The Return of the Vampire of Finance

by **antiaristo** » Sun Jan 08, 2006 9:12 pm

These two stories are worth noting on this thread. It's all about what happened deep within the Labour Party in the 1990's. <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Former minister Tony Banks dies Press Association Sunday January 8, 2006 9:54 PM Former sports minister Tony Banks has died in Florida after suffering a stroke, a family friend said. The 62-year-old former Labour MP, who became Lord Stratford when he accepted a peerage last year, was being taken to a hospice when he died. He had been left "effectively brain dead" after suffering the massive stroke while holidaying on Sanibel Island on Thursday. Prime Minister Tony Blair paid tribute to the peer saying: "Tony Banks was one of the most charismatic politicians in Britain, a true man of the people. "Whether he was campaigning for the regeneration of East London, fighting for animal welfare or expressing his enthusiasm for Chelsea football club he was someone who said what they thought and was loved by people for it. "He worked tirelessly for his constituents in West Ham and showed them by his commitment in over 20 years as their MP how politicians can make a difference. "I was proud to have him as a sports minister in the first term of the Government and like everyone in the Labour Party will miss him and regret that he was taken from us so soon." Lord Stratford and his wife Sally were staying with friends on Sanibel Island, off the west coast of Florida, when he suffered the stroke. He was lunching with a friend when he collapsed. By the time he reached a hospital in the town of Fort Myers, doctors concluded the outlook was bleak.<hr></blockquote> <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uklatest/story/0,1271,-5532333,00.html">www.guardian.co.uk/uklate...33,00.html</a> <blockquote>Quote:<hr>PM Backs Brown as New Labour leader Press Association Sunday January 8, 2006 9:54 PM Tony Blair gave Gordon Brown his strongest endorsement yet, predicting that as party leader he could take New Labour reforms "to a new level". The Prime Minister hailed the "very, very strong" new generation of politicians rising through the party's ranks. But the "best combination" was both youth and experience and "that is a very, very strong case for Gordon", the PM said. Mr Blair also urged Labour colleagues to "relax" about the threat from new Tory leader David Cameron. And he signalled a concession over the forthcoming smoking ban in TV and newspaper interviews. The PM said he and the Chancellor spent a decade building New Labour and his departure from the political scene will not end it. Mr Cameron's claims that Mr Brown is a "road block" to reform were "complete nonsense", he told BBC1's Sunday AM. "There is no doubt in my mind that New Labour will continue and will continue well after I've gone, I mean I've absolutely no doubt about that," he said. "It's sometimes said that Gordon is, you, he's not New Labour, he's old Labour, he's a roadblock to reform. "It's complete nonsense. He is completely and totally on the same line as New Labour."<hr></blockquote> <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uklatest/story/0,1271,-5532337,00.html">www.guardian.co.uk/uklate...37,00.html</a> If I were an "Old Labour" survivor, someone like Prescott or Margaret Beckett, I'd be feeling just a little bit nervous.

by **scollon** » Sun Jan 08, 2006 9:18 pm

Gordon is a big fat ugly electoral liability, that's why Blair was chosen in the first place. Mandelsson is a homosexual so no go there.

by **antiaristo** » Sun Jan 08, 2006 9:45 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>Mandelsson is a homosexual so no go there<hr></blockquote> scollon, I think you underestimate the Windsors' ability to place whomsoever they wish in that office - given calm waters. When they succeeded in selling rap to predominantly white youth, they proved they could sell anything. Homosexual PM? Why not? Hey, England swings. Remember, they were grooming Blunkett until he self-destructed over Hilary Quinn. (He's blind). And remember too that Jeffrey Archer hoped to lead a government from the Lords - "It's been done before, you know!"

by **scollon** » Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:03 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>Homosexual PM? Why not? Hey, England swings<hr></blockquote> He's Jewish too, I doubt they'd swallow both. Not mentioning he's a crook and a scumbag of the very lowest kind. Mandelsson is Murdoch's little friend, an English neocon. As for rap, that was MTV. they should be sent packing just for that.

