The End Is Near, But First, This Commercial

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

The End Is Near, But First, This Commercial

Postby nomo » Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:19 pm

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/13/AR2006061301832.html">www.washingtonpost.com/wp...01832.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>The End Is Near, But First, This Commercial<br>On the Hill, Sci Fi Channel Promotes 'Doomsday' Scenario<br><br>By Libby Copeland<br>Washington Post Staff Writer<br>Wednesday, June 14, 2006; C01<br><br>There are a lot of really crummy ways we could all die, including nuclear annihilation or a flu pandemic.<br><br>And then, of course, there's the possibility that we'll be attacked by aliens. Or that robots might become smarter than humans and put us in zoos.<br><br>The Sci Fi Channel sponsored a discussion on Capitol Hill yesterday speculating on 10 exceedingly lousy ways our species might meet its end. It was part of an elaborate promotion for a television special called "Countdown to Doomsday," which airs tonight at 9.<br><br>Amazingly, the channel managed to lure two congressmen and some serious experts to essentially shill for the show by talking about the various paths toward mass extinction.<br><br>The event was moderated by Linda Douglass, a former ABC congressional correspondent, who kept saying that "Countdown" was so scary that she'd been having trouble sleeping. She apologized for arriving late:<br><br>"I could tell you that I was abducted by aliens -- and you'd probably believe me after watching this," she said.<br><br>The first topic for discussion was the possibility that Earth could be hit by a really big asteroid.<br><br>"Why haven't we suffered more terrible destruction?" Douglass wanted to know.<br><br>"Space is big," said Ed Lu, a NASA astronaut.<br><br>Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.) mentioned an asteroid called 99942 Apophis, which he said might hit the Earth in 2036. There was discussion of something called a "gravity tractor," which might fix these sorts of problems.<br><br>Next up was a lengthy portion of the special dealing with nuclear terrorism, which included a clip of the Tom Clancy film "The Sum of All Fears." Douglass declared it "scary." She asked why terrorists hadn't yet gotten their hands on "loose nukes."<br><br>"There are many, many experts who believe that if we just keep doing what we're doing, a terrorist attack involving nuclear materials is inevitable over the next 10 years," said Joseph Cirincione of the Center for American Progress.<br><br>Nuclear terrorism is indeed scary, but it seemed strange to tackle the issue through a TV show that treats aliens as nearly equivalent to al-Qaeda.<br><br>"Countdown" is a montage of real-life and imagined destruction along with chilling music and voice-overs taunting viewers to consider that life on Earth could end "tomorrow." It is hosted by Matt Lauer of NBC's "Today" show. (The Sci Fi Channel is owned by NBC Universal.) The segment on robots taking over the Earth shows a montage of real robots, such as Honda's Asimo, a small humanoid figure that can walk.<br><br>"Don't let these cute and innocent-looking machines fool you," Lauer says in the show. "Many believe they're the first soldiers on the front lines of a robot revolution that's taking over the planet."<br><br>As proof of how this could happen, the special then shows clips from "Battlestar Galactica," a show about robots battling humans that just happens to air on Sci Fi.<br><br>The news conference dealt with only three modes of mass extinction, although Sci Fi Channel Executive Vice President Dave Howe assured everyone that if they view the special, they will see "another seven terrifying scenarios."<br><br>"You wanna watch the robots," Douglass said. "Seriously."<br><br>Rep. James Langevin (D-R.I.), who participated in the panel on nuclear terrorism, said afterward that he had not seen an advance copy of "Countdown." We told him about threat No. 9, alien attack, and asked how he rated that risk.<br><br>"I would put that relatively low on the list of threats," he said. "Who are you with?"<br><br>The Washington Post.<br><br>"Okay," he said, he just wanted to "make it very clear" that he did not take the threat of alien attack "seriously."<br><br>The makers of the show said they thought a robot rebellion was slightly more likely than an alien attack.<br><br>"Only because," said Thomas Vitale, a Sci Fi senior vice president, "you don't know if there <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>are </em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->aliens." <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
nomo
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:48 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The End Is Near, But First, This Commercial

