Supply Chains

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Supply Chains

Postby alloneword » Sun Feb 13, 2022 7:15 pm

^ :D

To be serious though - although at the risk of further thread derailment - there was a decent attempt made a few years ago at addressing the question of 'Can Britain Feed Itself?'

It was by a certain Mr. Simon Fairlie (the closest I think I ever got to meeting a real God) and was published in 'The Land' magazine. It really pissed off a lot of vegans at the time (though not as much as his book on 'Meat: A Benign Extravagance' did a few years later).

From memory, my main problem with the analysis was regarding the implied level of mechanisation (as in, remaining static) in that we probably shouldn't assume that the energy inputs required to maintain it's use will remain as available. But as 'back of the envelope' goes, it's pretty good.

Mechanisation is a rarely-discussed, yet pivotal aspect of food security. It's one genie that's going to be a real bastard to get back in it's bottle.
User avatar
alloneword
 
Posts: 902
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:19 am
Location: UK
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Supply Chains

Postby drstrangelove » Sun Feb 13, 2022 10:09 pm

If anyone has good resources on sustainable gardening please share. I'm an urban apartment dweller but lucky enough to have a reasonably sized open sky balcony. I've bought a number of those self watering containers, soiled them and seeded them with onions, carrots, broccoli, and lettuce.

I expect to fail at this first attempt, but I need to understand why. I already know all the materials are good. Good soil and good seeds. The self watering mechanism should be able to remove that margin of error and leave either sowing technique or sunlight/climate variables. My apartment complex also has a community garden that I can move onto should all the balcony space be taken up.

Obviously there's a lot of stuff online. But looking for some information curation. Maybe another online message board dedicated to this type of stuff?
drstrangelove
 
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat May 22, 2021 10:43 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Supply Chains

Postby Harvey » Mon Feb 14, 2022 8:13 am

I haven't forgotten your request for soups, I have lots but I'm a rather intuitive cook and writing down what I do is fairly time consuming. I will start the thread shortly, Pufpuf is also itching to dive in with that so let's go for it. Almost all the fruit and veg you buy will have viable seeds, start keeping them. Grow a little lemon tree or two on your balcony and in just a few years you'll have fresh lemons, a few tomato vines, they're easy but need regular water, a good pot of basil plants (five or six plant gives hundreds of seeds after flowering and should keep you supplied for a good while) and carrots are easy. Plant a Bay bush too.

Derailment over!
And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
Harvey
 
Posts: 4201
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (20)

Re: Supply Chains

Postby alloneword » Mon Feb 14, 2022 8:54 am

Heh... not quite over!

The trouble with curation/forums is that you'll find lots of info that isn't really that relevant to your location. I moved a couple of years ago (only by about 150 miles) and am having to un/re-learn a whole load of stuff (things like the likelihood of -5 °C frosts in May, for instance).

So start local when looking for information, so it's more applicable to your climate/seasons/pest threats etc. Local seed/equipment suppliers often have good information freely available (e.g.). I regularly download my local suppliers entire website to ensure I'll always have access to the information.

You'd think it's obvious, but grow stuff you like to eat. I grew a few cucumber plants a few years ago, which did spectacularly well. A fuckton of cucumbers. I hate cucumbers.

Expecting to fail at first is a healthy attitude to begin with, but don't be put off by other's seeming success - gardeners rarely blog about their failures.

Go for 'heirloom' varieties (non-hybrids), particularly if you want to save your own seed (actually often easier than it sounds).

For a roof terrace, composting is probably not going to be suitable, so look at getting a wormery (check if your local council might still be offering kits at a discount).

But mainly, seek out any local groups or projects you can find, visit them and see what works for them. Steal ideas. Hell, take a ziplock bag and steal cuttings. (skyfarm? Vegout? A fair few links in this old blog post, some of which are not dead). A lot of the best info will be found offline, though. A lot of older folks who have been doing this a while don't even have email addresses. You have to get out and find them.
User avatar
alloneword
 
Posts: 902
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:19 am
Location: UK
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Supply Chains

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Mon Feb 14, 2022 9:32 pm

Start at the seed savers network.

https://seedsavers.net/local-seed-networks/

You'll get advice and good seeds and you'll be helping fight Monsanto.

Build a worm farm. Plenty of guides online. Compost your organic rubbish if it doesn't go in the worm farm. You can go to a park and get handfulls of green matter for worm farming and composts if you're careful.

Use that to fertilise your plantings

Grow herbs cos they make all sorts of food taste nice. You can share them with neighbours too and get other food in exchange. And they work in a garden because they are useful for companion planting.