by **antiaristo** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:49 am

I’ve done some more digging in public sources for information on the Vampire. Beyond his position as Managing Director of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts he’s a director of Diageo (1) and TRW (2). He’s also Chairman of London’s South Bank (3). He used to be REALLY powerful, with direct control over government policy on business and industry. This Independent piece relates how he would become Mr Blair’s “Special Advisor” at the Department of Trade and Industry in 1997 (4). What this means is that Hollick was breathing down the neck of Margaret Beckett when she gave all those evasive and misleading replies to Gordon Prentice MP. When Hollick himself was the subject of the second inquiry by Kaye and Aldous, no wonder it was all so secret. He was a director of Anglia Television when the crimes were committed by Malcolm Wall. That report shows Hollick as a simple thief and would be murderer (just like Archer). When Beckett had served her purpose and was replaced as Secretary of State at the DTI Hollick stayed on with her replacement (the Prince of Darkness, Peter Mandelson). When Mandelson was moved to the Northen Ireland Office Hollick stayed on yet again with Stephen Byers. He was not shy about paying himself huge amounts from his corporate thievery (5), raking in over $8 million in 1997. By 1999 he was in line to take the dominant share of ITV and so convert himself into Britain’s own Berlusconi (6). But I kept on fighting after bringing down Lord Archer. In June of the following year Blair got nailed at the EU Council and Hollick got blackballed (7). Yes, I take credit for that. There’s no ambiguity about any of this, and they all know Hollick is a sack of shit, as the New Statesman makes clear (<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/glasses.gif ALT="8)"> . References 1 <a href="http://www.diageo.com/en-row/NewsAndMedia/PressReleases/2001/19+Dec+2001+Lord+Hollick.htm">www.diageo.com/en-row/New...ollick.htm</a> 2 <a href="http://www.theautochannel.com/news/press/date/20000216/press008115.html">www.theautochannel.com/ne...08115.html</a> 3 <a href="http://www.mysouthbank.co.uk/southwark/celebs&gossip-lord_hollick.htm">www.mysouthbank.co.uk/sou...ollick.htm</a> 4 <a href="http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_19970507/ai_n14109196">www.findarticles.com/p/ar..._n14109196</a> 5 <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlContent.jhtml?html=/archive/1997/04/23/chol23.html">www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlC...hol23.html</a> 6 <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/537996.stm">news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/537996.stm</a> 7 See Please do not Post in Data Dump 8 <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/200012040013">www.newstatesman.com/200012040013</a>

