Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Brexit: the Monkey's Paw edition posted by Richard Seymour
This is the Brexit that none of those who supported it, rallied for it, campaigned for it, voted for it, really wanted.
I am not here referring to the so-called 'Bregrets' (please stop this) expressed by about 7% of those who voted to Leave. Those regrets are clearly not enough to get people to support a new referendum, which is very strongly opposed in polls. (Also, please don't try to get around this difficulty by talking about how 'we are a parliamentary sovereignty' for god's sake.) I am talking about the fact that the number one issue, by far, among Leave voters, was the fear of immigration. It was the question of the free movement of labour within the European Union that harnessed the energies of the Leave.
It was, you will recall, a question of quality not just quantity. All those Romanians. All those Bulgarians. All those Poles. All those Turks looming over the horizon. NHS under threat. 'Breaking point'. Not that most of those who voted Leave had much experience of migration - the areas with the highest numbers of EU nationals living in them were also those with the strongest Remain votes. But that is how it usually works with race politics in the UK.
And yet, strange to relate, it now appears that the majority of British voters want EU nationals to stay. Leading Brexiters like Douglas Carswell have now openly campaigned for their rights to stay on. And even Nigel Farage has joined those condemning Theresa May for refusing to guarantee the rights of EU nationals in the UK to stay here.
Bank of England warns Brexit risks beginning to crystallise BBC News 05 July 2016
The Bank of England has warned there is evidence that risks it identified related to Brexit are emerging.
In a major report it states: "There is evidence that some risks have begun to crystallise. The current outlook for UK financial stability is challenging."
cont - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36712040
coffin_dodger » Tue Jul 05, 2016 7:03 pm wrote:I have the distinct feeling that the UK is currently experiencing something akin to The Phoney War - the period between the declaration of war in Sept '39 and when the actual fighting bagan in Apr '40. There is an eerie calm, considering the potential ramifications of brexit. I'm enjoying it whilst it lasts. Cheers!
slimmouse » Tue Jul 05, 2016 8:58 pm wrote:Im just wondering how many people in England know exactly who "The Bank of England ", who say this that and the other actually are? - and what they and their buddies up there are doing to the rest of us ?
Once enough people know this, we have a platform.
Edited to add in the light of searchers post, I reckon that these people know that many of we know.
More than 500 reports of hate crimes were made to police in London after Britain’s vote to leave the European Union.
The Metropolitan police said they received 599 allegations between Friday 24 June, the day the result was revealed, and Saturday 2 July.
Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe, the Met commissioner, said that the vote had allegedly been “directly referenced or alluded to” in 23 incidents.
The force said it had received eight allegations that Polish or other European communities had been targeted.
The Met, which is Britain’s largest force, usually averages between 20 and 50 reports of hate crime a day. On Sunday 26 June it received 62 reports and the following Tuesday it had 64.
The figures were revealed in a letter from Hogan-Howe to Keith Vaz, the chair of the home affairs committee, which on Tuesday announced an investigation into hate crime.
Suspected incidents in London have included the spraying of racist graffiti on the front entrance of the Polish Social and Cultural Association (POSK) in Hammersmith on 26 June.
On Monday, police released CCTV footage of a man throwing rotten pork meat at a mosque in north London.
Nationally, police say the aftermath of the referendum produced a fivefold increase in reports to a special hate crime reporting website, with 331 received by last Wednesday.
Most incidents involved alleged harassment, but Avon and Somerset police said a Polish man suffered “significant injuries” following a racially aggravated assault by two men on the day the result was announced.
The victim, in his 30s, was walking along St Michael’s Avenue in Yeovil, Somerset at about 6pm on 24 June when two men approached him and asked whether he spoke English, before repeatedly punching and kicking him, police said.
He required hospital treatment for a potentially life-changing eye injury, a fractured cheekbone and substantial bruising to his body.
Other incidents included the distribution of cards saying “Leave the EU/No more Polish vermin” in English and Polish outside a school in Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire.
An official report published last year said there were an estimated 222,000 hate crimes on average per year in England and Wales. The most commonly reported motivating factor was race. Police estimate that only one in four hate crimes are reported to them.
slimmouse » Tue Jul 05, 2016 10:15 pm wrote:I find Kenneth Clarke to be the epitome of the lunacy that we allow ourselves to be governed by
Baghdad, Brexit And The Chicken Coup
A few issues I meant to write about (but from which family issues keep me away):
Last night two bombs by Islamic State terrorists killed 172 and wounded some 200 people in Baghdad. At the same time the New York Times had a piece up, with zero evidence for its thesis, which was headlined Appealing to Its Base, ISIS Tempers Its Violence in Muslim Countries. (The headline was since changed.) The people in Turkey, Bangladesh, Yemen, Iraq and Syria - all place where IS committed mass murder last week, likely have a different view than the NYT expressed.