Depending on how much room you have you can try this.

Get old tyres, put one down and fill it with straw, then plant seed potatoes. As the grow add tyres and straw so what was the stem is now "underground", but make sure you leave a healthy growing tip to keep growing. Repeat this process as high as is practical. When its as high as possible and the potatoe plant dies or matures enough and you're hungry you can harvesy and get soil out of the tyres.

There may be some issues with using tyres cos they aren't exactly pollution free but if you live in a city you're exposed to heaps of toxins anyway. I'm not sure of how bad they might be. But you can replicate the process by using garbage bins from bunnings and just planting the bottom 6 inches then backfilling slowly as the potato plant grows. You can also build short tressle thingees off the balcony and then grow kiwi fruit or passionfruit or other vines onto them, expanding the amount of sunlight available.
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 10616
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Supply Chains

Postby drstrangelove » Tue Feb 15, 2022 3:04 am

Harvey » Mon Feb 14, 2022 8:13 am wrote:Almost all the fruit and veg you buy will have viable seeds, start keeping them. Grow a little lemon tree or two on your balcony and in just a few years you'll have fresh lemons, a few tomato vines, they're easy but need regular water, a good pot of basil plants (five or six plant gives hundreds of seeds after flowering and should keep you supplied for a good while) and carrots are easy. Plant a Bay bush too.

Derailment over!

solutions to problems are progressive not digressive, and I think the two have become too detached. That is, there is a hyper-obsession with elucidating every single facet of the problems we face, for instance here at RI by posters like myself, assumedly in the hope something can be done about it. But what? Are we just playing the fiddle while Western civilisation burns.

It seems to me there are two areas where individuals can actualise themselves in this regard:
1) grassroots propaganda.
2) food self sufficiency.
Some would argue 3) is direct political action. But that ship has sailed, and I think the definition of being 'red-pilled', so to speak, is the realisation of this.

Alex Jones is successful because he takes the first and uses it to market the second. Though in the process he does a disservice to both. However, a slight tweak to his business model would become devastatingly effective(against 'them').

The only thing that can be used against people who can both think for themselves and feed themselves is naked violence. Shelter plays into it as well though, which is why 'they' are using the economic cycle to create a population of corporate landlords and renters. Then they'll be able to regulate gardens out of existence and start feeding us Soylent Green. But it won't work out for them in the long run and life goes on at the community level.


Thanks for tips all fo you. I'll start collecting seeds, gathering local books, and look into worm farming.
drstrangelove
 
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat May 22, 2021 10:43 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Supply Chains

Postby MacCruiskeen » Tue Feb 15, 2022 3:59 am

Strawberries!
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Supply Chains

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Sat Feb 19, 2022 5:13 pm

I thought this seemed like a big deal but checking in with our commodities desk I was surprised to find them in a completely apocalyptic mood over it, so perhaps a still bigger deal than my hick ass thought.

https://www.mining.com/web/belarusian-p ... zer-chaos/

Belarusian potash force majeure adds to global fertilizer chaos

A Belarusian potash miner that accounts for a major chunk of global supply has declared force majeure, shaking up a market that’s already contending with soaring prices.

Belaruskali said around Feb. 16 that it won’t be able to meet its contracts, according to a letter from an exporter addressed to clients seen by Bloomberg. Shipments have been halted as a result of U.S. and European sanctions.

The absence of Belarusian supplies will have big consequences. Potash is a key nutrient for major commodity crops like corn and soybeans, as well as produce. Fertilizer prices have already skyrocketed as soaring natural gas costs forced some European plants to halt or curtail production, and U.S. spot prices for potash in the Corn Belt have nearly doubled in the last year. Expensive fertilizer is making food more costly to produce and contributing to rising global inflation for consumers.

“This is a fairly unprecedented situation in the potash market,” CRU Group analyst Humphrey Knight said by phone. “It could take many months if not longer for that supply to recover.”

Belarus exports about 10-12 million tons annually, according to Green Markets data. The country accounts for about a fifth of global supply. It’s a major shipper to Brazil, as well as to India and China.

“Global potash contracts have settled at the highest price since 2008, ensuring another year of pricey inputs for farmers and strong earnings for producers,” Alexis Maxwell, an analyst Green Markets, a company owned by Bloomberg, said in an email. “U.S. sanctions on Belarus eliminated a key competitor” with no readily available alternative supplier.

The U.S. sanctions against Belaruskali, Belarus’s only potash miner, came into force in December, while penalties against Belarusian Potash Co., which exports all the potash from the country, should become effective April 1.