by **antiaristo** » Wed Jan 25, 2006 5:29 pm

Peter Kilfoyle was in the 1997 Cabinet (think Donald Rumsfeld). So my work here is done. Just don't get yourself suicided by the Windsor family, Peter. <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Comment We will demand real change from Tony Blair's successor Labour must never again allow itself to be hijacked by a small group antagonistic to our collective values Peter Kilfoyle Wednesday January 25, 2006 The Guardian When Margaret Thatcher was unceremoniously dumped as leader by the Tories, the process was begun by an obscure Welsh Tory member of parliament - Sir Anthony Meyer. While Michael Heseltine waited in the wings, the coup de grace was delivered by those raised up to the cabinet by Mrs Thatcher. They had recognised that the poll tax was a loser. They watched their local government base start to shrink, and feared that - unless radical action was taken - they too would disappear from government. Sentiment did not enter into the equation; it was a simple question of survival, regardless of Thatcher's hat-trick. Tony Blair would do well to ponder on that piece of history. He is also a three-time winner, but has fatally disclosed that he will not stand again. His cabinet colleagues observe this with more than passing interest. Like his role model Mrs Thatcher, he has also been viewed as a vote-winner. Yet these are changing times, with a doppelganger of his youthful self leading the Tories, and all political eyes will be on whether David Cameron can maintain the momentum he has carried with him into 2006. The first real test will be at the May local government elections. It will be difficult for Labour in the run-up to them. The prime minister has already alienated a huge number of Labour activists, and repeatedly snubbed the unions. He believes that he can reach beyond them to an almost mystical "people" who will continue to support him. Not, I believe, with the 36% share of the vote won in the general election. It will be even harder to motivate Labour voters in May. Failure will be extremely damaging to his standing, in and outside his party. Between now and then, he has set himself some extra - and rather formidable - obstacles. Reactionary education proposals have already aroused serious opposition. The trade unions fume as they await delivery on the Warwick Accords, and watch government water down proposals on corporate manslaughter. Privatisation and market-modelling of health services provoke as much antipathy as does the onslaught on schools. Pensions and benefits rumble in the background. It is almost as if the prime minister is trying to goad his party to take him on. If so, it would be foolish. No one wishes to see Labour go out of government with him. Indeed, there will be a number of his colleagues looking to succeed him, and others hoping for preferment or resurrection under a new leadership. Unless there are changes in both strategy and tactics, the prime minister will place himself in exactly the same position as Thatcher - a presumed negative in national ballots. His cabinet colleagues may then summon the courage to say that he ought to go sooner rather than later. The issue facing the Labour party then would be to decide on a successor. The long-standing favourite is Gordon Brown. However, he faces the dilemma of representing a Scottish seat while potentially deciding in England on devolved matters such as health and education. More importantly, after David Cameron's election, and one to come in the Liberal Democrats, it would be short-sighted of Labour not to have a choice of candidates. Who they might be, time will tell. Cometh the hour, cometh the man or woman. Choice might be fanciful for those who have taken exception to cabinet complicity in the Iraq war, top-up fees and other breaches of trust. Yet with choice comes responsibility to ensure that whoever succeeds will deliver Labour policies on the basis of Labour values. It is not easy to see who that might be, but never again can the Labour party allow itself to be hijacked by a small group antagonistic to the collective values which characterise the party. The party needs a new style of leadership that will offer to citizens, at home and in the workplace, the same benevolence which has often been showered on big business by New Labour. Naturally, that leadership must accommodate policies to the rapidly changing world around us. The internet age does not allow us the option of 20th-century solutions for the daunting tasks of the 21st. Sensible people - and they are in all wings of the Labour party - recognise that we cannot halt the processes of change; but they can be better managed for the good of all. Yet since 1997 there has been a failure to promote the necessary new type of politics, as promised. Certainly, in parliament, the same old disregard by government for parliamentary scrutiny has been a persistent problem. Too many features of a democratic centralist approach to government have taken hold. Where changes in parliament have been made, and where accountability has been strengthened (look at the Freedom of Information Act), there has been a determined government effort to emasculate those changes. These are the discredited politics persistently but wrongly spun as old Labour. So when we seek the next Labour leader, we will look for cast-iron commitments from the candidates, not just on policies, but also on their respective approaches to leadership. Their answers will decide the issue with many Labour party members, and with the trade unions, a critical element in the election of a new Labour leader. The candidates will have everything to play for. In 1994 Blair captured the party's head; this time the winner will also need to capture its heart. We may well find out who has done so at this year's party conference. · Peter Kilfoyle is Labour MP for Liverpool Walton and a former defence minister.<hr></blockquote> <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1694001,00.html">www.guardian.co.uk/commen...01,00.html</a> Notice he cites the Freedom of Information Act as having been emasculated. This is what he is referring to. <blockquote>Quote:<hr>A quick peer at Archer? No chance The freedom of Information Act has been hailed as a new charter for British investigative journalism, but so far seems to have yielded little of real substance. Some interesting little snippets on how much interior decorating cost at 10 Downing Street, a piece here or there on the cost of speed cameras and security cops for islamic preachers, but the letter of the new act has been observed far more than the spirit. So no glasnost on the legal advice prior to the war in Iraq, no information on how much we wasted on Black Wednesday - as yet. To this frustrating list must be added the story of Lord Archer and the mysterious case of Anglia TV shares. New readers start here: in 1995, the novelist-peer had a little dabble in shares in the Anglia TV company, and made a nice profit. But then, he had the advantage that his wife was a non-executive on the board, and a takeover bid materialised for the company just days after he bought his shares. Coincidence? The Department of Trade and Industry thought there might be more to it than that, and asked inspectors to investigate. Roger Kaye and Hugh Aldous plodded assiduously through the byzantine complexity of the case and completed their report, which was then left to gather dust on the DTI's shelves. Could The Observer possibly see a copy, we asked? In the new spirit of freedom of information, of course. We sat patiently waiting for the report to arrive, eager for all those grubby little details Lord Archer effortlessly generates, only to be told: 'Information is exempt information if its disclosure by the public authority holding it is prohibited by or under any enactment.' So back to square one then. Now where was that phone number for Hugh Aldous?<hr></blockquote> <a href="http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,,1406804,00.html">media.guardian.co.uk/site...04,00.html</a>