Will there be a Je Suis Baghdad campaign tonight? Will the colors of the Iraqi flag be projected onto the Eiffel Tower, the Berlin Gate or the White House? No? Why not? Are the mostly Shia kids, women and men killed in Baghdad the wrong kind of people?
I strongly agree with this paragraph: Brexit Is Just The First Earthquake Of Its Kind
People want a new order in which a sense of belonging and a sense of security, nationalism and economics, go together. There is nothing intrinsically wrong with this democratic desire. At base, this is what this vote is about. The British people are of course not alone in this search. In searching for a vision in which nations can be economically strong in a connected world, some opportunists will pair up with genuinely racist elements to make political capital. But to see this as merely the resurgence of some archaic, parochial, provincial populism is to miss the wood for the trees.
The Canary has an excellent series on the long planned but failed Chicken Coup in the British Labour party.Tony Blair’s crony elite want to snatch Labour back from the working class, How a PR company manufactured the Labour coup – Part I, Senior Labour Party insider reveals plan to oust Corbyn was in play 10 months ago (EXCLUSIVE). The coup was publicly announced in The Telegraph ten days before it happened: Labour rebels hope to topple Jeremy Corbyn in 24-hour blitz after EU referendum. This coup attempt was an embarrassment. The Blairite masters of spin have obviously lost their abilities.
Post Brexit, my lexit friends keep telling me that the result represents ‘huge opportunities for the left’. The ruling class is in crisis and antagonisms are being sharpened. My answer to these people is always, ‘what Left’? Where is it, what social forces does it have that can take advantage of this crisis?
The Right are always in a better position to take advantage of a crisis, and Brexit is no exception. For decades now the Left has been picking fights it can’t win, getting beaten up, and then starting another fight. Without forces, you can’t fight, and if you can’t fight, you can’t win.
What the Left should be doing, then, is building up its social forces that would be able to wage a protracted fight against Capital and the State. A perspective for theorising the creation of these forces is the concept of hegemony; the notion that one can tie a seemingly disparate set of interests to a particular class project through a discourse articulated with our experiences. Hegemony shouldn’t just be understood as a clever language game. Instead, it is a fundamental material thing, rooted in our everyday practices: in our workplaces, homes, pubs, state institutions, sexual relations; hegemony is founded in the dull compulsion of everyday life. It is at the level of the everyday that the neoliberals win consent for their class project. Everyday competition and discipline build consenting neoliberal subjects. Neoliberalism is part of everyday life, neoliberalism is the common sense through which we see the world.
It seems to me what the Left needs to do is build up its own, socialist hegemony. We need to build up our own hegemony rooted in people’s everyday experiences and articulated with a ‘socialist common sense’. What does this mean in practice? To me, it means building up a set of solid material institutions which provide a base from which to wage struggles against Capital and the State and simultaneously form the basis of a new society. An infrastructure that can provide shelter and respite from the vagaries of the market and reproduce individuals as ‘socialists’.
These should include unions and anti-fascist organisations, but also social centres, football clubs, ‘red gyms’, cultural events, and a weatherspoons of the Left; a people’s palace fit for the 21st Century. Places where people can go to act politically but also enjoy themselves, places where people are reproduced as socialists, where the primary logic of the space is not competition and accumulation but solidarity and friendship. For this project to be truly hegemonic, it needs to be expansive and outward looking, always trying to draw people in and never becoming insular and cliquish, as much of the left often does. If basic bonds of solidarity are rebuilt, if communism becomes part of everyday life, we can then start to build up consent and the ability to force through a communist class project.
These aren’t utopian demands, but are embedded in the reality that surrounds us. From football clubs like Clapton, FC Manchester, and Whitehawk to social centres like Common House and The Cowely Club, to national co-op projects like Radical Routes; the basic infrastructure and models of how to build it are already there. We just need to generalise these projects and deepen those that already exist.
A left wing hegemony needs to be rooted in the dull compulsion of everyday life, it needs to start at the level of the mundane, everyday communism. It begins with creating our own way of life outside of and not reliant on Capital or the State.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 171 guests