The sanctions may result in shifting trade flows and some demand rationing, Nutrien Ltd. interim Chief Executive Officer Ken Seitz said in an interview. Customers who have historically purchased from Belarus are trying to secure supplies elsewhere. For example, Russia is doubling fertilizer quantities offered to Brazil, Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro said during an interview to Radio Jovem Pan Thursday.

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko discussed the potash sanctions with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin, he said during a televised joint news conference in Moscow. Putin ordered a port to be built near St. Petersburg for exports of the nutrient, Lukashenko said, adding that Belarus expects to start loading “millions” of tons of cargo there within 1 to 1 ½ years.

CRU’s Knight said that Russian ports were likely the only option left for Belarusian Potash Co. to export, but most are already operating at capacity. While some Belarusian potash could be rerouted to the Russian market, pushing Russian companies to export more, the volumes would be small, he said.

Nutrien has an additional half million tons of capacity that would be available in the latter half of 2022 if needed, Seitz said. Grower margins are strong, so higher potash prices won’t result in less demand.

The company could also ramp up potash output, but first, it would need to see a prolonged impact on the market for “years” to bring on additional sustained capacity, Seitz said. Nutrien increased its potash capacity by 1 million tons in 2021 and additional volumes are expected to come online in 2022 from other companies, he said.

“We’re not standing around saying we’re not doing anything,” Seitz said, noting the company doesn’t want to be left with additional cost if supply challenges go away quickly. “We are bringing on volumes.”

Nutrien anticipates global potash shipments will be between 68 million tons and 71 million tons in 2022.

The potash situation in Belarus is bleak, Scotiabank analyst Ben Isaacson said in a note. Nutrien will benefit not only from the higher prices, but also from being able to leverage their volume of the crop nutrient.

“Nutrien is now in the driver’s seat for how high potash prices go this year, while Belaruskali will determine how low they go,” Isaacson said.


China has been stocking up on strategic food supplies at an unprecedented scale for over a year now. The world is definitely on hot war footing these days; fun times.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Supply Chains

Postby alloneword » Wed Mar 02, 2022 12:24 pm

User avatar
alloneword
 
Posts: 902
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:19 am
Location: UK
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Supply Chains

Postby Elvis » Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:46 pm

Lesson: If Germany had started working on its own energy sovereignty ten years ago—ala a Green New Deal—Germany wouldn't be so reliant on Russian oil. More importantly, on a global scale, building up renewable energy capacity will also keep us alive.

The failure to invest in renewable energy is going to cost a lot more than supply-chain driven inflation.
“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7563
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Supply Chains

Postby alloneword » Thu Mar 03, 2022 8:06 am

Erm...

Germany leads Europe in terms of renewable generation capacity.

Image

Note how - despite the massive increase in renewable generating capacity - the consumption of Natural Gas has still increased ~50%.

We are already running up against the physical and technical limits in terms of how that much 'episodic' or 'non-dispatchable' generating capacity can be utilised. The costs of creating any sort of storage to address this problem are astronomical.

In a recent in-depth discussion of this issue, Gail (the actuary) Tverberg goes through it all here: Limits to Green Energy Are Becoming Much Clearer

All major types of cost analyses (including the levelized cost of energy, energy return on energy invested, and energy payback period) leave out the need for storage (both short- and long-term) if balancing with other electricity production is not available.

If no solution to inadequate electricity supply can be found, then demand must be reduced by one means or another. One approach is to close businesses or schools. Another approach is rolling blackouts. A third approach is to permit astronomically high electricity prices, squeezing out some buyers of electricity. A fourth balancing approach is to introduce recession...


Looks like we've gone for '1', '3' and '4' so far. I suspect that '2' isn't far behind (no doubt to be blamed on 'Russian Cyber Attack').

(There are also a bunch of really good interactive charts on German energy here).
User avatar
alloneword
 
Posts: 902
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:19 am
Location: UK
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Supply Chains

Postby alloneword » Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:39 am

To flesh that out a little:

Europe produces 3.6 million barrels of oil a day but uses 15 million barrels of oil a day. ..Europe produces 230 billion cubic meters of natural gas a year but uses 560 billion cubic meters. ... Europe uses 950 million tons of coal a year but produces half that.

..Russia produces 11 million barrels of oil per day but only uses 3.4 million. ... Russia now produces over 700 billion cubic meters of gas a year but only uses around 400 billion. Russia mines 800 million tons of coal each year but uses 300.