by **antiaristo** » Sat Feb 04, 2006 11:41 pm

This is the direct result. <blockquote>Quote:<hr>US rebels call for ITV to be broken up Brandes and Fidelity want to maximise value by demerging production and broadcast businesses Richard Wachman, city editor Sunday February 5, 2006 The Observer ITV is facing a break-up threat from rebel shareholders who want it to demerge its production operation from its broadcasting business as part of an audacious bid to extract value for long-suffering investors.<hr></blockquote> <a href="http://observer.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,,1702247,00.html">observer.guardian.co.uk/b...47,00.html</a> It's really very easy to make money in television if you have a free hand. You simply fire everybody and source everything from America. They want to turn ITV into the type of operation described by Netanyahu (see towards the end of this thread <a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessageRange?topicID=2923.topic&start=21&stop=37)">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...1&stop=37)</a> What will stop them is the license conditions. ITV is a regional network of fifteen licenses. Every license carries conditions that must be met. The problem is that the system is corrupt. The Deputy Chairman of Ofcom (the regulator) is Richard Hooper. Richard Hooper was a director of MAI plc at the time of the Anglia Television takeover and subsequent fraud. In legal terms he is every bit as liable, and every bit as guilty as the Vampire of Finance himself. Lord Clive Hollick. Interesting times!

by **antiaristo** » Sat Feb 04, 2006 11:55 pm

Actually, it is more subtle and more sinister than I have described. ITV actually comprises TWELVE license regions. Everywhere EXCEPT Scotland. The three Scottish Channel 3 companies stand aloof. I hope you can see what's coming. They are going to do it to England, Wales and N Ireland. But Scotland will have a separate service. Just like Scotland has a separate church, separate High Court and a separate legal system. The old cow intends to shit all over the English, and leave the Scottish untouched. Her and her filthy homicidal gang of Scottish Rite Freemasons. Wake up England. That Treason Felony Act must be nullified without delay. To her majesty, I would like to say exactly what Floyd said to doro. With bells on.

by **antiaristo** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:26 am

A little more background. Ofcom is the Office of Communications. It regulates telephony and related and broadcasting and related. It took over the functions of about three different regulatory bodies. It was established a few years ago. Its chairman is Lord Currie, and its Deputy Chairman the abovementioned Richard Hooper. Lord Currie is a member of the great and the good. He is just like the directors of Anglia when taken over by MAI. Completely fucking useless. The idea was to use Currie as a figurehead while piloting the bill through parliament, wait a decent interval and then dump him. Then Richard Hooper would hold sovereign power within the regulator, and the rape would begin. Guess what? I wrote a letter about this! <blockquote>Quote:<hr>C/ Eusebio Navarro, 12 Rt. Hon. Patricia Hewitt MP 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Secretary of State for Trade and Industry Spain (Correos Certificado 30 June 2002 Queens Bench 1994-C-2024 J.P.Cleary v Anglia Television Dear Secretary of State, I understand from the draft Communication Bill that HM Government intends to remove the ownership rules governing Channel 3 and Channel 5. So you need to take care that you don’t emulate Stephen Byers twice over and create a false market in the shares of Channel 3 (Granada and Carlton). For any purchase of Channel 3 will of necessity include Anglia Television. And any purchaser will become party to the conspiracy to defraud and, with the passage of time, party to the conspiracy to murder. Just like Charles Allen and his gang at Granada (see Cleary to Patrick Cox 6 April 2002, copied to your good self by name). Due diligence demands that you review the two inquiry reports by Roger Kaye and Hugh Aldous into illegal insider trading by Mary and Jeffrey Archer in the shares of Anglia Television Group plc during January 1994. Neither report has been published, and no action ever taken against those who broke the law. And you would be well advised to review the papers associated with Queens Bench 1994-C-2024, J.P.Cleary v Anglia Television. What is shown with absolute definition is British regulators’ tolerance for fraud, theft, and insider dealing when done by greedy high-ranking Masons such as Lord HOLLICK, Lord ARCHER, and Lord PUTTNAM. While you claim to promote clean financial markets, the documents cited prove the very opposite to be the case these past sixteen years. The Windsors, their Lords and their Honorary Knights have made a cesspool out of market capitalism, and the financial markets are waking up to it. Yes, that’s the same Lord Clive Hollick that was your boss at the IPPR. It was tony’s crony Lord Clive Hollick that cheated hundreds of workers at Anglia Television out of their hard-earned money. It was tony’s crony Lord Clive Hollick that trousered . 50millions of porn money from the Express. It will be tony’s crony Lord Clive Hollick that grabs much much more from a Channel 5 News of the World, entrapments and all. And the ordinary people that pay your salary will again be the losers. Yours sincerely, John Cleary BScMAMBA cc John Ashcroft (with attachment) Correos Certificado Justice Stephen Breyer ( “ ) Gordon Brown MP ( “ ) Sir Edward George ( “ ) Correos Certificado Lord Chief Justice Woolf ( “ ) enc. Cleary to Cook 5 June 2002<hr></blockquote> And I've got an acknowledgement for it. (Sorry about the formating. It can be copied back into Word.) Here's another interesting connection. Patricia Hewitt's husband is a commercial lawyer. He works for Berlusconi. The Italians are after him. A Milan magistrate has indicted him for tax evasion (he set up an offshore entity and funnelled Berlusconi's foreign programming purchases through it. This led to lower reported profits in Italy, and hence lower taxes). Small world, eh?

