16)

Re: Jeff Wells

Postby General Patton » Tue May 17, 2016 7:30 pm

штрафбат вперед
User avatar
General Patton
 
Posts: 959
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Jeff Wells

Postby Laodicean » Tue May 17, 2016 7:41 pm

Image


Image
User avatar
Laodicean
 
Posts: 3554
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:39 pm
Blog: View Blog (16)

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests