JackRiddler » Sun May 06, 2018 10:48 pm wrote:Burnt Hill » Sun May 06, 2018 9:00 pm wrote:It is literally the title of the article presented in the original post.
Which is a lazy and annoying way to do it. This is not Facebook. The threads continue, there is supposed to be a discussion. I would prefer the OP's explicit bias to some corporate media headline that then lives on for years.
Iamwhomiam » Sun May 06, 2018 11:01 pm wrote:Burnt Hill, thanks for checking back to the OP. While I was amenable to a name change, I now agree with you that we should not alter the thread title, as it purely reflects the OP title.
seemslikeadream wrote:I think it would be a good idea for someone to start a thread
Changing Thread Titles - Discuss
maybe we could get the mods to talk to Jeff and he could take the time to add another forum just for discussing thread titles
Iamwhomiam » Sun May 06, 2018 9:46 pm wrote:Here's my true unblemished opinion. I really don't give a damn! It's not my blog, It's Jeff's. AD and Jeff came to terms and if Jeff wanted AD gone, he'd be gone.
What I do care about is the incessant complaining, because that is annoying. Please, take issue with the poster via PM, or if that avenue doesn't pan out, ask for moderator intervention, but for the sake of all past, present and future contributors, bite your friggin tongue and control your emotions.
Enough with the screed. Your issue is with board management. Take it up with the managers; write a letter to the owner.
JackRiddler wrote: And now it's 25 pages and a useful archive of a historical event that should continue, but still every time one responds to the latest development in The Skripal Affair the result is to push the same false headline up.
Users browsing this forum: cptmarginal, Google [Bot] and 27 guests