by **antiaristo** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:59 am

My apologies to Ms Hewitt. I have defamed her and mixed her up with Tessa Jowell, who then was Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport. Jowell is the wife of the fraudster. She is now in charge of HEALTH. I believe I wrote to her as well. I'll have a look but I want to post this correction and apology now.

by **antiaristo** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 1:01 am

<blockquote>Quote:<hr> C/ Eusebio Navarro, 12 Rt. Hon. Tessa Jowell MP 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Secretary of State for Culture Media & Sport Spain (Correos Certificado RR052197232ES) 26 November 2002 Queens Bench 1994-C-2024 J.P.Cleary v Anglia Television Dear Secretary of State, It’s about this chappie you’ve just installed as Deputy Chairman of OFCOM. Richard Hooper . Mr Hooper is apparently to be the “content supreme” for the whole of British television. A sort of turbo charged Lord Wakeham. Do you know what sort of man you are so empowering? Let me enlighten you about his record. Mr Hooper was one of the five directors of MAI at the time of the takeover of Anglia Television Group plc. At the very least Mr Hooper is a liar, a fraud and a thief. Perfect, I should think, for the Blair vision of a Masonic Britain. While I sympathise with anyone who must operate within a government that is falling to pieces, could you not learn to talk to your friend the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry? She knows all about this, but apparently she forgot to tell you. RSVP Yours sincerely, John Cleary BScMAMBA cc Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury Lady Elspeth Howe Lord Currie Gerald Kaufman MP, Chairman of the Culture Media & Sport Select Committee Charles Kennedy MP, Leader of the Opposition enc. Cleary to Hewitt 30 June 2002 Cleary to Ashcroft 24 July 2002 Cleary to Annan 26 August 2002<hr></blockquote>

by **slimmouse** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 6:58 am

I have to say, I find it fascinating that people can come up with various "theorems" backing up their stated belief that their is no overiding power behind all the madness of todays world. Like their isnt a guiding hand. People conducting the orchestra of greed, war, murder hatred, drug running, arms sales, et cetera ad infinitum. People who make the laws behind the scenes, and stand idly by as their lieutenants mentioned by the likes of PDS implement the above and line their own pockets along the way. These people rarely seem to post on your threads anti. And there I was thinking that its only people who believe Bush is great, or that 9/11 was 19 hijackers who are experiencing cognitive dissonance. Who knows, perhaps its a pride thing ?