That’s how Russia ends up supplying about 20 percent of Europe’s oil, 40 percent of its gas, and 20 percent of its coal.

(source)

For context, I dug out this 'sankey' chart, which I drew up about 8 years ago to visualise gas flows around Europe (2012):

Image

There's an up-to-date version on the images only thread from the UKGov, but it's ugly AF and difficult to read.

Also what's missing from my version above is the origin of LNG shipments... It was mainly middle east back then, but these days around 12% of the UK LNG (for instance) is from Russia.

So yeah, stand by for some 'demand destruction'.
User avatar
alloneword
 
Posts: 902
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:19 am
Location: UK
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Supply Chains

Postby Elvis » Fri Mar 04, 2022 5:02 am

alloneword wrote:Germany leads Europe in terms of renewable generation capacity.


Okay, I'll amend that to something more realistic...

If the world had committed to renewable energy thirty years ago—ala a Global Green New Deal—nobody would be reliant on (Russian) oil.
“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7563
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Supply Chains

Postby alloneword » Fri Mar 04, 2022 9:00 am

Sorry, E, but I still don't think that's 'realistic'.

Let's look at the UK just yesterday (a little after 6pm GMT):

Image

Image
( https://gridwatch.co.uk/demand )

Do you see how the output from 'wind' crimps off late afternoon, right where demand starts to pick up? That shortfall is then made up by Gas (CCGT), which can be spun up and brought online relatively quickly (is 'dispatchable'). Note also that a GW or two of 'pumped hydro' (brought online in seconds, essentially a battery) kicks in to help out whilst the CCGT ramps up.

If we were to increase the 'wind' capacity, we would further increase the shortfall when the wind drops, further increasing the problem. How ever you look at it, we can't 'keep the lights on' without the gas.

And this is just electricity production. There's the heating, transport and industry to consider.

We still seem to have a rather quaint cornucopian notion that we're going to be able to shift a large part of the energy requirements of transport and domestic heating (via air source heat pumps - currently being subsidised/pushed by GovUK) onto the electricity system, as if the generation and distribution infrastructure to cope with that will just magically appear if we just wish hard enough.

The flowchart below gives us an idea of the scale of that task:

Image
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistic ... chart-2020

Note the dark pink line on the left that shows renewables (which also includes all the hydro generation). Try to imagine the scale of the investment required to make that pink line even half as wide as all the other lines put together.

Now imagine the practical issues (as outlined above) that doing so would present.

Sure, renewables have a place in the mix - recent storms in the UK saw us generating almost 20GW from wind at one point - but I think their utility with regard to our current infrastructure is often vastly overstated and poorly understood.
User avatar
alloneword
 
Posts: 902
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:19 am
Location: UK
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Supply Chains

Postby drstrangelove » Mon Mar 07, 2022 3:23 am

How War in Ukraine Drives Up Inflation at U.S. Farms, Supermarkets, Retailers

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has set the stage for faster-rising consumer prices, with the mayhem of war driving up manufacturing costs for food, consumer goods and machinery in places far from the battlefield.

The conflict is stressing an already strained global supply chain, and its economic impact will likely be felt in households world-wide, at supermarkets, retailers and the gas pump. While higher costs will take time to work their way from producers to consumers, executives and analysts expect the war’s fallout to worsen inflation already stoked by shortages of goods and workers.

“It seems to be overshadowing everything now and reversing the improvement that we were seeing,” said Kathy Bostjancic, chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics.

The short-term consequences have been serious. Grain markets recently hit a 14-year high in anticipation of a diminished harvest in Ukraine, which would raise costs to feed the world’s cattle and poultry.

Aluminum prices rose in anticipation of sanctions on Russia, a major supplier of the metal used in soda cans, aircraft and construction, as well as on fears that Moscow could halt exports.

Crude oil prices rose 25% last week, to more than $118 a barrel, the highest level since 2013. Gas prices have gone up an average of 43.7 cents a gallon in the U.S., according to data from price tracker GasBuddy. On Sunday, the national average was $4.02 a gallon, according to GasBuddy.

On Friday, Russia, one of the world’s largest suppliers of fertilizers such as potash and nitrogen, said it could suspend exports. Farmers and consumers will bear the cost of any prolonged shortage.

Ingka Group, which owns and operates furniture giant IKEA’s stores, said Thursday that prices would rise more than expected this year after it warned the war in Ukraine was causing serious supply chain disruptions. IKEA said its global prices would rise about 12%, up from earlier estimates of 9%.

