 by FourthBase » Sat Aug 26, 2006 8:26 pm
by FourthBase » Sat Aug 26, 2006 8:26 pm 
			
			PM guy says...<br><br>- Very little info not given to the public..hah.<br>- But...Pentagon videos confiscated & unreleased...duh.<br>- Suspects other videos, but "used for other investigations"...and?<br>- For their article, evidence was "abundant"...pfff.<br>- Hearst owns PM.<br>- Approach was "curiousity"...riiiiiiight.<br>- PM would like to see as much evidence as possible...sure.<br>- Interviewer mentions WTC7.<br>- PM says 1/3 of the face scooped out.<br>- 25% of building's south face carved away.<br>- 7 built over Edison substation.<br>- Steel columns particularly load-bearing.<br>- Interviewer mentions pics don't show that.<br>- PM guy:  Pics of 7's face exist!  O RLY?<br>- NYPD didn't allow PM to disseminate them...right.<br>- PM guy describes pics, says it shows face damage.<br>- If pics withheld for investigation, why shown to PM? PWNED.<br>- Caller:  Baer says reporter says CIA person says...blah.<br>- Same caller:  Silverstein "pull".<br>- PM guy:  Spoke to Silverstein & CD firms, "pull" is not a demolition term.  Never heard "pull" in CD context, only in firefights for firemen.  "Pull" only refers to literally pulling.  "It" may have referred to brigade.  Ok, sure.  Uh huh.<br>- Caller:  "pull" in Websters dictionary, cut off by int guy.<br>- Same caller:  alive hijackers.<br>- PM guy:  only one BBC report (O RLY?), and it's false.<br>- Int guy:  How did PM verify that?<br>- PM guy:  DNA evidence.<br>- Int guy:  <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Where'd they get original DNA to match?</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> (PM guy is PWNED)<br>- PM guy:  Question itself is baseless, not worth asking!<br>- PM guy:  If men are alive, why no reports of them?<br>- PM guy:  A 7-year-old can ask why.  (Wow, hack shill motherfucker)<br>The interviewer completely owned the PM guy. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=fourthbase>FourthBase</A> at: 8/26/06 6:27 pm<br></i>