Might be a slightly unfair characterization, but almost 100% Bernie. I've never seen the hip vote align with the rural vote as far as I can remember.NeonLX » Wed Apr 27, 2016 2:27 pm wrote:Were the "Hipsters" in the Bernie camp, or were they with XXXlintoon?
Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
- Luther Blissett
- Posts: 4994
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
- Location: Philadelphia
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
- NeonLX
- Posts: 2293
- Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:11 am
- Location: Enemy Occupied Territory
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
A whole lot of people across wide swaths of the population are completely disgusted with the status quo. I'm one of them. I'm actually sick of it.
America is a fucked society because there is no room for essential human dignity. Its all about what you have, not who you are.--Joe Hillshoist
-
Nordic
- Posts: 14230
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
- Location: California USA
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
-
tapitsbo
- Posts: 1824
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:58 pm
- spambot: no
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
I HAVE seen what appears to be some Clinton support online that is not from bots. It is drowned out by Trump support which is in turn drowned out by Sanders support. I am certain Clinton's camp has used fraud but also that her base is not the type that is vocal on the net
-
Nordic
- Posts: 14230
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
- Location: California USA
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Her base has posted kiddie porn to troll Sanders pages.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
- NeonLX
- Posts: 2293
- Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:11 am
- Location: Enemy Occupied Territory
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
tapitsbo » Wed Apr 27, 2016 6:19 pm wrote:I HAVE seen what appears to be some Clinton support online that is not from bots. It is drowned out by Trump support which is in turn drowned out by Sanders support. I am certain Clinton's camp has used fraud but also that her base is not the type that is vocal on the net

That bolded bit was supposed to be in green, right? I'm getting pasted by Hillary fans on many different forums (fora). It gets nasty very quickly.
America is a fucked society because there is no room for essential human dignity. Its all about what you have, not who you are.--Joe Hillshoist
-
backtoiam
- Posts: 2101
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:22 am
- spambot: no
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Her base has done a lot to smear Sanders. The fake, rude, obnoxious, aggressive, cussing, nasty, shit starting (sic) "Bernie supporters" were part of that effort too.Nordic » Wed Apr 27, 2016 6:23 pm wrote:Her base has posted kiddie porn to troll Sanders pages.
"A mind stretched by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions." Oliver Wendell Holmes
- 82_28
- Posts: 11194
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
- Location: North of Queen Anne
- Contact:
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Well, I support Sanders because I support him -- I like his approach and values. I don't support Clinton because I don't. And so on. Sanders people are not craven idiots. We are also not paedophiles and are well versed in the ways, the rumors can be spread. I think it was some skipper on her staff who got into "The Lemon Party" and thought is was clever. Also do not google "lemon party". No seriously, do not.
I know someone will. But you don't need to see it and I think that, again, it was some paid young prankster on her staff that thought it was a bright idea to put a fairly elderly man in a negative and disgusting light. Kaching!
I know someone will. But you don't need to see it and I think that, again, it was some paid young prankster on her staff that thought it was a bright idea to put a fairly elderly man in a negative and disgusting light. Kaching!
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
-
Rory
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:08 pm
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
President Trump. We may as well prepare for it
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Luther Blissett
- Posts: 4994
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
- Location: Philadelphia
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
I've been arguing with Clinton supporters (people I know) since our primaries and I actually need to come here for a respite if that makes any sense at all.
The main problem now is that I have to contend with my friends who voted for Sanders in the primary but, now that they expect him to lose, have all turned and are attacking me to support Clinton.
The main problem now is that I have to contend with my friends who voted for Sanders in the primary but, now that they expect him to lose, have all turned and are attacking me to support Clinton.
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
-
bks
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:44 am
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
I'm saying no to Democratic Party blackmail, Luther. If Sanders would just join with the Greens it would signal a tectonic shift in US politics, with his many-millions strong email list and database of contacts drawn from SM.Luther Blissett » Fri Apr 29, 2016 8:08 am wrote:I've been arguing with Clinton supporters (people I know) since our primaries and I actually need to come here for a respite if that makes any sense at all.
The main problem now is that I have to contend with my friends who voted for Sanders in the primary but, now that they expect him to lose, have all turned and are attacking me to support Clinton.
As for those Clinton supporters, show them this, not that they'll give a shit:
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2 ... ebels.html
- 82_28
- Posts: 11194
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
- Location: North of Queen Anne
- Contact:
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
He simply has to go on full independent. . . . after he wins Oregon and California. He utilized the names and stuff that the DNC has in their databases in which I am one. I think Sanders will take CA. But who knows.Luther Blissett » Fri Apr 29, 2016 5:08 am wrote:I've been arguing with Clinton supporters (people I know) since our primaries and I actually need to come here for a respite if that makes any sense at all.
The main problem now is that I have to contend with my friends who voted for Sanders in the primary but, now that they expect him to lose, have all turned and are attacking me to support Clinton.
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
-
zangtang
- Posts: 1247
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:13 pm
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Would it not also be good merely by being refreshing - esp if he's going to be vote-fucked by his own party ?
Can't remember if Ralph Nader did or did not do such a thing - i'm sure if he did he was attacked for trying to 'split the left'
- When was the last time you had a credible force running as an 'independent' ?
on edit: i was thinking H Ross Perot, but memory fails me about his relationship with Repubs......googletime
Can't remember if Ralph Nader did or did not do such a thing - i'm sure if he did he was attacked for trying to 'split the left'
- When was the last time you had a credible force running as an 'independent' ?
on edit: i was thinking H Ross Perot, but memory fails me about his relationship with Repubs......googletime
- Project Willow
- Posts: 4798
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:37 pm
- Location: Seattle
- Contact:
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
Just want to say, there is a veritable mountain of evidence of wrong doing that one can mine to critique Hillary. There is no need whatsoever to attack her based on her looks or gender.
- Pele'sDaughter
- Posts: 1917
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:45 am
- Location: Texas
Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous
I agree, and it would be great if it were applied to all candidates.
Don't believe anything they say.
And at the same time,
Don't believe that they say anything without a reason.
---Immanuel Kant
And at the same time,
Don't believe that they say anything without a reason.
---Immanuel Kant