Pentagon Video to be released today

[dugoboy]

do remember wtc7 was imploded 7 hours or so after the two big towers were imploded. there may have even been a bomb under wtc6.<br><br>i say this so we don't get stuck in a rut about just the pentagon iconsistencies.<br><br>( i put the word just to distinguish what i meant to say, thank you nomo) <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=dugoboy@rigorousintuition>dugoboy</A> at: 5/17/06 2:23 pm<br></i>

[nomo]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>i say this so we don't get stuck in a rut about the pentagon iconsistencies.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>Yeah, let's get stuck in the WTC inconsistencies instead!<br><br>As far as I can tell, the only thing this "new" video has accomplished is a rehash among the so-called 9-11 Thruthies of some of the most outlandish and ridiculous theories. Someone out there must be quite happy with that. <p></p><i></i>

[dugoboy]

nomo, um, what i meant to suggest is that categorically or in the aggregate is to, not just focus on JUST the WTC site or JUST the pentagon, but what i suppose i should have explained further is that it should take into account EVERYTHING be it physicial, financial or deep political or business as usual or whatever else sub-category you wish to chop the incident of 9/11 into.<br><br>but i also have no idea where this discussion of outlandish and ridiculous theories has come up AT ALL in this thread. if you mean elsewhere, then i feel sorry for them, they just became government controlled. i'm not. <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=dugoboy@rigorousintuition>dugoboy</A> at: 5/17/06 2:26 pm<br></i>

[professorpan]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>The release of these images comes at a time when the 9/11 truth movement is at its most prominent. This is a targeted assault intended to quash questions about 9/11 and discredit the movement. TV news anchors are already uniform in their talking points in using the video images to attack 9/11 skeptics.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Yup. I'm inclined to believe this is a brilliant PSYOP -- it simultaneously feeds the fires of the conspiracy crowd (especially the no-planers), distracts from the more fruitful inquiries into the truth of 9/11, and lumps all doubters of the official story in with the no-planers for an easy slam-dunk debunking on the evening news programs.<br><br>I knew the truth movement was gaining credibility when my kooky, Bush-loving relatives (god love 'em) started sending links to Loose Change and similar material.<br><br>Distraction -- that's what this footage is. <p></p><i></i>

[dugoboy]

agreed. <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i></i>

[dugoboy]

CNN SAID THE FLIGHT RECORDER OF FLIGHT 77 WAS RECOVERED AFTER THE CRASH. IS THIS TRUE? <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i></i>

[slimmouse]

<br> It strikes me that there are several individuals on this board who appear to suggest, that whilst they see 9/11 as the mother of all conspiracies, suggest in the same the same breadth that we dont alert people to the obvious by pointing it out.<br><br> Its almost as if either ;<br><br> a) their intellectuall superiority suggests to us all that we dont highlight the physical evidence ( of which there are as many questions as anything ) because somehow its not healthy.<br><br> b) There are NO questions about the physical evidence !!!!!! Too fucking funny for my fucking munny.<br><br> c) we need to bore the tits of people who havent got the time to listen, by emphasising the non physical evidence that is easily lost on the average joe, and come to think of it, is never even remotely covered by ANYONE, usually because it doesnt sell advertising space. get it ? <br><br> So, 9/11 intellectuals, and with the greatest respect in the world for one of my modern days heroes, namely our host, I ask you amidst several others here directly ;<br><br><br> How exactly does one wake ordinary people up to the complete and utter crap that is the official story of 9/11 ?<br><br> Answers on a copy of "Crossing the fucking Rubicon" ?????????<br> How <br><br> <p></p><i></i>

[Et in Arcadia ego]

Having a(essentailly worthless) discussion elsewhere, but wanted to get some help from one of you if possible.<br><br>What agencies had offices in WTC 7? In other words, how many alphabet agencies had data scrubbed on 9/11? <p></p><i></i>

[sunny]

My husband brought home this monstrous 47 inch tv a few months ago- on a screen such as that, when you stop the video just when the object comes into view above the traffic cone, you can see clearly it is a missile. It is too small and skinny to be a plane- the camera would have to be miles and miles from a plane to make it look that small.<br><br>I still question whether this is a Psy-Op, tho. Who is to say they haven't tampered with it? Just so they can go on teevee and say to everybody "See the plane?" when in fact, the bloody thing just isn't there, and anyone with eyes can see that for themselves. Total mind-fuck. <p></p><i></i>

[dugoboy]

et in arcadia:<br><br>FEMA's nonchalance about WTC-7’s collapse is stunning. Structural failures of this magnitude do not normally take place. In addition, there was high-profile, large-budget government agencies leasing office space in WTC-7 that day. Besides the <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>SEC, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Department of Defense (DOD), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and New York’s Office of Emergency Management (OEM) were all tenants.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> None of the current heads of these departments have been vocal in demanding to know why this building collapsed. In addition, while some details have been released, a full accounting of what data these agencies lost has not been prominently reported.<br><br>just google WTC7 agencies.<br><br>link: <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/11/05/archive/main316911.shtml" target="top">CIA Lost Office In WTC</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=dugoboy@rigorousintuition>dugoboy</A> at: 5/17/06 6:00 pm<br></i>

[dugoboy]

even better download this scroll to page 2. you'll see what i mean<br><br>here: <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch5.pdf" target="top"><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE START--><span style="text-decoration:underline">FEMA report on WTC7, page 2 thetenant's list</span><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE END--></a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT."</p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=dugoboy@rigorousintuition>dugoboy</A> at: 5/17/06 6:11 pm<br></i>

[NewKid]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I knew the truth movement was gaining credibility when my kooky, Bush-loving relatives (god love 'em) started sending links to Loose Change and similar material.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Pan, just curious, what do your Bush loving relatives now think about 9-11? Were they mocking Loose Change or did they think it was so neat that it converted them from Fox News zombies to conspiracy theorists? Or is it a more gradual loss of trust in the administration from the war, Katrina, immigration, the debt, etc.? <p></p><i></i>

[Et in Arcadia ego]

cheers, dugoboy.. <p></p><i></i>

[Hugh Manatee Wins]

My my my. The hijacking never ends.<br><br>Doing a search on "loose change 9/11 video" gave me this first search result which is a <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>LetsRoll911.com</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> attempted hijacking of the url in order to sell pods and missiles-<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://loosechange.cjb.net/">loosechange.cjb.net/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Now what kind of a 'truth' website would try to hijack hits intended for another truth website? <br><br>Right. <p></p><i></i>

[medicis]

I think the Pentagon Issue should be discussed as a 'honey pot' - along the lines of Michael Ruppert's arguments and those at www.oilempire.com, etc.<br><br>the arguments for, against, etc. <br><br>Then, what to do. How to help the movement resist such attempts at disinfo.<br><br>rdw<br><br> <p></p><i></i>