The apology thread.

sw · Post by sw » Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:38 pm

lbo:

I totally agree.

barracuda · Post by **barracuda** » Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:55 pm

^^ Wuzzup widat?

Project Willow · Post by **Project Willow** » Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:08 am

I see the damage but analysis points to a confluence of unrelated factors and dissimilar processes. I think I see neurotic people, hopefully no ARG. Argh, my apologies to neurotic people (including me).

barracuda · Post by **barracuda** » Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:22 am

^^Tend to agree, if we are talking about the entrance of Cordelia and Brigit.

lightningBugout · Post by **lightningBugout** » Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:15 am

No no no. Not entirely what I was getting at.

Project Willow · Post by **Project Willow** » Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:42 am

Allow me to clarify via 'Cuda who got it. No aspersions cast via boomerang here. Chill, please, my apologies ...again.

compared2what? · Post by **compared2what?** » Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:37 am

lightningBugout wrote:No no no. Not entirely what I was getting at.

I don't know about the ARG part. But I'm very strongly inclined to agree that quelque chose is happening here, mais qu'est-ce que c'est ain't exactly clear.

Also, I apologize for using phrases from a language I don't speak, for pretty much no reason at all.

brainpanhandler · Post by **brainpanhandler** » Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:23 pm

Sigh...

I apologize to the board in general but especially to anyone that is disappointed that the strmfrnt lite thread was locked, even if I only had some small part in making that happen. I'm not sure if I am one of the "personalities" referred to when Jeff says the thread had degenrated into a clash of personalities, but I suspect I am. It's not like it won't come up again, which, ya know, maybe it'll always come up and OP ED was a little more right than I had a chance to grant him. No doubt some of you are happy the thread was locked and for good reason. You can ignore the apology.

barracuda · Post by **barracuda** » Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:04 am

Bampf.

Post by **Jeff** » Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:06 am

Sorry it took so effing long.

elfismiles · Post by **elfismiles** » Thu Jan 07, 2010 5:45 pm

Jeff wrote:Sorry it took so effing long.

The wait was worth it Jeff.

Et in Arcadia ego · Post by **Et in Arcadia ego** » Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:06 pm

Sorry, Percival!

Percival · Post by **Percival** » Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:13 pm

et in Arcadia ego wrote:Sorry, Percival!

Yea man me too, sorry for being a douchenozzle I will try not to let it happen again. You did indeed do a very good job on the forum and I appreciate this place.

If for no other reason, we can bury the hatchet out of respect for Jeff.

OP ED · Post by **OP ED** » Wed Jan 13, 2010 1:54 am

brainpanhandler wrote:Sigh...
OP ED (is) right

sorry.

compared2what? · Post by **compared2what?** » Thu Jan 14, 2010 3:04 am

I'm sorry to tell you:

How about you comment on the thread instead of attacking me

(1) that would be a false dichotomy even had I attacked you, which I didn't.

I have nothing to do with the fucking blog

(2) that you do now; and

and this is exactly the type of shit I talked about in the other thread I made, attacking the messenger instead of discussing the content.

(3) that it's customary to let the dead rest in peace, honey. And that one's hardly going to improve with repetition. Even you must realize that. So show a little respect, please.

Thanks.

rigorousintuition.ca

The apology thread.

lbo

Re: The apology thread.

Re: The apology thread.

Re:

Re:

Percival