Some analysts and company officials caution that it is too early to know exactly what the long-term effects of the war will have on the global economy, and not all think the conflict in Ukraine will have a major impact on supply chains. Businesses have rebounded from global conflicts in the past and can mitigate the effects by finding alternative suppliers elsewhere.

But the invasion of Ukraine has already slowed the journey of goods traveling by various means. Many Western shipping companies are steering clear of Russian ports, an important Asia-to-Europe rail line is used less, much of the Black Sea remains out of bounds and many air cargo flights are either banned from or are avoiding Russian airspace, a key route for goods moving between Europe and Asia. Shipping and airfreight rates have moved higher.

Rising energy and food prices are only the most obvious pressure points for consumers. “Now that we are seeing increases across other commodities, like aluminum, palladium, copper,” Ms. Bostjancic said, “that is going to feed through to some degree to consumer prices as well.”

. . .

Farm to table

Ukrainian farmers are supposed to plant their spring crops soon. Yet even if the fighting were to stop, they may not have enough fertilizer and pesticides. Agriculture industry executives are warning of smaller yields in Ukraine, which normally has some of the world’s most productive fields.

“Depending on what crop you’re looking at, it could have rather severe impacts already in the first growing season,” said Svein Tore Holsether, chief executive officer of Norway-based Yara International AS A, one of the world’s largest fertilizer makers. “Yields could drop by 50%.”

Ukraine accounts for 8% and 13%, respectively, of global wheat and corn exports, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data. “For certain parts of the world it means more expensive food,” Mr. Holsether said. “For other parts of the world, it means access to food, and it’s a matter of life and death.”

In the past month, wheat futures climbed to a 14-year high and rose more than 40% over the past week. Corn and soybean prices over the past month were up roughly 21% and 15%, respectively.

Higher commodity costs stand to further inflate prices of such pantry staples as cereal and cooking oil, as well as beef and other meat, because producers rely heavily on grain to feed livestock and poultry.

Rising grain and corn costs eliminate some of the hope that inflation could plateau in the second half of the year. Such agricultural commodities are used in nearly all food products, said Ben Bienvenu, a food and agribusiness research analyst at Stephens Inc.

Hormel Foods Corp. , the owner of food brands including Spam canned meat and Skippy peanut butter, said it expected higher raw material prices from the war in Ukraine. “There will be some disruption now and further down the road,” the company’s Chief Financial Officer Jacinth Smiley said.

James Halverson, a rancher in Beulah, Wyo., and executive director of the South Dakota Stockgrowers Association, said feed costs have jumped in the past week, making it more expensive for ranchers, himself included, to hold on to cattle and negotiate better prices from meatpackers.

If grain costs stay high over the coming months, it will cut into his bottom line, he said, and customers will pay more for meat at the grocery store.

“We’ve seen grain come up,” he said. “That’s the number one cost of feeding cattle.”

Soil supplements

Higher food prices are related to the rising cost of natural gas, one of the main ingredients for nitrogen fertilizers. Ken Seitz, interim chief executive of fertilizer giant Nutrien Ltd. , said higher gas prices could lead to plant closures in Europe.

The transport of fertilizers, largely on trains and ships, has been difficult since the invasion of Ukraine. Several large shipping companies have temporarily suspended services to Russian ports.

Fertilizer supplies were already tight, and prices have reached record highs. That adds to the pressure on farmers, who are paying significantly more for fuel, weed-killing chemicals, crop seeds and seasonal labor.

If fertilizer supplies run short—or get too expensive—some farmers may shift acres toward less fertilizer-intensive crops such as soybeans. Others could cut back on fertilizers, potentially slimming harvests, analysts said.

Nutrien, the Canada-based company, could produce more potash fertilizer if the global supply problems persist, Mr. Seitz said. But his company could be stuck with unsold quantities should Belarusian and Russian suppliers return to the market.

Farmers are wringing their hands over supplies they will need for spring planting, said Chris Edgington, president of the National Corn Growers Association and an Iowa farmer. “The American farmer is going to get a crop in the ground,” he said. “What it will look like, I can’t tell you.”

Randy Stephens, chief executive of SureGrow Agricultural Products Inc., has a plan to fill orders from his roughly 3,000 customers in Texas. The CEO of the chemical and fertilizer business in Comanche, Texas, says that over the next three months he will be making stops at as many as 15 ports from Houston to Corpus Christi, seeking needed shipments.

Even if he finds enough supply, he said, “I think we can run out really quickly.”

- https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-wars-c ... 1646597823
drstrangelove
 
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat May 22, 2021 10:43 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 147 guests