by rothbardian » Wed May 31, 2006 7:23 am
Chiascuro--<br><br>These are some summary thoughts about this thread, so don't take it to be directed solely at you. This is directed to any and all who may be interested, but thanks for your previous comments. You brought up the subject of these 'hook'em horns':<br><br>I have thought that the great number of times George W and his family have flashed the 'horns' has had something to do with thumbing their nose at that small number of us who have surmised what they're really all about (psychopathic evil and apparent occultism). They had two daughters who attended U. of Texas of course, but the number of times they had occasion to flash those horns seem to go well beyond what was called for.<br><br>I had seen Laura Bush, for example, whippin' out the horns after disembarking from the helicopter on the White House lawn...and her daughters were a good thousand miles away at their Texas college. <br><br>I have seen it as something similar to the 'nose-thumbing' Jeff had described from Jeb Bush, who at one point got up in front of the Florida legislature and began blabbering about a personal relationship he supposedly had with a superhuman entity named "Chang". He gave every outward appearance of meaning it very literally.<br><br>But at the risk of incurring wrath, I have noticed what appears to be...a liberal political correctness regimen (on the part of most of those I have encountered) which requires the interpretation that the Bush family and other PTB members mean all of this only as a big prank...that they take none of their occult activities seriously, supposedly. (I don't quite recall Jeff's exact nuance on the Jeb thing, at this point.)<br><br>Skull and Bones? Oh, that's just silly college frat hi-jinks. Bohemian Grove? It's just a kind of Halloween for the power elite...a place where they can 'let their hair down'. Never mind the huge number of reports of brutality and murder from some of the Franklin children and other corroborating eyewitnesses, regarding the Grove.<br><br>(Paul Bonacci, one of the Franklin children, testified of torture and murder taking place at the foot of a giant forty foot owl at a place somewhere near Sacramento, CA. He didn't know where he was and it was quite some time before investigators, including John DeCamp, happened to find out about this owl at Bohemian Grove. That made for very strong corroboration and credibility.)<br><br>And never mind that MWSmith's behavior can't be dismissed as a 'prank'. Given the subcultural context, I consider that an absurd notion. This is very shocking, deadly serious, pointedly anti-Christian behavior from a prominent and influential 'Christian' entertainer (with close ties to the Bush family).<br><br>John Decamp, who is very far from being some tinfoil hat paranoid, has reported satanic ritual abuse in connection with the Aks-Ar-Ben crowd in Omaha. These were the rich and powerful of the region, and the Franklin story spread all the way to Washington DC and George Bush Sr.<br><br>So here again we have the power elite taking their occultism/luciferianism very seriously. There was the story, reported by Jeff , of the little girl over in Great Britain, who was 'inexplicably' drawing pictures of the interior of Masonic halls, before she was later ritually murdered. These kinds of stories that indicate a luciferian (or at least a very evil) inner core to various secret societies are cropping up...over and over and over.<br><br>No matter all of that-- we simply cannot have a picture emerging of a worldwide luciferian cult among the world's rich and powerful. According to some sort of political correctness regimen (and for reasons I couldn't immediately fathom), this cannot and must not be.<br><br>I had been puzzled by this and it took me a while to figure out (I think) why there was this curious black-out on the rather spectacular information being offered by a certain "Svali", for example. Or the curious de-emphasizing of Bush Sr.'s connection to the overt Satanism involved with the Franklin scandal. <br><br>Or the firestorm of controversy here at RI when a Time magazine cover photo of Pat Robertson was produced, where he was flashing a secret (or almost secret) Masonic hand sign, the "Lion's Paw"...the ominous secretiveness of it made even more ominous in view of Robertson's explicit denunciation of Freemasonry, throughout the years.<br><br>This consternation really threw me for a loop. I was thinking that anti-Bush folks and liberals would be deliriously happy to find out these 'evangelicals ' were even creepier than was first imagined. To my surprise though, libs here and a number of other places I have occasion to encounter them, did not welcome these reports of covert occultism at all...and were in fact very unhappy and very disconcerted.<br><br>I think I have surmised what this is all about-- my working conclusion is that these ancient manuscripts which comprise the so-called Bible would have to therefore be viewed as having accurately predicted a worldwide luciferian quest for world domination...and as having made these predictions, thousands of years before the fact.<br><br>This then would also call into play the entire array of 'Biblical' scenarios. For certain mindsets, this cannot and must not be. But why not? I am guessing people are afraid of getting 'Christian cooties' and can't separate out those issues long enough to take a long hard and intellectually honest look at whether there is indeed remarkably accurate information to be found here.<br><br>I honestly believe there may be a fear of having to maybe eventually come to inadvertent agreement with the 'reprehensible' likes of say, Jerry Falwell. If these ancient manuscripts have accurately foretold events thousands of years in advance, what to do? <br><br>I say forget about Jerry Falwell. When I see a Falwell or a Robertson with their chubby, greasy paws clasped around a twenty-two pound edition of the "Good Book" I think of the Planet of the Apes (of all things):<br><br>In that story, the monkeys had come into possession of some very valuable and historically significant artifacts. But they didn't know the true significance of them and thus they approached these things with syrupy religious veneration and superstition. It was the 'astronauts' that were finally able unravel the mystery, with their insights. <br><br>I say it's time to take the artifacts (these ancient manuscripts) back from the monkeys.<br><br>These manuscripts are by all rights, very very interesting, just from the standpoint alone of what they describe of a powerful luciferian cabal bent on world domination and...the descriptions of these malevolent beings (and how accurately it is echoed in these modern day reports). <br><br>I think we need some 'astronauts' to step in here. You need to approach this subject matter independently of the religious veneration stuff and the superstition, the quavering organ music and all the weird religious culture that has overgrown this whole thing. Is it actually true that malevolent superhuman entities have set upon the human race with murderous intentions? If the 'manuscripts' have accurately described and foretold these things...then it also describes a Head Honcho (of the intergalactic variety) who is coming up right on the heels of all of that, to shut it all down. Great news, if true.<br><br>I dare to theorize aggressively like this because I have been told (even by those at this board who strike me as routine 'naysayers') that this is the place for putting ideas and theories on the table. These are some working conclusions that I have formed at this point, and as with any working conclusion it needs to be subject to any and all scrutiny. I could go into much greater detail as to just how many accurate predictions/statements I have come across in these 'ancient manuscripts' but..enough for now. <br> <p></p><i></i>
