Coercive Engineered Migration: Zionism’s War on Europe

[AlicetheKurious]

It's a scam. If your purpose is to destroy Arab nation-states, then do so using an infinitely mutable and mysterious proxy calling itself "Islamic state", though it is neither Islamic, nor a state. You specifically target secular and religiously tolerant and diverse Arab countries, where the influence of the Wahhabist cult is severely curtailed by the government.

In the ensuing chaos and bloodshed, magnified by your own bombing of civilian infrastructure and destruction of all the things necessary to sustain human life (under the guise of fighting "Islamic State" and/or "spreading democracy"), you create a "refugee problem." Millions of refugees are helped and encouraged (by "international human rights organizations" financed and controlled by yourself, and collaborating with human traffickers) to flee to your economic rival, Europe, and you browbeat the European states into abdicating their right under international law to regulate immigration into their countries.

This, naturally, will provoke a popular backlash, especially as your own media screams "news" about rapists and terrorists and other monsters among them. The unregulated and unprecedented and potentially infinite influx of millions of destitute people from all the countries you have "liberated" -- from Afghanistan to Iraq, to Syria and Libya, among others, including some of your closest African "allies", where your pet regimes and terrorist proxies are making life hell on earth for people, threatens the advanced social welfare system that guarantees a decent life for these European countries' citizens.

Ordinary citizens are polarized: some are lulled by idealism and naivete into believing that Europe is capable of absorbing and integrating so many foreign refugees all at once and providing them with housing, education, health care and enough income to live on, without this causing either crippling damage to their countries' economies or stability. Others point to the foreign-financed, well-established and extremely active Wahhabist organizations who dominate and speak on behalf of "Muslims", and who run almost all the mosques and "Islamic schools" in Europe, under the patronage and protection of its intelligence agencies which you have infiltrated and subverted. These will gladly provide "humanitarian" help to the poor, traumatized refugees, to ease the burden on the government. They will be especially active in the field of religious education, and anything that involves access to children and youths. A parallel process will recruit among Christians, Jews, Buddhists, etc. and instill loyalty to one's "group" (which you define according to your interests and fund accordingly) rather than to one's country, promoting divisions and alienation rather than patriotism. Thus, they can guarantee you a constant supply of new brainwashed recruits in service of your empire.

So your average European feels justifiably under threat, and at the same time is made to feel guilty or evil should he voice that feeling. The word "Nazi" is bandied about. Somebody should tell them about the Palestinians, and about what happened to their country. They, too, were called "Nazis", and accused of being ungenerous towards a massive, uncontrollable flow of desperate refugees. Today, they are the refugees, stateless, desperate, unable to defend themselves, crowded into decades-old refugee camps repeatedly attacked by the Western-backed terrorists and the terrorist Zionist entity, but nobody cares about them.

The great thing about this scam is that you get to kill several birdies with one stone. You destroy the most diverse, prosperous Arab countries, especially the ones with strong armies to defend against Israeli expansionism; you fatally undermine European countries that could one day rival the Zio-American empire's global economic hegemony and become rebellious; you bankrupt the wealthiest Arab Gulf countries (whom you mislead into believing that if they do what you want, you'll let them live), so it doesn't cost you anything; your arms manufacturers make a killing; you sabotage Russia's planned pipeline to supply Arab and Iranian oil to Europe, which was to by-pass your NATO pet Turkey or the Zionist entity's monopoly over oil supplies to Europe. And you lay the foundation for not just European civil wars, but global destabilization by stoking and fueling religious and ethnic hatred, with mysterious, well-financed elements on both sides working towards militarization and yes, "weaponization" of the "two sides", everyone feeling aggrieved and victimized and provoked to 'fight back', whether "Muslim"/"Christian", "Muslim/Buddhist", "Sunni/Shi'a", etc., etc., ad infinitum. This should prove very useful in destabilizing and even collapsing African countries, India, and of course China.

Best of all, you destroy the very basis of such fundamental concepts as national sovereignty, national unity, national identity, national freedom and independence, and loyalty to and sacrifice for one's country. You erase indigenous culture and history, traditional values and wisdom passed down through the generations, and attachment to the land, and transform people into commodities, movable, rootless pawns with only implanted, fabricated memories, concerned only with their own, individual survival subject to transnational organizations such as multinational corporations or agencies that you own and control and that serve your agenda while purporting to represent their "race", "religion" or even humanity as a whole. Legal and defensible borders will be a thing of the past, which suits you just fine, because so will the very idea of government by and for the people, subject to their will and responsible for their welfare and safety; not just today, but for future generations. People will interpret reality through the transnational corporate and "alternative" media that you own and control, and will know only what you want them to know. You will define right and wrong for them, and stir them to action, whip them into a frenzy, or put them to sleep. The process of substituting corporate interests for international law as the guiding principle of what constitutes "legitimacy" will be complete, in the New World Order.

[tapitsbo]

You are also convinced this Empire has bitten off more than it can safely chew, though, aren't you, Alice? It isn't 1947 anymore and there would seem to be a good number of parties who are wise to the "scam" you just outlined.

[AlicetheKurious]

You are also convinced this Empire has bitten off more than it can safely chew, though, aren't you, Alice? It isn't 1947 anymore and there would seem to be a good number of parties who are wise to the "scam" you just outlined.

Yes, definitely, though it could still go either way. It's a very high stakes, white-knuckle situation, and things may get very bad before they get better. But I'm very optimistic in the medium term.

