tapitsbo » Mon Sep 26, 2016 10:32 pm wrote:trump hasn't taken up those really crucial things like libya/syria bc he would likely be constrained by a security state that is of course already advising him, and won't let him take a radically different course of action. maybe he'd supervise a radically worse one
clinton of course will herself be much worse than obama about these issues
I think she will be Bush + Obama in many ways. I don't know if "invasion" will ever be on the table again, but I think it will be bombs away.
A pretty dud debate. Not as entertaining as I thought it would be. I'm not sure if Trump won. He started droning on about irrelevant issues towards the end, but he started strong and bullied her into standing there and smiling. She had a much stronger grasp of specifics and policies, and in a quiet way, she got him to defend himself on taxes, on the birther issue, on racism, and on the Iraq War stuff. That was very unlike him.
backtoiam, I agree, he never attacked her in any strong way. It's almost like he was holding back or he just couldn't think quick enough on his feet.
I'm not sure what to think, really.