by Starman » Mon Jul 18, 2005 6:55 pm
Jeez --<br>I always enjoyed and learned from Vialls' noteable writings and proddings after the kernal of truth embedded within the outward 'shape' of things -- Indeed, it's a sad thing to note his passing into the Great Beyond -- But then, one can contemplate the something better beyond this Veil of Tears and Suffering that Joe is now at;<br><br>LOL: Checking behind God's throne for the Mossad;<br>Surely THERE the petty animosities and cruelties and horrors don't exist no mo'; That's what I gotta believe.<br><br>The most noteable story of his I recall was the Bali Micro-nuke Bombing report, attributing the likely explosive used was an atomic SDAM backpack atomic-trigger-type-bomb as a false-flag ops to arouse Australian support for Bush & Blairs' perpetual War on Terror scheme. Vialls' (in typical overblown fashion, bless 'im) calmly concluded that the only bomb capable of the damage extent caused was an Israeli micro-nuke <br>-- a claim which I still don't find absolutely compelling. It's since turned out there are other yet-classified weapons that could have done the job, like the little-known a-neutronic bomb proposed by some theorists as devastating the OKC Murrah Building, that uses hydrostatic-charges to create a tremendous pressure-differential and shock-blast wave --which would have stripped and pulverized the columns' concrete exposing rebar. It was allegedly invented by notorious scientist (also involved in the Inslaw PROMIS affair) Michael Riconosciuto -- a very sinister person deeply embedded in many recent parapolitical events -- worthy of research in his own right.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://homepage.ntlworld.com/steveseymour/nuke/bali_micro_nuke.htm">homepage.ntlworld.com/ste...o_nuke.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>--excerpt--<br>Absolute proof that this Australian myth is a structured lie, can be seen in these photographs of a reinforced concrete structure located more than fifty feet away from ground zero. Every fragment of hard concrete has been completely stripped away by overpressure, leaving only the ductile reinforcing rods or bars, known in the trade as “rebar”. The critical significance of this is best explained by General Benton K. Partin USAF (Ret), who had overall responsibility for all research, development, testing, analysis, requirements generation and acquisition management of weapons systems in the United States Air Force. <br> <br> (website photo) <br> Concrete completely stripped from Reinforcing bar "rebar", 50+ feet from ground zero <br> <br> In an official rebuttal to media and executive branch claims that the source of the awesome damage to the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma was a single truck bomb consisting of 4,800 pounds of ammonium nitrate & diesel low-explosive, General Partin wrote:<br> “The detonation wave pressure (1,000,000 to 1,500,000 pounds per square inch) from a high detonation velocity contact explosive sweeps into the reinforced concrete structure as a wave of compressive deformation. Since the pressure in the wave of deformation far exceeds the yield strength of the concrete (about 3,500 pounds per square inch) by a factor of approximately 300, the concrete is turned into granular sand and dust until the wave dissipates to below the yield strength of the concrete.<br> “This leaves a relatively smooth but granular surface, with protruding, bare reinforcement rods, a distinctive signature of damage by contact explosives. The effect of the contact explosive on the reinforcement rods themselves can only be seen under microscopic metallurgical examination. (The rods are inertially confined during the explosion and survive basically intact because of their much higher yield strength and plasticity.)”<br> Note here that General Partin is referring to explosives “in contact” with the reinforced concrete structure requiring between 1,000,000 and 1,500,000 pounds per square inch to strip the concrete away, leaving only the bare reinforcement rods. Think about this people, think about it. The stripped reinforcement rods in Bali were more than fifty feet away from the weapon, and thus not in contact at all.<br> Because blast through a fifty foot air gap is a very inefficient energy coupling mechanism against heavily reinforced concrete, four hundred pounds of the fastest chemical explosive so far touted by the Australian Government, RDX, would exert [but would not exceed] approximately ten pounds per square inch, fifty feet away from the point of criticality at ground zero. An equal weight of Potassium chlorate would be lucky to exert two pounds per square inch at the same range.<br> The problem here is obvious, and the only accurate conclusion about Kuta Beach is impossible for the Australian authorities to simply wish away with wild tales about potassium chlorate detergent all too conveniently "stolen from Java". To cause the actual damage photographed at the crime scene in Bali, we must have a weapon with a compound yield, and velocity of detonation fast enough to ensure one million pounds per square inch of retained pressure fifty feet away from ground zero. There is only one weapon in the world compact enough to perform this staggering trick: A micro nuke from Dimona in the Negev Desert. . <br><br><br>*****<br>Aieiei ...<br>We'll miss ya, Joe -- Till we meet up yonder; Your earnest quest to reveal the hard truth of things that we may better resist the modern global murderous thugs and thieves by speaking Truth to Power will be missed -- but your example of inspiration lives on.<br><br>Starman<br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>Joe Vialls website (still up, with several mirror sites):<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.vialls.com/">www.vialls.com/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