[tapitsbo]

Regardless of what happens with the conflicts going on right now, the situation where a tiny group cannabalizes everyone else to make transhumanist vaporware real doesn't seem all that sustainable... yet...

[DrEvil]

transhumanist vaporware?

[tapitsbo]

well with no proof that it will work anytime soon, but a demographic that sees it as their reward for co-operation with tech-sector governance...

[DrEvil]

Isn't that what religion has been doing for the last few thousand years?
At least transhumanism is based on something tangible - scientific progress, and you could argue that we already are transhuman. The "natural" state of humans is that about half our kids die young and those that grow up die from some horrible disease.

That said - will Ray Kurzweil live forever? Nope. He's going to die an old, disillusioned man, and good riddance. He's the Richard Dawkins of transhumanism. An annoying git in other words.

[tapitsbo]

I'm not sure most of the demographic has thought it through as much as Kurzweil

I see no state of nature from here but I see an awful lot of alternatives to everyone serving the MISGUIDED transhumanism pursued by a tiny group - and yes it is different from religion, capitalism, and all that jazz if it's a) a dead end and b) kills off most people in a quixotic orgasm of "efficiency"

What kind of "immortality" would you like for yourself DrEvil?

[Joe Hillshoist]

Seriouisly. There are no good guys in this fight and based on the comments of Sam Gerrans here:

I did not find the applicable comments at that link and my feeble computer does not link to that rt article but seriously, all this talk of there being 'no good guys' claims or implies an equivalency that is not there on the ground.

Russia has to deal with, bred by western imperial powers to be crazy Wahhabists, first taking down a relatively modern and secular Afghanistan and turning it into sectarian hellhole. This is a very real threat to Russian territorial security. Then the western powers decimate a prosperous Libya, starting with a 'no fly zone' pretext so as to bomb the hell out of Libya. Even now Merkel and others, (Avazz is always calling for them) are calling for a no fly zone for Syria.

Russia effectively says; 'no you are not going to do that again', and all we get is an echo chamber of 'there are no good guys here'.

We apologize to all you dedicated fans, and we are sorry but reason has left the building.

For some reason linking to that post in that thread takes you several posts before the one it should.

The article is the one where someone (gerrans) calls Soros a psycopath but then goes on to say that Russia should and in fact does aim to unite with Germany to form its own version of the pan European super state. (No point linking to it. Follow the link and scroll down about 5 or 6 posts.)

Obviously this can't happen with the EU in place but a flood of "weaponised refugees" could weaken the EU enough to drive Germany out of it.

[tapitsbo]

How can it happen with NATO/US bases in place barring a Soviet-style collapse of the West in its current incarnation?

[DrEvil]

I'm not sure most of the demographic has thought it through as much as Kurzweil

I see no state of nature from here but I see an awful lot of alternatives to everyone serving the MISGUIDED transhumanism pursued by a tiny group - and yes it is different from religion, capitalism, and all that jazz if it's a) a dead end and b) kills off most people in a quixotic orgasm of "efficiency"

What kind of "immortality" would you like for yourself DrEvil?

The kind that works, preferably biological in nature.

Btw: Just to clarify - transhumanism and the technological singularity are two different things.

I have serious doubts that the singularity will ever happen (slightly more likely than the Rapture) while transhumanism is pretty much inevitable unless we decide to stop progress at some point (which is not going to happen).

There's billions upon billions being poured into making us live as long and healthily as possible - "everyone" wants to be young forever. All the money being spent on heart disease, cancer research, vaccines, alzheimers, etc. is helping us move towards transhumanism. There's about 100000 people in the world today with brain implants, and we're starting to connect artificial limbs to our nervous system. At some point the artificial will beat the natural and people will start "upgrading"; military first, then civilians. Dick Cheney literally did not have a heart for years, just an artificial pump.
Gene editing is now easy as pie, and germ-line editing is possible (but controversial).

Anyway - back to the topic at hand. We already have a transhumanism vs. primitivism discussion going here: http://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/ ... =8&t=22581

[tapitsbo]

Exactly, not likely to happen doesn't change that it's being sold to us as part of the progress package. Meanwhile I would like to think historical development does more than just "stop" or "start".

I'm not at all surprised that the "primitivist" tag would come up in a tangent to the discussion at hand. Under "reactionary" in the thesaurus as a strawman label for dissidents?

I realize anarcho-primitivists and the like exist but surely "luddite vs. progressive" is a 19th century-tier false dichotomy.

The author of the series SLAD linked seems to see himself on the right side of history, American Dream seems to disagree - is this a matter of "stopping" and "starting"? I would like to think there are more directions to take than forwards and backwards. And if many Europeans want a civilization defined against Islam and against American hegemony, as exists in China, India, and elsewhere, the accusation that this can only be understood as a "backwards" movement is ludicrous.

Can we imagine a world where the instigators of the destruction of the Middle East (certainly including the so-called "neocons") and the mass displacement of people from war zones are brought to trial?

[backtoiam]

Where the hell is word pad in Windows 10? What happened to windows xp? This is not a computer, its a zombie. I am not happy about this.

[seemslikeadream]

The author of the series SLAD linked seems to see himself on the right side of history, American Dream seems to disagree -

but AD simply does not disagree with the author ....he has to accuse him of being an anti-semite....without any proof whatsoever....and of course that makes one wonder why would he do that?

[DrEvil]

Where the hell is word pad in Windows 10? What happened to windows xp? This is not a computer, its a zombie. I am not happy about this.

Start menu -> All apps -> Windows Accessories (I think. I'm still on W7 so can't actually check).