by **antiaristo** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:50 am

Elspeth Howe is an example of the great and the good. She was chairman of the Broadcasting Standards Council. What's her payof for partaking of all this? <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Geoffrey Howe - the Tory minister who forced Margaret Thatcher out of No 10 - still has something special in common with his old boss, it was revealed yesterday. A gleaming luxury car and driver, provided by the taxpayer.<hr></blockquote> The focus of the story was Geoffrey Howe, not Thatcher. I suppose former Prime Ministers are allocated this perk for life. But the story was wondering why, Howe as well? Why have they been given a perk worth sixty thousand pounds a year? <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Cut violence on TV and videos, say ministers By Philip Johnston and George Jones Wednesday 6 November 1996 SIGNIFICANT cuts in the levels of violence on television and home videos were demanded by the Government last night. Ministers widened the moral debate prompted by Frances Lawrence, widow of the murdered London headmaster, to place pressure on programme makers, distributors and censors to consider afresh the impact of screen violence on children. They opened a campaign on three fronts in response to "a mood of considerable public concern". Whitehall sources said this had been "given voice" by Mrs Lawrence's recent appeal. Virginia Bottomley, National Heritage Secretary, said she wanted urgent talks with Sir Christopher Bland, chairman of the BBC Board of Governors, Sir George Russell, chairman of the Independent Television Commission and Lady Howe, chairman of the Broadcasting Standards Council, to discuss proposals to protect children and others from television violence.<hr></blockquote> <a href="http://www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/htmlContent.jhtml?html=/archive/1996/11/06/nvid06.html">www.portal.telegraph.co.u...vid06.html</a> <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Monday, January 25, 1999 Published at 16:58 GMT Entertainment Watchdog to attack Channel 5 The BSC doesn't like what Channel 5 is giving viewers The Broadcasting Standards Commission is to criticise Channel 5 for its policy of showing erotic programmes late at night. The watchdog's chairman Lady Howe is expected to condemn the channel's use of sexually explicit material for its own sake on free-to-air television in a statement on Thursday. She will add such material should only be shown on subscription channels, with explicit scenes on mainstream services restricted to documentaries and drama "within a dramatic or informative context".<hr></blockquote> <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/262593.stm">news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/enter...262593.stm</a> She was Chairman of the Broadcast Standards Council. That's one of the regulators rolled into Ofcom four years ago.

by **antiaristo** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:44 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>These people rarely seem to post on your threads anti.<hr></blockquote> slim, that was the job of emad QC. You know, set a Brit to catch a Brit. But I think he's gone away, though I'm sure he'll come back. Just like doro. I dunno. We can keep out all the neo-Nazis, but not doro, which is wasting its time without its intended audience. Do you remember Spitting Image? How they got rid of that? The same game is going on here.

by **antiaristo** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 1:49 pm

Sir George Russell was Chairman of the Independent Television from 1993 until 2002, when it was folded into Ofcom. From there he went to Granada Television as Chairman, while Charles Allen was Chief Executive. When I formally complained direct to Russell back in 1994 he didn't want to know. But then I tricked him into revealing that he was helping MAI cover up their crimes. His deputy, Sir Jocelyn Stevens then replied along the same lines - "Get lost, little man." When Russell went to Granada (sound familiar to American students of the lobby phenomenom?) I went after him again. He tried to trick me back, but it didn't work. And I have the correspondence. Sir Charles Allen is very buddy-buddy with the Old Slag. He was a constant companion during the Commonwealth Games in Edinburgh. He is currently Chairman of ITV and will make a huge amount of money if the Yanks are able to rape ITv. And guess what? ITV covers England, Wales and N Ireland, but not Scotland. Can you guess Allen's nationality? Yup. Yet another Scot lording it over an English institution. The Old Slag has no imagination at all. Finally, Sir Christopher Bland was Chairman of British Telecom at the time it was party to the rape of Spain's taxpayers. See the thread on Greek phonetapping. <a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessage?topicID=2949.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...2949.topic</a>

The Return of the Vampire of Finance

Two more worth noting

Re: Two more worth noting

Mandelson

Re: Mandelson

Re: The Return of the Vampire of Finance

Fight for the Soul of the Labour Party

Re: The Return of the Vampire of Finance

Re: The Return of the Vampire of Finance

Re: The Return of the Vampire of Finance

CORRECTION

Jowell

"Peter Dale Scott".

Lord and Lady Howe

Re: Lord and Lady Howe

More of the Great and the Good

Who is online