Postby Et in Arcadia ego » Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:43 pm

I'd like a super-sized Fear Milkshake with my Terror Programme, plz.. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Et in Arcadia ego
 
Posts: 4104
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: The Void
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The End Is Near, But First, This Commercial

Postby HMKGrey » Wed Jun 14, 2006 7:07 pm

Anothe rexample of the new fangled: <br><br>MILITARY ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX at work. <br><br>One day, people will argue about who first said that. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :D --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif ALT=":D"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
HMKGrey
 
Posts: 666
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: West Coast
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The End Is Near, But First, This Commercial

Postby thurnandtaxis » Wed Jun 14, 2006 7:31 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Anothe rexample of the new fangled: <br><br>MILITARY ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX at work. <br><br>One day, people will argue about who first said that. <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>uhmmm... How 'bout Agent Mulder on the "X-files"?<br><br>from a December 29, 2000 "Column of the Americas weblog entry by Patrisia Gonzales and Roberto Rodriguez.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.voznuestra.com/Americas/_2000/_December/29">www.voznuestra.com/Americ...ecember/29</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>The desire for an egalitarian society is a universal pursuit. It's what the great philosophers and the scriptures of most major religions teach, yet it's viewed by many as utopian at best and subversive at worst.<br><br>Not unexpectedly, those who preach its antithesis are those who profit most from what Dwight D. Eisenhower warned us about: the "military industrial complex." Or as Mulder from "The X-Files" has coined it: <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"The military-entertainment-industrial complex." </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> In effect, the amoral accumulation of huge profits for global corporations is inextricably connected to the existence of borders. Otherwise, they would have no incentives to set up shop in Mexico, Central America, Haiti or China. Their justification for maintaining these huge inequalities is that it benefits the workers and, by extension, the host countries.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>also this from a panel presented by the American Studies Association:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://chnm.gmu.edu/asa/viewabstract.php?id=396&cf=2">chnm.gmu.edu/asa/viewabst...d=396&cf=2</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Killer Amusements: Scrutinizing the Military-Entertainment-Industrial Complex</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><br>Modern forms of militarism, especially as they have manifested in conflicts between nation-states, are linked in complex ways to nation-based and, more recently, to transnational entertainment industries. This session will consist of focused presentations by five interdisciplinary thinkers who variously analyze the epistemological, financial, technological, aesthetic, and political dynamics that constitute the rapidly expanding contact zone that could aptly be called the military-entertainment complex. Taking into consideration the history of the entertainment industries’ part in modern militarization, the panel will raise and respond to some key questions: How has the US nation-state used entertainment media and techniques to promote military expansion and imperialism? How does this process compare to militarist entertainment strategies developed by nation-states outside the US? How have forms of entertainment and entertainment products been shaped by historically and geo-politically specific agendas of militarization? What products sell and why? By what avenues and means have entertainment technologies (e.g. broadcast radio, cinema, television, computer games, etc.) traveled into military contexts, how have they been applied there, and what are the results of this movement? Conversely, how have military technologies traveled into entertainment contexts, what have they been used for there, and what are the implications of this contact? Finally, how have popular amusements (i.e. films, television shows, recorded music, traveling variety shows, theme parks, toys, games) contributed to setting the implicit protocols for how militarism is popularly conceptualized, evaluated, embraced or resisted, making it either seem a dreaded but necessary inevitability or a heroic achievement whose violence is elided through entertaining acts of illusion?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <p></p><i></i>
thurnandtaxis
 
Posts: 213
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 5:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The End Is Near, But First, This Commercial

Postby HMKGrey » Wed Jun 14, 2006 7:36 pm

See, what did I tell you... We're arguing about it already. <br><br>PS: you didn't have to pile in with two instances, thurn. One wouldda done.<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START >D --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/grin.gif ALT=" >D"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
HMKGrey
 
Posts: 666
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: West Coast
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to Media and Information Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest